Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 ... 10
Send Topic Print
Factcheck: Safe Schools program (Read 11675 times)
mothra
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 34374
Gender: female
Factcheck: Safe Schools program
Nov 22nd, 2017 at 7:43pm
 
FactCheck: does the Safe Schools program contain ‘highly explicit material’?



At a recent press conference discussing One Nation’s policies for “protecting the whole family unit”, One Nation Queensland leader Steve Dickson claimed that female students in Grade 4 were “being taught by teachers how to masturbate, how to strap on dildos, how to do this sort of stuff” under the Safe Schools program.

While Dickson later apologised for the “specific words” he used, he went on to say the information resource does contain “highly explicit material” that is being “directed at young children”.

Let’s look at the facts.

Checking the source

The Conversation contacted Steve Dickson’s office to request sources and comment, but did not hear back before deadline.

Verdict

One Nation Queensland leader Steve Dickson’s claim that the Safe Schools program “contains highly explicit material directed at young children in their formative years” is incorrect.

There is no discussion of the details of specific sex acts, sex aids or sexual health in Safe Schools resources.

Safe Schools is an optional resource for schools and teachers. Its aim is to help school staff create safer and more inclusive environments for LGBTI students and families.

What is the Safe Schools program?

The Victorian government first established the Safe Schools Coalition Australia in 2010. It’s now a national network convened by the Foundation for Young Australians, and delivered by partner organisations in several states and territories.

The published aim of the Safe Schools Coalition is:

… to help school staff create safer and more inclusive environments for same-sex-attracted, intersex and gender-diverse students, school staff and families.
The program provides optional resources for secondary schools, including professional development for teachers and one classroom-level teaching resource, “All of Us”, designed for Year 7 and 8 students, who are generally aged between 11 and 14.

Safe Schools is supported in some form by several state and territory governments. But it is not a compulsory part of the curriculum in any Australian jurisdiction.

Safe Schools received federal funding for four years, but this ended in June 2017. Some state and territory governments have committed to continue funding Safe Schools to make it available for government schools.

The Safe Schools review

In February 2016 I was asked by the federal education minister, Simon Birmingham, to review the resources given to schools under Safe Schools. I reported on the extent to which the resources were:

consistent with the program’s aims
suitable and robust
age-appropriate
educationally sound, and
aligned to the Australian curriculum.
Broadly, I found that the materials were consistent with the program’s aims, and suitable and appropriate for use in schools.

I recommended schools be given official guidelines around the context in which certain materials should be available, as well as around the suitability of material available on third-party websites recommended in the Safe Schools resources.

At that time, I found no school had implemented the whole eight-lesson “All of Us” classroom program, and that it was reasonable for teachers to decide how many of the resources to use based on their own school policy.

How did the government respond?

In response to my review, the federal government introduced a series of changes to the way Safe Schools operated.

Some lesson plans for the “All of Us” classroom resource were amended or removed to ensure they were suitable for all students and appropriate for their target age group. Some other resources were restricted to use in one-on-one discussions between students and key qualified staff.

The government recommended that schools consult with parents and parent bodies regarding the implementation of Safe Schools, and local program managers were required to ensure the distribution of the program was restricted to secondary schools only.

You can read more about those recommendations and changes here.

Not all states and territories implemented all of the changes, and as mentioned earlier, federal funding of the program has now ceased. You can read more about how Safe Schools is offered across Australia in this recent FactCheck. It’s worth reiterating that the level of any school’s engagement with the program is optional.

Does Safe Schools contain ‘highly explicit material’?

The words “highly explicit” will mean different things to different people.

But there is certainly no discussion of the details of specific sex acts or sex aids or sexual health in the “All of Us” classroom resource or any other resources currently offered as part of Safe Schools.

The government’s changes meant the Safe Schools curriculum resource “All of Us”, which is designed for teachers to use with Year 7 and Year 8 students, was revised.

Any web links to third-party websites that may have contained material that some might consider explicit were removed. Birmingham’s changes included ensuring that any web links were government-funded organisations.

