Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 ... 12
Send Topic Print
Milo and promoters billed for police protection (Read 12413 times)
Gordon
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20202
Gordon
Gender: male
Re: Milo and promoters billed for police protection
Reply #105 - Dec 8th, 2017 at 9:55pm
 
philperth2010 wrote on Dec 8th, 2017 at 9:47pm:
Freediver wrote....
Quote:
Do you support holding Milo financially accountable for the moronic actions of the imbeciles trying to prevent his talks from going ahead?


No....The Victorian police are....My solution was for Milo to sue the dickheads....Either way I do not believe taxpayers should have to pay for it....Everyone knew there was going to be trouble as there where 350 riot police there and the media....A very successful advertising promotion for Milo in his line of work???

Smiley Smiley Smiley



Milo should be charged a capped amount comensurat with what's required to crowd control the number of people attending his event.  That's fair. The cost to control the protesters unfortunately needs to be carried by taxpayers.
Back to top
 

IBI
 
IP Logged
 
Mattyfisk
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 91870
Gender: male
Re: Milo and promoters billed for police protection
Reply #106 - Dec 8th, 2017 at 9:56pm
 
philperth2010 wrote on Dec 8th, 2017 at 9:47pm:
Freediver wrote....
Quote:
Do you support holding Milo financially accountable for the moronic actions of the imbeciles trying to prevent his talks from going ahead?


No....The Victorian police are....My solution was for Milo to sue the dickheads....Either way I do not believe taxpayers should have to pay for it....Everyone knew there was going to be trouble as there where 350 riot police there and the media....A very successful advertising promotion for Milo in his line of work???

Smiley Smiley Smiley


You see? Now, that's the difference between you and FD, Phil. FD's solution is to ship in stupid, miserable Yanks just out of nappies to give Herbie and the old boy jolly old hardons.

Your solution is for Milo to employ an army of Brown Shirts to carry torches and beat up any recalcitrants.

Have you thought of combining your two solutions? Couldn't we dress the police in Nazi uniforms and train them to take out the trash? A win-win by any stretch of the imagination, shurely, and one we all know FD would approve of, but won't say.

You?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Mattyfisk
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 91870
Gender: male
Re: Milo and promoters billed for police protection
Reply #107 - Dec 8th, 2017 at 9:57pm
 
Gordon wrote on Dec 8th, 2017 at 9:51pm:
Mattyfisk wrote on Dec 8th, 2017 at 9:49pm:
Gordon wrote on Dec 8th, 2017 at 9:42pm:
Mattyfisk wrote on Dec 8th, 2017 at 9:37pm:
Captain Caveman wrote on Dec 8th, 2017 at 6:16pm:
Mattyfisk wrote on Dec 8th, 2017 at 5:59pm:
Captain Caveman wrote on Dec 8th, 2017 at 5:54pm:
Mattyfisk wrote on Dec 8th, 2017 at 5:25pm:
Captain Caveman wrote on Dec 8th, 2017 at 5:19pm:
I think it's time Australia started charging and locking up these violent left wing nazis. They are a disgrace. They are the true violent humans.



Yes, but I think you'll find FD wants to leave the right wing Nazis alone.

Superior culture, innit.


Dunno.
But have you ever tried to put across a difference to a leftist. They call you names, threaten you, give you demeaning labels. Bloody disgraceful and you don't even have to be a right wing.



I know - take that hideous Yassmin woman. She had the hyde to call us racist. Us!

So abusive, no unfair.


Why? Cause Australia doesn't need islam Grin
We accept all races but our law and culture is to stay. We don't bend and pretend. Respect the hand that helps you.


That's right. These people offend us just by coming here.

How very dare they.


Is islam a particularly progressive culture?  They seem to be tracking about 500 years behind western society.


Have you read any of the old boy's posts lately? He hasn't changed a word since 1517. He's positively carved in stone.

At least you people are carved in flesh and blood, so to speak. That's your covenant with G_d, no?



I'm an atheist, for the 500th time. Is this when you ask me about my penis?


Now now, atheists are not a race.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 47067
At my desk.
Re: Milo and promoters billed for police protection
Reply #108 - Dec 8th, 2017 at 10:00pm
 
Gordon wrote on Dec 8th, 2017 at 9:55pm:
philperth2010 wrote on Dec 8th, 2017 at 9:47pm:
Freediver wrote....
Quote:
Do you support holding Milo financially accountable for the moronic actions of the imbeciles trying to prevent his talks from going ahead?


