Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 ... 27
Send Topic Print
Victorian judge bans niquab in court (Read 20858 times)
Johnnie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 12485
Gender: male
Re: Victorian judge bans niquab in court
Reply #30 - Feb 8th, 2018 at 12:59pm
 
This could and should set a precedent for every court of law in this land, no ifs no buts just bugger off with your sacks worn over your heads, in fact just bugger off.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Sprintcyclist
Gold Member
*****
Online


OzPolitic

Posts: 39436
Gender: male
Re: Victorian judge bans niquab in court
Reply #31 - Feb 8th, 2018 at 1:15pm
 
Baronvonrort wrote on Feb 8th, 2018 at 9:27am:
Alinta wrote on Feb 8th, 2018 at 9:10am:
Victorian Supreme Court judge sensationally bans burqas in his court
REBEKAH CAVANAGH, Herald Sun
February 7, 2018 8:45pm
Subscriber only
A VICTORIAN Supreme Court judge has sensationally banned burqas in his court.

Justice Christopher Beale stopped the niqab-wearing wife of an accused terrorist from entering his courtroom this week, saying all in his court must show their faces.

“I require anybody who comes into the court — and all are welcome — but anybody who comes into the court, for their face to be uncovered,” Justice Beale said.

The woman refused to remove her traditional garb, and sat outside.

The Herald Sun ­understands it is the first known case of a burqa ban in a Victorian court.

Premier Daniel Andrews said this morning that move showed judges and magistrates had sufficient powers to run their courts and changes flagged by the State Opposition were unnecessary.

“The decision made by that particular judge would seem to demonstrate that point,’’ he said.

“There is no need to be making further changes ... judges and magistrates have all the powers they need to run their court processes.

“I think this was done in a respectful way and as I understand it the person actually removed the item of clothing and that was seen by the court as important.”

However, Islamic leaders slammed the decision as “unreasonable” and a violation of the woman’s human rights.

The controversial Islamic veil has long troubled courts, where the dress code does not even allow people to wear sunglasses perched on their heads.


The Victorian Supreme Court dress code advises people to “dress appropriately”, adding “no hats or sunglasses”.
The Supreme Court dress code, set out on its website, advises people to “dress appropriately”, adding “no hats or sunglasses”.

But a court spokesman said judges were able to decide who entered their courts.

The woman concerned is the wife of an accused terrorist, who cannot be named for legal reasons. She did not want to remove her niqab, but instead agreed to leave the courtroom; however, she is expected to attend further hearings, which may lead to further problems.

Islamic Council of Victoria vice-president Adel Salman said: “This woman’s human rights have been violated. I think the judge’s decision is unreasonable and concerning.

“Women choose to wear it. It’s part of their faithfulness to God. To ask them to remove it is quite intrusive and, in some cases, can be traumatic.”


Islamic Council of Victoria vice-president Adel Salman says the woman’s human rights have been violated. Picture: Mark Wilson
During the man’s appearances in the Melbourne Magistrates’ Court last year his supporters, including women wearing burqas, snubbed court protocols and refused to stand when the magistrate entered the courtroom.

The state Opposition last year proposed the introduction of laws to jail or fine women wearing the burqa or niqab who refused to show their faces in court.

Opposition Leader Matthew Guy stood by that policy on Wednesday, saying it would ­ensure that disrespect shown towards judges was punished.

“If you don’t respect the court, you don’t respect the law,” Mr Guy said.

Attorney-General Martin Pakula said the Coalition’s proposal was unnecessary.


The Islamic council of Victoria claim her human rights have been violated, they should be more concerned about muslims on terror charges.



islam is a death cult
Back to top
 

Modern Classic Right Wing
 
IP Logged
 
Grappler Truth Teller Feller
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 79591
Proud pre-1850's NO Voter
Gender: male
Re: Victorian judge bans niquab in court
Reply #32 - Feb 8th, 2018 at 2:32pm
 
Gordon wrote on Feb 8th, 2018 at 12:46pm:
Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Feb 8th, 2018 at 12:16pm:
Terminate Muslim Immigration NOW!  No means NO!!


