Firstly, I placed this thread in "Women's issues" because Wilkin
sin is a woman and she has issues.
Secondly, I'm not a hater of women, I'm a hater of unfairness. In that regard, I'm a hater of feminazis of which Wilkinson is one.
How do I come to that conclusion?
Well, every time I see her or read her viewpoint, I'm just waiting for the "downtrodden women" angle and how they never had the chance to die in the coalmines and be blown to bits during numerous wars.
Sure enough, her unbalanced inept viewpoint rears it's ugly head almost every time.
The latest of hers to tick me off:
Quote: On Sunday night’s episode of The Project, host Lisa Wilkinson reflected on Deputy Prime Minister
Barnaby Joyce’s affair with a former staffer, and stated that his “position is becoming untenable”.
In a piece to camera, the journalist asked a poignant question: “What if the genders were reversed?
What if a female Deputy PM who had risen to power on the often thunderous promotion of her family
values, was suddenly revealed to be having a secret affair, and was now pregnant to a staffer more
than 15 years her junior?”
The hypothetical scenario borders on laughable – because in no world would we afford that woman
privacy, let alone allow her to keep her job.
“What if we found,” she continued, “that staffer had been moved to a newly created, well paid,
tax payer funded position nearby, and if she had left her husband and four children to move in
with him?
“Would Malcolm Turnbull continue to say: ‘There’s nothing to see here?'”
But at the core of Wilkinson’s monologue was a point we mustn’t forget: There is one protagonist
in this story. Not two. Certainly not six. But one.
And that protagonist is Barnaby Joyce himself.
Really, this is merely the old schoolgirl rhetoric of (enter whiny voice) "Why are girls who bang around called sluts and the boys are called studs?"
Do you really need the differences between men and women explained to you?
I'm not defending Joyce by any means, however, most voters would not be so dismissive of the situation if the roles were reversed because they accept that there are differences between men and women.
Of course anybody can bring up 100's of instances where society would see differently if the roles
were reversed in regards to men vs. women... Child custody, as one glaring example.
Are the feminazis after an androgynous society or one where women can rule without question?
Both will have (and are having) dire consequences for our society as a whole.