FD?

You seem to have gone.

Mattyfisk wrote on Apr 19^th, 2018 at 6:28am:



Typical Paki slime. A tinted woman makes a fool of herself and people tell her so - Oh!! it's wacism!!. No white person can ever call out a tinted woman for being wrong because it will immediately become a wace issue.

She was wrong about Islam being the most feminine religion.

She was blatantly lying about her reasons for being sent home from the US.

She was wrong to use taxpayer money to fund her book promotion.

She was wrong about the public backlash being based on racism.

etc

etc



It's all wacist. Agreeing and endoring and promoting a tinted person is the only correct, supplicant position for a white person.

Aussie wrote on Apr 19^th, 2018 at 1:26pm:


Are you saying that Islam is the most feminine religion Aussie?

Or that you are arguing out of pure ignorance?

Aussie wrote on Apr 19^th, 2018 at 1:26pm:


FD doesn't have a real opinion. He didn't see Yassmin's rant against Jacquie Lambie on Q&A ("to me, Islam is the most feminist of religions"). He doesn't know about Yassmin's job travelling to various parts of Australia for a show called Australia Wide (the so-called taxpayer-funded book promotion). He doesnt know about her comments on Sharia (which Yassmin described as a personal code of conduct). FD doesnt even know about Yassmin's Tweet on Remembrance Day, which turned into a media witch-hunt.

Nauru, Manus, Palestine, lest we forget.

All FD knows is that Yassmin Abdel-Mageid is an awful Muslim woman with ridiculous glasses and a wardrobe of obscene turbans. He only knows what the headlines and the old boy's News Ltd cartoons have told him. He hasn't read anything about Yassmin's views or her comments (or her book or her columns or her radio show), all of which are tame to say the least.

FD does not grant her the right to express these tame beliefs without being howled out of the country. Threatened with violence by phone and on social media, cursed in the street, the tabloid/shockjock media mercilessly chasing her everywhere she went, and all of it, according to FD, her just deserts. That's what you get for saying whatever it was she said.

FD, of course, doesn't know what she said, but it must have been bad.

And when we point all this out, FD sulks and plays the victim - doesn't he have the right to express a view too? Can't he pretend he knows all about Yassmin's views to join in a good old Muslim bashing? Can't we allow FD to express his views about awful tinted Muslim bints without calling him a wacist jellyfish?

But of course! We welcome FD's views on Yassmin Abdel-Magied. Unfortunately, FD doesn't want to share them.

So much for Freeedom, eh?

Frank wrote on Apr 19^th, 2018 at 6:41pm:


No need to play the victim, old boy. You've already said you don't want these sorts of tinted bints in the country you flew to. You want her religion out, her hijab banned, and her backward tinted culture extinguished.

So stop pretending. You dont even know what ANZAC Day is. The only reason you're even bothering to throw such a virtuous hissy fit over Yassmin is she's unapologetically tinted.

Thanks for the lecture on ANZAC Day, old boy. Good to see you've finally Googled what it is.

Perverted,  ja?

Aussie wrote on Apr 19^th, 2018 at 9:19pm:

He is right on the money with his anti-British Irish animus. He is just the latest iteration.


He's is talking mostly about his misunderstandings (which he doesn't comprehend, of course).
https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2018/apr/18/richard-flanagan-national...

Opening with a parallel with Communist Eastern Europe and name-dropping Kundera tells you just how silly all this is going to be. And it is.

He is precisely the voice of that twisted Western gloating he misunderstands Havel about. All downhill from here.