The_Barnacle wrote on Nov 28
th, 2019 at 3:38pm:
You try and discredit scientists at BOM and NASA by using your own completely inaccurate calculations
So far you haven't pointed to any "inaccuracies".
I used the available ice core "data" from the various papers. I used the latest ECS from the IPCC.
The_Barnacle wrote on Nov 28
th, 2019 at 3:38pm:
You don't understand how Glaciers work, you continuously show your lack of understanding of the Carbon Cycle and you expect a vastly higher standard of proof from others than you do yourself.
I understand how glaciers work. It snows or rains, it partially melts (if snow) and freezes to form ice. These rivers of ice then gradually go down slope.
If it doesn't snow or precipitate enough glaciers retreat. If the snow or rain increases then the glaciers advance.
You haven't got back to us to explain why old Roman mines have been uncovered from retreating glaciers.
What lack of understanding petal? You really must explain yourself better.
We are all carbon based life forms. Therefore we are part of the carbon cycle. Even animals.
I don't expect any standard of proof from you because you can't do the maths. You therefore have to rely on your favourite prophet.
Which one I wonder?
James Hansen who famously said that the oceans could boil away?
Michael E Mann who famously made a hockeystick by grafting thermometer records onto his one tree mometer.
John Cook who famously gave us the 97%, despite what the calculations actually said. He of the SKS website.
The_Barnacle wrote on Nov 28
th, 2019 at 3:38pm:
It's no wonder that your posts are a complete farce
It is a wonder that you can't do the science. But for you that is par for the course.