I'll come to your house uninvited.
Let myself in via the window.
Expect to be given $10 by you.
Tell you stories of why I left my house - because I didn't like the furniture and my 52 kids have eaten me out of home.
Hell, I brought 25 of them into your house to join me also.
So shut up you racist Australian #@$t and look after me!!!

Jasin wrote on Nov 20^th, 2017 at 4:13am:



If I had signed the convention on house break in then fair enough.

Which countries have agreed to the Refugee Convention?

There are 143 countries which have agreed to the obligations under both the Refugee Convention and its Protocol (known as ‘states parties’). There are also three countries (including the United States of America) which have agreed to the Protocol only, and two small countries that have agreed to the Convention only.

Australia was one of the first countries to become a state party to the Refugee Convention, on 22 January 1954. Australia became a party to the 1967 Protocol on 13 December 1973.

https://www.refugeecouncil.org.au/getfacts/international/internationalsystem/the...


The Liberal party signed up Australia and then broke their word.

Australia must now apologise to these refugees for the Liberal Party's (lack of) behaviour.

I am watching Zimbabwe at the moment   and yes they have suffered greatly for over 30 years of control by a nut case....did they run away and claim asylum elsewhere   not that I have seen...and right now the tables have turned at long last   and when they finally unshackle the monster that ruled them they will I very much hope put their shoulders to the wheel and rebuild their country,

they should at least realise it is UP TO THEM..its their country  they have lived through the worst..

they never ran away and left it for the few at the top....

and good on them  ....

I trust the UN  or some such agency will get behind them.. as the last thing they need is another dictator...

I admire those who stay to back the country they want and not hand it over to dictators....

not those who run away  and expect to live off the backs of others...

Hundreds of thousands of Zimbabweans (shona & nbele) have crossed borders like illegal Mexicans into neighbouring Southern African nations, especially South Africa. Living in shantie, resorting to crime and being persecuted by other African Tribes who don't wish to carry the burden of Zimbabwean problems.

As for the monster Mugabe?
Well he wouldn't have appeared if the British didn't stuff up that country in the first place!

Mugabe & Britain - another example of two wrongs not making a right and there is plenty of that going around in this world in this day and age.

cods wrote on Nov 20^th, 2017 at 6:20am:


"The number of Zimbabweans seeking asylum in South Africa has increased dramatically since Robert Mugabe's police assaulted the country's opposition leaders on 11 March, experts say."   2007

Refugees flood from Zimbabwe

Here are 10 facts about Zimbabwe refugees:

1. "It’s estimated that 3.4 million Zimbabweans, a quarter of the population have fled their country as refugees. Most of them have gone to three countries — South Africa, Australia and Britain. Britain houses the majority with over 400,000."

"9,286 people from Zimbabwe have fled in 2016 and applied for asylum in other countries."

Refugees from Zimbabwe

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 20^th, 2017 at 8:02am:



asylum in Sth Africa  right    thats almost like going to Nth Korea for asylum.

Britain  would have the white folks   like we have the white Sth African..

neither Sth Africa nor Zimbabwe have been successful  I wonder why?.

We should never have signed the Convention.
We live in very different times, we should withdraw if they refuse to amend it.
Many asylum seekers are not genuine refugees and they use criminals and criminal means to get here.  That on its own should send a message to even the thickest luvvie.
They fail the character test and should be deported straight away.  End of story.

Jews fleeing Nazi Germany ... they too were economic refugees.

It's not economic to be dead.


The term 'Economic Refugee' is just created so to be able to pretend persecuting people fleeing persecution is ok.

It isn't.


Apologise

cods wrote on Nov 20^th, 2017 at 8:11am:



It's because blecks can't run anything, right Cods?

Oh good for you Cods! Bwood agrees with you again.

You really do attract posters with class, don't you. Must be something about you.

Once again - genuine refugees are not 'illegal immigrants' - they are refugee claimants, and are processed according to a set of rules.

