You are wayyyyy off the mark AUGGIE.
If a 'Republic' is made in Australia - it will be situated at the 'base' of the Pyramid ...regarding the poor, but populating part of Australia (Art industry being for the 'rich').
The USA 'Democracy' is the reverse, with Politics for the rich (few), Art for the poor (many).
Regardless - the Democracy of Politics in the USA is a 'business', not a 'race' or 'family'.
Much like Rome was a varied race of peoples from all around the Empire, it was all about 'business' and the more you succeeded for Rome's behalf, the more 'Roman' you were than others.
In the USA - if you were not 'American' and you preferred to stand aloof as 'native' or 'African' - then you exiled yourself from the 'business' and suffered being put last in line or discriminated against ...which, in my view - is justified.
Any Brit or Aboriginal that did not 'conform' to an Oz-Republic would also be discriminated against for being detached. At the moment, any Australian NOT British/Aboriginal - gets second best (called a Convict, Racist, etc)
So the idea of Meaghan being 'black' means nothing, if she fits into being 'Royal' quite well. She may be a far better choice for the Royal family than a 'white' version (like Diana
).
But of course, Harry & Co are there to make future King more better than he really is.
Personally, the British Royalty are too Political/Military to be considered 'real Royalty' like the mainland European Royals - as being a King was founded upon being a 'Master of Ceremony' (pomp and all that jazz) like an Entertainer (hence the Court Jester mock). Kings are traditionally NOT military - that's for 'Emperors'.
But as we see, Britain & its Royals are more like North Americans, than Europeans and Europe is more Medical/Music as each decade goes by and Politics/Military is on its way out (very some devastating wars ...which goes to show the 'negative' impact).
Hence Germany v Britain was the Battle to see who the real 'Bad' guy in Europe is ...and in 'the end' Britain will be held accountable after France and Italy give up their 'Holy Ghost' on that level too.
I think Meaghan is a gorgeous inclusion to the Royal Family
and although Black by race, she is definitely very 'Western', in fact - she, being from the 'Entertainment' side of life, is more ROYAL, than the (Political/Military) royals themselves.
There, that about sums it all up
She's not "black" by race .... her father is white Dutch Irish, her mother African American. So Meghan is mixed race.
“While my mixed heritage may have created a grey area surrounding my self-identification, keeping me with a foot on both sides of the fence, I have come to embrace that.
"To say who I am, to share where I’m from, to voice my pride in being a strong, confident mixed-race woman."
And regarding the highlight ... it's a pity that many Australians of mixed race can't take pride in their heritage but just pick one side, despite any contradiction of their claim to be just one part of the mix.
White is the new black ... No?