I wonder what mosque they went to?

freediver wrote on Feb 16^th, 2018 at 7:42pm:


If I'm not mistaken that photo was taken from Watsons Bay.  Pricks.

Fkkn muslims and their ideology.
He won't be the last.


Good on the judge too. Speak up and be heard.

Quote:


Of course this CULT is on trial.
It is a brutal, barbaric, primitive, evil CULT the roots of which are in a self confessed paedophile, retarded nutcase sociopath.

This CULT must be eradicated

RightSaidFred wrote on Feb 17^th, 2018 at 6:19am:


Why did the judge refer to those verses at all?

Inb4 bwian "tsk tsk dearie me, he's just misunderstood" 

The response is always the same. His interpretation of the Koran was wrong. SBS is now touting a show about Muzlims where one of the faithful says its the individual that defines the religion, not the religion that defines the individual. So now we have a situation where these people think they can make it up as the they go along, and avoid association with the atrocities in the public perception.

Just how one remains a Muzlim without the Koran is anyone's guess, but if you were conned into believing that rubbish to begin with, you are going to look for self-esteem anyway you can get it.

Gordon wrote on Feb 16^th, 2018 at 7:45pm:


Looks like you've got a few over there.

How do we know they're not you-know-whos?

freediver wrote on Feb 17^th, 2018 at 7:23am:


I assume these guys might have god delusions but this one is just being ignorant. As a judge you need to set aside your personal views.

Bobby. wrote on Feb 17^th, 2018 at 6:49am:



Behead them and behead them high!

polite_gandalf wrote on Feb 19^th, 2018 at 6:59pm:

You can't  fathom???

Well, fathom this: you are simply not trusted, as a Muslim. Not you, not any other Muslim. You have zero credit in the trust department. You send girls, children, mentally retarded on suicide missions. You are sly, duplicitous, completely untrustworthy. 


Fathom that.

polite_gandalf wrote on Feb 19^th, 2018 at 6:59pm:



I would prefer muslims to stay away from the west and practice their religion in a muslim country. Yeah...that sounds like a great idea.
That way...when they get the "interpretation" wrong they get it wrong in a country that has islamic value at heart and understands, or should i say, keeps quiet and...doesnt really care.
Australia doesn't need islam. It has no positive effect on us at all. 

polite_gandalf wrote on Feb 19^th, 2018 at 6:59pm:


You error is in placing 'preaching and practicing' in the one choice, and then allowing only a vote on one or the other of extremes...

A fair choice would have included:-

c) preaching a peaceful, tolerant version of Islam but not practicing it?

d)  running around calling for infidels to be slaughtered, and actually slaughtering infidels, but practicing a theoretically peaceful, tolerant version of Islam?

We old guys can always smell 'spin' when someone tries to force feed it to us... don't piss down my back and tell me it's a warm tropical rain...

Captain Caveman wrote on Feb 16^th, 2018 at 8:32pm:


I most definitely believe a hard line approach is necessary, however guilty by association in this case does not apply. Otherwise we will say all those who are Catholic molest children, all fathers commit acts of domestic violence.  Blanket statements are absurd for systems of this size.

I don't agree with some of the teachings of Islam, however I also don't agree with Christian doctrine. However I respect anyone who interprets and perceives it in a just and right way, because they have the right to do so.

I would prefer muslims to stay away from the west and practice their religion in a muslim country. Yeah...that sounds like a great idea.
That way...when they get the "interpretation" wrong they get it wrong in a country that has islamic value at heart and understands, or should i say, keeps quiet and...doesnt really care.
Australia doesn't need islam. It has no positive effect on us at all.  [/quote]



I am unsure if you understand what is occurring in their "Muslim Country".
Wars, terror and constant pain and death. You may state its not our problem, however when we along with the United States induced intense warfare on these countries which became the catalyst to the asylum seeker pandemic. One we must attempt to solve. They have no viable option other than flee and escape, they are no different to all other humans. They will fight to survive and keep their families safe.

In relation to practising their religion. The Constitution contains an express right relating to practising your religion. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights UDHR contains this right. It is their basic right too, you remove these rights it ruins the system that is in place and additionally equality and equity.

To be honest with you Australia doesn't need a-lot of things....
1. Christianity but we are not ridding all Christians
2. Domestic Violence but we are not ridding all males
3. Drink Drivers but we are not removing all those who drive.

Frank wrote on Feb 19^th, 2018 at 7:15pm:


Wow how about that Frank - I personally strap bombs to retarded kids and make them blow themselves up. You got me.

Shouldn't you like, report me to the police or something?

Gandalf,

Do you agree that there is a difference between Islam and Islamism?

