Australian Politics Forum - Judge 'unreasonable'

Grendel Gold Member Offline OzPolitic Posts: 28080 Gender:	Re: Judge 'unreasonable' Reply #15 - Feb 11^th, 2018 at 5:30pm Mattyfisk wrote on Feb 11^th, 2018 at 1:05pm: She's not a witness, dear, she's there to support her husband. The judge is making a point. And not an unreasonable one
Back to top	IP Logged

Mattyfisk

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 92377
Gender: male

Re: Judge 'unreasonable'
Reply #16 - Feb 11^th, 2018 at 8:18pm

Grendel wrote on Feb 11^th, 2018 at 5:30pm:

Mattyfisk wrote on Feb 11^th, 2018 at 1:05pm:

She's not a witness, dear, she's there to support her husband. The judge is making a point.

And not an unreasonable one

That the Muselman shall be refused his or her choice of attire?

Strangely, not even FD or the old boy will publicly admit to backing that one. Freeedom, you see.

Back to top

IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 40659
Gender: male

Re: Judge 'unreasonable'
Reply #17 - Feb 11^th, 2018 at 8:22pm

Mattyfisk wrote on Feb 11^th, 2018 at 8:18pm:

Grendel wrote on Feb 11^th, 2018 at 5:30pm:

Mattyfisk wrote on Feb 11^th, 2018 at 1:05pm:

She's not a witness, dear, she's there to support her husband. The judge is making a point.

And not an unreasonable one

That the Muselman shall be refused his or her choice of attire?

Strangely, not even FD or the old boy will publicly admit to backing that one. Freeedom, you see.

You are lying as usual.

No ten rupee for you, Paki.

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

Mattyfisk

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 92377
Gender: male

Re: Judge 'unreasonable'
Reply #18 - Feb 11^th, 2018 at 8:28pm

Frank wrote on Feb 11^th, 2018 at 8:22pm:

Mattyfisk wrote on Feb 11^th, 2018 at 8:18pm:

Grendel wrote on Feb 11^th, 2018 at 5:30pm:

Mattyfisk wrote on Feb 11^th, 2018 at 1:05pm:

She's not a witness, dear, she's there to support her husband. The judge is making a point.

And not an unreasonable one

That the Muselman shall be refused his or her choice of attire?

Strangely, not even FD or the old boy will publicly admit to backing that one. Freeedom, you see.

You are lying as usual.

No ten rupee for you, Paki.

No no, old boy, you don't believe in banning the burqa, you believe in ripping it off ladies who pass one by.

Not you, of course - others. You know, those jolly, kind-hearted people you hold so dear to. The civilised, Western, ethical set.

People like Grendel.

Back to top

IP Logged

Mattyfisk

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 92377
Gender: male

Re: Judge 'unreasonable'
Reply #19 - Feb 11^th, 2018 at 8:29pm

Frank wrote on Feb 11^th, 2018 at 8:22pm:

Mattyfisk wrote on Feb 11^th, 2018 at 8:18pm:

Grendel wrote on Feb 11^th, 2018 at 5:30pm:

Mattyfisk wrote on Feb 11^th, 2018 at 1:05pm:

She's not a witness, dear, she's there to support her husband. The judge is making a point.

And not an unreasonable one

That the Muselman shall be refused his or her choice of attire?

Strangely, not even FD or the old boy will publicly admit to backing that one. Freeedom, you see.

You are lying as usual.

No ten rupee for you, Paki.

We don't want your stinking Indian rupees anyway. What are we supposed to do with them?

Back to top

IP Logged

freediver

Gold Member

Online

www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 47470
At my desk.

Re: Judge 'unreasonable'
Reply #20 - Feb 11^th, 2018 at 8:57pm

Frank wrote on Feb 11^th, 2018 at 8:22pm:

Mattyfisk wrote on Feb 11^th, 2018 at 8:18pm:

Grendel wrote on Feb 11^th, 2018 at 5:30pm:

Mattyfisk wrote on Feb 11^th, 2018 at 1:05pm:

She's not a witness, dear, she's there to support her husband. The judge is making a point.

And not an unreasonable one

That the Muselman shall be refused his or her choice of attire?

Strangely, not even FD or the old boy will publicly admit to backing that one. Freeedom, you see.

You are lying as usual.

