The situation in France has gotten so desperate that the only way to prevent civil war between Muslim and non-Muslim sections of society is to divide the country in two, one French academic argued. This may seem needlessly drastic, but the push for Sharia (Islamic law) being enshrined in the government may make it necessary.

"Just as the English never managed to tame the Irish Catholics, we will never be able to eradicate the radical Islamism," wrote Christian de Moliner in the French online magazine Causeur. "Everyone realizes that a second people has formed in France, a branch that wants to settle their life on religious values and is fundamentally opposed to the liberal consensus on which our country was founded." The author also shared his article in a post on Facebook.

De Moliner argued that "a nation always rests on a fundamental pact, a minimum of laws that all approve." In France, he claimed, this is no longer the case.

"We can never get the toothpaste into the tube and convert the 30% of Muslims who demand the introduction of Sharia to the merits of our democracy and secularism," the author explained. "We are now allowing segregation to take place that does not say its name."
"While we are not yet at open war, the faithful of the Prophet are already grouped in areas sometimes governed by special rules (compulsory veil, rejection of Jews in certain ghettos, marriage and married life regulated by the Qur'anic principles)," de Moliner wrote.

The French author warned against appeasing those who push for legal recognition of Sharia in French laws and courts.

"For fear of appearing Islamophobic, to satisfy this waving fringe of Muslims, these governments are ready to accept the widespread spread of radical practices throughout the country: the veil at school and at work, the obligation of halal meat in all the cafeterias," the author wrote.

He argued that if France continues to appease the Sharia minority, local laws will prevent people from eating during Ramadan, blasphemy will be punished as "an incitement to racial hatred" and Christianity will have to be practiced in secret. "The chimes of the churches will stop," he warned.

J Media

Valkie's getting worked up again   

Tsk tsk.

Mod alert! Impersonation going on here

I cannot speak for others, but the "appease Islam at all costs" members of Western societies seem to believe that, by accepting mass immigration from Islamic countries, a kind of assimilation will take place where Muzlims become simply another group that respects secular pluralism. SBS and the ABC are actively promoting this through their editorial and programming policies. They either believe this assimilation will definitely take place, or they are merely "keeping their fingers crossed." (bad metaphor intended) A third option which I recognise is the support of Islam because it is a minority and perceived as victims of prejudice.

Whatever the justification, the appeasers don't mind taking the risk of "betting the farm on it". They had better be right because there is no going back. So far the situation has been getting worse for twenty years. I'm not seeing any sign of the so-called moderation of Islam no matter how many happy smiling Muzlims our confident Infidel editors put on their media platforms.

The Muzlim guy, on the panel of four, is obfuscating the way Gandalf does about Islam. The Koran states clearly what should be done with unbelievers, and it ain't pretty. Those who don't follow it, are apostates.

bogarde73 wrote on Nov 21^st, 2017 at 10:54am:


But Bogie, this is what you've been promoting for years. Your posts on Islam all aim for division, exclusion and all-out war.

France has a big Muslim population because it used to have African colonies. This is the inescapable legacy of being a former colonial power. If Muslims are citizens, you have to get along with them. No ifs or buts. No modern country is going to kick out a population based on their religion, especially France, a state based on the call for liberty, equality and fraternity.

Mattyfisk wrote on Nov 22^nd, 2017 at 8:34am:


"Inescapable legacy" - ?

Rabid nonsense.

There's no law that says the citizens of former colonies are granted free access to the countries that colonised them.

Mattyfisk wrote on Nov 22^nd, 2017 at 8:34am:


Nonsense again.

France can do what the hell it likes so long as it has a mandate from the voting public.