The deviation - and the ONLY deviation - by the LNP was to process them offshore AND refuse them entry to this nation even if positively vetted, but ONLY if they attempted to arrive by boat.

That was against convention, against treaties signed, by intercepting them on the High Seas a crime was committed against the law of the sea, and the entire process was against humanity, and possibly a crime against humanity.

I'd be interested to see what Geoffrey Robertson had to say about it.

____ wrote on Nov 20^th, 2017 at 4:07am:


What a terrible thing for those refugees. Not one of them able to operate a tap in the town of Lorengau nor capable of operating a broom. Maybe a series of photos could assist them. The first would be the shape of a human > a tap > a hand turning on the tap > a drinking vessel to capture the water > a human drinking the water. To add to that confusion perhaps a series of photos showing how to purchase a bottle of water (Commonwealth agrees to pay Manus Island detainees $70m in class action settlement) at a cost of $1.50 per bottle.

We could send Ian Rintoooool up there to Manus Island with 30 brooms and an official approved short video showing how to use the brooms.

I think the refugee convention is silent on detainee those seeking refuge.

mothra wrote on Nov 20^th, 2017 at 8:57am:

and you attract Greg and Smith MB and aussie- you really shouldnt use the word class because as we know you dont know what the word means- let alone point fingers-

bwood1946 wrote on Nov 20^th, 2017 at 8:55am:



as a rule NO-

Agnes wrote on Nov 20^th, 2017 at 12:31pm:


She's in excellent company.

Armchair_Politician wrote on Nov 20^th, 2017 at 1:10pm:


Here we go again - another case of conservatives not knowing the difference between asylum seekers and refugees.

The 150 that NZ want to take are refugees.

red baron wrote on Nov 20^th, 2017 at 1:19pm:


a) nothing illegal about (or wrong with) country shopping.

b) a person's financial situation has nothing to do with refugee status.

c) these 150 have been processed, and deemed to be refugees.

d) there is no queue.

red baron wrote on Nov 20^th, 2017 at 1:31pm:


Why?

The United Nations can take a flying f...k at a rolling donut

The most corrupt organisation since the Nazi Party in Germany

red baron wrote on Nov 20^th, 2017 at 1:47pm:


With the CFMEU coming in a close second!

They are not refugees they are cashed up Country Shoppers who tried to jump the queue in front of genuine refugees

This Manus Island con is such shite it has me reaching for the chum bucket...refugees my arse!!!!!

I don't give a shite about skin colour I do give a shite about major con being carried out. Notice that 95% of them are male adults what a con!

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 20^th, 2017 at 1:55pm:


Oh, there's a queue alright. Let's say our refugee intake is 15,000 people. Lets say there's 2,000 people who come by boat and are given refugee status. Now the intake is only 13,000 people. The other 2,000 who are in UNHCR camps and had been assessed as genuine and were to come here now must wait until next year or hope another country takes them in.

Armchair_Politician wrote on Nov 20^th, 2017 at 2:13pm:


That's a quota.

There's no queue.

"If UNHCR assesses a refugee to be eligible for resettlement it does not mean that they have joined an orderly ‘queue’, and that they will be guaranteed resettlement to another country when their ‘number comes up’."

Parliament of Australia.

some people just haven't go ta clue. 

Armchair_Politician wrote on Nov 20^th, 2017 at 2:26pm:


You're confusing the terms 'queue' and 'quota'.

There is no queue.

"If UNHCR assesses a refugee to be eligible for resettlement it does not mean that they have joined an orderly ‘queue’, and that they will be guaranteed resettlement to another country when their ‘number comes up’."

Does Australia only take people from refugee camps?

"No. There is no requirement under Australian law that a person be registered with UNHCR prior to applying for an Australian refugee category visa but in practice most have been recognised as refugees by the UNHCR and have been referred to Australia’s Immigration Department for resettlement (UNHCR referred cases).

