Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Poll closed Poll
Question: Are the " Royals "
*** This poll has now closed ***


my lords and masters    
  2 (25.0%)
planetary usurpers and invaders    
  0 (0.0%)
reptilians    
  2 (25.0%)
parasites and genocidal maniacs    
  2 (25.0%)
option 2 - 4    
  2 (25.0%)




Total votes: 8
« Created by: it_is_the_light on: May 19th, 2018 at 12:27am »

Pages: 1 ... 6 7 8 
Send Topic Print
Royal Dole Bludgers (Read 9030 times)
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 95236
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Royal Dole Bludgers
Reply #105 - May 20th, 2018 at 9:31pm
 
Setanta wrote on May 20th, 2018 at 9:18pm:
Bobby. wrote on May 20th, 2018 at 8:50pm:
Setanta wrote on May 20th, 2018 at 8:34pm:
Bobby. wrote on May 20th, 2018 at 6:06pm:
Agnes wrote on May 20th, 2018 at 6:05pm:
sore loser not a good look- are you jealous of Harry Bobby- ? Why so keen to bring him down- when the evidence argues otherwise /




Yes I'm jealous,
I wish I could have had such a happy marriage.  Cry Cry Cry Cry Cry Cry


It's the life after the marriage you have to worry about Bobby. Now the house of Windsor has a ni99er in the woodpile.



What if Harry's kids turn out as throwbacks and are coal black?

( not that there's anything wrong with that)


May well happen...



The Queen would not be amused.  Smiley
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Aussie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 37678
Gender: male
Re: Royal Dole Bludgers
Reply #106 - May 20th, 2018 at 9:38pm
 
I don't know why the name changed.  I offered a guess.  So.....please explain your point.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Setanta
Gold Member
*****
Offline


\/ Peace man!

Posts: 15914
Northern NSW
Gender: male
Re: Royal Dole Bludgers
Reply #107 - May 20th, 2018 at 9:45pm
 
Aussie wrote on May 20th, 2018 at 9:38pm:
I don't know why the name changed.  I offered a guess.  So.....please explain your point.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/House_of_Windsor
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Aussie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 37678
Gender: male
Re: Royal Dole Bludgers
Reply #108 - May 20th, 2018 at 10:00pm
 
Setanta wrote on May 20th, 2018 at 9:45pm:
Aussie wrote on May 20th, 2018 at 9:38pm:
I don't know why the name changed.  I offered a guess.  So.....please explain your point.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/House_of_Windsor


So.....my guess was spot on?

Quote:
The name was changed from Saxe-Coburg and Gotha to the English Windsor in 1917 because of anti-German sentiment in the British Empire during World War I.[1]


Huh
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Setanta
Gold Member
*****
Offline


\/ Peace man!

Posts: 15914
Northern NSW
Gender: male
Re: Royal Dole Bludgers
Reply #109 - May 20th, 2018 at 10:02pm
 
Aussie wrote on May 20th, 2018 at 10:00pm:
Setanta wrote on May 20th, 2018 at 9:45pm:
Aussie wrote on May 20th, 2018 at 9:38pm:
I don't know why the name changed.  I offered a guess.  So.....please explain your point.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/House_of_Windsor


So.....my guess was spot on?

Quote:
The name was changed from Saxe-Coburg and Gotha to the English Windsor in 1917 because of anti-German sentiment in the British Empire during World War I.[1]


Huh


Yes, so now read your article again(History! or perhaps a load of crap).
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Aussie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 37678
Gender: male
Re: Royal Dole Bludgers
Reply #110 - May 20th, 2018 at 10:10pm
 
Wiki and that Article I linked are not at odds are they.  If  you believe so, spit it out.  From my link:

Quote:
Last year, a Buckingham Palace spokesperson told the Boston Globe, “The House of Windsor has never denied Queen Charlotte's claimed African ancestry."

"This has been rumored for years and years," said the spokesperson, "It is a matter of history, and frankly, we've got far more important things to talk about."


I agree with that spokesperson.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Setanta
Gold Member
*****
Offline


\/ Peace man!

Posts: 15914
Northern NSW
Gender: male
Re: Royal Dole Bludgers
Reply #111 - May 20th, 2018 at 10:15pm
 
Aussie wrote on May 20th, 2018 at 10:10pm:
Wiki and that Article I linked are not at odds are they.  If  you believe so, spit it out.  From my link:

Quote:
Last year, a Buckingham Palace spokesperson told the Boston Globe, “The House of Windsor has never denied Queen Charlotte's claimed African ancestry."

"This has been rumored for years and years," said the spokesperson, "It is a matter of history, and frankly, we've got far more important things to talk about."


I agree with that spokesperson.


