Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 13 14 15 16 17 ... 20
Send Topic Print
racial hatred in Australia (Read 3527 times)
Neferti
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 4857
Canberra, ACT.
Re: racial hatred in Australia
Reply #210 - Oct 12th, 2017 at 4:16pm
 
greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 4:02pm:
Neferti wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 4:00pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:48pm:
Neferti wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:47pm:
"Marriage" has never, ever been between anybody BUT a MAN and a WOMAN.



Incorrect.


OK, I shall give you that BUT it always WAS between a man and a woman UNTIL the Homosexuals and their tag team (you & Co) started carrying on about it.

I don't care. NOBODY cares. Don't you get it?

Now Britain is starting to worry about "property" and so forth with their new Marriage Law.  At least Australia did it first ... change the "spouse" laws to apply to ALL couples, married or otherwise.  Y.A.W.N.

I can't wait for the Fat Lady to Sing!


Yes, it's only a recent thing   Grin

"Roman Emperor Nero was married to not one man, but two. His nuptials were recorded and discussed at the time between subjects - friendly and hostile. The detail is recorded in the 1999 book Roman Homosexuality (updated in 2012) by Craig Williams, a classics professor of Brooklyn College, New York. The book includes a chapter on marriage between men, practiced throughout the empire, all the way to the top."


Wikipedia ....  Grin Grin Grin Grin Anybody can post there and change posts.

Since Nero was  born around AD 37, those tablets by various in the MI when Jesus was born as a Jew .......  it all sounds like bullshit to me, to me ....

It is obvious that some rampant homosexual is trying the change HISTORY .... how the hell would Craig Williams KNOW what was going on in AD67 or whatever  ... s.p.e.c.u.l.a.t.i.o.n.

NOBODY knows. Get it?

Besides when the Homosexuals can get married in Australia, they will have to fork out the exorbitant Legal fees that Divorce Lawyers ...
Back to top
 
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Neferti
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 4857
Canberra, ACT.
Re: racial hatred in Australia
Reply #211 - Oct 12th, 2017 at 4:19pm
 
mothra wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 4:06pm:
Neferti wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 4:03pm:
mothra wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:53pm:
John Smith wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:52pm:
Neferti wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:47pm:
Anybody who has done their Family History will know that "marriage" dates back to the year dot ... or when people could write and fill in Church Registers.



actually, marriage existed long before it was hijacked by the church



And among very many people, all over the world.

Not always between a man and a woman.


Got a link to that comment?


How many times do you people need it typed out?

Seriously?


Wink
Back to top
 
WWW  
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 67172
Gender: female
Re: racial hatred in Australia
Reply #212 - Oct 12th, 2017 at 4:19pm
 
Neferti wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 4:16pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 4:02pm:
Neferti wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 4:00pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:48pm:
Neferti wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:47pm:
"Marriage" has never, ever been between anybody BUT a MAN and a WOMAN.



Incorrect.


OK, I shall give you that BUT it always WAS between a man and a woman UNTIL the Homosexuals and their tag team (you & Co) started carrying on about it.

I don't care. NOBODY cares. Don't you get it?

Now Britain is starting to worry about "property" and so forth with their new Marriage Law.  At least Australia did it first ... change the "spouse" laws to apply to ALL couples, married or otherwise.  Y.A.W.N.

I can't wait for the Fat Lady to Sing!


Yes, it's only a recent thing   Grin

"Roman Emperor Nero was married to not one man, but two. His nuptials were recorded and discussed at the time between subjects - friendly and hostile. The detail is recorded in the 1999 book Roman Homosexuality (updated in 2012) by Craig Williams, a classics professor of Brooklyn College, New York. The book includes a chapter on marriage between men, practiced throughout the empire, all the way to the top."


Wikipedia .... 


No. Not Wikipedia.

Do you have a problem with your eyes?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 67172
Gender: female
Re: racial hatred in Australia
Reply #213 - Oct 12th, 2017 at 4:21pm
 
Neferti wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 4:16pm:
.......  it all sounds like bullshit to me, to me ....


Of course it does - you're an uneducated fool.

Unlike the person who wrote the book, who is a classics professor at Brooklyn College, New York.

Who to believe: classic professor, or internet troll?   Undecided

Tough decision.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
mothra
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 23675
Gender: female
Re: racial hatred in Australia
Reply #214 - Oct 12th, 2017 at 4:24pm
 
Neferti wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 4:19pm:
mothra wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 4:06pm:
Neferti wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 4:03pm:
mothra wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:53pm:
John Smith wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:52pm:
Neferti wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:47pm:
Anybody who has done their Family History will know that "marriage" dates back to the year dot ... or when people could write and fill in Church Registers.



actually, marriage existed long before it was hijacked by the church



And among very many people, all over the world.

Not always between a man and a woman.