However, that does not mean that Australia only accepts refugees from UNHCR camps. Despite the iconic image of refugees living in white tents in a sprawling emergency camp, the reality is that over 60 per cent of the world's 19.5 million refugees live in urban environments."

John Smith wrote on Nov 20^th, 2017 at 2:30pm:


They'll never learn.

Mr Hammer wrote on Nov 20^th, 2017 at 3:09pm:


A clear sign of desperation.

Mr Hammer wrote on Nov 20^th, 2017 at 3:13pm:


For the 150 that NZ offered to take in, it was quite clearly desperation.

juliar wrote on Nov 20^th, 2017 at 3:24pm:


Off-topic nonsense.

Armchair_Politician wrote on Nov 20^th, 2017 at 3:39pm:


1. It's not illegal to use people smugglers.

2. These people are refugees. No ifs, no buts.

"illegals"    

juliar wrote on Nov 20^th, 2017 at 3:50pm:


I would not go so far as to call Tony Abbott a hero. But that cartoon was spot on. The on Greg posted was supposed to imply that illegals have no choice other than to sneak into Australian territory. Thats why they go to other countries first and pay cash for a boat ride.

Dr Mengele wrote on Nov 20^th, 2017 at 4:28pm:




I think keep them and deport all lefties..


maybe the only ones who infest ozpol....


maybe!

Hey gecko troll they are all turning against you.

What are you going to come up with to justify your Greeny brainwashing about the illegal country shoppers illegally brought here by the Labor imbeciles ?

Gecko troll you have been brainwashed by the vile Greenies who want to turn Australia into a 4th world country and then dump the world's unwanted Blacks Browns and Brindles here.

Paw sowl U can't comprehend that the vile Greenies are trying to implement the UN AGENDA 2030 right here in Australia.

But there is hope after Tony Abbott STOPPED the BOATS crammed to the rafters with illegal country shoppers.

Now the vile Greenies are going to try to RESTART the BOATS via NZ with the help of FANG the Tooth Fairy.



Strewth get a load of those fangs!!!!

juliar wrote on Nov 20^th, 2017 at 5:07pm:

FANG the Tooth Fairy. That's ace!!! She looks like she's got one of those teeth lollies stuck in her stupid mouth.

juliar wrote on Nov 20^th, 2017 at 5:07pm:



looks like shes borrowed her husbands teeth by mistake.. oh blimey..

And the gecko troll is pumping out his faulty Greeny brainwashing about the illegal country shoppers illegally brought here by the Labor imbeciles to go onto WELFARE for EVER for LIFE.

Gecko troll just repeating your incorrect brainwashing doesn't make it correct.

But then the Greeny belief is that - if you don't believe me THEN YOU ARE WRONG!!!!!

And Tony Abbott STOPPED the BOATS crammed to the rafters with illegal country shoppers - NOT REFUGEES at all.

Send 'em packing to whence they crawled out of - these evil country shoppers.

Or leave 'em to the cannibals.

The mentality shows in the choices they make when 'given' options at Manus. Obviously the Papuans aren't worth living with - for some reason? Maybe they can't get away with drug dealing like they would if they were in Sydney?

Australia has 'politically' always asked for 'skilled & educated' migration (unlike the USA which said "Give us your Poor.").
So where these 'illegals' get off trying to enter Australia 'illegally' and use emotional blackmail ("Let me come in or I will kill myself!" ...which is like "Let me have sex with you or I will kill myself!" ) to enter, is beyond me. Maybe they think that OVER-POPULATION is a good excuse? Many nations use that.

I can see why who doesn't like being 'name called'  - being 'Gay' wants to flood Australia with 'illegals' to justify a sense of growing our population.  Something really screwed up there! 

I knew that allowing the Gays to justify their behaviour (and using Rednecks as their excuse to be justified) via the SSM vote would open the gates for them to penetrate all the back-doors of our society and create chaos and problems. Making our simply pleasant society, more complicated than it needs to be - pure 'over-indulgent' OVER-ACHIEVERS.

