freediver wrote on Aug 2
nd, 2018 at 9:53pm:
That's the beauty of online forums Gandalf. It's all there, like it has been from the very beginning when I pointed it out to you.
Only its not there, and you never pointed it out - you merely claimed it was there.
The proof that its not there is your continued refusal to simply show us the quote.
So cutting out the bullshit here - I've gone back over the thread, and this is what FD is talking about:
This is my first quote (and post) - reply#10:
Quote:Australia sends about $10 million in aid to Palestine territories. It will now direct its funds through the United Nations.
Quote:s Bishop said she was confident no Australian funds had been used inappropriately.
"I am confident that previous Australian funding to the PA through the World Bank has been used as intended," she said in a statement.
"However, I am concerned that in providing funds for this aspect of the PA's operations, there is an opportunity for it to use its own budget to [fund] activities that Australia would never support."
to which FD replied:
Quote:Read your own quote. We put $10 million into the Palestinian Authority's bank account. They withdraw a 'different' $10 million to give to terrorists.
Thats obviously absurd, no sane person could possibly interpret that from "reading my own quote". But wait it gets weird from here.
After questioning him about how he got this claim from what I quoted, he replied:
Quote:It's in the bit you deleted from the quote.
and then...
Quote:I am not going to explain something to you that only needs explaining because you deleted it from the post you quoted.
I deleted what exactly? Do you mean
a) I went in and edited something out after I posted it?
b) I requoted something I quoted before - but ommitted some part of the original? (definitely not true - as I had only posted one quote up to that time)
c) I simply left out something incriminating in the one quote I posted from the OP article?
So straight away we can rule out b) - since I had only made one post with a quote at the time FD made the above allegations.
As for a) and c), they are effectively one in the same thing - as both suggests there must be something from the OP article that I "deleted" that explains how 10 million was going to the terrorists.
And yet curiously, in FD's initial reply - in reply#14 - he made no mention of anything being "deleted" - and indeed clearly suggests that all the "evidence" he needs exists in what I posted:
Quote:Read your own quote. We put $10 million into the Palestinian Authority's bank account. They withdraw a 'different' $10 million to give to terrorists.
"Read my own quote" FD - thats what you said. Clearly you had no reliance on any mysteriously "deleted" quote to make your point.
Help me out here FD - I'm *REALLY* trying hard not to be an evasive muslim - I'm simply laying out the facts to demonstrate how little sense you are making. There is no other way of interpreting your first reply#14 FD - the claim "We put $10 million into the Palestinian Authority's bank account. They withdraw a 'different' $10 million to give to terrorists" - can only come from what I quoted in reply#10. And I think even you agree this is a patently absurd interpretation to make.
No wonder you won't even attempt to explain this bizarre and utterly ridiculous interpretation, and instead resort to your usual idiotic wriggly worm routine. Maybe you misread the quote the first time - maybe you misread "territories" for "terrorists" or something silly like that - and now you are too embarassed to simply own up to that. Who knows.