Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Leaker/Liar Goes Silent.... (Read 280 times)
President Elect, The Mechanic
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 17501
Gender: male
Leaker/Liar Goes Silent....
May 20th, 2018 at 7:11pm
 
Quote:
LEAKER GOES SILENT: James Comey GOES SILENT After News Breaks He Was Running Spies Inside Trump Campaign


In a SHOCKING admission on Wednesday The New York Times reported
the FBI opened an  investigation dubbed “Crossfire Hurricane” into Trump’s campaign 100 days before the Presidential election.


The FBI was spying on the opposition party’s campaign 100 days before the election.  The spying was based on a phony Russian dossier that was paid for by Democrats and Hillary Clinton and by the hearsay of a low-level Trump campaign official who was coached by FBI operatives on Russian rumors.

Five agents, including
Peter Strzok
traveled to London in the summer of 2016 to interview with a diplomat after Papadopoulos drunkenly claimed to Australian Ambassador Alexander Downer he knew who had Hillary’s emails.

And the FBI informant used thousands of dollars to entice Trump campaign official Papadopoulos to London to set up meetings.

Deep State opreatives released this information to The New York Times for Wednesday’s report.
The information was only leaked out after Congressional investigators discovered this last week
.

This is likely the biggest political scandal in US history.

On Saturday the Washington Post started their defense of the Deep State spying on the Republican campaign.

Liberal hack Asha Rangappa insisted the spying was meant to protect Trump.
  Grin

That may be the most dishonest and shameful headline of all time.

The New York Times insisted the spies inside the Trump campaign were not there to spy.

So the corrupt liberal media continues to spin for the deep state Democrat criminals.

But noticeably absent is the loundmouth and former FBI Chief.


Leaker James Comey has gone dark.


He has not tweeted since the news broke that he had a spy (at least one) inside the Trump Campaign.


Comey has not tweeted since then.

Here is Comey’s last tweet — from May 10:
Back to top
 

Q

The STORM has arrived
Every Dog Has Its Day...
Dark to Light.
Sheep no more.
 
IP Logged
 
SadKangaroo
Gold Member
*****
Offline


#FightStupid

Posts: 14879
Mianjin (Brisbane)
Re: Leaker/Liar Goes Silent....
Reply #1 - May 20th, 2018 at 7:27pm
 
Again, he wasn't running spies, you've been invited to provide evidence but all you've done is join dots that don't exist, as usual.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
President Elect, The Mechanic
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 17501
Gender: male
Re: Leaker/Liar Goes Silent....
Reply #2 - May 20th, 2018 at 8:16pm
 
SadKangaroo wrote on May 20th, 2018 at 7:27pm:
Again, he wasn't running spies, you've been invited to provide evidence but all you've done is join dots that don't exist, as usual.


ok..

lets try this one line at a time so that your peanut brain can understand..

Leaker/Liar Goes Silent....

now go check his twitter dumb dumb...

you'll see he has gone to ground since May 11...

once again im 100% right

and once again you are 100% wrong..
Back to top
 

Q

The STORM has arrived
Every Dog Has Its Day...
Dark to Light.
Sheep no more.
 
IP Logged
 
longweekend58
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male
Re: Leaker/Liar Goes Silent....
Reply #3 - May 20th, 2018 at 10:48pm
 
The 'shocking' evidence so far is that one person unrelated to the campaign, spoke to 3 trump people about russian contacts...  Not exactly 007 stuff, is it?

morons
Back to top
 

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."
 
IP Logged
 
Richdude
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 8457
NC
Gender: male
Re: Leaker/Liar Goes Silent....
Reply #4 - May 21st, 2018 at 1:34am
 
President Elect, The Mechanic wrote on May 20th, 2018 at 7:11pm:
Quote:
LEAKER GOES SILENT: James Comey GOES SILENT After News Breaks He Was Running Spies Inside Trump Campaign


In a SHOCKING admission on Wednesday The New York Times reported
the FBI opened an  investigation dubbed “Crossfire Hurricane” into Trump’s campaign 100 days before the Presidential election.


The FBI was spying on the opposition party’s campaign 100 days before the election.  The spying was based on a phony Russian dossier that was paid for by Democrats and Hillary Clinton and by the hearsay of a low-level Trump campaign official who was coached by FBI operatives on Russian rumors.

Five agents, including
Peter Strzok
traveled to London in the summer of 2016 to interview with a diplomat after Papadopoulos drunkenly claimed to Australian Ambassador Alexander Downer he knew who had Hillary’s emails.

And the FBI informant used thousands of dollars to entice Trump campaign official Papadopoulos to London to set up meetings.

Deep State opreatives released this information to The New York Times for Wednesday’s report.
The information was only leaked out after Congressional investigators discovered this last week
.

