Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Poll closed Poll
Question: Please nominate yourself if you want to run this board
*** This poll has now closed ***


I want to run this board    
  0 (0%)
DO NOT USE    
  0 (0%)




Total votes: 0
« Created by: Nom de Plume on: Feb 19th, 2018 at 7:34am »

Pages: 1 2 3 4 
Send Topic Print
New mod required (Read 6436 times)
cods
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 88048
Re: New mod required
Reply #15 - Feb 27th, 2018 at 9:52pm
 
The_Barnacle wrote on Feb 25th, 2018 at 10:08am:
cods wrote on Feb 21st, 2018 at 3:29pm:
seriously isnt Atheism a form of religion anyway??



No Cods it isn't. It's the ABSENCE of religion
The clue is in the name



well yes   ...  who would have thought..

however what is it ANTI about?????.....if not religion...

which mean in my book you would need to mention the R word...no?..

unless it also means you dont like CHinese food..


maybe!
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
issuevoter
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 9200
The Great State of Mind
Gender: male
Re: New mod required
Reply #16 - Feb 28th, 2018 at 7:20am
 
cods wrote on Feb 27th, 2018 at 9:52pm:
The_Barnacle wrote on Feb 25th, 2018 at 10:08am:
cods wrote on Feb 21st, 2018 at 3:29pm:
seriously isnt Atheism a form of religion anyway??



No Cods it isn't. It's the ABSENCE of religion
The clue is in the name



well yes   ...  who would have thought..

however what is it ANTI about?????.....if not religion...

which mean in my book you would need to mention the R word...no?..

unless it also means you dont like CHinese food..


maybe!


Mentioning the R word does not make you a member of a religion, which is what you suggest. That is not logical, if that matters to you.
Back to top
 

No political allegiance. No philosophy. No religion.
 
IP Logged
 
cods
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 88048
Re: New mod required
Reply #17 - Feb 28th, 2018 at 8:09am
 
issuevoter wrote on Feb 28th, 2018 at 7:20am:
cods wrote on Feb 27th, 2018 at 9:52pm:
The_Barnacle wrote on Feb 25th, 2018 at 10:08am:
cods wrote on Feb 21st, 2018 at 3:29pm:
seriously isnt Atheism a form of religion anyway??



No Cods it isn't. It's the ABSENCE of religion
The clue is in the name



well yes   ...  who would have thought..

however what is it ANTI about?????.....if not religion...

which mean in my book you would need to mention the R word...no?..

unless it also means you dont like CHinese food..


maybe!


Mentioning the R word does not make you a member of a religion, which is what you suggest. That is not logical, if that matters to you.



since when did I say that??... I just suggested they could be in the same compartment   as they are on the same subject...
you either believe or you dont.. but it all interacts with religion...

how can you talk about atheism without mentioning religion??????..or books on religion  or wars on religion......

well I guess you can... tell me how?..

its go not a thing to do with belonging to anything     unless you call atheism a cult.. Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
cods
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 88048
Re: New mod required
Reply #18 - Feb 28th, 2018 at 8:09am
 
by the look of this no takers anyway   what does that say?>
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 94085
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: New mod required
Reply #19 - Feb 28th, 2018 at 8:14am
 
cods wrote on Feb 28th, 2018 at 8:09am:
by the look of this no takers anyway   what does that say?>


You take the job Cods.
Other sub-forum mods are not allowed to have more than one board to mod -
that's probably why this position is not filled.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
cods
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 88048
Re: New mod required
Reply #20 - Feb 28th, 2018 at 4:48pm
 
Bobby. wrote on Feb 28th, 2018 at 8:14am:
cods wrote on Feb 28th, 2018 at 8:09am:
by the look of this no takers anyway   what does that say?>


You take the job Cods.
Other sub-forum mods are not allowed to have more than one board to mod -
that's probably why this position is not filled.




who wants to talk about what ever Atheism is??????....

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Redmond Neck
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 20606
ACT
Gender: male
Re: New mod required
Reply #21 - Feb 28th, 2018 at 6:39pm
 
I dont believe one has to know anything about a subject to mod it.

For that matter you dont really have to read every post, people will complain if things get out of hand.

Back to top
 

BAN ALL THESE ABO SITES RECOGNITIONS.

ALL AUSTRALIA IS FOR ALL AUSTRALIANS!
 
IP Logged
 
cods
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 88048
Re: New mod required
Reply #22 - Feb 28th, 2018 at 9:46pm
 
Redmond Neck wrote on Feb 28th, 2018 at 6:39pm:
I dont believe one has to know anything about a subject to mod it.

For that matter you dont really have to read every post, people will complain if things get out of hand.




true   but you know what a busybody I am...

as it is how do we vote... vic tells us two people have nominated in the fringe.....

and thats it...!!!!!..

I dont even know if we can vote anymore.....

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Nom de Plume
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 671
Re: New mod required
Reply #23 - Mar 1st, 2018 at 11:13am
 
Bobby. wrote on Feb 28th, 2018 at 8:14am:
cods wrote on Feb 28th, 2018 at 8:09am:
by the look of this no takers anyway   what does that say?>


You take the job Cods.
Other sub-forum mods are not allowed to have more than one board to mod -
that's probably why this position is not filled.


