Australian Politics Forum

John Smith Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 72272 Gender:	Re: FD Reply #210 - Nov 18^th, 2017 at 12:13pm mothra wrote on Nov 18^th, 2017 at 11:57am: John Smith wrote on Nov 18^th, 2017 at 11:26am: mothra wrote on Nov 18^th, 2017 at 10:39am: I think John is owed an apology too. apology? I bet she's going to come back and claim to be the victim https://media.giphy.com/media/10GqZIENqWKfeM/giphy.gif told ya!
Back to top	Our esteemed leader: I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus. IP Logged

John Smith Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 72272 Gender:	Re: FD Reply #211 - Nov 18^th, 2017 at 12:13pm mothra wrote on Nov 18^th, 2017 at 11:46am: Poor old Cods. https://media.giphy.com/media/l1J9u3TZfpmeDLkD6/source.gif
Back to top	Our esteemed leader: I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus. IP Logged

mothra

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 34535
Gender: female

Re: FD
Reply #212 - Nov 18^th, 2017 at 12:20pm

John Smith wrote on Nov 18^th, 2017 at 12:12pm:

cods wrote on Nov 18^th, 2017 at 11:38am:

and no i dont believe js was not the mole the traitor why should I?..

and I don't believe you're not an alcoholic drunk ... why should I?

you said mothra said that I sent her the PM ... are you going to put up where she said it or are you going to admit you lied?

No. She won't admit it.

A question to her though (and all those watching ((always watching))) ... how do i still know what's going on in the secret roomS at PA seeing as John has been banned from there for quite a while?

Very active yesterday afternoon and last night, yes? Some terrible, terrible things said about me.

So much seething hatred.

Back to top

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.

IP Logged

Secret Wars

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 3928
Gender: male

Re: FD
Reply #213 - Nov 18^th, 2017 at 12:26pm

mothra wrote on Nov 18^th, 2017 at 10:38am:

Do i get an apology now for all of the revolting names you have called me Cods?

And for calling me a liar when i certainly did not lie?

When do I get an apology for you calling me dishonest? I posted how I got my results, you or anyone else can replicate it and see for themselves.

So not dishonest. The opposite of dishonest.

Honest. Open. Transparent. Reviewable. Checkable.

Now, as for dishonesty, you have refused to show your workings.

They too should be open, transparent, reviewable and checkable.

You accused me of dishonesty, show your workings.

Back to top

IP Logged

mothra

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 34535
Gender: female

Re: FD
Reply #214 - Nov 18^th, 2017 at 12:30pm

I didn't accuse you of dishonesty precious .. i said you were wrong. That of those online at the time of my statement, Gordon, Hammer and Herbie make more posts a day then most on your list.

But that doesn't interest you, does it? You're hunting wabbits.

Bit like how you caught poor old Cods in the crossfire but sucked up to her and hung enough poo on those of us she doesn't like to make her overlook that, yes?

My workings? You honestly can't work it out? LOL!

Am i wrong? Ask yourself that.

Now have a look at the time stamps to see how long it took me.

I'll just let you digest that and shuffle back to irrelevancy.

Back to top

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.

IP Logged

Mr Hammer

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 25212
Gender: male

Re: FD
Reply #215 - Nov 18^th, 2017 at 12:35pm

mothra wrote on Nov 18^th, 2017 at 12:30pm:

I didn't accuse you of dishonesty precious .. i said you were wrong. That of those online at the time of my statement, Gordon, Hammer and Herbie make more posts a day then most on your list.

But that doesn't interest you, does it? You're hunting wabbits.

Bit like how you caught poor old Cods in the crossfire but sucked up to her and hung enough poo on those of us she doesn't like to make her overlook that, yes?

My workings? You honestly can't work it out? LOL!

Am i wrong? Ask yourself that.

Now have a look at the time stamps to see how long it took me.

I'll just let you digest that and shuffle back to irrelevancy.

Hammer? That's funny coming from you considering that I've been on here longer than you and have racked up 12,000 posts to your 24,000???

Back to top

IP Logged

mothra

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 34535
Gender: female

Re: FD
Reply #216 - Nov 18^th, 2017 at 12:41pm

Mr Hammer wrote on Nov 18^th, 2017 at 12:35pm:

mothra wrote on Nov 18^th, 2017 at 12:30pm:

I didn't accuse you of dishonesty precious .. i said you were wrong. That of those online at the time of my statement, Gordon, Hammer and Herbie make more posts a day then most on your list.

But that doesn't interest you, does it? You're hunting wabbits.

Bit like how you caught poor old Cods in the crossfire but sucked up to her and hung enough poo on those of us she doesn't like to make her overlook that, yes?

My workings? You honestly can't work it out? LOL!

Am i wrong? Ask yourself that.

Now have a look at the time stamps to see how long it took me.

I'll just let you digest that and shuffle back to irrelevancy.

Hammer? That's funny coming from you considering that I've been on here longer than you and have racked up 12,000 posts to your 24,000???

Hey, this ain't my fight. It's Secret War's.

He thinks it's terribly important how much some people post per day but not others.

He's on your side though .. so don't worry, you're allowed to.

Back to top

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.

