Australian Politics Forum - Real British Aboriginals had dark skin, curly hair

Prime Minister for Canyons Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 26906 Canberra Gender:	Re: Real British Aboriginals had dark skin, curly hair Reply #30 - Feb 8^th, 2018 at 1:23pm Another example would be breast cancer. Everyone has the breast cancer gene (its a normal gene slowing down cell division), but only some people have the mutation that sows the genes action down
Back to top	In a time of universal deceit — telling the truth is a revolutionary act. No evidence whatsoever it can be attributed to George Orwell or Eric Arthur Blair (in fact the same guy) IP Logged

Mr Hammer

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 25212
Gender: male

Re: Real British Aboriginals had dark skin, curly hair
Reply #31 - Feb 8^th, 2018 at 1:25pm

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Feb 8^th, 2018 at 1:21pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Feb 8^th, 2018 at 1:16pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Feb 8^th, 2018 at 1:15pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Feb 8^th, 2018 at 1:14pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Feb 8^th, 2018 at 1:12pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Feb 8^th, 2018 at 1:11pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Feb 8^th, 2018 at 1:00pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Feb 8^th, 2018 at 12:57pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Feb 8^th, 2018 at 12:43pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Feb 8^th, 2018 at 12:41pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Feb 8^th, 2018 at 12:27pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Feb 8^th, 2018 at 12:24pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Feb 8^th, 2018 at 12:19pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Feb 8^th, 2018 at 12:17pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 8^th, 2018 at 12:14pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Feb 8^th, 2018 at 12:00pm:

How can you tell the skin and hair type from a skeleton muppet?

Drill into the skull and extract DNA from bone powder, I guess.

So you can get hair type and skin colour from the powder from a 10,000 year old skeleton??? Grin

What a load of leftist inspired rubbish. When CNN was mentioned it lost my interest.

You can get an idea of it yes. Thats what genetics is about.

Skin colour is a response to UV. It has nothing to do with genetics.

Partially correct, the mutations in DNA occurred as a result of favouring darker skin in higher UV areas when we lost our body hair.

SO yes its a response to UV, but the genetic determinants are there

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Melanin#Evolutionary_origins

If it was only to do with UV, people would rangee from Negro to albino in this country year round

So being black is genetic then?

In terms of melanin production, its genetic.

So black people and white people have different genes concerning skin colour?

Different alleles.

Thanks for clearing that up. people have been arguing me for years on that subject.

What do you mean.

so white people have a variant of a common gene between white and black people. So they have different genes?

No its the same gene, just variants of it. IN exactly the same way eye colour or hair colour is different.

but it differs?

It won't be the whole gene thats different, it might just be one base out of 10,000 in the entire code.

Or in some cases its not even the gene thats different.

IN people with blue eyes theres a mutation in a protein ligase gene that shuts off one of the eye colour genes that produces blue eyes.

So you are saying the difference is minimal. Most genetic differences are minimal. One little difference can lead to cancer. There aren't major differences in genes. Otherwise we'd get blob creatures.

Back to top

IP Logged

Prime Minister for Canyons

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 26906
Canberra
Gender: male

Re: Real British Aboriginals had dark skin, curly hair
Reply #32 - Feb 8^th, 2018 at 1:26pm

Mr Hammer wrote on Feb 8^th, 2018 at 1:25pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Feb 8^th, 2018 at 1:21pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Feb 8^th, 2018 at 1:16pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Feb 8^th, 2018 at 1:15pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Feb 8^th, 2018 at 1:14pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Feb 8^th, 2018 at 1:12pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Feb 8^th, 2018 at 1:11pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Feb 8^th, 2018 at 1:00pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Feb 8^th, 2018 at 12:57pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Feb 8^th, 2018 at 12:43pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Feb 8^th, 2018 at 12:41pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Feb 8^th, 2018 at 12:27pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Feb 8^th, 2018 at 12:24pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Feb 8^th, 2018 at 12:19pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Feb 8^th, 2018 at 12:17pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 8^th, 2018 at 12:14pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Feb 8^th, 2018 at 12:00pm:

How can you tell the skin and hair type from a skeleton muppet?

Drill into the skull and extract DNA from bone powder, I guess.

So you can get hair type and skin colour from the powder from a 10,000 year old skeleton??? Grin

What a load of leftist inspired rubbish. When CNN was mentioned it lost my interest.

You can get an idea of it yes. Thats what genetics is about.

Skin colour is a response to UV. It has nothing to do with genetics.

