PZ547
|
Online sources claim that Markle is Harry's beard. Other online sources claim that Markle has been living at SoHo house since the engagement and that she and Harry only meet in order to carry out 'royal' appearances
Many online sources and some print claim Markle is in fact a jew and izrayli without an ounce of 'black' blood
Other online sources claim the true Harry was replaced when he was aged 8 years and that the true Harry was assassinated in Ireland not long ago
Books long in print claim QE2 is the result of artificial insemination with one of several claimed sires
Queen Mother is said to be the illegitimate of a jew servant woman and landed gentry. Whatever the case, Queen Mother was most definitely a 'commoner'
That in turn mean that at most, QE2 is only half 'royal'
Which means Charles is only 1/4 'royal'
Diana was a commoner. It's claimed her biological father was jew Goldsmith. Regardless, Diana was a commoner
Thus, William and Harry (if in fact Charles is the biological father of Harry) are at most, 1/8 'royal'
Kate Middleton is a commoner despite having Goldsmith ancestry
William as a future king is 1/8 'royal'. And his children, also in line for the throne, are 1/16 'royal'
Harry is far down in list of succession and his parentage will always be questioned because the 'royals' have not proven conclusively that he is Charles bilogical son
Harry married Markle who is a commoner. His future children will be 1/16 'royal'
Harry's wedding cost taxpayers multiple millions of pounds, it has been reported. He now wants taxpayers to pay for security on his holiday home, plus 24/7 taxpayer-funded security for himself and his wife and her parents, reportedly
That's in addition to ongoing, taxpayer funded security for numerous other 'royals' and their parents, etc
It is said by statisticians and other experts that we are each related to every 33rd person world wide
Harry is 1/8 royal, which is not far removed from all 'commoner' individuals. Yet it's 'commoners' whom he believes should maintain him and his undoubtedly common wife in lives of secure luxury
and when 1/8 'royal' Harry and his common bride visit Australia, for example, it will be 'commoner', tax-paying Aussies who will be compelled to accord him further luxury, despite that Aussies have not invited 1/8 'royal' Harry or his common wife to step on our shores (nor would they if it were put to a vote)
Then we consider all the 'charities' headed by the fake 'royals'. After all, their untold wealth has to come from somewhere
Meanwhile, Charles, the 1/4 'royal' future king, has his pimp selling all those expensive and unnecessary gifts presented to him and other 'royals' by basically poverty-stricken little nations
A future king who will go down for posterity as he told his gushing adulterous girlfriend that he wished to become her sanitary product
then his wife was killed
then he married his adulterous girlfriend
and now he wants his 'subjects' to accept his adulterous, commoner girlfriend as their 'royal' queen
|