Who the bloody hell thought this was a good edition to Australia?
http://www.islammonitor.org/uploads/pics/benbrika.jpg


I'd better grow a beard or he might get lustful thoughts.........
Back to top
 

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams
 
IP Logged
 
Grappler Truth Teller Feller
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 79591
Proud pre-1850's NO Voter
Gender: male
Re: Victorian judge bans niquab in court
Reply #33 - Feb 8th, 2018 at 2:39pm
 
**sighs** another strand on the subject of Musselonians bites the slow button at General Command HQ .....

"I thought for a minute there I saw her whipped. Maybe I did. But I see now that it don't make any difference.... To beat her you don't have to whip her two out of three or three out of five, but every time you meet. As soon as you let down your guard, as soon as you lose once, she's won for good. And eventually we all got to lose. Nobody can help that."

One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest
Chief Bromden, on Nurse Ratched, as patients see McMurphy dominating the meeting, Part 1.
Back to top
 

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 94199
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Victorian judge bans niquab in court
Reply #34 - Feb 8th, 2018 at 3:59pm
 
Mr Hammer wrote on Feb 8th, 2018 at 9:47am:
Well done judge. We show our faces in court. Drop dead apologists.



You wouldn't be allowed to wear a motorcycle helmet in court
so this is not surprising.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
BigOl64
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 14438
Townsville QLD
Gender: male
Re: Victorian judge bans niquab in court
Reply #35 - Feb 8th, 2018 at 4:16pm
 
Bobby. wrote on Feb 8th, 2018 at 3:59pm:
Mr Hammer wrote on Feb 8th, 2018 at 9:47am:
Well done judge. We show our faces in court. Drop dead apologists.



You wouldn't be allowed to wear a motorcycle helmet in court
so this is not surprising.



Well it is considering being labelled an islamophobe is something all grub socialists are absolutely terrified of.

To exercise the law instead of being a gutless apologist for terrorists and their wives is pretty unusual indeed.


Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Gordon
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20202
Gordon
Gender: male
Re: Victorian judge bans niquab in court
Reply #36 - Feb 8th, 2018 at 4:19pm
 
Stoopid retarded muzzos.

Back to top
 

IBI
 
IP Logged
 
Aussie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 37678
Gender: male
Re: Victorian judge bans niquab in court
Reply #37 - Feb 8th, 2018 at 4:20pm
 
Judge is being a prima donna.  The woman could not have accessed the Court Building without being scanned for weapons like we all are.  That woman was no security risk, so what was his point?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Valkie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 16088
Central Coast
Gender: male
Re: Victorian judge bans niquab in court
Reply #38 - Feb 8th, 2018 at 6:46pm
 
Funny
The APOLOGIST, sympathiser,  sychopant islamaphiles go ape when we enforce our countries rules and laws.

And yet in sandmonkeyland (love that term) we are expected to abide by their primitive laws and rules.

Do you sand monkey lovers (love it) realize the hypocrisy in that argument.

We must bow down to the sand monkeys🤣 in their land
And yet
The sand monkeys🤣 don't need to abide by our laws.

Please explain?

I seriously want to know how you justify this stand
Back to top
 

I HAVE A DREAM
A WONDERFUL, PEACEFUL, BEAUTIFUL DREAM.
A DREAM OF A WORLD THAT HAS NEVER KNOWN ISLAM
A DREAM OF A WORLD FREE FROM THE HORRORS OF ISLAM.

SUCH A WONDERFUL DREAM
O HOW I WISH IT WERE TRU
 
IP Logged
 
Aussie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 37678
Gender: male
Re: Victorian judge bans niquab in court
Reply #39 - Feb 8th, 2018 at 6:51pm
 
Valkie wrote on Feb 8th, 2018 at 6:46pm:
Funny
The APOLOGIST, sympathiser,  sychopant islamaphiles go ape when we enforce our countries rules and laws.

