Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 17 18 19 20 21 ... 25
Send Topic Print
trees rocks talk donkeys fly (Read 46635 times)
Mattyfisk
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 92346
Gender: male
Re: trees rocks talk donkeys fly
Reply #270 - Jan 12th, 2018 at 9:17am
 
Setanta wrote on Jan 11th, 2018 at 11:37pm:
Mattyfisk wrote on Jan 11th, 2018 at 11:17pm:
Setanta wrote on Jan 11th, 2018 at 11:07pm:
Auggie wrote on Jan 11th, 2018 at 10:34pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Jan 11th, 2018 at 7:02pm:
Zionists detonated bombs in Israel.  They blew up the King David Hotel, which the British were using for ther HQ.   Ninety-one people of various nationalities were killed and 46 injured.  They also detonated bombs in Italy, Austria and London, during their violent campaign to try and force the British to give them independence. This is a list of Irgun attacksRoll Eyes


And once they got their Zionist state they stopped. Islamists won’t stop until the whole world is Islam. Huge difference, don’t you think?


Although it does show the disadvantage of having religiously motivated people in the world.


Most Zionists weren't even religious. Most Zionists are atheists.


How could the land god gave them be theirs if they were atheist and there is no god? Were they just using religion or religious texts to get what they want? See my problem with religion here?


No, they were using their history in the region to get a country. A number of peoples in the Middle East were displaced - Armenians, Kurds, Assyrians. They've all had their struggles.

Zionism goes back to the 19th century. While they had factions, it was largely a European political movement.

The Torah isn't just a religious text, it's a history of the Jewish people.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
polite_gandalf
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20023
Canberra
Gender: male
Re: trees rocks talk donkeys fly
Reply #271 - Jan 12th, 2018 at 9:27am
 
Laying claim to a piece of land based on a claimed several thousand year heritage isn't necessarily a religious thing. Evidently this is the justification FD has adopted.

Where zionists and orthodox jews (who also claim the land of Palestine) differ is in the belief that God himself promised the land to the jews.
Back to top
 

A resident Islam critic who claims to represent western values said:
Quote:
Outlawing the enemy's uniform - hijab, islamic beard - is not depriving one's own people of their freedoms.
 
IP Logged
 
Mattyfisk
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 92346
Gender: male
Re: trees rocks talk donkeys fly
Reply #272 - Jan 12th, 2018 at 9:41am
 
polite_gandalf wrote on Jan 12th, 2018 at 9:27am:
Laying claim to a piece of land based on a claimed several thousand year heritage isn't necessarily a religious thing. Evidently this is the justification FD has adopted.

Where zionists and orthodox jews (who also claim the land of Palestine) differ is in the belief that God himself promised the land to the jews.


And it's the Orthodox Jews causing all the problems these days - claiming Jerusalem, Golan Heights, etc. They're backed by the US Bible Belt, who say they're quite happy to bring on Armageddon because they think they'll get to heaven quicker.

Secular Jews are much more cautious. They know that moving the Israeli capital to Jerusalem would bring them no end of problems. Right now, it seems, the US just doesn't care.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Online


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 47443
At my desk.
Re: trees rocks talk donkeys fly
Reply #273 - Jan 12th, 2018 at 12:11pm
 
polite_gandalf wrote on Jan 12th, 2018 at 9:16am:
freediver wrote on Jan 11th, 2018 at 9:33pm:
So the Quran never actually says that war should be restricted to self defence, except in the verse you choose not to quote?


I chose to quote lots of verses to support that very claim FD, you just pretended I didn't quote anything of relevance.  Like this:

Quote:
Permission [to fight] has been given to those who are being fought, because they were wronged. And indeed, Allah is competent to give them victory.
(22:39)

and...

Quote:
Fight them until there is no more persecution, and worship is devoted to God. If they cease hostilities, there can be no [further] hostility, except towards aggressors.
(2:193)

Again, reeeeeally slowly...

If they cease hostilities, there can be no [further] hostility, except towards aggressors.