No Bobby, look at the results, no one nominated, therefore, no one is interested in running the board.

The only reason Sappho wanted to start an Atheist sub-forum was to engage  the then current head of the Atheist Foundation of Australia. You see, Sappho was banned from that forum because she questioned why an Org. that claims to be without religion, should want to use laws protecting religious expression to get their message made public.

Now, her absence shows her lack of interest.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Aussie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 37678
Gender: male
Re: New mod required
Reply #24 - Mar 1st, 2018 at 1:51pm
 
I suspect no-one nominated because (a) you did not have the capacity to run the thing on any basis which FD would accept and (b) you have zero credibility.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Jasin
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 45543
Gender: male
Re: New mod required
Reply #25 - Mar 1st, 2018 at 9:11pm
 
Nom de Plume wrote on Mar 1st, 2018 at 11:13am:
Bobby. wrote on Feb 28th, 2018 at 8:14am:
cods wrote on Feb 28th, 2018 at 8:09am:
by the look of this no takers anyway   what does that say?>


You take the job Cods.
Other sub-forum mods are not allowed to have more than one board to mod -
that's probably why this position is not filled.


No Bobby, look at the results, no one nominated, therefore, no one is interested in running the board.

The only reason Sappho wanted to start an Atheist sub-forum was to engage  the then current head of the Atheist Foundation of Australia. You see, Sappho was banned from that forum because she questioned why an Org. that claims to be without religion, should want to use laws protecting religious expression to get their message made public.

Now, her absence shows her lack of interest.



Hmm. A severe case of deja-vu with that post.

Anyway - Atheism is just an ANTI expression that was foundered against Religion but 'unofficially' is very Pro-Science.

As for Science - well, look at what all of its wondrous inventions have done to the world.
Yep - just because you can do it, doesn't mean that you should!  Wink Just ask God.  Grin
Back to top
 

AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY.
 
IP Logged
 
Jasin
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 45543
Gender: male
Re: New mod required
Reply #26 - Mar 1st, 2018 at 9:45pm
 

Dear Atheist.

Did you know Religion was based on the innovation of 'Writing' and holds firmly on the concept of the 'Book' to justify its existence.
So, as an Atheist - do you accept the fact that you are on a Forum that is based on ...writing?

*******************88

In regards to Nom's Post: I think I met Sappho or whoever Sappho was on that 'Atheist' Forum - As I too was on that Forum and got 'jilted' off.
Small world.
Back to top
 

AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY.
 
IP Logged
 
The_Barnacle
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6205
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: New mod required
Reply #27 - Mar 3rd, 2018 at 12:10pm
 
Jasin wrote on Mar 1st, 2018 at 9:11pm:
Anyway - Atheism is just an ANTI expression that was foundered against Religion


That's a common myth spread by theists. By definition atheism is a disbelief or lack of belief in the existence of God or gods. Some people choose to be anti religious and some don't. Its up to the individual. There are no sets of rules.

Jasin wrote on Mar 1st, 2018 at 9:11pm:
As for Science - well, look at what all of its wondrous inventions have done to the world.
Yep - just because you can do it, doesn't mean that you should!  Wink Just ask God.  Grin


I can guarantee you that the number of lives that science has saved vastly out numbers the lives lost because of religion.

Jasin wrote on Mar 1st, 2018 at 9:45pm:
Did you know Religion was based on the innovation of 'Writing' and holds firmly on the concept of the 'Book' to justify its existence.
So, as an Atheist - do you accept the fact that you are on a Forum that is based on ...writing?


Thats a false dichotomy. Writing developed an many different cultures under many different religions and had no connection to the religions. Considering that most people were illiterate until quite modern times your claim has no basis.
Back to top
 

The Right Wing only believe in free speech when they agree with what is being said.
 
IP Logged
 
issuevoter
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 9200
The Great State of Mind
Gender: male
Re: New mod required
Reply #28 - Mar 3rd, 2018 at 12:54pm
 
Here is where a good moderator should ask contributors to focus on the subject properly. Religion does not mean a belief in gods. It may be common usage in societies trying to crawl out from under the stupidity of Abrahamism, but in objective discussion it only clouds the subject. Pedantic? No. The common usage is flat out wrong and misleading.
Back to top
 

No political allegiance. No philosophy. No religion.
 
IP Logged
 
Jasin
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 45543
Gender: male
Re: New mod required
Reply #29 - Mar 3rd, 2018 at 1:14pm
 
MYTHOLOGY is the belief in God/Gods.
Religion: the manifestation of Writing (or the 'official' bounded 'book' of writing) is the vessel of using Mythology to its own ends.

Atheism - in its true form, developed as an ANTI against Religion. The fact that it has developed to be finally 'pro' at something and that is on behalf of Science, Media all things that will eventually find a home in Oceania for want of the Middle-East ...shows that it believes in something.

Religion was the 'mechanism' that helped the world branch out. It has more of a truer connection to the New World regions of North America, South America & Sahul (Australia) than Science and its Media culture which, even from the USA, shows a blatant BIAS towards all things European, Asia & Africa (Old Worlds) ...hence why Media love Obama was more Pro-Asian groveller than Pro-USA like Trump.
Back to top
 

AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY.
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 
Send Topic Print