No....The Victorian police are....My solution was for Milo to sue the dickheads....Either way I do not believe taxpayers should have to pay for it....Everyone knew there was going to be trouble as there where 350 riot police there and the media....A very successful advertising promotion for Milo in his line of work???

Smiley Smiley Smiley



Milo should be charged a capped amount comensurat with what's required to crowd control the number of people attending his event.  That's fair. The cost to control the protesters unfortunately needs to be carried by taxpayers.


He had his own security for his event. The police were there for the idiot antifa mob out on the street.
Back to top
 

I identify as Mail because all I do is SendIT!
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Lisa Jones
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 39047
Sydney
Gender: female
Re: Milo and promoters billed for police protection
Reply #109 - Dec 8th, 2017 at 10:03pm
 
Gordon wrote on Dec 8th, 2017 at 9:55pm:
philperth2010 wrote on Dec 8th, 2017 at 9:47pm:
Freediver wrote....
Quote:
Do you support holding Milo financially accountable for the moronic actions of the imbeciles trying to prevent his talks from going ahead?


No....The Victorian police are....My solution was for Milo to sue the dickheads....Either way I do not believe taxpayers should have to pay for it....Everyone knew there was going to be trouble as there where 350 riot police there and the media....A very successful advertising promotion for Milo in his line of work???

Smiley Smiley Smiley



Milo should be charged a capped amount comensurat with what's required to crowd control the number of people attending his event.  That's fair. The cost to control the protesters unfortunately needs to be carried by taxpayers.


Nahhhh those left whinging protester nongs should pay.

All 500 of them.

And let them know it's all thanks to good old ex Labor PM Paul Keating's user-pay system ideology 😂



Back to top
 

If I let myself be bought then I am no longer free.

HYPATIA - Greek philosopher, mathematician and astronomer (370 - 415)
 
IP Logged
 
Mattyfisk
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 91870
Gender: male
Re: Milo and promoters billed for police protection
Reply #110 - Dec 8th, 2017 at 10:04pm
 
Gordon wrote on Dec 8th, 2017 at 9:55pm:
philperth2010 wrote on Dec 8th, 2017 at 9:47pm:
Freediver wrote....
Quote:
Do you support holding Milo financially accountable for the moronic actions of the imbeciles trying to prevent his talks from going ahead?


No....The Victorian police are....My solution was for Milo to sue the dickheads....Either way I do not believe taxpayers should have to pay for it....Everyone knew there was going to be trouble as there where 350 riot police there and the media....A very successful advertising promotion for Milo in his line of work???

Smiley Smiley Smiley



Milo should be charged a capped amount comensurat with what's required to crowd control the number of people attending his event.  That's fair. The cost to control the protesters unfortunately needs to be carried by taxpayers.


Rubbish. As FD says, we should only pay to lock up the leftards. Decent Nazi supporters should be granted their sovereign right to be offended.

How very dare they?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Mattyfisk
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 91870
Gender: male
Re: Milo and promoters billed for police protection
Reply #111 - Dec 8th, 2017 at 10:05pm
 
freediver wrote on Dec 8th, 2017 at 10:00pm:
Gordon wrote on Dec 8th, 2017 at 9:55pm:
philperth2010 wrote on Dec 8th, 2017 at 9:47pm:
Freediver wrote....
Quote:
Do you support holding Milo financially accountable for the moronic actions of the imbeciles trying to prevent his talks from going ahead?


No....The Victorian police are....My solution was for Milo to sue the dickheads....Either way I do not believe taxpayers should have to pay for it....Everyone knew there was going to be trouble as there where 350 riot police there and the media....A very successful advertising promotion for Milo in his line of work???

Smiley Smiley Smiley



Milo should be charged a capped amount comensurat with what's required to crowd control the number of people attending his event.  That's fair. The cost to control the protesters unfortunately needs to be carried by taxpayers.


He had his own security for his event. The police were there for the idiot antifa mob out on the street.


Now now, FD, no one has the right to not be offended.

Does this fact comfort you?

A simple yes or no will suffice.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Gordon
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20202
Gordon
Gender: male
Re: Milo and promoters billed for police protection
Reply #112 - Dec 8th, 2017 at 10:07pm
 
freediver wrote on Dec 8th, 2017 at 10:00pm:
Gordon wrote on Dec 8th, 2017 at 9:55pm:
philperth2010 wrote on Dec 8th, 2017 at 9:47pm:
Freediver wrote....
Quote:
Do you support holding Milo financially accountable for the moronic actions of the imbeciles trying to prevent his talks from going ahead?