Please do tell me what the sinister hidden subtext there is FD

But don't just take my word for it. That the Quran permits war *ONLY* in self defense is a unanimous interpretation amongst scholars. From the article:

Quote:
According to classical jurist Ibn Taymiyyah (d. 1328), jihād is a response to military aggression and not merely religious difference. There is no evidence in the source texts of Islam that permit Muslims to attack or kill civilians or invade non-hostile nations. He asserts that this was the view of the majority of Muslim scholars:

As for the oppressor who does not fight, then there are no texts in which God commands him to be fought. Rather, the unbelievers are only fought on the condition that they wage war, as is practiced by the majority of scholars and as is evident in the Book and Sunnah.


and Ibn Al-Qayam:

Quote:
Fighting is only necessary to confront war and not to confront unbelief. For this reason, women and children are not killed, neither are the elderly, the blind, or monks who do not participate in fighting. Rather, we only fight those who wage war against us. This was the way of the Messenger of God, peace and blessings be upon him, with the people of the earth. He would fight those who declared war on him until they accepted his religion, or they proposed a peace treaty, or they came under his control by paying tribute.




So a verse instructing Muslims to fight people until they convert to Islam is actually a just war doctrine of self defence?
Back to top
 

I identify as Mail because all I do is SendIT!
WWW  
IP Logged
 
polite_gandalf
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20023
Canberra
Gender: male
Re: trees rocks talk donkeys fly
Reply #274 - Jan 12th, 2018 at 1:55pm
 
A verse instructing muslims to fight aggressors who continue to wage war against muslims until they stop waging war or convert is a just war doctrine of self defense - yes:

Quote:
As for the oppressor who does not fight, then there are no texts in which God commands him to be fought. Rather, the unbelievers are only fought on the condition that they wage war, as is practiced by the majority of scholars and as is evident in the Book and Sunnah.


and...

Quote:
Fighting is only necessary to confront war and not to confront unbelief. For this reason, women and children are not killed, neither are the elderly, the blind, or monks who do not participate in fighting. Rather, we only fight those who wage war against us.
Back to top
 

A resident Islam critic who claims to represent western values said:
Quote:
Outlawing the enemy's uniform - hijab, islamic beard - is not depriving one's own people of their freedoms.
 
IP Logged
 
Auggie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


The Bull Moose

Posts: 8571
Re: trees rocks talk donkeys fly
Reply #275 - Jan 12th, 2018 at 2:12pm
 
polite_gandalf wrote on Jan 11th, 2018 at 7:29pm:
Zionists sabotaged their own refugee ship killing 267 civilians:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patria_disaster


Totally unacceptable but not comparable to islamism.
Back to top
 

The Progressive President
 
IP Logged
 
Auggie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


The Bull Moose

Posts: 8571
Re: trees rocks talk donkeys fly
Reply #276 - Jan 12th, 2018 at 2:24pm
 
polite_gandalf wrote on Jan 12th, 2018 at 1:55pm:
A verse instructing muslims to fight aggressors who continue to wage war against muslims until they stop waging war or convert is a just war doctrine of self defense - yes:

Quote:
As for the oppressor who does not fight, then there are no texts in which God commands him to be fought. Rather, the unbelievers are only fought on the condition that they wage war, as is practiced by the majority of scholars and as is evident in the Book and Sunnah.


and...

Quote:
Fighting is only necessary to confront war and not to confront unbelief. For this reason, women and children are not killed, neither are the elderly, the blind, or monks who do not participate in fighting. Rather, we only fight those who wage war against us.


So, an example of preemptive warfare: Mohammad ensured that there would be no threat from anyone else.

But as I’ve said before: not exactly self-defence.
Back to top
 

The Progressive President
 
IP Logged
 
moses
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6353
Re: trees rocks talk donkeys fly
Reply #277 - Jan 12th, 2018 at 4:00pm
 
bloody Jews and the land their god gave them, that's the problem?

then again islam says:
Quote:
Al-Anfal 8:41:
And know that whatever of war-booty that you may gain, verily one-fifth (1/5th) of it is assigned to Allâh, and to the Messenger, and to the near relatives [of the Messenger (Muhammad SAW)], (and also) the orphans, Al-Masâkin (the poor) and the wayfarer, if you have believed in Allâh and in that which We sent down to Our slave (Muhammad SAW) on the Day of criterion (between right and wrong), the Day when the two forces met (the battle of Badr) - And Allâh is Able to do all things.

