Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 8 9 10 
Send Topic Print
What is Atheism? (Read 50171 times)
Ayn Marx
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 2937
South of Australia
Gender: male
Re: What is Atheism?
Reply #135 - Sep 4th, 2021 at 7:48am
 
Frank wrote on Sep 3rd, 2021 at 6:29pm:
A Lutheran, a Christian Scientist, an evangelical  Christian and a Bahá’í walked into a bar… well,

Why not offer to put yourself forward as God’s spokesperson?
Back to top
 

The Human Race is Insane
 
IP Logged
 
John_Taverner
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 2212
Gender: male
Re: What is Atheism?
Reply #136 - Oct 14th, 2021 at 9:25am
 
Raven wrote on Jul 5th, 2020 at 3:06am:
Raven has said this in another thread but....

Atheism, in part, means doing what is right without the promise of eternal reward or the fear of divine retribution.


"Atheism" is silent on morality. I think you mean Humanism.
Back to top
 
72+Adelaide+Street  
IP Logged
 
Ayn Marx
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 2937
South of Australia
Gender: male
Re: What is Atheism?
Reply #137 - Oct 14th, 2021 at 10:05am
 
John_Taverner wrote on Oct 14th, 2021 at 9:25am:
Raven wrote on Jul 5th, 2020 at 3:06am:
Raven has said this in another thread but....

Atheism, in part, means doing what is right without the promise of eternal reward or the fear of divine retribution.


"Atheism" is silent on morality. I think you mean Humanism.


Atheism is more complex than most believe.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atheism
For me the bottom line is all concepts of God are equally meaningless. intance, how do we meaningfully define an entity which is infinate?
Back to top
 

The Human Race is Insane
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 51464
Gender: male
Re: What is Atheism?
Reply #138 - Oct 14th, 2021 at 11:12am
 
Ayn Marx wrote on Oct 14th, 2021 at 10:05am:
John_Taverner wrote on Oct 14th, 2021 at 9:25am:
Raven wrote on Jul 5th, 2020 at 3:06am:
Raven has said this in another thread but....

Atheism, in part, means doing what is right without the promise of eternal reward or the fear of divine retribution.


"Atheism" is silent on morality. I think you mean Humanism.


Atheism is more complex than most believe.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atheism
For me the bottom line is all concepts of God are equally meaningless. intance, how do we meaningfully define an entity which is infinate?



According to Spinoza, everything that exists is either a substance or a mode (E1a1). A substance is something that needs nothing else in order to exist or be conceived. Substances are independent entities both conceptually and ontologically (E1d3). A mode or property is something that needs a substance in order to exist, and cannot exist without a substance (E1d5). For example, being furry, orange, hungry, angry, etc. are modes that need a substance which is furry, orange, hungry, angry, etc. Hunger and patches of orange color cannot exist floating around on their own, but rather, hunger and patches of orange color need something (namely, a substance) to be hungry and have the orange color. Hunger and colors are, therefore, dependent entities or modes.

According to almost all of Spinoza’s predecessors (including Aristotle and Descartes) there are lots of substances in the universe, each with their own modes or properties. For example, according to Descartes a cat is a substance which has the modes or properties of being furry, orange, soft, etc. (Though some have argued that Descartes cannot actually individuate multiple extended substances. See Curley 1988, 15-19; 141-2 n. 9.) Spinoza, however, rejects this traditional view and argues instead that there is only one substance, called “God” or “Nature.” Cats, dogs, people, rocks, etc. are not substances in Spinoza’s view, but rather, cats, dogs, people, rocks, etc. are just modes or properties of one substance. This one substance is simply people-like in places, rock-like in other places, chair-like in still other places, etc.

One can think of substance as an infinite space. Some regions of this one space are hard and brown (rocks), other regions of space are green, juicy, and soft (plants), while still other regions are furry, orange, and soft (cats), etc. As a cat walks across the room all that happens in Spinoza’s view is that different regions of space become successively furry, orange, and soft (See Bennett 1984: 88-92 for more on space and the extended substance in Spinoza).