No....The Victorian police are....My solution was for Milo to sue the dickheads....Either way I do not believe taxpayers should have to pay for it....Everyone knew there was going to be trouble as there where 350 riot police there and the media....A very successful advertising promotion for Milo in his line of work???

Smiley Smiley Smiley



Milo should be charged a capped amount comensurat with what's required to crowd control the number of people attending his event.  That's fair. The cost to control the protesters unfortunately needs to be carried by taxpayers.


He had his own security for his event. The police were there for the idiot antifa mob out on the street.


I think the police should have the right to attend for event crowd control if they deem the private security is not sufficient,  but that's something that would be worked out in advance l. The number of protesters showing up is beyond anyone's control,  he shouldn't get the bill.
Back to top
 

IBI
 
IP Logged
 
Lisa Jones
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 39047
Sydney
Gender: female
Re: Milo and promoters billed for police protection
Reply #113 - Dec 8th, 2017 at 10:08pm
 
freediver wrote on Dec 8th, 2017 at 10:00pm:
Gordon wrote on Dec 8th, 2017 at 9:55pm:
philperth2010 wrote on Dec 8th, 2017 at 9:47pm:
Freediver wrote....
Quote:
Do you support holding Milo financially accountable for the moronic actions of the imbeciles trying to prevent his talks from going ahead?


No....The Victorian police are....My solution was for Milo to sue the dickheads....Either way I do not believe taxpayers should have to pay for it....Everyone knew there was going to be trouble as there where 350 riot police there and the media....A very successful advertising promotion for Milo in his line of work???

Smiley Smiley Smiley



Milo should be charged a capped amount comensurat with what's required to crowd control the number of people attending his event.  That's fair. The cost to control the protesters unfortunately needs to be carried by taxpayers.


He had his own security for his event. The police were there for the idiot antifa mob out on the street.


The people that came to see the show lined up very peacefully, they were all quite happy and the ferals that were on the other side of the police lines were the ones throwing the bottles and they weren’t ticket holders, they weren’t invited and they certainly weren’t welcome.
Back to top
 

If I let myself be bought then I am no longer free.

HYPATIA - Greek philosopher, mathematician and astronomer (370 - 415)
 
IP Logged
 
Gordon
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20202
Gordon
Gender: male
Re: Milo and promoters billed for police protection
Reply #114 - Dec 8th, 2017 at 10:08pm
 
Mattyfisk wrote on Dec 8th, 2017 at 10:05pm:
freediver wrote on Dec 8th, 2017 at 10:00pm:
Gordon wrote on Dec 8th, 2017 at 9:55pm:
philperth2010 wrote on Dec 8th, 2017 at 9:47pm:
Freediver wrote....
Quote:
Do you support holding Milo financially accountable for the moronic actions of the imbeciles trying to prevent his talks from going ahead?


No....The Victorian police are....My solution was for Milo to sue the dickheads....Either way I do not believe taxpayers should have to pay for it....Everyone knew there was going to be trouble as there where 350 riot police there and the media....A very successful advertising promotion for Milo in his line of work???

Smiley Smiley Smiley



Milo should be charged a capped amount comensurat with what's required to crowd control the number of people attending his event.  That's fair. The cost to control the protesters unfortunately needs to be carried by taxpayers.


He had his own security for his event. The police were there for the idiot antifa mob out on the street.


Now now, FD, no one has the right to not be offended.

Does this fact comfort you?

A simple yes or no will suffice.


Did Lakemba mosque get a bill for about 20 million for the Lindt Cafe siege?  Why not?
Back to top
 

IBI
 
IP Logged
 
Lisa Jones
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 39047
Sydney
Gender: female
Re: Milo and promoters billed for police protection
Reply #115 - Dec 8th, 2017 at 10:20pm
 
Huh
Back to top
 

If I let myself be bought then I am no longer free.

HYPATIA - Greek philosopher, mathematician and astronomer (370 - 415)
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 47067
At my desk.
Re: Milo and promoters billed for police protection
Reply #116 - Dec 8th, 2017 at 10:22pm
 
Gordon wrote on Dec 8th, 2017 at 10:07pm:
freediver wrote on Dec 8th, 2017 at 10:00pm:
Gordon wrote on Dec 8th, 2017 at 9:55pm:
philperth2010 wrote on Dec 8th, 2017 at 9:47pm:
Freediver wrote....
Quote:
Do you support holding Milo financially accountable for the moronic actions of the imbeciles trying to prevent his talks from going ahead?