Partially correct, the mutations in DNA occurred as a result of favouring darker skin in higher UV areas when we lost our body hair.

SO yes its a response to UV, but the genetic determinants are there

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Melanin#Evolutionary_origins

If it was only to do with UV, people would rangee from Negro to albino in this country year round

So being black is genetic then?

In terms of melanin production, its genetic.

So black people and white people have different genes concerning skin colour?

Different alleles.

Thanks for clearing that up. people have been arguing me for years on that subject.

What do you mean.

so white people have a variant of a common gene between white and black people. So they have different genes?

No its the same gene, just variants of it. IN exactly the same way eye colour or hair colour is different.

but it differs?

It won't be the whole gene thats different, it might just be one base out of 10,000 in the entire code.

Or in some cases its not even the gene thats different.

IN people with blue eyes theres a mutation in a protein ligase gene that shuts off one of the eye colour genes that produces blue eyes.

So you are saying the difference is minimal. Most genetic differences are minimal. One little difference can lead to cancer. There aren't major differences in genes. Otherwise we'd get blob creatures.

Geneticists prefer to use the term variation.

Back to top

In a time of universal deceit — telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

No evidence whatsoever it can be attributed to George Orwell or Eric Arthur Blair (in fact the same guy)

IP Logged

Mr Hammer

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 25212
Gender: male

Re: Real British Aboriginals had dark skin, curly hair
Reply #33 - Feb 8^th, 2018 at 1:28pm

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Feb 8^th, 2018 at 1:26pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Feb 8^th, 2018 at 1:25pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Feb 8^th, 2018 at 1:21pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Feb 8^th, 2018 at 1:16pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Feb 8^th, 2018 at 1:15pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Feb 8^th, 2018 at 1:14pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Feb 8^th, 2018 at 1:12pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Feb 8^th, 2018 at 1:11pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Feb 8^th, 2018 at 1:00pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Feb 8^th, 2018 at 12:57pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Feb 8^th, 2018 at 12:43pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Feb 8^th, 2018 at 12:41pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Feb 8^th, 2018 at 12:27pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Feb 8^th, 2018 at 12:24pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Feb 8^th, 2018 at 12:19pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Feb 8^th, 2018 at 12:17pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 8^th, 2018 at 12:14pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Feb 8^th, 2018 at 12:00pm:

How can you tell the skin and hair type from a skeleton muppet?

Drill into the skull and extract DNA from bone powder, I guess.

So you can get hair type and skin colour from the powder from a 10,000 year old skeleton??? Grin

What a load of leftist inspired rubbish. When CNN was mentioned it lost my interest.

You can get an idea of it yes. Thats what genetics is about.

Skin colour is a response to UV. It has nothing to do with genetics.

Partially correct, the mutations in DNA occurred as a result of favouring darker skin in higher UV areas when we lost our body hair.

SO yes its a response to UV, but the genetic determinants are there

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Melanin#Evolutionary_origins

If it was only to do with UV, people would rangee from Negro to albino in this country year round

So being black is genetic then?

In terms of melanin production, its genetic.

So black people and white people have different genes concerning skin colour?

Different alleles.

Thanks for clearing that up. people have been arguing me for years on that subject.

What do you mean.

so white people have a variant of a common gene between white and black people. So they have different genes?

No its the same gene, just variants of it. IN exactly the same way eye colour or hair colour is different.

but it differs?

It won't be the whole gene thats different, it might just be one base out of 10,000 in the entire code.

Or in some cases its not even the gene thats different.

IN people with blue eyes theres a mutation in a protein ligase gene that shuts off one of the eye colour genes that produces blue eyes.

So you are saying the difference is minimal. Most genetic differences are minimal. One little difference can lead to cancer. There aren't major differences in genes. Otherwise we'd get blob creatures.

Geneticists prefer to use the term variation.

I thought about it and what you are saying is very true. White people have been living in Africa for 300 years and are still white while black people have been living in North America for 300 years and are still black. It must be a strong gene built up over many thousands of years.

