Black Orchid wrote on Mar 19^th, 2018 at 8:48pm:


Yet I did.

Quote:


Oh dear.  They were counted.  I was ahead of the game, as were my Mates.  They voted for my opponent, and their votes were lavishly accepted.  As was planned....they later changed their vote to me...and that is when their votes suddenly became unworthy.  One minute their vote was accepted...because it went the way AiA wanted....then when they changed their vote (as was allowed) they were not to be counted.  

Quote:


No desperation at all.  I knew what AiA would do....the whole way, and he did exactly what was anticipated. 

Quote:


I made no secret of the fact that I asked (not begged) OP Members to register and vote.  And the fact is they did.....so AiA and NOIQ deliberately registered Ozpol names there (they were fake, not real as I had support from) and they voted.  That was a very clever ploy as it made FD nervous about the vote and he was misled by that deception.

Quote:


I think I have just shown that elections are too easily mucked around with.  I support the original FD model...he appoints and that means there is no question.  End of story.

Quote:


I was always quite open, and knew what the grubs would do.  They did defeat me with their false OzPol registrants.  There were genuine OzPol people who did vote for me...but those babies got washed out with the fraud water created by AiA and NOIQ.  Fact.

Quote:


I know the truth and have always posted it.  It never fails as you can always remember what actually happened.  If you lie....you need to be very clever to recall them when tested.

Dear all,

Again aussie continually tells lies in the hope that if he repeats them often enough someone will believe it.

Pls see below. It is the official count reviewed and approved by FD.

Note the score was 29-14 in Aussie's favour when all the votes were counted.
Note the number of his cabbie mates with -0.02 or less than 0.05 years membership (from the start date of voting, yes some registered after voting period started) that arrived just to vote for Aussie.

Sheet explained.

Count 1st is the number of 1 votes, 2nd and 3rd represent preferences.

The 2nd and 3rd column (Aussie, Skippy) are the counts unqualified.
The 4th and 5th columns (Aussie, Skippy) represents the votes only including eligable voters.

This skippy won 5-11.

Joined is the date the member joined.
Years is the number of years calculated to the vote start date.
Posts is the number of posts they have made.
Eligible is if they were eligible to vote.

Note the following.
- The number of people with a single post - a vote for aussie
- The number of people who just register for the election, even after election started
- Known socks removed - e.g. Lucas & Bart who voted for Skip.
- Note Phil E. Buster - Aussie's own sock voting for himself. So he voted twice for himself.

He tried to rig the elections. This is the proof. It is all here.

So it is all a lie. Aussie tried to stack the election and failed. Here is the evidence. Again he cannot be believed. If you read anything he types it's either a lie or a trap set for you.

Aussie wrote on Mar 20^th, 2018 at 11:48am:




Who cares. You tried to rig the two elections you ran in and failed Mr Failed Lawyer.

Failure is a reoccuring theme with you isn't it.

False my arse.

Replace cabbies with "ring ins".... I don't know who you involved in your evil plots. Cabbies, Ozpol members, your son... mates from the golf club... fairies from the bottom of the garden... who knows.

FACT - you tried to rig 2 elections.
FACT - you tell lies to cover your own inadequacies and failures
FACT - you keep restating untruths to make it look like your failure is somebody else's fault.. playing victim when you are just the victim of your own stupidity.

Simple fact.  Can't be denied.  You blokes run and rig elections to suit the outcome you want.   It's all there in that count.  All the evidence to prove me right, and I'm glad you posted it because it has been/is hidden from view at the sewer.  I've now safely tucked away a screen shot.

So let's be clear. You are arguing that a person who registered after the election had started should be eligible to vote and the fact that this was not accepted means people other than you rigged the election.

Let's get down to specifics Aussie. Your generalization are just designed to deflect.

Do you argue that someone joining the day before or even after the election voting has started should be eligible... is that your point? If not what is your specific point of argument. Come on Mr Lawyer.... get specific in presenting your argument.

if he ever was a lawyer he would not be driving cabs now if he was ever driving a cab  - the lawyer thing/family life etc- is all just a huge online fabricated life-  dont believe a word he say's but that is just me

Super Nova wrote on Mar 20^th, 2018 at 4:33pm:


I know exactly where the bitterness is, and that is with the silly bloke who, by way of projection, mentions it.   

So....I had 24 hours to do something, and if I did not, and I have not, what will you do?  FD is  entitled to know if his Forum or one of his Members is under some attack/threat, don't you think?