As it stands today, “All of Us” contains material on sexual diversity, homophobia and transphobia, gender identity and stereotypes, intersex characteristics, supportive and disrespectful behaviours, and school strategies to create a safer environment for LGBTI people. – Bill Louden

Back to top
 

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.
 
IP Logged
 
mothra
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 34374
Gender: female
Re: Factcheck: Safe Schools program
Reply #1 - Nov 22nd, 2017 at 7:43pm
 
Blind review

This is a sound FactCheck.

The author is correct: the Safe Schools Coalition provides optional resources for schools and educators, primarily designed to support gender diversity and same-sex attracted young people. The resources do not reference masturbation, or teach about sex toys or sex aids.

While federal government funding of the Safe Schools Coalition Australia program has completed, select Safe Schools resources are available on the Student Wellbeing Hub, which is funded by the Australian Department of Education.

Safe Schools does offer support and resources to primary school educators, but this is strictly on request only. Again, resources for primary schools do not teach or discuss or reference masturbation, or sex toys.

The author is correct that the “All of Us” resource is a health and physical education resource designed for years 7 and 8 students. It does not teach or discuss or reference masturbation, or sex toys. – Emma Rowe

https://theconversation.com/factcheck-does-the-safe-schools-program-contain-high...
Back to top
 

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.
 
IP Logged
 
Dnarever
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 57063
Here
Gender: male
Re: Factcheck: Safe Schools program
Reply #2 - Nov 22nd, 2017 at 8:08pm
 
How unfair of you Mothra, telling the truth about safe schools, we can't have that.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Prime Minister for Canyons
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 26906
Canberra
Gender: male
Re: Factcheck: Safe Schools program
Reply #3 - Nov 22nd, 2017 at 8:11pm
 
Theres no place for facts in a debate about Safe Schools.
Back to top
 

In a time of universal deceit — telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

No evidence whatsoever it can be attributed to George Orwell or Eric Arthur Blair (in fact the same guy)
 
IP Logged
 
mothra
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 34374
Gender: female
Re: Factcheck: Safe Schools program
Reply #4 - Nov 22nd, 2017 at 8:11pm
 
Dnarever wrote on Nov 22nd, 2017 at 8:08pm:
How unfair of you Mothra, telling the truth about safe schools, we can't have that.



I know. It's hardly the forum for it.
Back to top
 

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 130890
Gender: male
Re: Factcheck: Safe Schools program
Reply #5 - Nov 22nd, 2017 at 9:57pm
 
mothra wrote on Nov 22nd, 2017 at 8:11pm:
Dnarever wrote on Nov 22nd, 2017 at 8:08pm:
How unfair of you Mothra, telling the truth about safe schools, we can't have that.



I know. It's hardly the forum for it.


Indeed.

This is the forum for under-educated, ignorant conservatives who pride themselves on being racist, homophobic, Islamophobic keyboard-cowards, being owned every day and every night by reasonable, rational lefties.

And boy, did they have a bad day today.



Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Grappler Truth Teller Feller
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 79534
Proud pre-1850's NO Voter
Gender: male
Re: Factcheck: Safe Schools program
Reply #6 - Nov 22nd, 2017 at 10:25pm
 
Hang ten a week until the rest get the message....
Back to top
 

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams
 
IP Logged
 
Grappler Truth Teller Feller
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 79534
Proud pre-1850's NO Voter
Gender: male
Re: Factcheck: Safe Schools program
Reply #7 - Nov 22nd, 2017 at 10:26pm
 
greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 22nd, 2017 at 9:57pm:
mothra wrote on Nov 22nd, 2017 at 8:11pm:
Dnarever wrote on Nov 22nd, 2017 at 8:08pm:
How unfair of you Mothra, telling the truth about safe schools, we can't have that.



I know. It's hardly the forum for it.


Indeed.

This is the forum for under-educated, ignorant conservatives who pride themselves on being racist, homophobic, Islamophobic keyboard-cowards, being owned every day and every night by reasonable, rational lefties.

And boy, did they have a bad day today.





Apologist................  Wink
Back to top
 

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams
 
IP Logged
 
Grendel
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 28080
Gender: male
Re: Factcheck: Safe Schools program
Reply #8 - Nov 23rd, 2017 at 7:15am
 
Roz Ward architect and once head of the Safe Schools Program... 