Back to top

IP Logged

Prime Minister for Canyons

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 26906
Canberra
Gender: male

Re: Real British Aboriginals had dark skin, curly hair
Reply #34 - Feb 8^th, 2018 at 1:29pm

Mr Hammer wrote on Feb 8^th, 2018 at 1:28pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Feb 8^th, 2018 at 1:26pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Feb 8^th, 2018 at 1:25pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Feb 8^th, 2018 at 1:21pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Feb 8^th, 2018 at 1:16pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Feb 8^th, 2018 at 1:15pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Feb 8^th, 2018 at 1:14pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Feb 8^th, 2018 at 1:12pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Feb 8^th, 2018 at 1:11pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Feb 8^th, 2018 at 1:00pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Feb 8^th, 2018 at 12:57pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Feb 8^th, 2018 at 12:43pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Feb 8^th, 2018 at 12:41pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Feb 8^th, 2018 at 12:27pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Feb 8^th, 2018 at 12:24pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Feb 8^th, 2018 at 12:19pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Feb 8^th, 2018 at 12:17pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 8^th, 2018 at 12:14pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Feb 8^th, 2018 at 12:00pm:

How can you tell the skin and hair type from a skeleton muppet?

Drill into the skull and extract DNA from bone powder, I guess.

So you can get hair type and skin colour from the powder from a 10,000 year old skeleton??? Grin

What a load of leftist inspired rubbish. When CNN was mentioned it lost my interest.

You can get an idea of it yes. Thats what genetics is about.

Skin colour is a response to UV. It has nothing to do with genetics.

Partially correct, the mutations in DNA occurred as a result of favouring darker skin in higher UV areas when we lost our body hair.

SO yes its a response to UV, but the genetic determinants are there

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Melanin#Evolutionary_origins

If it was only to do with UV, people would rangee from Negro to albino in this country year round

So being black is genetic then?

In terms of melanin production, its genetic.

So black people and white people have different genes concerning skin colour?

Different alleles.

Thanks for clearing that up. people have been arguing me for years on that subject.

What do you mean.

so white people have a variant of a common gene between white and black people. So they have different genes?

No its the same gene, just variants of it. IN exactly the same way eye colour or hair colour is different.

but it differs?

It won't be the whole gene thats different, it might just be one base out of 10,000 in the entire code.

Or in some cases its not even the gene thats different.

IN people with blue eyes theres a mutation in a protein ligase gene that shuts off one of the eye colour genes that produces blue eyes.

So you are saying the difference is minimal. Most genetic differences are minimal. One little difference can lead to cancer. There aren't major differences in genes. Otherwise we'd get blob creatures.

Geneticists prefer to use the term variation.

I thought about it and what you are saying is very true. White people have been living in Africa for 300 years and are still white while black people have been living in North America for 300 years and are still black. It must be a strong gene built up over many thousands of years.

Plus as well theres no evolutionary pressure to get rid of it.

Back to top

In a time of universal deceit — telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

No evidence whatsoever it can be attributed to George Orwell or Eric Arthur Blair (in fact the same guy)

IP Logged

Mr Hammer

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 25212
Gender: male

Re: Real British Aboriginals had dark skin, curly hair
Reply #35 - Feb 8^th, 2018 at 1:31pm

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Feb 8^th, 2018 at 1:29pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Feb 8^th, 2018 at 1:28pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Feb 8^th, 2018 at 1:26pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Feb 8^th, 2018 at 1:25pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Feb 8^th, 2018 at 1:21pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Feb 8^th, 2018 at 1:16pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Feb 8^th, 2018 at 1:15pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Feb 8^th, 2018 at 1:14pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Feb 8^th, 2018 at 1:12pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Feb 8^th, 2018 at 1:11pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Feb 8^th, 2018 at 1:00pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Feb 8^th, 2018 at 12:57pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Feb 8^th, 2018 at 12:43pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Feb 8^th, 2018 at 12:41pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Feb 8^th, 2018 at 12:27pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Feb 8^th, 2018 at 12:24pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Feb 8^th, 2018 at 12:19pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Feb 8^th, 2018 at 12:17pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 8^th, 2018 at 12:14pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Feb 8^th, 2018 at 12:00pm:

How can you tell the skin and hair type from a skeleton muppet?

Drill into the skull and extract DNA from bone powder, I guess.

So you can get hair type and skin colour from the powder from a 10,000 year old skeleton??? Grin

What a load of leftist inspired rubbish. When CNN was mentioned it lost my interest.

You can get an idea of it yes. Thats what genetics is about.

Skin colour is a response to UV. It has nothing to do with genetics.

Partially correct, the mutations in DNA occurred as a result of favouring darker skin in higher UV areas when we lost our body hair.

SO yes its a response to UV, but the genetic determinants are there

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Melanin#Evolutionary_origins

If it was only to do with UV, people would rangee from Negro to albino in this country year round

So being black is genetic then?

In terms of melanin production, its genetic.