Got a link to that comment?


How many times do you people need it typed out?

Seriously?


Wink


Oh. You're just trolling. You have already read the countless examples of the diversity in marriage over the ages.

Or do you still think it's just for nice white people from proper churches?
Back to top
 

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.
 
IP Logged
 
Neferti
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 4857
Canberra, ACT.
Re: racial hatred in Australia
Reply #215 - Oct 12th, 2017 at 4:24pm
 
greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 4:19pm:
Neferti wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 4:16pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 4:02pm:
Neferti wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 4:00pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:48pm:
Neferti wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:47pm:
"Marriage" has never, ever been between anybody BUT a MAN and a WOMAN.



Incorrect.


OK, I shall give you that BUT it always WAS between a man and a woman UNTIL the Homosexuals and their tag team (you & Co) started carrying on about it.

I don't care. NOBODY cares. Don't you get it?

Now Britain is starting to worry about "property" and so forth with their new Marriage Law.  At least Australia did it first ... change the "spouse" laws to apply to ALL couples, married or otherwise.  Y.A.W.N.

I can't wait for the Fat Lady to Sing!


Yes, it's only a recent thing   Grin

"Roman Emperor Nero was married to not one man, but two. His nuptials were recorded and discussed at the time between subjects - friendly and hostile. The detail is recorded in the 1999 book Roman Homosexuality (updated in 2012) by Craig Williams, a classics professor of Brooklyn College, New York. The book includes a chapter on marriage between men, practiced throughout the empire, all the way to the top."


Wikipedia .... 


No. Not Wikipedia.

Do you have a problem with your eyes?


No, do you?

I think you have a problem with your sexual feelings ... go on, TRY it.

you might even like "BEING IN SEX" WITH A MAN .....

Just leave the children and the animals alone ... that is very, very GROSS .... and illegal. Wink

Back to top
 
WWW  
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 67172
Gender: female
Re: racial hatred in Australia
Reply #216 - Oct 12th, 2017 at 4:24pm
 
Neferti wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 4:24pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 4:19pm:
Neferti wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 4:16pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 4:02pm:
Neferti wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 4:00pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:48pm:
Neferti wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:47pm:
"Marriage" has never, ever been between anybody BUT a MAN and a WOMAN.



Incorrect.


OK, I shall give you that BUT it always WAS between a man and a woman UNTIL the Homosexuals and their tag team (you & Co) started carrying on about it.

I don't care. NOBODY cares. Don't you get it?

Now Britain is starting to worry about "property" and so forth with their new Marriage Law.  At least Australia did it first ... change the "spouse" laws to apply to ALL couples, married or otherwise.  Y.A.W.N.

I can't wait for the Fat Lady to Sing!


Yes, it's only a recent thing   Grin

"Roman Emperor Nero was married to not one man, but two. His nuptials were recorded and discussed at the time between subjects - friendly and hostile. The detail is recorded in the 1999 book Roman Homosexuality (updated in 2012) by Craig Williams, a classics professor of Brooklyn College, New York. The book includes a chapter on marriage between men, practiced throughout the empire, all the way to the top."


Wikipedia .... 


No. Not Wikipedia.

Do you have a problem with your eyes?


No,



Then why did you mention Wikipedia?

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
cods
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 63474
Re: racial hatred in Australia
Reply #217 - Oct 12th, 2017 at 4:26pm
 
greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 2:40pm:
cods wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 2:38pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 2:36pm:
cods wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 2:33pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 2:10pm:
Grendel wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 1:44pm:
Got nothing eh gweggy...

Grendel wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 12:24pm:
Because for thousands of years and billions of people it has ever been thus...  anything else is an aberration or anomaly certainly a very very small minority.

men and women...  multiply... and I don't mean maths.
men and women have children and create families from their progeny.
men and women keep the species alive.

Need I go on?



That's correct - you have nothing.

It has not been that way for thousands of years.





so how many years then pet.... you never said...




Zero.



so if man and women havnt been making babies..

who has..???..  Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked

what do you know the rest of us dont????.. WOW...


Nobody said that, cods.

I suggest you scroll back and see what's being discussed.




I suggest you read the bit above which is what you replied too.. Angry in red.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 67172
Gender: female
Re: racial hatred in Australia
Reply #218 - Oct 12th, 2017 at 4:29pm
 
cods wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 4:26pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 2:40pm:
cods wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 2:38pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 2:36pm:
cods wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 2:33pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 2:10pm:
Grendel wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 1:44pm:
Got nothing eh gweggy...

Grendel wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 12:24pm:
Because for thousands of years and billions of people it has ever been thus...  anything else is an aberration or anomaly certainly a very very small minority.

men and women...  multiply... and I don't mean maths.
men and women have children and create families from their progeny.
men and women keep the species alive.

Need I go on?