Islamism being the ideology of imposing Islam on a society.

polite_gandalf wrote on Feb 20^th, 2018 at 3:38pm:

Sorry, pal, I should have realised that you have assimilated to the lebbo way of speaking English and think 'youse'. You Muslims - youse Muslims. Geddit??

You are just like a KKK member who hasn't personally lynched anyone. But you remain a member despite the lynchings. Or members of the Communist Party after the various Soviet invasions of people who didn't want communism any more.  You are not handing in your membership card.

So 'you' - sorry, 'youse' - is correct.

polite_gandalf wrote on Feb 20^th, 2018 at 3:40pm:


It's got nothing to do with that.

I am sure there are plenty of other options he would prefer to the two you presented. You are basically trying to guilt trip people into accepting your delusions about Islam without question by insisting the only alternative is Islamic terrorism, and that such terrorism would be their fault for being honest about Islam.

Quote:


The world will only be a better place when muslims have the honesty to thoroughly investigate those parts of the qur'an which facilitate the preaching and practicing of violence and intolerance.

muslims are the worlds' top 25 listed terrorist organizations, because of these teachings.

The world will only be a better place when Christians have the honesty to thoroughly investigate those parts of the Bible  which facilitate the preaching and practicing of violence and intolerance.   

polite_gandalf wrote on Feb 23^rd, 2018 at 12:25pm:


I find both disturbing - just as I find your lies about the Quran just as disturbing as Abu's honesty about it. I honestly cannot pick which is worse.

Because islam is conducive to preaching violence and intolerance right here, right now, we have:

Australian National Security Listed terrorist organisations

Currently, 25 organisations are listed as terrorist organisations under the Criminal Code. They are:

•Abu Sayyaf Group (ASG)
Listed 14 November 2002, re-listed 5 November 2004, 3 November 2006, 1 November 2008, 29 October 2010, 12 July 2013 and 28 June 2016

•Al-Murabitun
Listed 5 November 2014, re-listed 2 November 2017

•Al-Qa'ida (AQ)
Listed 21 October 2002, re-listed 1 September 2004, 26 August 2006, 9 August 2008, 22 July 2010, 12 July 2013 and 28 June 2016

•Al-Qa'ida in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP)
Listed 26 November 2010, re-listed 26 November 2013 and 26 November 2016.

•Al-Qa’ida in the Indian Subcontinent (AQIS)
Listed 28 November 2016

•Al-Qa’ida in the Lands of the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM)
Listed 14 November 2002, re-listed 5 November 2004, 3 November 2006, 9 August 2008, 22 July 2010, 12 July 2013 and 28 June 2016

•Al-Shabaab
Listed 22 August 2009, re-listed 18 August 2012 and 11 August 2015

•Ansar al-Islam
Formerly known as Ansar al-Sunna—Listed 27 March 2003, re-listed 27 March 2005, 24 March 2007, 14 March 2009, 9 March 2012 and 3 March 2015

•Boko Haram
Listed 26 June 2014 and re-listed 27 June 2017.

•Hamas' Izz al-Din al-Qassam Brigades
Listed 9 November 2003, re-listed 5 June 2005, 7 October 2005, 8 September 2007, 8 September 2009, 18 August 2012 and 11 August 2015

•Hizballah's External Security Organisation (ESO)
Listed 5 June 2003, re-listed 5 June 2005, 25 May 2007, 16 May 2009, 12 May 2012 and 2 May 2015

•Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan
Listed 11 April 2003, re-listed 11 April 2005, 31 March 2007, 14 March 2009, 10 March 2012 and 3 March 2015

•Islamic State
Formerly listed as Al-Qa’ida in Iraq—2 March 2005, re-listed 17 Feb 2007, 1 Nov 2008, 29 Oct 2010, 12 July 2013. Formerly listed as Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant on 14 Dec 2013. Listed 11 July 2014 as Islamic State and re-listed 1 July 2017.

•Islamic State East Asia
Listed 8 September 2017

•Islamic State in Libya (IS-Libya)
Listed 28 November 2016

•Islamic State Khorasan Province
2 November 2017

•Islamic State Sinai Province (IS-Sinai)
Listed 28 November 2016.

•Jabhat al-Nusra
Listed 29 June 2013, re-listed 28 June 2016 and amended on 4 November 2016 to include alias Jabhat Fatah al-Sham.