So black people and white people have different genes concerning skin colour?

Different alleles.

Thanks for clearing that up. people have been arguing me for years on that subject.

What do you mean.

so white people have a variant of a common gene between white and black people. So they have different genes?

No its the same gene, just variants of it. IN exactly the same way eye colour or hair colour is different.

but it differs?

It won't be the whole gene thats different, it might just be one base out of 10,000 in the entire code.

Or in some cases its not even the gene thats different.

IN people with blue eyes theres a mutation in a protein ligase gene that shuts off one of the eye colour genes that produces blue eyes.

So you are saying the difference is minimal. Most genetic differences are minimal. One little difference can lead to cancer. There aren't major differences in genes. Otherwise we'd get blob creatures.

Geneticists prefer to use the term variation.

I thought about it and what you are saying is very true. White people have been living in Africa for 300 years and are still white while black people have been living in North America for 300 years and are still black. It must be a strong gene built up over many thousands of years.

Plus as well theres no evolutionary pressure to get rid of it.

You'd think that the pressure from high or low uv would have left it's mark by now. The eskimos have been in the artic for about 8,000 years and they are still brown?

Back to top

IP Logged

Prime Minister for Canyons

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 26906
Canberra
Gender: male

Re: Real British Aboriginals had dark skin, curly hair
Reply #36 - Feb 8^th, 2018 at 1:32pm

Mr Hammer wrote on Feb 8^th, 2018 at 1:31pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Feb 8^th, 2018 at 1:29pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Feb 8^th, 2018 at 1:28pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Feb 8^th, 2018 at 1:26pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Feb 8^th, 2018 at 1:25pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Feb 8^th, 2018 at 1:21pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Feb 8^th, 2018 at 1:16pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Feb 8^th, 2018 at 1:15pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Feb 8^th, 2018 at 1:14pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Feb 8^th, 2018 at 1:12pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Feb 8^th, 2018 at 1:11pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Feb 8^th, 2018 at 1:00pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Feb 8^th, 2018 at 12:57pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Feb 8^th, 2018 at 12:43pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Feb 8^th, 2018 at 12:41pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Feb 8^th, 2018 at 12:27pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Feb 8^th, 2018 at 12:24pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Feb 8^th, 2018 at 12:19pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Feb 8^th, 2018 at 12:17pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 8^th, 2018 at 12:14pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Feb 8^th, 2018 at 12:00pm:

How can you tell the skin and hair type from a skeleton muppet?

Drill into the skull and extract DNA from bone powder, I guess.

So you can get hair type and skin colour from the powder from a 10,000 year old skeleton??? Grin

What a load of leftist inspired rubbish. When CNN was mentioned it lost my interest.

You can get an idea of it yes. Thats what genetics is about.

Skin colour is a response to UV. It has nothing to do with genetics.

Partially correct, the mutations in DNA occurred as a result of favouring darker skin in higher UV areas when we lost our body hair.

SO yes its a response to UV, but the genetic determinants are there

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Melanin#Evolutionary_origins

If it was only to do with UV, people would rangee from Negro to albino in this country year round

So being black is genetic then?

In terms of melanin production, its genetic.

So black people and white people have different genes concerning skin colour?

Different alleles.

Thanks for clearing that up. people have been arguing me for years on that subject.

What do you mean.

so white people have a variant of a common gene between white and black people. So they have different genes?

No its the same gene, just variants of it. IN exactly the same way eye colour or hair colour is different.

but it differs?

It won't be the whole gene thats different, it might just be one base out of 10,000 in the entire code.

Or in some cases its not even the gene thats different.

IN people with blue eyes theres a mutation in a protein ligase gene that shuts off one of the eye colour genes that produces blue eyes.

So you are saying the difference is minimal. Most genetic differences are minimal. One little difference can lead to cancer. There aren't major differences in genes. Otherwise we'd get blob creatures.

Geneticists prefer to use the term variation.

I thought about it and what you are saying is very true. White people have been living in Africa for 300 years and are still white while black people have been living in North America for 300 years and are still black. It must be a strong gene built up over many thousands of years.

Plus as well theres no evolutionary pressure to get rid of it.

You'd think that the pressure from high or low uv would have left it's mark by now. The eskimos have been in the artic for about 8,000 years and they are still brown?

But thats an excellent example, whats the advantage to an eskimo thats not as brown.

