Australian Politics Forum - Royal Dole Bludgers

Aussie

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 37678
Gender: male

Re: Royal Dole Bludgers
Reply #75 - May 20^th, 2018 at 2:49pm

Bobby. wrote on May 20^th, 2018 at 2:17pm:

Aussie wrote on May 20^th, 2018 at 2:10pm:

Bobby. wrote on May 20^th, 2018 at 2:08pm:

Aussie wrote on May 20^th, 2018 at 2:05pm:

It ain't James Hewitt.

You tricked me - you wicked man.

forgiven

namaste

रति

So who is that older bloke, Bobby?

Wink

It looks like lady Di's brother?

So...why did you say it was James Hewitt?

Back to top

IP Logged

Agnes

Gold Member

Offline

fish dinner

Posts: 6081
Bedford Park rnd

Re: Royal Dole Bludgers
Reply #76 - May 20^th, 2018 at 3:28pm

Bobby. wrote on May 20^th, 2018 at 2:17pm:

Aussie wrote on May 20^th, 2018 at 2:10pm:

Bobby. wrote on May 20^th, 2018 at 2:08pm:

Aussie wrote on May 20^th, 2018 at 2:05pm:

It ain't James Hewitt.

You tricked me - you wicked man.

forgiven

namaste

रति

So who is that older bloke, Bobby?

Wink

It looks like lady Di's brother?

and Harry

Back to top

x=^..^= x <o((((>< ~~~ x=^..^=x~~~x=^..^=x<o((((><~~~x=^..^=x

farewell to days of wild abandon and freedom in the adriatic

IP Logged

Agnes Gold Member Offline fish dinner Posts: 6081 Bedford Park rnd	Re: Royal Dole Bludgers Reply #77 - May 20^th, 2018 at 3:30pm He hasn't got a clue who Harry looks like that is why- he just wants to spread nastiness- malicious
Back to top	x=^..^= x <o((((>< ~~~ x=^..^=x~~~x=^..^=x<o((((><~~~x=^..^=x farewell to days of wild abandon and freedom in the adriatic IP Logged

Bobby. Gold Member Online Australian Politics Posts: 95417 Melbourne Gender:	Re: Royal Dole Bludgers Reply #78 - May 20^th, 2018 at 5:29pm Agnes wrote on May 20^th, 2018 at 3:30pm: He hasn't got a clue who Harry looks like that is why- he just wants to spread nastiness- malicious What about some scientific DNA test? There hasn't been any proper tests has there?
Back to top	IP Logged

Agnes Gold Member Offline fish dinner Posts: 6081 Bedford Park rnd	Re: Royal Dole Bludgers Reply #79 - May 20^th, 2018 at 5:42pm A DNA test was done- but the science was not acceptable to you- disappointed Bobby
Back to top	x=^..^= x <o((((>< ~~~ x=^..^=x~~~x=^..^=x<o((((><~~~x=^..^=x farewell to days of wild abandon and freedom in the adriatic IP Logged

Bobby. Gold Member Online Australian Politics Posts: 95417 Melbourne Gender:	Re: Royal Dole Bludgers Reply #80 - May 20^th, 2018 at 5:57pm Agnes wrote on May 20^th, 2018 at 5:42pm: A DNA test was done- but the science was not acceptable to you- disappointed Bobby If you think a tabloid newspaper is acceptable? I read somewhere - many years ago - that Charles refused to give a DNA sample for the test. BTW - that is his right.
Back to top	IP Logged

Aussie

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 37678
Gender: male

Re: Royal Dole Bludgers
Reply #81 - May 20^th, 2018 at 5:58pm

Bobby. wrote on May 20^th, 2018 at 5:57pm:

Agnes wrote on May 20^th, 2018 at 5:42pm:

A DNA test was done- but the science was not acceptable to you- disappointed Bobby

If you think a tabloid newspaper is acceptable?

I read somewhere - many years ago -
that Charles refused to give a DNA sample for the test.
BTW - that is his right.

Does not matter. The tabloid reported the outcome of a DNA match between Harry and Hewitt. No match.

Back to top

IP Logged

Bobby.

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 95417
Melbourne
Gender: male

Re: Royal Dole Bludgers
Reply #82 - May 20^th, 2018 at 6:02pm

Aussie wrote on May 20^th, 2018 at 5:58pm:

Bobby. wrote on May 20^th, 2018 at 5:57pm:

Agnes wrote on May 20^th, 2018 at 5:42pm:

A DNA test was done- but the science was not acceptable to you- disappointed Bobby

If you think a tabloid newspaper is acceptable?

I read somewhere - many years ago -
that Charles refused to give a DNA sample for the test.
BTW - that is his right.

Does not matter. The tabloid reported the outcome of a DNA match between Harry and Hewitt. No match.

A link to the scientific paper please?