That's correct - you have nothing.

It has not been that way for thousands of years.





so how many years then pet.... you never said...




Zero.



so if man and women havnt been making babies..

who has..???..  Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked

what do you know the rest of us dont????.. WOW...


Nobody said that, cods.

I suggest you scroll back and see what's being discussed.




I suggest you read the bit above which is what you replied too.. Angry in red.


No.

Scroll back further.

I'm not replying to that.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
cods
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 63474
Re: racial hatred in Australia
Reply #219 - Oct 12th, 2017 at 4:47pm
 
greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 4:05pm:
Neferti wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 4:03pm:
mothra wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:53pm:
John Smith wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:52pm:
Neferti wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:47pm:
Anybody who has done their Family History will know that "marriage" dates back to the year dot ... or when people could write and fill in Church Registers.



actually, marriage existed long before it was hijacked by the church



And among very many people, all over the world.

Not always between a man and a woman.


Got a link to that comment?


A significant body of academic work shows that marriage and "other solemnised relationships" have not always been between "a man and a woman".

A Link.



omg... well you do read some weird stuff..

as we are talking about marriage   as we know it.. or thought we did.. Roll Eyes

can we see some of the registrations of these homosexual marriages that took place hundreds of years ago... I am not disputing homosexuality in Roman times ..but we all know Nero was depraved  as many of them were...and mock ceremonies do not make a marriage..

unless you are gweg that is.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
cods
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 63474
Re: racial hatred in Australia
Reply #220 - Oct 12th, 2017 at 4:48pm
 
greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 4:29pm:
cods wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 4:26pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 2:40pm:
cods wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 2:38pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 2:36pm:
cods wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 2:33pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 2:10pm:
Grendel wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 1:44pm:
Got nothing eh gweggy...

Grendel wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 12:24pm:
Because for thousands of years and billions of people it has ever been thus...  anything else is an aberration or anomaly certainly a very very small minority.

men and women...  multiply... and I don't mean maths.
men and women have children and create families from their progeny.
men and women keep the species alive.

Need I go on?



That's correct - you have nothing.

It has not been that way for thousands of years.





so how many years then pet.... you never said...




Zero.



so if man and women havnt been making babies..

who has..???..  Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked

what do you know the rest of us dont????.. WOW...


Nobody said that, cods.

I suggest you scroll back and see what's being discussed.




I suggest you read the bit above which is what you replied too.. Angry in red.


No.

Scroll back further.

I'm not replying to that.




well I did.. and as far as I am concerned so did you?..

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Ye Grappler
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 31870
Mid-North Coast NSW
Gender: male
Re: racial hatred in Australia
Reply #221 - Oct 12th, 2017 at 6:13pm
 
cods wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 4:47pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 4:05pm:
Neferti wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 4:03pm:
mothra wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:53pm:
John Smith wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:52pm:
Neferti wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:47pm:
Anybody who has done their Family History will know that "marriage" dates back to the year dot ... or when people could write and fill in Church Registers.



actually, marriage existed long before it was hijacked by the church



And among very many people, all over the world.

Not always between a man and a woman.


Got a link to that comment?


A significant body of academic work shows that marriage and "other solemnised relationships" have not always been between "a man and a woman".

A Link.


omg... well you do read some weird stuff..

as we are talking about marriage   as we know it.. or thought we did.. Roll Eyes

can we see some of the registrations of these homosexual marriages that took place hundreds of years ago... I am not disputing homosexuality in Roman times ..but we all know Nero was depraved  as many of them were...and mock ceremonies do not make a marriage..

unless you are gweg that is.




Aye - and that's always been oddities and transgressions and has subsequently been stamped out... thank you for coming.  I read the links thanks, and it clearly shows that 'some' homosexual priests etc carried out homosexual marriages, but that practice was outlawed fifteen or sixteen hundred years ago... you are not permitted to cite illegal acts by some rogue priests that may have occurred subsequently.  Part of the reason for the attacks on the Templars, centuries later, was that they were cited as being homosexuals.... and thus agin the nature of Man and of God!!!

This kind of nonsense is like arguing with the 'feminist' minded about the suffragettes - who, by their violent and illegal and irresponsible actions, actually delayed the vote for women in Britain for twenty years after it was granted by majority vote under the first vote employing universal male suffrage in 1900 in Australia.

MEN gave women the vote in this nation at the first possible opportunity - MEN delayed it for twenty years in Britain due to the activities of suffragettes.

There is a lesson there for those who wish to learn properly and stop listening to the voices they think are from the Oracles.

Round 2:-  "actually, marriage existed long before it was hijacked by the church "

Indeed - but it was always solemnised by priests or heads of tribes or whatever.... just because one specific brand of religion adopted it and applied their own rules to it makes not one jot of difference.  Attacking some amorphous 'church' has no meaning whatsoever in the discussion of marriage.