And yet in sandmonkeyland (love that term) we are expected to abide by their primitive laws and rules.

Do you sand monkey lovers (love it) realize the hypocrisy in that argument.

We must bow down to the sand monkeys🤣 in their land
And yet
The sand monkeys🤣 don't need to abide by our laws.

Please explain?

I seriously want to know how you justify this stand


What Laws are you referring to?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 94199
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Victorian judge bans niquab in court
Reply #40 - Feb 8th, 2018 at 7:19pm
 
Aussie wrote on Feb 8th, 2018 at 6:51pm:
Valkie wrote on Feb 8th, 2018 at 6:46pm:
Funny
The APOLOGIST, sympathiser,  sychopant islamaphiles go ape when we enforce our countries rules and laws.

And yet in sandmonkeyland (love that term) we are expected to abide by their primitive laws and rules.

Do you sand monkey lovers (love it) realize the hypocrisy in that argument.

We must bow down to the sand monkeys🤣 in their land
And yet
The sand monkeys🤣 don't need to abide by our laws.

Please explain?

I seriously want to know how you justify this stand


What Laws are you referring to?



The law that:

thou shall follow the directions of a judge in his court.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Aussie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 37678
Gender: male
Re: Victorian judge bans niquab in court
Reply #41 - Feb 8th, 2018 at 7:28pm
 
Bobby. wrote on Feb 8th, 2018 at 7:19pm:
Aussie wrote on Feb 8th, 2018 at 6:51pm:
Valkie wrote on Feb 8th, 2018 at 6:46pm:
Funny
The APOLOGIST, sympathiser,  sychopant islamaphiles go ape when we enforce our countries rules and laws.

And yet in sandmonkeyland (love that term) we are expected to abide by their primitive laws and rules.

Do you sand monkey lovers (love it) realize the hypocrisy in that argument.

We must bow down to the sand monkeys🤣 in their land
And yet
The sand monkeys🤣 don't need to abide by our laws.

Please explain?

I seriously want to know how you justify this stand


What Laws are you referring to?



The law that:

thou shall follow the directions of a judge in his court.


So, if the Judge tells you to take your pants  and underpants off, you'd do it?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 94199
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Victorian judge bans niquab in court
Reply #42 - Feb 8th, 2018 at 7:29pm
 
Aussie wrote on Feb 8th, 2018 at 7:28pm:
Bobby. wrote on Feb 8th, 2018 at 7:19pm:
Aussie wrote on Feb 8th, 2018 at 6:51pm:
Valkie wrote on Feb 8th, 2018 at 6:46pm:
Funny
The APOLOGIST, sympathiser,  sychopant islamaphiles go ape when we enforce our countries rules and laws.

And yet in sandmonkeyland (love that term) we are expected to abide by their primitive laws and rules.

Do you sand monkey lovers (love it) realize the hypocrisy in that argument.

We must bow down to the sand monkeys🤣 in their land
And yet
The sand monkeys🤣 don't need to abide by our laws.

Please explain?

I seriously want to know how you justify this stand


What Laws are you referring to?



The law that:

thou shall follow the directions of a judge in his court.


So, if the Judge tells you to take your pants  and underpants off, you'd do it?



Reasonable directions Aussie -
strawman arguments don't work on one such as me.
Don't take such ungranted liberties in future.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Aussie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 37678
Gender: male
Re: Victorian judge bans niquab in court
Reply #43 - Feb 8th, 2018 at 7:31pm
 
How about if he tells you to take your shirt off?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 94199
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Victorian judge bans niquab in court
Reply #44 - Feb 8th, 2018 at 7:40pm
 
Aussie wrote on Feb 8th, 2018 at 7:31pm:
How about if he tells you to take your shirt off?



If it was claimed that an attacker had a giant tattoo of a skull and cross bones on their chest
then it would be acceptable to take ones shirt off to prove that it wasn't you.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 ... 27
Send Topic Print