Al-Ahzab 33:27:
And He caused you to inherit their lands, and their houses, and their riches, and a land which you had not trodden (before). And Allâh is Able to do all things.


Both clearly sanction plundering. You can't get booty if you stay at home peacefully, you have to be the aggressor and invade to collect your spoils of war, plus inherit their lands, and their houses, and their riches, in the land you have not trodden before

So is it fair to say: bloody muslims and their lands they invaded because allah told to, is the problem?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Brian Ross
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Representative of me

Posts: 39572
Re: trees rocks talk donkeys fly
Reply #278 - Jan 12th, 2018 at 4:15pm
 
Frank wrote on Jan 12th, 2018 at 7:40am:
Brian Ross wrote on Jan 11th, 2018 at 11:53pm:
Auggie wrote on Jan 11th, 2018 at 10:34pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Jan 11th, 2018 at 7:02pm:
Zionists detonated bombs in Israel.  They blew up the King David Hotel, which the British were using for ther HQ.   Ninety-one people of various nationalities were killed and 46 injured.  They also detonated bombs in Italy, Austria and London, during their violent campaign to try and force the British to give them independence. This is a list of Irgun attacksRoll Eyes


And once they got their Zionist state they stopped. Islamists won’t stop until the whole world is Islam. Huge difference, don’t you think?


In the early-mid 1960s, Mossad started a campaign aimed at discouraging German scientists and technicians who were working for the Egyptians to build long range rockets for use against Israel.   Several Germans were killed or severely wounded when letter and package bombs exploded in their faces when they opened them.  This was Operation Damocles  Nowadays, it could rightfully be called "Terrorism"... Roll Eyes


So covert operations are now terrorism?  SO all the ASIO, ASIS and other intelligence services are really terrorist organisations?
Bwian, you are so silly, it's astonishing.


Covert operations which result in the harming of or death of their victims and which are later disowned by their own Governments are IMHO equivalent to Terrorism.  The objective of Operation Damocles was to terrorise the German scientists into not working for the Egyptian Government.   They were conducted illegally and dangerously.   Egyptians also suffered.   What is the difference between a PLO bomb and an Israeli bomb?  Usually the guidance mechanism.  The effects are the same.  Tsk, tsk, how typical of you, Soren to defend Terrorism, to make excuses for it.   Apologist.    Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour.  Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe?  Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
moses
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6353
Re: trees rocks talk donkeys fly
Reply #279 - Jan 12th, 2018 at 4:35pm
 
Operation Damocles was a covert campaign of the Israeli Mossad in August 1962 targeting German scientists and technicians, formerly employed in Nazi Germany's rocket program, who were developing rockets for Egypt at a military site known as Factory 333. According to Otto Joklik, an Austrian scientist involved with the project, the rockets being developed were programmed to use a radioactive waste. source

holy bloody whiteman the Jews carried out preemptive strikes against people who were developing radioactive waste rockets.

Gee whiz I mean who would these radioactive rockets be used against?

Not the jews surely, not I mean we all know the muzzies hate the Jews, but radioactive rockets, surely not?

Only an islamophobe would think the Jews were doing what they had to do to survive against the muslims.

So Jewish self defence nearly 60 years ago is definitely a true blue excuse for world wide islamic terrorism today 2018, just ask any leftard apologist for islam.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Jan 12th, 2018 at 4:41pm by moses »  
 
IP Logged
 
Brian Ross
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Representative of me

Posts: 39572
Re: trees rocks talk donkeys fly
Reply #280 - Jan 12th, 2018 at 5:37pm
 
moses wrote on Jan 12th, 2018 at 4:35pm:
Operation Damocles was a covert campaign of the Israeli Mossad in August 1962 targeting German scientists and technicians, formerly employed in Nazi Germany's rocket program, who were developing rockets for Egypt at a military site known as Factory 333. According to Otto Joklik, an Austrian scientist involved with the project, the rockets being developed were programmed to use a radioactive waste. source

holy bloody whiteman the Jews carried out preemptive strikes against people who were developing radioactive waste rockets.

