Australian Politics Forum

Agnes

Gold Member

Offline

fish dinner

Posts: 6081
Bedford Park rnd

Rule Change
Mar 19^th, 2018 at 12:10pm

the striking out of another's written word is defacing their written work- we need a rule change to stop trolls from abusing this function to harrass poster's- can we get some changes here please to restore peace
One poster has already expressed eye strain problems trying to read such defaced post's and that is quite apart from the fact that it is highly disrespectful and juvenile to treat fellow posters in such a manner- if he wants to attend Playschool then he should go find the playschool site-

Back to top

« Last Edit: Mar 19^th, 2018 at 12:19pm by Agnes »

x=^..^= x <o((((>< ~~~ x=^..^=x~~~x=^..^=x<o((((><~~~x=^..^=x

farewell to days of wild abandon and freedom in the adriatic

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 131414
Gender: male

Re: Rule Change
Reply #1 - Mar 19^th, 2018 at 12:19pm

Agnes wrote on Mar 19^th, 2018 at 12:10pm:

the striking out of another's written word is defacing their written work- we need a rule change to stop trolls from abusing this function to harrass poster's- can we get some changes here please to restore peace
One poster has already expressed eye strain problems trying to read such defaced post's and that is quite apart from the fact that it is highly disrespectful and juvenile to treat fellow posters in such a manner- if he wants to attend Playschool then he should go find the playschool site-

"Harrass" (sic) poster's what?

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 131414 Gender:	Re: Rule Change Reply #2 - Mar 19^th, 2018 at 12:42pm How about a rule change to stop people adding words to another forum member's post? You know, like this: http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1521354815/11#11 Oh, hang on - there already is a rule to prevent that. Why did you do it then, Agnes - why did you break the rules? Was it another attempt to harass me? I'm curious.
Back to top	IP Logged

UnSubRocky Gold Member Offline Australian Legend Posts: 21718 Rockhampton, Q Gender:	Re: Rule Change Reply #3 - Mar 21^st, 2018 at 5:31am A rule to prevent obfuscation?
Back to top	IP Logged

Jasin

Gold Member

Online

Posts: 46380
Gender: male

Re: Rule Change
Reply #4 - Mar 21^st, 2018 at 7:37am

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 19^th, 2018 at 12:42pm:

How about a rule change to stop people adding words to another forum member's post?

You know, like this:

http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1521354815/11#11

Oh, hang on - there already is a rule to prevent that.

Why did you do it then, Agnes - why did you break the rules?

Was it another attempt to harass me?

I'm curious.

Because Agnes is a member from Black Orchid's PA Forum and you are a member from Monk's PA Forum and because FreeDiver is on Black Orchid's side with utter bias. Agnes can hypocritically get what she wants.
Although what you do is 'legal' and what she does is 'illegal' on this OzPol Forum. Agnes is expressing what all PA members from Black Orchid's Forum - pure bullying indulgence against the Monk 'tribe' and even against a few OzPol members.

Now with me saying what I've just said. I will be attacked for being a sexist pig against 'women', because there are many female members in Black Orchid's PA Forum.
But of course, I'm not a sexist pig, as there are female members over at Monk's PA Forum. Maybe the only sexist remark here I could make is that the difference is possibly that the women at Monk's don't throw their 'pussy-whippin' around like the women at Black Orchids ...notice the only males drifting towards Black Orchids are a bit 'sexually' needy. Wink

But like I said, that's the only 'sexist' thing I can think about.

So lets see what happens.
Will Agnes's dummy-spit allow her to change people's posts (which she has done often, even to me) because you can 'strike out' people's posts GP?
Will your method GP be banned because of Agnes's dummy spit?
Or will it just remain the same?

Stay tuned folks for more Soap enemas. Cheesy

Back to top

AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY.

IP Logged

Sir Spot of Borg Gold Member Offline WE ARE BORG Posts: 26460 Australia	Re: Rule Change Reply #5 - Mar 21^st, 2018 at 7:49am Spot
Back to top	red-down-arrow-hi.png (5 KB \| 62 ) Whaaaaaah! I'm a Moron! - edited by some unethical admin - you think its funny? - its a slippery slope IP Logged

Grappler Truth Teller Feller Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 80152 Proud pre-1850's NO Voter Gender:	Re: Rule Change Reply #6 - Mar 21^st, 2018 at 9:49pm Thou Shalt Not Strike Out! ... punishment will be death by slow stoning, then slow beheading...... and a fine of ten dollars.....
Back to top	“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.” ― John Adams IP Logged

