Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Jun 14
th, 2018 at 10:36am:
aquascoot wrote on Jun 14
th, 2018 at 10:31am:
Fuzzball wrote on Jun 14
th, 2018 at 9:29am:
issuevoter wrote on Jun 13
th, 2018 at 7:49pm:
Fuzzball wrote on Jun 13
th, 2018 at 3:17pm:
Trump should get the Nobel Peace Prize. Obama received it for doing far less for world peace, in fact he did more harm especially where Iran is concerned.
This initiative may amount to nought, but Trump certainly progressed further than Obama ever did in a very short period of time.......
Let's not get carried away here. Remember all forum comments about WW3 a few months ago? It is quite possible Trump will Phaq this up. Guiliani and Pence have already done their best to kybosh the pitch.
Bojack has jogged my memory. I seem to remember
Osama Obama saying he would meet Kim. So what we may have domestically, is an agreement that pisses-off the Republicans and the Democrats. That would be classic Trump.
Well it could hardly get any worse than when Nobama was in office. As I said, it may not result in a change for the good, but at least he's achieved much more than his predecessor. Nobody's getting "carried away", the fact is Trump met with the little fat guy and probably left him in no doubt that the alternative to his nuclear ambitions doesn't bear thinking about.
trump was right to go meet the little fat guy and this is what occurs in nature.
if i introduce a new gelding (Kim Jon) into a paddock with an established stallion (Trump), the stallion would NEVER just ignore the gelding.
he is straight over in a flash.
and he will establish dominance immediately.
he might give the gelding a kick or a bite, make the gelding move off, herd it around for a bit and show it he is the "superior horse".
the interesting thing is that once the hierachy is sorted out, you go back in 2 hours and there they are, standing side by side, mutually groomng each others necks .
trump undertsands how to keep the herd functional
as leader of the free world , it is important he mans up, establishes the hierachy and then mutually grooms.
thats how nature does it.
these leftie beta males in positions of power are very unnatural.
obama, trudeau, merkel, macron, turnbull...they arent in accordance with nature.
hence they will be a darwinian "dead end " and will soon become extinct
Care to explain then how Obama offered to meet kim, and was then attacked by Fox News for wanting to meet with dictators?
Plus using the term darwinian in this statement tends to show precisely 2/5s of bugger all about evolution.
the stallion doesnt "offer " to do anything.
the rabbit and the sheep might "offer" up their throats , maybe.
the stallion does what the stallion is going to do.
darwinian?
well , for the last 100,000 years since we came down from the trees, human societies have been led by the most competant males.
there has always been a hierachy and the hierachy was there to make you safe.
since 1960 leftie intellectuals have seen this "patriachy" as "oppressive" and have done everything in their power to destroy it.
and they are almost there.
but the patriachy is NOT oppressive.
the patriachy is the natural tendency of men to look around and choose the most competant men to lead them.
thats what happens organically (in a darwinian sense) when you put men together.
the lefties dont accept this.
they see men as "clinging to power".
they cant distinguish the tyrant from the competant.
once we started being led by the incompetant (the likes of blair, dave cameron, teresa may, obama, bill clinton, merkel, macron , hollande, trudeau) we started down a very novel road from a darwinian perspective.
because we have never given the power to the meek and the sheep like and seen good things happen.
its almost impossible to express just how bad that idea is.
but lets play the game out and see where it lands us.
i think we are in pretty bad shape.
trump may be the 'dead cat bounce' of the patriachy.
could be the case.
if he is, i think most people are going to be much much worse off