I think they should change the way they review LBW decisions with the DRS?
Quote:The Umpire Decision Review System (abbreviated as UDRS or DRS) is a technology-based system used in the sport of cricket. The system was first introduced in Test cricket, for the sole purpose of reviewing controversial decisions made by the on-field umpires as to whether or not a batsman had been dismissed
We have this farcical situation were the third umpire reviews a decision that takes forever when the decision is obvious.
LBW - The umpire first determines if it is a no ball, then if the batsman has edged the ball onto his pad. This process can take several minutes in some cases which includes hot spot and snicko.
Then the umpire goes to ball tracking and the ball is clearly pitching well outside leg (Not out).
What if the umpire used ball tracking first to see if the ball did not pitch outside leg stump, hit the batsman in line with the stumps and would have hit the stumps or missed.
If all three line up then determine if there was an edge onto the pad.
This would save a lot of time and frustration from spectators who can clearly see what the decision is but the umpire takes eternity to signal the obvious.