This one substance has an infinite number of attributes. An attribute is simply an essence; a “what it is to be” that kind of thing. According to Descartes, every substance has only one attribute: bodies have only the attribute of extension, and minds have only the attribute of thought. Spinoza, however, argues against this claim that the one substance is absolutely infinite and so it must exist in every way that something can exist. Thus, he infers that the one substance must have an infinite number of attributes (E1p9). An attribute, according to Spinoza, is just the essence of substance under some way of conceiving or describing the substance (E1d4). When we consider substance one way, then we conceive of its essence as extension. When we consider substance another way, then we conceive of its essence as thought. (See Della Rocca 1996a: 164-167.) While substance has an infinite number of different attributes, Spinoza argues that human beings only know about two of them: extension and thought.
Etc
Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Ayn Marx
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 2937
South of Australia
Gender: male
Re: What is Atheism?
Reply #139 - Oct 14th, 2021 at 12:32pm
 
Frank wrote on Oct 14th, 2021 at 11:12am:
Ayn Marx wrote on Oct 14th, 2021 at 10:05am:
John_Taverner wrote on Oct 14th, 2021 at 9:25am:
Raven wrote on Jul 5th, 2020 at 3:06am:
Raven has said this in another thread but....

Atheism, in part, means doing what is right without the promise of eternal reward or the fear of divine retribution.


"Atheism" is silent on morality. I think you mean Humanism.


Atheism is more complex than most believe.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atheism
For me the bottom line is all concepts of God are equally meaningless. instance, how do we meaningfully define an entity which is infinate?



According to Spinoza, everything that exists is either a substance or a mode (E1a1). A substance is something that needs nothing else in order to exist or be conceived. Substances are independent entities both conceptually and ontologically (E1d3). A mode or property is something that needs a substance in order to exist, and cannot exist without a substance (E1d5). For example, being furry, orange, hungry, angry, etc. are modes that need a substance which is furry, orange, hungry, angry, etc. Hunger and patches of orange color cannot exist floating around on their own, but rather, hunger and patches of orange color need something (namely, a substance) to be hungry and have the orange color. Hunger and colors are, therefore, dependent entities or modes.

According to almost all of Spinoza’s predecessors (including Aristotle and Descartes) there are lots of substances in the universe, each with their own modes or properties. For example, according to Descartes a cat is a substance which has the modes or properties of being furry, orange, soft, etc. (Though some have argued that Descartes cannot actually individuate multiple extended substances. See Curley 1988, 15-19; 141-2 n. 9.) Spinoza, however, rejects this traditional view and argues instead that there is only one substance, called “God” or “Nature.” Cats, dogs, people, rocks, etc. are not substances in Spinoza’s view, but rather, cats, dogs, people, rocks, etc. are just modes or properties of one substance. This one substance is simply people-like in places, rock-like in other places, chair-like in still other places, etc.

One can think of substance as an infinite space. Some regions of this one space are hard and brown (rocks), other regions of space are green, juicy, and soft (plants), while still other regions are furry, orange, and soft (cats), etc. As a cat walks across the room all that happens in Spinoza’s view is that different regions of space become successively furry, orange, and soft (See Bennett 1984: 88-92 for more on space and the extended substance in Spinoza).