Grappler Truth Teller Feller Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 80152 Proud pre-1850's NO Voter Gender:	Re: Rule Change Reply #7 - Mar 21^st, 2018 at 9:53pm UnSubRocky wrote on Mar 21^st, 2018 at 5:31am: A rule to prevent obfuscation? The genetically imposed quasi-reliance on obfuscation is dependent on semi-variable incidences of potentially co-synchronised esoteric existentialist propensities.... I wouldn't knock it...
Back to top	“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.” ― John Adams IP Logged

Jasin Gold Member Online Posts: 46380 Gender:	Re: Rule Change Reply #8 - Mar 21^st, 2018 at 9:54pm Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Mar 21^st, 2018 at 9:53pm: UnSubRocky wrote on Mar 21^st, 2018 at 5:31am: A rule to prevent obfuscation? The genetically imposed quasi-reliance on obfuscation is dependent on semi-variable incidences of potentially co-synchronised esoteric existentialist propensities.... I wouldn't knock it...
Back to top	AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY. IP Logged

Grappler Truth Teller Feller

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 80152
Proud pre-1850's NO Voter
Gender: male

Re: Rule Change
Reply #9 - Mar 21^st, 2018 at 9:55pm

You mean like this???

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 19^th, 2018 at 12:42pm:

How about a rule change to stop people adding words to another forum member's post?

I don't think that's appropriate..

You know, like this:

http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1521354815/11#11

Oh, hang on - there already is a rule to prevent that.

There are no rules in a knife fight.

Why did you do it then, Agnes - why did you break the rules?

Irreverent...

Was it another attempt to harass me?

Delusions of self-importance ..

I'm curious.

.. even though that killed the cat....

Back to top

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams

IP Logged

Grappler Truth Teller Feller

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 80152
Proud pre-1850's NO Voter
Gender: male

Re: Rule Change
Reply #10 - Mar 21^st, 2018 at 9:57pm

Jasin wrote on Mar 21^st, 2018 at 9:54pm:

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Mar 21^st, 2018 at 9:53pm:

UnSubRocky wrote on Mar 21^st, 2018 at 5:31am:

A rule to prevent obfuscation?

The genetically imposed quasi-reliance on obfuscation is dependent on semi-variable incidences of potentially co-synchronised esoteric existentialist propensities....

I wouldn't knock it...

Just obfuscating.... a little... I'm stirring as you know...

Back to top

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams

IP Logged

Jasin Gold Member Online Posts: 46380 Gender:	Re: Rule Change Reply #11 - Mar 21^st, 2018 at 10:00pm It's within the rules Graps ...I guess btw - why hasn't Agnes responded to her own Topic?
Back to top	AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY. IP Logged

Grappler Truth Teller Feller Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 80152 Proud pre-1850's NO Voter Gender:	Re: Rule Change Reply #12 - Mar 21^st, 2018 at 10:05pm Jasin wrote on Mar 21^st, 2018 at 10:00pm: It's within the rules Graps ...I guess btw - why hasn't Agnes responded to her own Topic? No idea... I'll ask here when she arrives with the breakfast on a tray.... and kneels to offer it... Nothing chauvinist about me... OOOOH! Not THAT Agnes.... sorry....
Back to top	“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.” ― John Adams IP Logged

SadKangaroo Gold Member Offline #FightStupid Posts: 14879 Mianjin (Brisbane)	Re: Rule Change Reply #13 - Mar 22^nd, 2018 at 9:26am I'm more concerned with the current rules being enforced rather than creating new rules to pacify one person.
Back to top	IP Logged

cods

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 88048

Re: Rule Change
Reply #14 - Mar 22^nd, 2018 at 9:35am

SadKangaroo wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2018 at 9:26am:

I'm more concerned with the current rules being enforced rather than creating new rules to pacify one person.

which ONE person is that sad?>...

I think you will find there is MORE than one person...

it doesnt bother you thats fine....do you post here as much as others???>>>

is it your posts that get struck out as if what you have said is complete rubbish......

because thats what it feels like!

how about I do it to your post..

why cant you just highlight the bit you reply too why the need to cross ,everything else out????would you reply to a letter like that???>>..seems to me rudeness has taken over the forum...in reality it would be called bad manners.....I find that really sad and doing no justice to those who do it... Roll Eyes

ok its my opinion but dont kid yourself I and agnes are the only ones.

Back to top

IP Logged

Poll
Question: Should the strikethrough rule be changed
Yes 13 (61.9%) No 8 (38.1%) Total votes: 21 « Created by: Redmond Neck on: Mar 24^th, 2018 at 2:27pm »