Weak. Goodnight.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
AiA
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 18405
Gender: male
Re: Royal Dole Bludgers
Reply #112 - May 20th, 2018 at 10:28pm
 
We'll be hearing about Harry & Meagan's bi-racial brats the rest of our lives ...
Back to top
 

“Jerry, just remember: It’s not a lie … if you believe it.” George Costanza
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 95236
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Royal Dole Bludgers
Reply #113 - May 21st, 2018 at 6:36am
 
AiA wrote on May 20th, 2018 at 10:28pm:
We'll be hearing about Harry & Meagan's bi-racial brats the rest of our lives ...



Actually - Look at Tiger Woods & Obama.
When you mix the races the progeny is often smarter & stronger.
Maybe the Royal family needs some better genes?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
AiA
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 18405
Gender: male
Re: Royal Dole Bludgers
Reply #114 - May 21st, 2018 at 7:10am
 
Bobby. wrote on May 21st, 2018 at 6:36am:
Maybe the Royal family needs some better genes?



They do. Prince Andrew is the best example of that. Wikileaks had plenty to say about him.



Back to top
 

“Jerry, just remember: It’s not a lie … if you believe it.” George Costanza
WWW  
IP Logged
 
PZ547
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 9282
Gender: male
Re: Royal Dole Bludgers
Reply #115 - Jun 4th, 2018 at 2:23pm
 
Online sources claim that Markle is Harry's beard.  Other online sources claim that Markle has been living at SoHo house since  the engagement and that she and Harry only meet in order to carry out 'royal' appearances

Many online sources and some print claim Markle is in fact a jew and izrayli without an ounce of 'black' blood

Other online sources claim the true Harry was replaced when he was aged 8 years and that the true Harry was assassinated in Ireland not long ago

Books long in print claim QE2 is the result of artificial insemination with one of several claimed sires

Queen Mother is said to be the illegitimate of a jew servant woman and landed gentry.  Whatever the case, Queen Mother was most definitely a 'commoner'

That in turn  mean that at most, QE2 is only half 'royal'

Which means Charles is only 1/4 'royal'

Diana was a commoner.  It's claimed her biological father was jew Goldsmith.  Regardless, Diana was a commoner

Thus, William and Harry (if in fact Charles is the biological father of Harry) are at most, 1/8 'royal'

Kate Middleton is a commoner despite having Goldsmith ancestry

William as a future king is 1/8 'royal'.  And his children, also in line for the throne, are 1/16 'royal'

Harry is far down in list of succession and his parentage will always be questioned because the 'royals' have not proven conclusively that he is Charles bilogical son

Harry married Markle who is a commoner.  His future children will be 1/16 'royal'

Harry's wedding cost taxpayers multiple millions of pounds, it has been reported.  He now wants taxpayers to pay for security on his holiday home, plus 24/7 taxpayer-funded security for himself and his wife and her parents, reportedly

That's in addition to ongoing, taxpayer funded security for numerous other 'royals' and their parents, etc

It is said by statisticians and other experts that we are each related to every 33rd person world wide

Harry is 1/8 royal, which is not far removed from all 'commoner' individuals.  Yet it's 'commoners' whom he  believes should maintain him and his undoubtedly common wife in lives of secure luxury

and when 1/8 'royal' Harry and his common bride visit Australia, for example, it will be 'commoner', tax-paying Aussies who will be compelled to accord him further luxury, despite that Aussies have not invited 1/8 'royal' Harry or his common wife to step on our shores (nor would they if it were put to a vote)


Then we consider all the 'charities' headed by the fake 'royals'.  After all, their untold wealth has to come from somewhere

Meanwhile, Charles, the 1/4 'royal' future king, has his pimp selling all those expensive and unnecessary gifts presented to him and other 'royals' by basically poverty-stricken little nations


A future king who will go down for posterity as he told his gushing adulterous girlfriend that he wished to become her sanitary product


then his wife was killed


then he married his adulterous girlfriend


and now he wants his 'subjects' to accept his adulterous, commoner girlfriend as their 'royal' queen





Back to top
« Last Edit: Jun 4th, 2018 at 2:29pm by PZ547 »  

All my comments, posts & opinions are to be regarded as satire & humour
 
IP Logged
 
Aussie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 37678
Gender: male
Re: Royal Dole Bludgers
Reply #116 - Jun 4th, 2018 at 2:45pm
 
How many 'long bows' are there in that ^^^^^^ post?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
PZ547
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 9282
Gender: male
Re: Royal Dole Bludgers
Reply #117 - Jun 4th, 2018 at 3:16pm
 
Aussie wrote on Jun 4th, 2018 at 2:45pm:
How many 'long bows' are there in that ^^^^^^ post?


Indisputable basics:

Queen Mother = commoner

Diana = commoner

Middleton = commoner

Markle = commoner


Queen Mother, Diana, Middleton all biological commoner mothers of future ' royal' monarchs

The long bow is claiming any of their offspring are 'royal' or entitled to lives of inestimable wealth, privilege and luxury on the backs of their fellow commoners
Back to top
 

All my comments, posts & opinions are to be regarded as satire & humour
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 6 7 8 
Send Topic Print