capitosinora wrote on Nov 18
th, 2017 at 7:42am:
If you are normal straight person you must have different set of mind than sodomites and naturally you should feel responsible for preservation of your own human kind.
If you are not a gay than voting for SSM is extremely irresponsible act of disloyalty to healthy human population.
That makes absolutely no sense. Heterosexuals are still free to procreate if they wish. The ssm vote has zero effect on this
capitosinora wrote on Nov 18
th, 2017 at 7:42am:
If majority of Australians really voted YES for SSM than they are either Gays or closet Gays which would be a surprise for me.
So only logical conclusion is that the counting the plebiscite votes was rigged.
Incorrect. Many heterosexuals (myself included) have no issue with ssm. It will have no effect on us but if gay's want to get married then good luck to them. Marriage is nothing but a human social construct anyway.
capitosinora wrote on Nov 18
th, 2017 at 7:42am:
Prove us that counting votes were not rigged and I will change my mind.
GIVE US A PROOF IF YOU CAN.
That's not how it works. You are the one making the claim that it is rigged so the onus is on you to provide the evidence. This thread indicates that you don't have any evidence, you simply disagree with the result.
capitosinora wrote on Nov 18
th, 2017 at 7:42am:
How come few days before official announcement of the result main stream media and the organiser in rigging process Panny Wong with Gay lobby were already celebrating
Because all opinion polls have shown that support of ssm was running at over 60%. When the farcical postal vote had a response rate of 80% it was inevitable that the result would be in line with opinion polls. After all, the postal survey was nothing but a glorified and very expensive opinion poll