Gee whiz I mean who would these radioactive rockets be used against?

Not the jews surely, not I mean we all know the muzzies hate the Jews, but radioactive rockets, surely not?

Only an islamophobe would think the Jews were doing what they had to do to survive against the muslims.

So Jewish self defence nearly 60 years ago is definitely a true blue excuse for world wide islamic terrorism today 2018, just ask any leftard apologist for islam.



Actually, there is no evidence of that, Moses.   The Egyptians were attempting to build rockets but weren't doing very well so they paraded around some fakes, which fooled the Israelis.   What isn't mentioned in the Wikipedia article is that Otto Joklik was a Mossad Agent and he was one of the two agents who were arrested in Switzerland for threatening Heidi Gorki, the daughter of one of the German scientists. [Source]

Hardly the most neutral of sources, hey, Moses?   No, of course the Israelis would never lie, would they?  Tsk, tsk.   Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour.  Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe?  Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
moses
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6353
Re: trees rocks talk donkeys fly
Reply #281 - Jan 12th, 2018 at 6:22pm
 
Brian Ross wrote:Reply #280 - Today at 5:37pm

Quote:
Actually, there is no evidence of that, Moses. 


your source says

Quote:
page 48 of your source says: Khalil had planned to build a conventional warhead filled with strontium 90 and cobalt 60, whbich, upon detonation, would cause widespread radioactive contamination.



Oh dear tsk tsk dearie me.

your own source contradicts you Brian. General mohammed khalil was nassers' chief of air intelligence he recruited the  scientists etc. who were to build the radioactive warheads.


Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 40623
Gender: male
Re: trees rocks talk donkeys fly
Reply #282 - Jan 12th, 2018 at 6:32pm
 
Brian Ross wrote on Jan 12th, 2018 at 4:15pm:
Frank wrote on Jan 12th, 2018 at 7:40am:
Brian Ross wrote on Jan 11th, 2018 at 11:53pm:
Auggie wrote on Jan 11th, 2018 at 10:34pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Jan 11th, 2018 at 7:02pm:
Zionists detonated bombs in Israel.  They blew up the King David Hotel, which the British were using for ther HQ.   Ninety-one people of various nationalities were killed and 46 injured.  They also detonated bombs in Italy, Austria and London, during their violent campaign to try and force the British to give them independence. This is a list of Irgun attacksRoll Eyes


And once they got their Zionist state they stopped. Islamists won’t stop until the whole world is Islam. Huge difference, don’t you think?


In the early-mid 1960s, Mossad started a campaign aimed at discouraging German scientists and technicians who were working for the Egyptians to build long range rockets for use against Israel.   Several Germans were killed or severely wounded when letter and package bombs exploded in their faces when they opened them.  This was Operation Damocles  Nowadays, it could rightfully be called "Terrorism"... Roll Eyes


So covert operations are now terrorism?  SO all the ASIO, ASIS and other intelligence services are really terrorist organisations?
Bwian, you are so silly, it's astonishing.


Covert operations which result in the harming of or death of their victims and which are later disowned by their own Governments are IMHO equivalent to Terrorism.  The objective of Operation Damocles was to terrorise the German scientists into not working for the Egyptian Government.   They were conducted illegally and dangerously.   Egyptians also suffered.   What is the difference between a PLO bomb and an Israeli bomb?  Usually the guidance mechanism.  The effects are the same.  Tsk, tsk, how typical of you, Soren to defend Terrorism, to make excuses for it.   Apologist.    Roll Eyes

So stopping people from working on missiles designed to attack your country is the same as blowing yourself up at a Manchester concert full of teenagers to you Bwian.

And you ask why people regard you with the greatest contempt, as a liar and an unmoored absurd looney.

Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Mattyfisk
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 92346
Gender: male
Re: trees rocks talk donkeys fly
Reply #283 - Jan 12th, 2018 at 6:59pm
 
moses wrote on Jan 12th, 2018 at 4:00pm:
bloody Jews and the land their god gave them, that's the problem?

then again islam says:
Quote:
Al-Anfal 8:41:
And know that whatever of war-booty that you may gain, verily one-fifth (1/5th) of it is assigned to Allâh, and to the Messenger, and to the near relatives [of the Messenger (Muhammad SAW)], (and also) the orphans, Al-Masâkin (the poor) and the wayfarer, if you have believed in Allâh and in that which We sent down to Our slave (Muhammad SAW) on the Day of criterion (between right and wrong), the Day when the two forces met (the battle of Badr) - And Allâh is Able to do all things.

Al-Ahzab 33:27:
And He caused you to inherit their lands, and their houses, and their riches, and a land which you had not trodden (before). And Allâh is Able to do all things.


Both clearly sanction plundering. You can't get booty if you stay at home peacefully, you have to be the aggressor and invade to collect your spoils of war, plus inherit their lands, and their houses, and their riches, in the land you have not trodden before

So is it fair to say: bloody muslims and their lands they invaded because allah told to, is the problem?


Or is it fair to say that Jews are really nice because G_d told them to kill every adult, child, slave and animal in the cities they plundered without mercy?

I'm curious. I'm keen to hear what you think.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
moses
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6353
Re: trees rocks talk donkeys fly
Reply #284 - Jan 12th, 2018 at 7:18pm
 
As far as I know you're referring to ancient (4000 odd year old) commands which refer to the taking of the promised land.

The Hebrews were ordered to take the promised land only. (there is a clear cut boundary to the amount of land the Jews were given.

Moses never entered the promised land, it was long after Moses had died that the Hebrews were lead by Joshua to capture the promised land.

Joshua 1:1 Now after the death of Moses the servant of the LORD it came to pass, that the LORD spake unto Joshua the son of Nun, Moses' minister, saying,

Joshua 1:2 Moses my servant is dead; now therefore arise, go over this Jordan, thou, and all this people, unto the land which I do give to them, even to the children of Israel.

Joshua 1:3 Every place that the sole of your foot shall tread upon, that have I given unto you, as I said unto Moses.

Joshua 1:4 From the wilderness and this Lebanon even unto the great river, the river Euphrates, all the land of the Hittites, and unto the great sea toward the going down of the sun, shall be your coast.

The promised land had a defined limit going back to the book of Genesis

Genesis 15:18 In the same day the LORD made a covenant with Abram, saying, Unto thy seed have I given this land, from the river of Egypt unto the great river, the river Euphrates:

Genesis15:19 The Kenites, and the Kenizzites, and the Kadmonites,

Genesis15:20 And the Hittites, and the Perizzites, and the Rephaims,

Genesis15:21 And the Amorites, and the Canaanites, and the Girgashites, and the Jebusites.

...

It's all ancient history time (4000 odd years ago) and boundry specific.

Now to get back to todays' problem

Quote:
Al-Anfal 8:41:
And know that whatever of war-booty that you may gain, verily one-fifth (1/5th) of it is assigned to Allâh, and to the Messenger, and to the near relatives [of the Messenger (Muhammad SAW)], (and also) the orphans, Al-Masâkin (the poor) and the wayfarer, if you have believed in Allâh and in that which We sent down to Our slave (Muhammad SAW) on the Day of criterion (between right and wrong), the Day when the two forces met (the battle of Badr) - And Allâh is Able to do all things.

Al-Ahzab 33:27:
And He caused you to inherit their lands, and their houses, and their riches, and a land which you had not trodden (before). And Allâh is Able to do all things.



Both clearly sanction plundering. You can't get booty if you stay at home peacefully, you have to be the aggressor and invade to collect your spoils of war, plus inherit their lands, and their houses, and their riches, in the land you have not trodden before.

All part and parcel of the fact that islam is the sole motivation for the top 24 listed terrorist organizations.

Your excuses are useless, islam is a death cult.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 17 18 19 20 21 ... 25
Send Topic Print