No....The Victorian police are....My solution was for Milo to sue the dickheads....Either way I do not believe taxpayers should have to pay for it....Everyone knew there was going to be trouble as there where 350 riot police there and the media....A very successful advertising promotion for Milo in his line of work???

Smiley Smiley Smiley



Milo should be charged a capped amount comensurat with what's required to crowd control the number of people attending his event.  That's fair. The cost to control the protesters unfortunately needs to be carried by taxpayers.


He had his own security for his event. The police were there for the idiot antifa mob out on the street.


I think the police should have the right to attend for event crowd control if they deem the private security is not sufficient,  but that's something that would be worked out in advance l. The number of protesters showing up is beyond anyone's control,  he shouldn't get the bill.


People who organise events like music concerts are held responsible if they do not provide adequate security etc for the number of people coming. They get sued when they stuff it up. But they are not expected to pay the police force to manage protestors out on the street who are trying to shut them down. If the police are not there to defend our rights and freedoms, what are they for?
Back to top
 

I identify as Mail because all I do is SendIT!
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Mattyfisk
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 91870
Gender: male
Re: Milo and promoters billed for police protection
Reply #117 - Dec 8th, 2017 at 10:33pm
 
Hey, FD, that jellyfish Phil's not answering your question.

What do you think of that?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Mattyfisk
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 91870
Gender: male
Re: Milo and promoters billed for police protection
Reply #118 - Dec 8th, 2017 at 10:35pm
 
Gordon wrote on Dec 8th, 2017 at 10:08pm:
Mattyfisk wrote on Dec 8th, 2017 at 10:05pm:
freediver wrote on Dec 8th, 2017 at 10:00pm:
Gordon wrote on Dec 8th, 2017 at 9:55pm:
philperth2010 wrote on Dec 8th, 2017 at 9:47pm:
Freediver wrote....
Quote:
Do you support holding Milo financially accountable for the moronic actions of the imbeciles trying to prevent his talks from going ahead?


No....The Victorian police are....My solution was for Milo to sue the dickheads....Either way I do not believe taxpayers should have to pay for it....Everyone knew there was going to be trouble as there where 350 riot police there and the media....A very successful advertising promotion for Milo in his line of work???

Smiley Smiley Smiley



Milo should be charged a capped amount comensurat with what's required to crowd control the number of people attending his event.  That's fair. The cost to control the protesters unfortunately needs to be carried by taxpayers.


He had his own security for his event. The police were there for the idiot antifa mob out on the street.


Now now, FD, no one has the right to not be offended.

Does this fact comfort you?

A simple yes or no will suffice.


Did Lakemba mosque get a bill for about 20 million for the Lindt Cafe siege?  Why not?


I think they deferred their risk by reporting Man Monis to the Federal Police.

But that's just me.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Mattyfisk
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 91870
Gender: male
Re: Milo and promoters billed for police protection
Reply #119 - Dec 8th, 2017 at 10:38pm
 
Gordon wrote on Dec 8th, 2017 at 10:07pm:
freediver wrote on Dec 8th, 2017 at 10:00pm:
Gordon wrote on Dec 8th, 2017 at 9:55pm:
philperth2010 wrote on Dec 8th, 2017 at 9:47pm:
Freediver wrote....
Quote:
Do you support holding Milo financially accountable for the moronic actions of the imbeciles trying to prevent his talks from going ahead?


No....The Victorian police are....My solution was for Milo to sue the dickheads....Either way I do not believe taxpayers should have to pay for it....Everyone knew there was going to be trouble as there where 350 riot police there and the media....A very successful advertising promotion for Milo in his line of work???

Smiley Smiley Smiley



Milo should be charged a capped amount comensurat with what's required to crowd control the number of people attending his event.  That's fair. The cost to control the protesters unfortunately needs to be carried by taxpayers.


He had his own security for his event. The police were there for the idiot antifa mob out on the street.


I think the police should have the right to attend for event crowd control if they deem the private security is not sufficient,  but that's something that would be worked out in advance l. The number of protesters showing up is beyond anyone's control,  he shouldn't get the bill.


Okay, but what if he was using his freeedom to speak out against the Jew?

What then?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 ... 12
Send Topic Print