Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Feb 21
st, 2018 at 7:34am:
Something you add to your pickles to keep it in a jar?
A Greek waiter?
The length of time a con man serves in prison?
Same sex couples don't 'have' children - they inherit them or buy them.... how many of these lesbian couples are receiving payment from the fathers of the children - who are cut out of the loop? What's 'independent' and 'equal' about that? Two sheilas with kids could live without working and would certainly prosper far more than the former sperm donors.
Another 'unintended' consequence? No wonder there's a war on in this nation.
I actually disagree with that statement. A gay man can donate his sperm and 'have' a child through surrogacy, or in-vitro fertilisation. Same as a lesbian woman can donate her eggs to be fertilised or pass through surrogacy, thus they too can have children. This process is just frowned upon by some as an unnatural process or as not having a place in our society.
I pose this point to you......if a heterosexual couple are unable to conceive a child and have to go through surrogacy. Thus the father donates his sperm and passes it on to a surrogate mother. Does this then mean that they, as a heterosexual couple, cannot have children??? They are still conceiving a child that has some genetical material of their own, through an alternative method.
I am unsure of that happening within Australian society, I am sure it does however I have never read about. Have you got a news article or statistics on those happenings?
In that case their is nothing "equal" or "independent" regarding that. However that is not a justification to completely ban or go against same sex marriage. If a father in a heterosexual relationship leaves his wife alone with two children, it does not pose the question that heterosexual marriage should not continue to be allowed or demonised in any way.