Now - when you talk about 'the church' - what exactly 'church' do you mean?


Back to top
« Last Edit: Oct 12th, 2017 at 6:22pm by Ye Grappler »  

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams
 
IP Logged
 
cods
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 63474
Re: racial hatred in Australia
Reply #222 - Oct 12th, 2017 at 6:27pm
 
Ye Grappler wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 6:13pm:
cods wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 4:47pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 4:05pm:
Neferti wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 4:03pm:
mothra wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:53pm:
John Smith wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:52pm:
Neferti wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:47pm:
Anybody who has done their Family History will know that "marriage" dates back to the year dot ... or when people could write and fill in Church Registers.



actually, marriage existed long before it was hijacked by the church



And among very many people, all over the world.

Not always between a man and a woman.


Got a link to that comment?


A significant body of academic work shows that marriage and "other solemnised relationships" have not always been between "a man and a woman".

A Link.


omg... well you do read some weird stuff..

as we are talking about marriage   as we know it.. or thought we did.. Roll Eyes

can we see some of the registrations of these homosexual marriages that took place hundreds of years ago... I am not disputing homosexuality in Roman times ..but we all know Nero was depraved  as many of them were...and mock ceremonies do not make a marriage..

unless you are gweg that is.




Aye - and that's always been oddities and transgressions and has subsequently been stamped out... thank you for coming.  I read the links thanks, and it clearly shows that 'some' homosexual priests etc carried out homosexual marriages, but that practice was outlawed fifteen or sixteen hundred years ago... you are not permitted to cite illegal acts by some rogue priests that may have occurred subsequently.  Part of the reason for the attacks on the Templars, centuries later, was that they were cited as being homosexuals.... and thus agin the nature of Man and of God!!!

This kind of nonsense is like arguing with the 'feminist' minded about the suffragettes - who, by their violent and illegal and irresponsible actions, actually delayed the vote for women in Britain for twenty years after it was granted by majority vote under the first vote employing universal male suffrage in 1900 in Australia.

MEN gave women the vote in this nation at the first possible opportunity - MEN delayed it for twenty years in Britain due to the activities of suffragettes.

There is a lesson there for those who wish to learn properly and stop listening to the voices they think are from the Oracles.

Round 2:-  "actually, marriage existed long before it was hijacked by the church "

Indeed - but it was always solemnised by priests or heads of tribes or whatever.... just because one specific brand of religion adopted it and applied their own rules to it makes not one jot of difference.  Attacking some amorphous 'church' has no meaning whatsoever in the discussion of marriage.

Now - when you talk about 'the church' - what exactly 'church' do you mean?





I prefer to go by the recorded register of marriages....

to me thats when it all became legitimised....

until then anyone could say or write anything  none could dispute it could they?

Nero has been given credit for lots of things even burning Rome.. however its all based on rumours...

and seriously thats almost all they had in those times..

very few were privy to, the happenings  in the courts..

but the stories would have been scandalous...

worse than today when everything is on video.. Grin Grin
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Grendel
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 23010
Gender: male
Re: racial hatred in Australia
Reply #223 - Oct 12th, 2017 at 7:30pm
 
Auggie wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:26pm:
Grendel wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:24pm:
Auggie wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:03pm:
Grendel wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 12:24pm:
Because for thousands of years and billions of people it has ever been thus...  anything else is an aberration or anomaly certainly a very very small minority.

men and women...  multiply... and I don't mean maths.
men and women have children and create families from their progeny.
men and women keep the species alive.

Need I go on?


Ok, so for the umpteenth time, what if they don't create families, is it still marriage?

Also, people can have children without getting married, can't they?

YOU are an idiot....  can't refute what I said...  go away and take your ludicrous strawmen with you.

Gweggy is busy shooting himself in the foot and avoiding reality.  Soon he'll be just like you. Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy


G, you say that marriage is about multiplying and having children, therefore if the couple don't have children, is that considered still a marriage? Should we annul a marriage that doesn't produce children?

Actually I've said  marriage is about many things Auggie...  no need to create more lies about what I say.
You'll be taking gweggy's place doing that sort of thing. Cheesy
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Grendel
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 23010
Gender: male
Re: racial hatred in Australia
Reply #224 - Oct 12th, 2017 at 7:35pm
 
Don't worry about gweggy he's wrong and a liar and being disingenous as usual.
he created another strawman which doesn't address what I actually said.
Don't waste your time with him he's as stupid as Auggie.
Aren't ya gweggy.
Nero married a man...  ta da...  well there you have it, 1 exception to the rule negates the billions that don't.

Pull the other one gweggy. Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

Thousands of years and billions of people gweggy...  the trend and norm has been set...  you lose. Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 13 14 15 16 17 ... 20
Send Topic Print