As for the - well when a peoples from the Middle-East ignite Religion and use it to oppress Europe for 2000 years and say "We are the way to God", only to have North America come onto the scene where as Germany said "No you're not - you lied" along with the fact that Karma played the role of them having murdered Jesus, creating Christianity and the Germans showing the Jews that they 'reaped what they sowed'. Both were terrible situations - but that's history/karma for you.

Armchair_Politician wrote on Nov 20^th, 2017 at 3:39pm:


whereas if you were going to run from your homeland with your family and seek asylum elsewhere you'd choose the crappiest place you could find ... right?

If they  were white Australian protesters on Manus - doing what they were doing - they would be forcibly removed, charged, fined and gaoled!!

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 20^th, 2017 at 6:13pm:

People condemn it because it's not the best for our country. Obviously you've picked the other side hey Pecca?

People striving to do the best for their families..sure Gregg that's why they pissed off from their families with the family jewels..then paid them to pirates so they the adult males could have first dibs at getting their noses into working Australians' pocket books

The sting is to get their sorry arses here, sit in Government funded premises get their family services payments set up for life then finally get the rest of their families from their fly bitten homes here on the family reunion arrangements

Can't see a ripoff when its happening right under your nose can you Gregg?

Most left wingers I've come into contact with  are sorry cases who haven't known the words 'hard work' in their lives. They spend most of their time either running to social services to ensure they are getting paid every possible free allowance they are entitled to or in their  spare time getting stuck into hopeless bleeding heart causes..oh the joy oh the brotherhood ...lets all gather by the river

Goodness gracious, the resident rightards are really pissed off with the perfectly legal refugees this afternoon.

Bad day at work the Centre link office?

Oh well guys, get it out of your systems - we don't want you kicking the dog when you get home.

John Smith wrote on Nov 20^th, 2017 at 6:15pm:


Mr Smith, it appears that the rightards are angry with the perfectly legal refugees because they have more balls and determination than they do.

Pretty gutsy to give your life savings to a bunch of pirates, and then travel across the world in a leaky boat in the hope of starting a new (better) life for you and your family.

The closest a rightard would get to doing something like that, would be chartering a yacht to the Whitsundays for a long weekend.

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 20^th, 2017 at 6:44pm:

Righto asshole. Most of our white ancestors came out here in old wooden boats to a wild country and built a great place. Don't bet on it. It's in our blood. The best your ancestors could do Pecca was come out here from Slovenia in a steamship because they probably collaborated with the Nazis and were scared of revenge.

Mr Hammer wrote on Nov 20^th, 2017 at 6:50pm:


Driving to the local BWS in your rusty Holden, without putting your seat belt on, would be the most adventurous thing you've done this year Homo.

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 20^th, 2017 at 6:52pm:

So did your German and Slovenian ancestors fight with the Nazis Pecca? Smith's did. You may have a lot in common.

Oh but we are kicking the dog Greggy...on this site metaphorically

The dog being a flea bitten hopeless project the bleeding hearts society of Australia call..getting Country Shoppers relabelled as Refugees ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!

Since when did the gecko troll become an hexspurt on illegal entries to Oz ? Or is it all just in his not very full head only ? Sounds like it judging by all the blatantly incorrect nonsense he keeps banging on about. But then empty vessels make the most sound.

Thank God for Australia that Tony Abbott STOPPED the BOATS full of illegal country shoppers wanting to come to Australia to go onto WELFARE for LIFE.

But back to some factuals of why it is SO IMPORTANT for Australia to STOP the BOATS irregardless of the lying propaganda being spread about by the traitorous Greenies.



No-go zones – coming soon!
AMM 20/11/2017



More and more we are seeing criminal migrants taking over our suburbs. For example, revealing new crime data – listing for the first time offenders by country of birth – shows sharp increases in carjacking and aggravated burglaries in Melbourne by Sudanese offenders.