This one substance has an infinite number of attributes. An attribute is simply an essence; a “what it is to be” that kind of thing. According to Descartes, every substance has only one attribute: bodies have only the attribute of extension, and minds have only the attribute of thought. Spinoza, however, argues against this claim that the one substance is absolutely infinite and so it must exist in every way that something can exist. Thus, he infers that the one substance must have an infinite number of attributes (E1p9). An attribute, according to Spinoza, is just the essence of substance under some way of conceiving or describing the substance (E1d4). When we consider substance one way, then we conceive of its essence as extension. When we consider substance another way, then we conceive of its essence as thought. (See Della Rocca 1996a: 164-167.) While substance has an infinite number of different attributes, Spinoza argues that human beings only know about two of them: extension and thought.
Etc

Putting aside for now Kant’s criticism of Spinoza in the interest of grounding this discussion in something resembling logic I’m puzzled as to what connection there is between my ‘  . . . all concepts of God are equally meaningless . . . ‘ and the above which reminds me of Ayn Rand’s pithy description of most western philosophy as “Overtossed word salad"
Back to top
 

The Human Race is Insane
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 51464
Gender: male
Re: What is Atheism?
Reply #140 - Oct 14th, 2021 at 12:44pm
 
You asked about the infinite. Spinoza explained it.

That Kant argued the limits of reason to be its qualities of dimension and causality is irrelevant to infinity. You can conceive infinity as Spinoza shows, whether dimension is outside of reason or is a built in furniture of it.

If a substance is not infinite then another substance is limiting it, which in turn is infinite or else similarly limited.

And so the legs of the elephants go ALL THE WAY DOWN, as the Hindus explain....
Back to top
« Last Edit: Oct 14th, 2021 at 8:49pm by Frank »  

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Ayn Marx
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 2937
South of Australia
Gender: male
Re: What is Atheism?
Reply #141 - Oct 14th, 2021 at 1:26pm
 
Frank wrote on Oct 14th, 2021 at 12:44pm:
You asked about the infinnfinite. Spinoza explained it.

That Kant argued the limits of reason to be its qualities of dimension and causality is irrelevant to infinity. You can conceive infinity as Spinoza shows, whether dimension is outside of reason or is a built in furniture of it.

If a substance is not infinite then another substance is limiting it, which in turn is infinite or else similarly limited.

And so the legs of the elephants go ALL THE WAY DOWN, as the Hindus explain....

Limiting? Care to define ‘limiting’ in that context?
I’m bored with overtossed word salad passing itself off as philosophy so depart this absurd dialogue you appear to believe has meaning.

Back to top
 

The Human Race is Insane
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 51464
Gender: male
Re: What is Atheism?
Reply #142 - Oct 14th, 2021 at 8:59pm
 
Ayn Marx wrote on Oct 14th, 2021 at 1:26pm:
Frank wrote on Oct 14th, 2021 at 12:44pm:
You asked about the infinnfinite. Spinoza explained it.

That Kant argued the limits of reason to be its qualities of dimension and causality is irrelevant to infinity. You can conceive infinity as Spinoza shows, whether dimension is outside of reason or is a built in furniture of it.

If a substance is not infinite then another substance is limiting it, which in turn is infinite or else similarly limited.

And so the legs of the elephants go ALL THE WAY DOWN, as the Hindus explain....

Limiting? Care to define ‘limiting’ in that context?
I’m bored with overtossed word salad passing itself off as philosophy so depart this absurd dialogue you appear to believe has meaning.


Infinite is something that has no limit. Anything that has limit is limited by something else.
What has no limit, ie is not limited by something else?
God, as Spinoza explained. God is the only substance that has nothing outside it to limit it.
What is god? Spinoza used 'nature' (in the sense of 'all that is') interchangeably with 'god'.
God has infinite attributes, which are of two kinds: things and ideas.


It is very interesting and very intelligent - so you may well pass, or else it will pass you. But Einstein, for example, thought that Spinoza came closest to philosophy being actually true.
Spinoza was formally excommunicated by the Jews of Amsterdam and was shuned by every organised Christian Church.
He was called both an atheist and one brimming with god.

There is more to him than what I sketched here but this is the start.

Oh - and he wasn't gay so he's no use for justifying yourself.

Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 50566
At my desk.
Re: What is Atheism?
Reply #143 - Dec 10th, 2023 at 4:55pm
 
This Topic was moved here from Atheism by freediver.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 8 9 10 
Send Topic Print