No ten rupee for you, Paki.

I'm with the judge on this one. Face coverings should be banned in court.

Back to top

I identify as Mail because all I do is SendIT!

IP Logged

Mattyfisk

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 92377
Gender: male

Re: Judge 'unreasonable'
Reply #21 - Feb 11^th, 2018 at 9:05pm

freediver wrote on Feb 11^th, 2018 at 8:57pm:

Frank wrote on Feb 11^th, 2018 at 8:22pm:

Mattyfisk wrote on Feb 11^th, 2018 at 8:18pm:

Grendel wrote on Feb 11^th, 2018 at 5:30pm:

Mattyfisk wrote on Feb 11^th, 2018 at 1:05pm:

She's not a witness, dear, she's there to support her husband. The judge is making a point.

And not an unreasonable one

That the Muselman shall be refused his or her choice of attire?

Strangely, not even FD or the old boy will publicly admit to backing that one. Freeedom, you see.

You are lying as usual.

No ten rupee for you, Paki.

I'm with the judge on this one. Face coverings should be banned in court.

Yes, but why can't they just be ripped off the woman's face as the old boy suggests? This would be a win-win for everybody.

Back to top

IP Logged

Grendel Gold Member Offline OzPolitic Posts: 28080 Gender:	Re: Judge 'unreasonable' Reply #22 - Feb 11^th, 2018 at 9:49pm Got nothing again karnal clown... best you keep your fingers away from the keyboard then eh
Back to top	IP Logged

polite_gandalf

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 20023
Canberra
Gender: male

Re: Judge 'unreasonable'
Reply #23 - Feb 19^th, 2018 at 3:49pm

freediver wrote on Feb 11^th, 2018 at 8:57pm:

Frank wrote on Feb 11^th, 2018 at 8:22pm:

Mattyfisk wrote on Feb 11^th, 2018 at 8:18pm:

Grendel wrote on Feb 11^th, 2018 at 5:30pm:

Mattyfisk wrote on Feb 11^th, 2018 at 1:05pm:

She's not a witness, dear, she's there to support her husband. The judge is making a point.

And not an unreasonable one

That the Muselman shall be refused his or her choice of attire?

Strangely, not even FD or the old boy will publicly admit to backing that one. Freeedom, you see.

You are lying as usual.

No ten rupee for you, Paki.

I'm with the judge on this one. Face coverings should be banned in court.

Why in a court? And why for someone merely sitting in the audience? What possible reason would the judge (or you for that matter) give for disallowing this? Are you in favour of dictating to women what they can and can't wear in any other setting?

Back to top

A resident Islam critic who claims to represent western values said:
Quote:

Outlawing the enemy's uniform - hijab, islamic beard - is not depriving one's own people of their freedoms.

IP Logged

cods

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 88048

Re: Judge 'unreasonable'
Reply #24 - Feb 19^th, 2018 at 4:21pm

polite_gandalf wrote on Feb 19^th, 2018 at 3:49pm:

freediver wrote on Feb 11^th, 2018 at 8:57pm:

Frank wrote on Feb 11^th, 2018 at 8:22pm:

Mattyfisk wrote on Feb 11^th, 2018 at 8:18pm:

Grendel wrote on Feb 11^th, 2018 at 5:30pm:

Mattyfisk wrote on Feb 11^th, 2018 at 1:05pm:

She's not a witness, dear, she's there to support her husband. The judge is making a point.

And not an unreasonable one

That the Muselman shall be refused his or her choice of attire?

Strangely, not even FD or the old boy will publicly admit to backing that one. Freeedom, you see.

You are lying as usual.

No ten rupee for you, Paki.

I'm with the judge on this one. Face coverings should be banned in court.

Why in a court? And why for someone merely sitting in the audience? What possible reason would the judge (or you for that matter) give for disallowing this? Are you in favour of dictating to women what they can and can't wear in any other setting?

how would you know it is a women gandalf???>...

I dont know about you maybe you dont mind a women covered from head to toe sitting at your dinner table...

all I know is its foreign to myself... and I would not allow it in my home.....the same with a nudist....do what you wish behind your own doors... but in my home.....and yes I consider the COURT on the same level as my home.....no it isnt on.. it is not part of our culture..

do not like our culture do not come here...

its not hard!