IP Logged

Mr Hammer

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 25212
Gender: male

Re: FD
Reply #217 - Nov 18^th, 2017 at 12:44pm

mothra wrote on Nov 18^th, 2017 at 12:41pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Nov 18^th, 2017 at 12:35pm:

mothra wrote on Nov 18^th, 2017 at 12:30pm:

I didn't accuse you of dishonesty precious .. i said you were wrong. That of those online at the time of my statement, Gordon, Hammer and Herbie make more posts a day then most on your list.

But that doesn't interest you, does it? You're hunting wabbits.

Bit like how you caught poor old Cods in the crossfire but sucked up to her and hung enough poo on those of us she doesn't like to make her overlook that, yes?

My workings? You honestly can't work it out? LOL!

Am i wrong? Ask yourself that.

Now have a look at the time stamps to see how long it took me.

I'll just let you digest that and shuffle back to irrelevancy.

Hammer? That's funny coming from you considering that I've been on here longer than you and have racked up 12,000 posts to your 24,000???

Hey, this ain't my fight. It's Secret War's.

He thinks it's terribly important how much some people post per day but not others.

He's on your side though .. so don't worry, you're allowed to.

Mention my name and it's our fight which obviously I won.

Back to top

IP Logged

mothra Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 34535 Gender:	Re: FD Reply #218 - Nov 18^th, 2017 at 12:47pm If you like, Hammer ..
Back to top	If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning. IP Logged

Mr Hammer Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 25212 Gender:	Re: FD Reply #219 - Nov 18^th, 2017 at 12:48pm mothra wrote on Nov 18^th, 2017 at 12:47pm: If you like, Hammer .. Good luck with post 24, 181. Cheers.
Back to top	IP Logged

Secret Wars

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 3928
Gender: male

Re: FD
Reply #220 - Nov 18^th, 2017 at 12:50pm

mothra wrote on Nov 18^th, 2017 at 12:30pm:

I didn't accuse you of dishonesty precious .. i said you were wrong. That of those online at the time of my statement, Gordon, Hammer and Herbie make more posts a day then most on your list.

...

My workings? You honestly can't work it out? LOL!

mothra wrote on Nov 16^th, 2017 at 12:50pm:

Except it just took me about a minute to see that it's quite wrong.

Not very well researched.

One would think you trying to make a point of your own choosing.

You wouldn't be that dishonest and petty by choice, surely Secret? You're just being characteristically nasty, yes?

What is it with the left and constantly lying?

Not hanging poo, I posted facts, it's not poo just cos you don't like the facts. Those same facts are available to you or to anyone.

Two keystrokes, go to members, go to posts.

Two keystrokes you called dishonest. Your wingman Gregg described, with a bit of tag teaming from yourself, Roll Eyes

as obsessional.

Over to you, prove I am wrong, prove you are right.

Show the method of your workings so they can be checked, I don't rely on your say so. And with good reason.

And now that is two apologies, one for calling me dishonest, and another for denying doing so.

And show your workings. Grin

Back to top

IP Logged

mothra Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 34535 Gender:	Re: FD Reply #221 - Nov 18^th, 2017 at 12:51pm Mr Hammer wrote on Nov 18^th, 2017 at 12:48pm: mothra wrote on Nov 18^th, 2017 at 12:47pm: If you like, Hammer .. Good luck with post 24, 181. Cheers. I see absolutely no indication in this thread that i require any luck at all.
Back to top	If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning. IP Logged

mothra Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 34535 Gender:	Re: FD Reply #222 - Nov 18^th, 2017 at 12:54pm Asking you if you were being deliberately dishonest is calling you dishonest is it? Perhaps you would like to apologise to me for asking me to apologise to you for not apologising over you stuffing up? I'm owed, like, sooooooo many apologies. Now answer me Secret, am i wrong?
Back to top	If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning. IP Logged

Mr Hammer

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 25212
Gender: male

Re: FD
Reply #223 - Nov 18^th, 2017 at 12:59pm

mothra wrote on Nov 18^th, 2017 at 12:54pm:

Asking you if you were being deliberately dishonest is calling you dishonest is it?

Perhaps you would like to apologise to me for asking me to apologise to you for not apologising over you stuffing up?

I'm owed, like, sooooooo many apologies.

Now answer me Secret, am i wrong?

Perhaps you'd like to apologise to me for writing something about me that is false. I go days and weeks without posting Mothra and am nowhere near a prolific poster as people like you, Smith and Pecca.

Back to top

IP Logged

mothra

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 34535
Gender: female

Re: FD
Reply #224 - Nov 18^th, 2017 at 1:01pm

Mr Hammer wrote on Nov 18^th, 2017 at 12:59pm:

mothra wrote on Nov 18^th, 2017 at 12:54pm:

Asking you if you were being deliberately dishonest is calling you dishonest is it?

Perhaps you would like to apologise to me for asking me to apologise to you for not apologising over you stuffing up?

I'm owed, like, sooooooo many apologies.

Now answer me Secret, am i wrong?

Perhaps you'd like to apologise to me for writing something about me that is false. I go days and weeks without posting Mothra and am nowhere near a prolific poster as people like you, Smith and Pecca.

How many posts a day do you make, Hammer? Look at your profile.

Oh! Now Secret will know how i did it! He was all confused and bamboozled and everything about my "workings".

Back to top

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.

IP Logged