The statistics show car thefts by Sudanese-born offenders rose significantly from 2015 to 2016. Aggravated burglaries almost doubled in 2016. Sudanese-born offenders committed 4.8 per cent of the aggravated burglaries in the state, according to the data.  Sudanese offenders make up 2.1 per cent of car thefts and car-jackings.

The community makes up less than 1 per cent of the Victorian population.Yes, our invited guests sure punch above their weight. They do everywhere.
A new report claims that migrant youth gangs in the Ebertplatz area of Cologne are becoming increasingly violent, leading some to describe the area as turning into a no-go zone.

Authorities in the Eberplatz area say that in recent months young migrants from the Middle East and Africa have turned the place into a no-go zone once the sun goes down. Over just the past nine months, police have been involved in around 3,000 incidents in the area ranging from simple stop and search to the murder of a 22-year-old African migrant last Saturday evening, Die Welt reports.

Police arrested three men in connection with the murder saying they were all part of the local drug scene. Police officials in Germany have previously warned that in some areas of the country asylum seekers and illegal migrants have begun to take over the lucrative drug trade, often using violence to achieve their goals.

One of the reasons the area has become so popular for drug dealing is its design allows criminals to come and go through passageways and tunnels and avoid authorities.

“The square is designed at such angles that even on the ground police can not overlook the entire area. This means that drug trafficking and acts of violence are not detected and prevented in a timely manner,” police said.
While police are called into the area on a daily basis and have carried out over 3,000 separate actions in the area, only 19 suspects have been arrested and prosecuted for crimes.

Ruth Wennemar, the spokesman for a local citizen’s association, said she, along with many other women, avoided the area altogether. “It has become a no-go zone for them. The boys drink hard alcohol from noon,” she said adding: “In the evening from 8 pm the Africans dominate the square, a marijuana cloud floats over it. That goes well into the night.”

The scenes are similar to reports in Paris where migrants in certain neighbourhoods harass women on the street and refuse to let them into cafes.
Politicians and police have advocated increasing the police presence in the area by building a mobile small police station, a move which is also being tried in an emerging no-go zone in Berlin. Local resident Gerd Franke, 63, said a redesign of the area and an increased police presence will not work. “At best, the drug scene will shift elsewhere,” he said.

Leftist media saturates the news. Fight back. Send articles to your friends, politicians, local media, and facebook.

http://morningmail.org/migrant-no-go-zones/#more-71755

And now some fair dinkum COMMENTS so different to the Lefties' bogus bunkum.

Graham Richards 20/11/2017, 6:16 am
Dutton is deporting New Zealand criminals by the dozen but never a mention of the deportation of Sudanese criminals. I hope he’s not using the he deportation of Kiwis as a smoke screen to cover up a soft approach to African criminals! Unfortunately we can’t trust any bloody politicians nowadays hence the the question!

TommyGun 20/11/2017, 11:29 am
Dutton is powerless to deport Sudanese.
They are refugees and refugees CANNOT be deported. Therin lies the problem!

Finn 20/11/2017, 7:58 am
Bankstown Lajemba are already no ho zones

Neville 20/11/2017, 5:54 pm
On the contrary Finn, there’s plenty of hoes in Bankstown and Lakemba. Bloke I work with, his brother lives next door to a quite well-established pimp, who runs a pretty fair number of them.

Lorraine 20/11/2017, 8:13 am
The Labor Party let in Criminals ,imported gangs and Daniel Andrews does nothing .

Joe Blogs 20/11/2017, 8:24 am
Criminals are the ALP’s natural constituents, L.  The Ape-ex gang are a new branch of Young Labor.

Lorraine 20/11/2017, 8:47 am
You are right sorry I messed up thinking that a State Government would bring them there thugs into line.

Mr Hammer wrote on Nov 20^th, 2017 at 6:59pm:


he was on his side.