This is likely the biggest political scandal in US history.

On Saturday the Washington Post started their defense of the Deep State spying on the Republican campaign.

Liberal hack Asha Rangappa insisted the spying was meant to protect Trump.
  Grin

That may be the most dishonest and shameful headline of all time.

[b]The New York Times insisted the spies inside the Trump campaign were not there to spy.


So the corrupt liberal media continues to spin for the deep state Democrat criminals.

But noticeably absent is the loundmouth and former FBI Chief.


Leaker James Comey has gone dark.


He has not tweeted since the news broke that he had a spy (at least one) inside the Trump Campaign.


Comey has not tweeted since then.

Here is Comey’s last tweet — from May 10:[/b]


Sad - what don't you understand?

They have admitted to spying! What do spies do? I know difficult question but the answer is they SPY.

Now can we proceed with redeeming this situation - restoring the constitution and draining the swamp!

It begins with charging the heads of the corrupt DOJ and FBI. Time for heads to roll.
Back to top
 

The mediocre mind is incapable of understanding the man who refuses to bow blindly to conventional prejudices and chooses instead to express his opinions courageously and honestly.”
 
IP Logged
 
AiA
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 18405
Gender: male
Re: Leaker/Liar Goes Silent....
Reply #5 - May 21st, 2018 at 1:58am
 
This from Mechanic who calls John McCain a "traitor" because Trump said he "doesn't like people who are captured."

Back to top
 

“Jerry, just remember: It’s not a lie … if you believe it.” George Costanza
WWW  
IP Logged
 
SadKangaroo
Gold Member
*****
Offline


#FightStupid

Posts: 14879
Mianjin (Brisbane)
Re: Leaker/Liar Goes Silent....
Reply #6 - May 21st, 2018 at 6:55am
 
Richdude wrote on May 21st, 2018 at 1:34am:
Sad - what don't you understand?

They have admitted to spying! What do spies do? I know difficult question but the answer is they SPY.

Now can we proceed with redeeming this situation - restoring the constitution and draining the swamp!

It begins with charging the heads of the corrupt DOJ and FBI. Time for heads to roll.


It's not a matter of failing to understand something, but the claims being made aren't supported by the facts.  You may  like them so you don't question them, but that doesn't make them any more or less true.

As a Trump support I understand how this may be a difficult concept for you, but for something to be true it needs to be supported by the facts.  To that end,

Here's what we actually know:

    Last August, Glenn Simpson of Fusion GPS, who compiled opposition research on Trump, told a Senate panel that British spy Christopher Steele relied on an “internal Trump campaign source” to compile his now-famous Trump dossier.

    A person familiar with Simpson’s testimony said at the time that he did not mean to suggest the FBI had a direct source of information from within the Trump campaign.

    The Washington Post reported on the existence of a U.S. citizen who had provided intelligence to the CIA and FBI in the Russia probe. The source had become of particular interest to Nunes, whose committee was quick to dismiss any allegations of collusion between Trump associates and Russia.

    According to the Post, the Justice Department clashed with Nunes and refused his request for specific details on the person.

    The New York Times seemed to lend credence to the idea by reporting that “at least one government informant” met several times with former Trump campaign advisers George Papadopoulos and Carter Page.


What we don't know:

    A person who provides information to investigators wasn’t planted by authorities. The person could have been someone already working with Trump’s campaign before they agreed to provide information. Or it could be someone who wasn’t affiliated with the campaign and just interacted with people around it.

    The FBI and Mueller have been extraordinarily tight-lipped about the investigation, providing few public clues on what sources they are relying on or where the probe is headed.

    Trump and his lawyer, Giuliani, acknowledge they don’t have the answers either. But that hasn’t stopped them from floating the mole theory as a way of undercutting Mueller’s work as an attempt by liberals to bring down the president.

    Giuliani said in a an interview on CNN’s “New Day” that he doesn’t know for sure what happened — and the president doesn’t either.

    But “for a long time, we’ve been told that there’s been some kind of infiltration,” he said.


To take all that information and jump to "the FBI planted a mole in the campaign" is an argument from ignorance.

"This grainy, out of focus footage that could simply be a child's balloon they let go is a UFO, therefore it must be Aliens"

The hypotithis that the FBI or the Deep State have been spying on Trump and working against him all along is a claim so fantastic that it requires some actual evidence.

You can't just jump to "someone provided information to the FBI" all the way to "The Deep State planted a mole in the Trump campaign" when there is zero evidence to make such a claim.

And when the claim is being used to help discredit the Mueller investigation you should be even more skeptical of it.