Back to top

IP Logged

Agnes Gold Member Offline fish dinner Posts: 6081 Bedford Park rnd	Re: Royal Dole Bludgers Reply #83 - May 20^th, 2018 at 6:05pm sore loser not a good look- are you jealous of Harry Bobby- ? Why so keen to bring him down- when the evidence argues otherwise /
Back to top	x=^..^= x <o((((>< ~~~ x=^..^=x~~~x=^..^=x<o((((><~~~x=^..^=x farewell to days of wild abandon and freedom in the adriatic IP Logged

Bobby. Gold Member Online Australian Politics Posts: 95417 Melbourne Gender:	Re: Royal Dole Bludgers Reply #84 - May 20^th, 2018 at 6:06pm Agnes wrote on May 20^th, 2018 at 6:05pm: sore loser not a good look- are you jealous of Harry Bobby- ? Why so keen to bring him down- when the evidence argues otherwise / Yes I'm jealous, I wish I could have had such a happy marriage.
Back to top	IP Logged

Aussie

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 37678
Gender: male

Re: Royal Dole Bludgers
Reply #85 - May 20^th, 2018 at 7:02pm

Bobby. wrote on May 20^th, 2018 at 6:02pm:

Aussie wrote on May 20^th, 2018 at 5:58pm:

Bobby. wrote on May 20^th, 2018 at 5:57pm:

Agnes wrote on May 20^th, 2018 at 5:42pm:

A DNA test was done- but the science was not acceptable to you- disappointed Bobby

If you think a tabloid newspaper is acceptable?

I read somewhere - many years ago -
that Charles refused to give a DNA sample for the test.
BTW - that is his right.

Does not matter. The tabloid reported the outcome of a DNA match between Harry and Hewitt. No match.

A link to the scientific paper please?

Go fetch. I can't be arsed. I doubt one exists.

Back to top

IP Logged

Agnes

Gold Member

Offline

fish dinner

Posts: 6081
Bedford Park rnd

Re: Royal Dole Bludgers
Reply #86 - May 20^th, 2018 at 7:29pm

Bobby. wrote on May 20^th, 2018 at 5:57pm:

Agnes wrote on May 20^th, 2018 at 5:42pm:

A DNA test was done- but the science was not acceptable to you- disappointed Bobby

If you think a tabloid newspaper is acceptable?

I read somewhere - many years ago -
that Charles refused to give a DNA sample for the test.
BTW - that is his right.

The test may only have been conducted to exclude Hewitt in which case Charles need not have participated at all

Back to top

x=^..^= x <o((((>< ~~~ x=^..^=x~~~x=^..^=x<o((((><~~~x=^..^=x

farewell to days of wild abandon and freedom in the adriatic

IP Logged

Bobby.

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 95417
Melbourne
Gender: male

Re: Royal Dole Bludgers
Reply #87 - May 20^th, 2018 at 7:45pm

Agnes wrote on May 20^th, 2018 at 7:29pm:

Bobby. wrote on May 20^th, 2018 at 5:57pm:

Agnes wrote on May 20^th, 2018 at 5:42pm:

A DNA test was done- but the science was not acceptable to you- disappointed Bobby

If you think a tabloid newspaper is acceptable?

I read somewhere - many years ago -
that Charles refused to give a DNA sample for the test.
BTW - that is his right.

The test may only have been conducted to exclude Hewitt in which case Charles need not have participated at all

Are you sure?
My knowledge doesn't extend to DNA testing.

Back to top

IP Logged

Aussie

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 37678
Gender: male

Re: Royal Dole Bludgers
Reply #88 - May 20^th, 2018 at 8:02pm

Bobby. wrote on May 20^th, 2018 at 7:45pm:

Agnes wrote on May 20^th, 2018 at 7:29pm:

Bobby. wrote on May 20^th, 2018 at 5:57pm:

Agnes wrote on May 20^th, 2018 at 5:42pm:

A DNA test was done- but the science was not acceptable to you- disappointed Bobby

If you think a tabloid newspaper is acceptable?

I read somewhere - many years ago -
that Charles refused to give a DNA sample for the test.
BTW - that is his right.

The test may only have been conducted to exclude Hewitt in which case Charles need not have participated at all

Are you sure?
My knowledge doesn't extend to DNA testing.

Read the link you reckon was cooked up, or whatever your term was.

Back to top

IP Logged

Bobby.

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 95417
Melbourne
Gender: male

Re: Royal Dole Bludgers
Reply #89 - May 20^th, 2018 at 8:07pm

Aussie wrote on May 20^th, 2018 at 8:02pm:

Bobby. wrote on May 20^th, 2018 at 7:45pm:

Agnes wrote on May 20^th, 2018 at 7:29pm:

Bobby. wrote on May 20^th, 2018 at 5:57pm:

Agnes wrote on May 20^th, 2018 at 5:42pm:

A DNA test was done- but the science was not acceptable to you- disappointed Bobby

If you think a tabloid newspaper is acceptable?

I read somewhere - many years ago -
that Charles refused to give a DNA sample for the test.
BTW - that is his right.

The test may only have been conducted to exclude Hewitt in which case Charles need not have participated at all

Are you sure?
My knowledge doesn't extend to DNA testing.

Read the link you reckon was cooked up, or whatever your term was.

I did Aussie,
it was just some dead British tabloid.

Back to top

IP Logged

Poll
Question: Are the " Royals "
* This poll has now closed *
my lords and masters 2 (25.0%) planetary usurpers and invaders 0 (0.0%) reptilians 2 (25.0%) parasites and genocidal maniacs 2 (25.0%) option 2 - 4 2 (25.0%) Total votes: 8 « Created by: it_is_the_light on: May 19^th, 2018 at 12:27am »