Back to top

In a time of universal deceit — telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

No evidence whatsoever it can be attributed to George Orwell or Eric Arthur Blair (in fact the same guy)

IP Logged

Mr Hammer Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 25212 Gender:	Re: Real British Aboriginals had dark skin, curly hair Reply #37 - Feb 8^th, 2018 at 1:40pm Being brown helps you absorb heat and vitamin d. But pale skin is a reaction to less vitamin so in 50,000 years eskimos will probably turn white due to low vitamin d. It a chemical reaction that isn't controllable.
Back to top	IP Logged

Prime Minister for Canyons

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 26906
Canberra
Gender: male

Re: Real British Aboriginals had dark skin, curly hair
Reply #38 - Feb 8^th, 2018 at 1:42pm

Mr Hammer wrote on Feb 8^th, 2018 at 1:40pm:

Being brown helps you absorb heat and vitamin d. But pale skin is a reaction to less vitamin so in 50,000 years eskimos will probably turn white due to low vitamin d. It a chemical reaction that isn't controllable.

IN actual fact in regards to Vit D they've found the opposite.

Back to top

In a time of universal deceit — telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

No evidence whatsoever it can be attributed to George Orwell or Eric Arthur Blair (in fact the same guy)

IP Logged

Mr Hammer

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 25212
Gender: male

Re: Real British Aboriginals had dark skin, curly hair
Reply #39 - Feb 8^th, 2018 at 1:48pm

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Feb 8^th, 2018 at 1:42pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Feb 8^th, 2018 at 1:40pm:

Being brown helps you absorb heat and vitamin d. But pale skin is a reaction to less vitamin so in 50,000 years eskimos will probably turn white due to low vitamin d. It a chemical reaction that isn't controllable.

IN actual fact in regards to Vit D they've found the opposite.

I believe the eskimo haven't been up north long enough to turn white. It's happened to most other people who live with low uv. Maybe Europe and north America have different levels of uv ?

Back to top

IP Logged

Prime Minister for Canyons

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 26906
Canberra
Gender: male

Re: Real British Aboriginals had dark skin, curly hair
Reply #40 - Feb 8^th, 2018 at 1:50pm

Mr Hammer wrote on Feb 8^th, 2018 at 1:48pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Feb 8^th, 2018 at 1:42pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Feb 8^th, 2018 at 1:40pm:

Being brown helps you absorb heat and vitamin d. But pale skin is a reaction to less vitamin so in 50,000 years eskimos will probably turn white due to low vitamin d. It a chemical reaction that isn't controllable.

IN actual fact in regards to Vit D they've found the opposite.

I believe the eskimo haven't been up north long enough to turn white. It's happened to most other people who live with low uv. Maybe Europe and north America have different levels of uv ?

Perhaps, I believe light skin though is due to mutations in several different genes.

Back to top

In a time of universal deceit — telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

No evidence whatsoever it can be attributed to George Orwell or Eric Arthur Blair (in fact the same guy)

IP Logged

Redmond Neck Gold Member Offline OzPolitic Posts: 20720 ACT Gender:	Re: Real British Aboriginals had dark skin, curly hair Reply #41 - Feb 8^th, 2018 at 1:52pm For god sake no one tell Herb he is decendant from a coon golliwog!
Back to top	BAN ALL THESE ABO SITES RECOGNITIONS. ALL AUSTRALIA IS FOR ALL AUSTRALIANS! IP Logged

miketrees Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 6488 Gender:	Re: Real British Aboriginals had dark skin, curly hair Reply #42 - Feb 8^th, 2018 at 8:07pm For god sake no one tell Herb he is decendant from a coon golliwog! Oh no no he must be told
Back to top	IP Logged

UnSubRocky Gold Member Offline Australian Legend Posts: 21743 Rockhampton, Q Gender:	Re: Real British Aboriginals had dark skin, curly hair Reply #43 - Feb 8^th, 2018 at 8:23pm Nothing surprising about the early Brits having black people there. Perhaps Britain needed a team to send to the early Olympics and had to recruit internationally.
Back to top	IP Logged

Setanta

Gold Member

Offline

\/ Peace man!

Posts: 15928
Northern NSW
Gender: male

Re: Real British Aboriginals had dark skin, curly hair
Reply #44 - Feb 8^th, 2018 at 9:38pm

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Feb 8^th, 2018 at 1:21pm:

IN people with blue eyes theres a mutation in a protein ligase gene that shuts off one of the eye colour genes that produces blue eyes.

The blue eye gene has been remarkably successful for a recessive gene, appeared around 10,000 years ago in one individual, I believe.

Back to top

IP Logged