Brian Ross
|
Secret Wars wrote on Mar 1 st, 2018 at 3:55pm: Brian Ross wrote on Mar 1 st, 2018 at 3:45pm: Secret Wars wrote on Mar 1 st, 2018 at 3:42pm: Brian Ross wrote on Mar 1 st, 2018 at 3:38pm: moses wrote on Feb 28 th, 2018 at 10:01pm: The board liar wrote: Quote:They believe they were, Moses. Who am I tell them different? Who are you to tell them different? Do you tell them different? Well you see the task of expressing the criteria is taken out of the hands of man, the standards are set in stone, in the word of Christ. Just as the standards for a muslim are set in stone in the qur'an and teachings of muhammad. So today 2018 we have muslims who are following muhammad to the very letter regressing rapidly, being listed as the worlds' top 25 terrorist organizations. Christ was, the last time I checked The Bible's New Testament, a carpenter, not a stone mason, Moses. Further, for them to "set in stone", means you believed he carved them into stone. Where did that occur? Where are the stones where he carved these statements? As I don't believe that Christ existed, and that The Bible is largely a pack of lies, created by the Church(es), I think you are lying. You're telling porkie-pies. How typical of a Christian to lie. Tsk, tsk. You are a cretin Brian. http://rs279.pbsrc.com/albums/kk157/dyedinthewool/Smilies/Yawn.gif~c200Oh, dearie, dearie, me. Tsk, tsk. Using ad homimen debate? Off to the little kiddies' playground with you. Wouldn't you have to be a cretin to think that the expression set in stone refers to being carved in a rock by a stone mason? And for buggers sake, Google and learn what "ad homimen" (sic) means and it's appropriate usage, you are embarrassing yourself. I wouldn't normally pick on a typo but hey, you do against others so what's fair is fair. My apologies. My dyslexia is showing through again. I'll correct it in future. As he claimed that "Christ had set it into stone", who am I to dispute what has been claimed? He's the Christian, afterall. Tsk, tsk.
|