Trump and his team have been attacking and trying to discredit everyone who is getting closer to the Truth about the Trump Campaign and the Russian involvement and unless anyone can provide any information otherwise, this looks to be just another example.

Trump wants to fire Mueller and he can't right now because Mueller is as clean as a whistle.  They've been throwing mud at him for months now and other than in the mind of the Trump supporters who as we know require Trump to tell them what the truth is and how to think (no evidence requires), it's not working.

Have they claimed Mueller is a peadophile yet, or claimed he personally sold uranium to the enemy? Those seem to be standard claims these days to discredit people investigating or not supporting Trump.

I'm not saying the claim is false, but for those saying it's true, you're going to need to provide some evidence.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
longweekend58
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male
Re: Leaker/Liar Goes Silent....
Reply #7 - May 21st, 2018 at 12:31pm
 
SadKangaroo wrote on May 21st, 2018 at 6:55am:
Richdude wrote on May 21st, 2018 at 1:34am:
Sad - what don't you understand?

They have admitted to spying! What do spies do? I know difficult question but the answer is they SPY.

Now can we proceed with redeeming this situation - restoring the constitution and draining the swamp!

It begins with charging the heads of the corrupt DOJ and FBI. Time for heads to roll.


It's not a matter of failing to understand something, but the claims being made aren't supported by the facts.  You may  like them so you don't question them, but that doesn't make them any more or less true.

As a Trump support I understand how this may be a difficult concept for you, but for something to be true it needs to be supported by the facts.  To that end,

Here's what we actually know:

    Last August, Glenn Simpson of Fusion GPS, who compiled opposition research on Trump, told a Senate panel that British spy Christopher Steele relied on an “internal Trump campaign source” to compile his now-famous Trump dossier.

    A person familiar with Simpson’s testimony said at the time that he did not mean to suggest the FBI had a direct source of information from within the Trump campaign.

    The Washington Post reported on the existence of a U.S. citizen who had provided intelligence to the CIA and FBI in the Russia probe. The source had become of particular interest to Nunes, whose committee was quick to dismiss any allegations of collusion between Trump associates and Russia.

    According to the Post, the Justice Department clashed with Nunes and refused his request for specific details on the person.

    The New York Times seemed to lend credence to the idea by reporting that “at least one government informant” met several times with former Trump campaign advisers George Papadopoulos and Carter Page.


What we don't know:

    A person who provides information to investigators wasn’t planted by authorities. The person could have been someone already working with Trump’s campaign before they agreed to provide information. Or it could be someone who wasn’t affiliated with the campaign and just interacted with people around it.

    The FBI and Mueller have been extraordinarily tight-lipped about the investigation, providing few public clues on what sources they are relying on or where the probe is headed.

    Trump and his lawyer, Giuliani, acknowledge they don’t have the answers either. But that hasn’t stopped them from floating the mole theory as a way of undercutting Mueller’s work as an attempt by liberals to bring down the president.

    Giuliani said in a an interview on CNN’s “New Day” that he doesn’t know for sure what happened — and the president doesn’t either.

    But “for a long time, we’ve been told that there’s been some kind of infiltration,” he said.


To take all that information and jump to "the FBI planted a mole in the campaign" is an argument from ignorance.

"This grainy, out of focus footage that could simply be a child's balloon they let go is a UFO, therefore it must be Aliens"

The hypotithis that the FBI or the Deep State have been spying on Trump and working against him all along is a claim so fantastic that it requires some actual evidence.

You can't just jump to "someone provided information to the FBI" all the way to "The Deep State planted a mole in the Trump campaign" when there is zero evidence to make such a claim.

And when the claim is being used to help discredit the Mueller investigation you should be even more skeptical of it.

Trump and his team have been attacking and trying to discredit everyone who is getting closer to the Truth about the Trump Campaign and the Russian involvement and unless anyone can provide any information otherwise, this looks to be just another example.

Trump wants to fire Mueller and he can't right now because Mueller is as clean as a whistle.  They've been throwing mud at him for months now and other than in the mind of the Trump supporters who as we know require Trump to tell them what the truth is and how to think (no evidence requires), it's not working.

Have they claimed Mueller is a peadophile yet, or claimed he personally sold uranium to the enemy? Those seem to be standard claims these days to discredit people investigating or not supporting Trump.

I'm not saying the claim is false, but for those saying it's true, you're going to need to provide some evidence.



They actually HAVE claimed that Mueller gave uranium to the Russians. The actual story is that the FBI and Russian authorities ran a sting operation on someone trying to sell enriched uranium to the americans and as a result, Mueller personally returned 10g of U238 to the Russians. of course it was the Russians uranium in the first place and was part of the sting.

I am sure the pedo claim will eventuate soon enough.
Back to top
 

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print