mozzaok wrote on Apr 9
th, 2018 at 11:34am:
Look, there has always been blokes that liked to dress up in frocks, and good luck to them.
What I take issue is with having doctors prescribing hormones etc, to little kids.
It may not be true, but I have heard people say that children as young as three and four, are receiving medication to help them change to the gender they identify with.
I look at someone like Carlotta, who was always attracted to dressing and acting like a woman, and when they could do the snip, she was stoked.
I may hold slight reservations, as a man, the thought of taking sharp objects to the nether regions is always cringe inducing, but that is MY issue, and I would not try and stop her from making her own decisions.
Now there are some folk that should never be allowed to make any decisions, people with easily identifiable, and obvious, mental conditions that make treatment of those being that which should be the first priority.
As for the ones who are blokes, then they dress like a sheila, and say they still like women, so they must be lesbians. WTF??? Seriously, if any one can tell me why these people should be assisted in any way, other than directions on how to take a long walk off a short pier, then don't tell me, cos I do not give a toss.
As for bloke putting on lycra and competing against women? Who the hell do they think they are, the chinese swim team? Fook em all, tell em to ferk off and examine their vaginas with a mirror, after all, they are designer made.
You will struggle to find a case where doctors prescribe hormonal tablets to little kids 3 to 4 for gender identity issues. Usually, at this young (3-4) age, it is because there is developmental problem, and that they are born either intersex, or meant to be a male, but for whatever reason the hormones were deficient. In which case, the parents usually choose a sex.
By contrast, in order for proper sexual reassignment, the hormonal treatment should ideally start before puperty in the case of males. Because once males hit puberty, their testicles would produce alot of testosterone, and that would lead to development of secondary sexual characteristics - e.g. facial / body hair, and voice changes. And ideally, the bilateral orchidectomy should occur then as well.
However, then, there is the ethical dilemma. The child would be too immature to realize the consequence of his or her action at this young age. What if its just an curiosity and experiment. Who is going to be responsible if there is 'buyer's remorse' later on in life?
Ideally, in the future, we can have sort of gene therapy. Where, we can change the basic DNA of a person, swapping the Y with X or vice versa. And more effective secondary treatment to alter the gender morphism.