greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 21
st, 2017 at 7:34am:
Captain Caveman wrote on Nov 21
st, 2017 at 6:28am:
So a guilty plea of rape isn't enough for some. They need the intricate details for satisfaction. Hmmm.
HE PLEADED GUILTY TO RAPE . RAPE!!!!
It doesn't say that in the article.
Ok I stand corrected.
"55-year-old man from Dubbo, whose identity has been suppressed, pleaded guilty this year to 10 counts of historic sex crimes involving two girls, aged eight and 10, from 1980 to 1987,"
Historic sex crimes with 2 girls aged 8 and 10.
For starters sex crimes involving kids at any age under the age of legal concent is pedophilia. Agreed???
Historic sex crimes are because they happened back in the 80's. Cold case. Agreed???
Regardless they are sex crimes obviously against our laws. Agreed???
If he showed them his penis, it's against our laws. Agreed???
If he fiddles with them, it's against our laws. Agreed???
Even showing them sexual content is against the law. Agreed???
So this pedophile pleaded guilty to 10 counts and has been pardoned due to his ill health which I am going to assume is his own fault and he is in danger of being ruffed up by other inmates. Cry me a river.
He was ok to commit crimes against the minors which he would have known was wrong (99% of people know right from wrong). The victims have lived with this for a substancial time. It will never go away for them yet this parasite is pretry much let off. The system is failing when the criminal is considered above the victim. The criminal made the decision to do what he did. The girls had no choice but to be subject to this pedos actions.
I have no sympathy for pedos. I will not show sympathy for them. Hang them high and stone them to death. They deserve it.
So, you don't actually know what he was convicted of.
That's all you had to say.