•Jaish-e-Mohammed
Listed 11 April 2003, re-listed 11 April 2005, 31 March 2007, 14 March 2009, 10 March 2012 and 3 March 2015

•Jamiat ul-Ansar (JuA)
Formerly known as Harakat Ul-Mujahideen—Listed 14 November 2002, re-listed 5 November 2004, 3 November 2006, 1 November 2008, 29 October 2010, 12 July 2013 and 28 June 2016

•Jemaah Islamiyah (JI)
Listed 27 October 2002, re-listed 1 September 2004, 26 August 2006, 9 August 2008, 22 July 2010, 12 July 2013 and 28 June 2016

•Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK)
Listed 17 December 2005, re-listed 28 September 2007, 8 September 2009, 18 August 2012 and 11 August 2015

•Lashkar-e Jhangvi
Listed 11 April 2003, re-listed 11 April 2005, 31 March 2007, 14 March 2009, 10 March 2012 and 3 March 2015

•Lashkar-e-Tayyiba
Listed 9 November 2003, re-listed 5 June 2005, 7 October 2005, 8 September 2007, 8 September 2009, 18 August 2012 and 11 August 2015

•Palestinian Islamic Jihad
Listed 3 May 2004, re-listed 5 June 2005, 7 October 2005, 8 September 2007, 8 September 2009, 18 August 2012 and 11 August 2015

Sick leftards support these terrorists with their unremitting lies and excuses.

Mattyfisk wrote on Feb 24^th, 2018 at 2:14pm:

Well, he is a liar as are you and bwian the halfwit.

You are all on some agitprop binge.

Mattyfisk wrote on Feb 24^th, 2018 at 11:12pm:

I give you 10 rupee, Paki arse-sniffer, if you can prove that.

Calling out your lies and identifying your motives is not a sign of being offended by youl bilge. Disgusted, sure. Not offended.

But even if someone is offended, that's  perfectly OK, as long as they do not demand the right not to be offended. You pretend to be an incomprehending fool like Bwian, but you are only fools. You understand very well your own lies and distortions. You actually enjoy nothing more than deliberately misrepresenting what others say.

A lot like Cathy  Newman  interviewing Jordan  Petersen  on BBC4. She is like you, bwian, gweggy and the rest of you idiots. That clip has gone viral precisely because there are fools and arse-sniffers like you lot everywhere. You are a very well recognised type.

freediver wrote on Feb 23^rd, 2018 at 8:17pm:


Right, there we have it - a muslim preaching love and peace and tolerance is disturbing to FD. Glad we got that sorted.

Sorry FD, lets check shall we...

Q:
Quote:


FD answers:
freediver wrote on Feb 26^th, 2018 at 12:28pm:


Was there a hidden meaning there that I missed FD? Did you notice how the statement you are pretending is the answer (I find your lies about the Quran just as disturbing as Abu's honesty about it) came after "just as I find..." - meaning "in addition" - ie you may well find my lies and Abu's honest about the Quran disturbing - but it doesn't negate your "disturbance" about muslims preaching love and peace and tolerance?

Brian Ross wrote on Feb 23^rd, 2018 at 4:27pm:



That examination has been going on since at least the time of Abelard, and in earnest since the Reformation.  It is still going on and will never stop. There is no  "closing of the gate of ijtihad" as happened in the 16th century (when the Christian Reformation took off), you silly, ignorant, lying  fool.

Frank wrote on Feb 26^th, 2018 at 4:32pm:


Kurds?

freediver wrote on Feb 27^th, 2018 at 12:37pm:


Gandalf said that? Oh, FD, that's terrible. Here we have 800 Jews genocided by Moh as collective punishment for being Jews, no individuality whatsoever, so unfair.

And Gandalf makes out that this is what happens when you break a treaty? It's just some ancient war and nothing to worry about?

If you don't mind me saying, FD, that's wacist. It's clear evidence of the Muselman killing decent white people everywhere.

I see your point. Muslims need to stop preaching love and peace and tolerance immediately.

polite_gandalf wrote on Feb 27^th, 2018 at 1:46pm:


I was perfectly clear about what I meant the very first time Gandalf.

freediver wrote on Feb 27^th, 2018 at 8:40pm:


Would you mind saying it again?

Frank wrote on Feb 27^th, 2018 at 10:53pm:


Thanks, dear boy. One replied at 12.37.

Would you like to have a stab? Remember, no one has the right to not be offended.

It's simply unacceptable.

Why, old boy, one is referring to this:

Frank wrote on Feb 27^th, 2018 at 10:53pm:


One replied with this:

Mattyfisk wrote on Feb 27^th, 2018 at 12:58pm:


Bloody idiot, no?

No one has the right to not be offended - except you.

polite_gandalf wrote on Feb 28^th, 2018 at 8:57am:

Why do you delete the substance of a post (highlighted)  and then argue with the little bit you left in as if that was the argument? Are you gweggy and Bwian and Paki?