Safe Schools is about social change not bullying...

When they use terms like heteronormative as a negative, when they talk of gender fluidity etc...  they shoot your arguments down better than those you ridicule mothballs...  relying on factcheck which btw on many occassions needs to be facts checked itself is hardly proof of anything.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Grendel
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 28080
Gender: male
Re: Factcheck: Safe Schools program
Reply #9 - Nov 23rd, 2017 at 7:18am
 
Quote:
Rather than gendered references to reproductive anatomy with words like penis, vagina, sperm, and ovaries, gender-neutral terms to identify these organs could be used, an Australian university study suggests.

“Educators and sexuality education programs must… develop ways of talking about bodies and intimacy that shift attention away from the normative association of particular genders with particular anatomies,” the paper published in the Journal of Sex Education, claims.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Gordon
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 20202
Gordon
Gender: male
Re: Factcheck: Safe Schools program
Reply #10 - Nov 23rd, 2017 at 7:20am
 
Grendel wrote on Nov 23rd, 2017 at 7:15am:
Roz Ward architect and once head of the Safe Schools Program... 

Safe Schools is about social change not bullying...

When they use terms like heteronormative as a negative, when they talk of gender fluidity etc...  they shoot your arguments down better than those you ridicule mothballs...  relying on factcheck which btw on many occassions needs to be facts checked itself is hardly proof of anything.


SAFE Schools creator Roz Ward has come under fire for recent comments in which she claimed up to half of young people were gay, with experts saying the figure was a “gross over-estimate”.
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/victoria/safe-schools-founder-under-fire-for-mi...
Back to top
 

IBI
 
IP Logged
 
Grendel
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 28080
Gender: male
Re: Factcheck: Safe Schools program
Reply #11 - Nov 23rd, 2017 at 7:24am
 
Quote:
WA Government backbencher Peter Abetz has warned parents and Liberal colleagues that an anti-bullying program being prepared for WA is actually a "gay lifestyle promotion program".

Quote:
Mr Abetz, an ordained former pastor in the Christian Reformed Church, said he believed encouraging teenagers to self-identify as gay, lesbian or transgender could be harmful in the long term.

He said most young people with same-sex attraction or transgender feelings lost them as they matured.


Mr Abetz said bullying was a real problem in schools and he highlighted other anti-bullying programs that he believed better addressed all forms of bullying.

The SSCA program, he said, crossed the line into advocacy and was "really not an anti-bullying program".

"In fact, when you look at it closer, it really is little more than a gay, lesbian, transgender lifestyle promotion program," Mr Abetz said.

"The militant gay lesbian lobby is trying to get this into our schools to 'normalise' what they consider the LGBTI agenda.

"I think in Australia most people are quite tolerant. Most people know someone among their relatives or workmates who is a lesbian or gay or whatever, and they don't bat an eyelid - they just accept them as human beings with inherent value and you treat them with dignity and respect."


Which backs up many claims and in fact is backed up by Roz Ward.... Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 130890
Gender: male
Re: Factcheck: Safe Schools program
Reply #12 - Nov 23rd, 2017 at 7:29am
 
Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Nov 22nd, 2017 at 8:11pm:
There's no place for facts in a debate about Safe Schools.


Grendel's sticking to that rule.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Gordon
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 20202
Gordon
Gender: male
Re: Factcheck: Safe Schools program
Reply #13 - Nov 23rd, 2017 at 7:33am
 
Roz Ward, avowed Marxist gender bender. No chance she was pushing a bit of a personal agenda... Nah...
Back to top
 

IBI
 
IP Logged
 
mothra
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 34374
Gender: female
Re: Factcheck: Safe Schools program
Reply #14 - Nov 23rd, 2017 at 8:43am
 
greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 23rd, 2017 at 7:29am:
Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Nov 22nd, 2017 at 8:11pm:
There's no place for facts in a debate about Safe Schools.


Grendel's sticking to that rule.




It's quite something, isn't it? Even with the facts before them, they're running around like the sky is falling.

I suppose anything that challenges their prejudices must be hard for them to swallow.
Back to top
 

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 ... 10
Send Topic Print