Brian Ross
|
Auggie wrote on Dec 6 th, 2017 at 5:51pm: Brian Ross wrote on Dec 6 th, 2017 at 5:46pm: Auggie wrote on Dec 6 th, 2017 at 5:45pm: Brian Ross wrote on Dec 6 th, 2017 at 3:39pm: Auggie wrote on Dec 6 th, 2017 at 3:21pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 6 th, 2017 at 3:15pm: Auggie wrote on Dec 6 th, 2017 at 3:12pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 6 th, 2017 at 3:03pm: Mr Hammer wrote on Dec 6 th, 2017 at 2:52pm: Auggie wrote on Dec 6 th, 2017 at 2:49pm: Mr Hammer wrote on Dec 6 th, 2017 at 2:17pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 6 th, 2017 at 2:16pm: Why does the Bible encourage domestic violence?
"Wives, submit to your own husbands, as to the Lord. For the husband is the head of the wife as Christ is the head of the church, his body, and is himself its Saviour." Ephesians 5: 22-23 Christians have moved on from that rubbish Pecca. Many muslims haven't. Not only that, Jesus didn't say this; it was Paul the Apostle. Q.E.D. Pecca is getting desperate Aug. Nobody mentioned Jesus. Christianity is what Jesus taught, not what Paul taught. I didn't say it was a quote from Jesus. I said it came from the Bible. My rule is: just ignore everything Paul says. He was a chartan, and corrupted Christ's teachings. A good rule. My question is though, if what you claim is true, why is Paul's teachings included in the New Testament? It is an essential part of Christianity's teachings. It is read extensively by multitudes of Christians as an example of Christian thought and belief. It is therefore a part of Christianity that cannot be easily dismissed, any more than the Old Testament can be. Well, Paul was the Second Founder of Christianity and so in this regard, that's why his teachings are valued. So, haven't you just contradicted yourself? Tsk, tsk. Not really, I'm not your run-of-the-mill Christian, so I can pick and choose what I want. Tsk, tsk! Ah, so. You believe you can disregard Paul yet at the same time suggest Paul is the second source for Christianity? No, no contradictions there, now are there? Tsk, tsk.
|