Back to top

IP Logged

Mattyfisk

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 92377
Gender: male

Re: Judge 'unreasonable'
Reply #25 - Feb 19^th, 2018 at 5:09pm

polite_gandalf wrote on Feb 19^th, 2018 at 3:49pm:

freediver wrote on Feb 11^th, 2018 at 8:57pm:

Frank wrote on Feb 11^th, 2018 at 8:22pm:

Mattyfisk wrote on Feb 11^th, 2018 at 8:18pm:

Grendel wrote on Feb 11^th, 2018 at 5:30pm:

Mattyfisk wrote on Feb 11^th, 2018 at 1:05pm:

She's not a witness, dear, she's there to support her husband. The judge is making a point.

And not an unreasonable one

That the Muselman shall be refused his or her choice of attire?

Strangely, not even FD or the old boy will publicly admit to backing that one. Freeedom, you see.

You are lying as usual.

No ten rupee for you, Paki.

I'm with the judge on this one. Face coverings should be banned in court.

Why in a court? And why for someone merely sitting in the audience? What possible reason would the judge (or you for that matter) give for disallowing this? Are you in favour of dictating to women what they can and can't wear in any other setting?

But of course. FD, you see, believes in Freeeeeedom (TM).

Back to top

IP Logged

Mattyfisk

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 92377
Gender: male

Re: Judge 'unreasonable'
Reply #26 - Feb 19^th, 2018 at 5:10pm

cods wrote on Feb 19^th, 2018 at 4:21pm:

polite_gandalf wrote on Feb 19^th, 2018 at 3:49pm:

freediver wrote on Feb 11^th, 2018 at 8:57pm:

Frank wrote on Feb 11^th, 2018 at 8:22pm:

Mattyfisk wrote on Feb 11^th, 2018 at 8:18pm:

Grendel wrote on Feb 11^th, 2018 at 5:30pm:

Mattyfisk wrote on Feb 11^th, 2018 at 1:05pm:

She's not a witness, dear, she's there to support her husband. The judge is making a point.

And not an unreasonable one

That the Muselman shall be refused his or her choice of attire?

Strangely, not even FD or the old boy will publicly admit to backing that one. Freeedom, you see.

You are lying as usual.

No ten rupee for you, Paki.

I'm with the judge on this one. Face coverings should be banned in court.

Why in a court? And why for someone merely sitting in the audience? What possible reason would the judge (or you for that matter) give for disallowing this? Are you in favour of dictating to women what they can and can't wear in any other setting?

how would you know it is a women gandalf???>...

Excuse I, dear, are you saying trannies should not be allowed in a court?

Please explain.

Back to top

IP Logged

polite_gandalf

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 20023
Canberra
Gender: male

Re: Judge 'unreasonable'
Reply #27 - Feb 19^th, 2018 at 5:56pm

cods wrote on Feb 19^th, 2018 at 4:21pm:

how would you know it is a women gandalf???>...

And why does it matter? What if a cross-dresser came in?

If she is to be a witness, then that is a completely different matter, but sitting in the audience? If they are worried about security, the woman herself is prepared to have identity/security check with a female security person.

Back to top

A resident Islam critic who claims to represent western values said:
Quote:

Outlawing the enemy's uniform - hijab, islamic beard - is not depriving one's own people of their freedoms.

IP Logged

Mr Hammer Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 25212 Gender:	Re: Judge 'unreasonable' Reply #28 - Feb 19^th, 2018 at 6:16pm Don't Muslims have to follow the law of the land Gandalf?
Back to top	IP Logged

polite_gandalf

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 20023
Canberra
Gender: male

Re: Judge 'unreasonable'
Reply #29 - Feb 19^th, 2018 at 6:37pm

Mr Hammer wrote on Feb 19^th, 2018 at 6:16pm:

Don't Muslims have to follow the law of the land Gandalf?

She did homo - she dutifully sat outside the courtroom as instructed.

And of course all muslims have a right - even duty to debate the law of the land, you know, as civic minded citizens of a democracy. Like for example, saying that such a "law" (if it can be called that) is complete pants.

Back to top

A resident Islam critic who claims to represent western values said:
Quote:

Outlawing the enemy's uniform - hijab, islamic beard - is not depriving one's own people of their freedoms.

IP Logged