Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 12 13 14 15 16 ... 20
Send Topic Print
racial hatred in Australia (Read 15501 times)
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 130913
Gender: male
Re: racial hatred in Australia
Reply #195 - Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:48pm
 
Neferti wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:47pm:
"Marriage" has never, ever been between anybody BUT a MAN and a WOMAN.



Incorrect.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 130913
Gender: male
Re: racial hatred in Australia
Reply #196 - Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:50pm
 

Here you go:

The claim: Tony Abbott says marriage, or marriage-like relationships, have always been between a man and a woman.

The verdict: A significant body of academic work shows that marriage and "other solemnised relationships" have not always been between "a man and a woman".
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
John Smith
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 71971
Gender: male
Re: racial hatred in Australia
Reply #197 - Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:52pm
 
Neferti wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:47pm:
Anybody who has done their Family History will know that "marriage" dates back to the year dot ... or when people could write and fill in Church Registers.



actually, marriage existed long before it was hijacked by the church
Back to top
 

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.
 
IP Logged
 
mothra
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 34385
Gender: female
Re: racial hatred in Australia
Reply #198 - Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:53pm
 
John Smith wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:52pm:
Neferti wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:47pm:
Anybody who has done their Family History will know that "marriage" dates back to the year dot ... or when people could write and fill in Church Registers.



actually, marriage existed long before it was hijacked by the church



And among very many people, all over the world.

Not always between a man and a woman.
Back to top
 

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.
 
IP Logged
 
Auggie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


The Bull Moose

Posts: 8571
Re: racial hatred in Australia
Reply #199 - Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:54pm
 
Neferti wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:47pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:29pm:
Grendel wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:28pm:
I suggest you read The HISTORY of MARRIAGE and you may (but I doubt it) just learn something.


Yes.

He'll learn that marriage has not always been only between a man and a woman.

And, that it's not only for having children.


Anybody who has done their Family History will know that "marriage" dates back to the year dot ... or when people could write and fill in Church Registers.

Marriage was to "legalise" a relationship and to protect the children from being "bastards" ... in God's eyes.

Sex has always been sex! You don't need to be married to do it.  Wink

"Marriage" has never, ever been between anybody BUT a MAN and a WOMAN.

Undoubtedly, there has always been men who preferred men to have sex with, or even a bit "both ways",  as much as there has always been men who prefer children to have sex with. There has probably been men who prefer to have sex with their pet goat, sheep, dog or whatever, as well.

Regardless, I wish the Homosexuals a Great Wedding (and a Divorce when they want to call it quits). They will get what they asked for!  Grin


'In God's eyes'?

That then means that you only get one bite at the cherry; sex for pleasure is a sin; and you can't divorce.

I will support this restrictive interpretation of marriage if you will?
Back to top
 

The Progressive President
 
IP Logged
 
Mattyfisk
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 91866
Gender: male
Re: racial hatred in Australia
Reply #200 - Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:55pm
 
mothra wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:53pm:
John Smith wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:52pm:
Neferti wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:47pm:
Anybody who has done their Family History will know that "marriage" dates back to the year dot ... or when people could write and fill in Church Registers.



actually, marriage existed long before it was hijacked by the church



And among very many people, all over the world.

Not always between a man and a woman.


Well yes, Mr Howard might have changed that, but it was supported by the leftards, you know.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 130913
Gender: male
Re: racial hatred in Australia
Reply #201 - Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:57pm
 

"Roman Emperor Nero was married to not one man, but two. His nuptials were recorded and discussed at the time between subjects - friendly and hostile.

"The detail is recorded in the 1999 book Roman Homosexuality (updated in 2012) by Craig Williams, a classics professor of Brooklyn College, New York.

"The book includes a chapter on marriage between men, practiced throughout the empire, all the way to the top."
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
mothra
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 34385
Gender: female
Re: racial hatred in Australia
Reply #202 - Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:58pm
 
Mattyfisk wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:55pm:
mothra wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:53pm:
John Smith wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:52pm:
Neferti wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:47pm:
Anybody who has done their Family History will know that "marriage" dates back to the year dot ... or when people could write and fill in Church Registers.



actually, marriage existed long before it was hijacked by the church



And among very many people, all over the world.

Not always between a man and a woman.


Well yes, Mr Howard might have changed that, but it was supported by the leftards, you know.



It's probably all part of the Marxist plot. Division  of the people so as to ultimately blame on the bourgeoisie. With the help of the universities, the ABC and fake news.
Back to top
 

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.
 
IP Logged
 
Mattyfisk
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 91866
Gender: male
Re: racial hatred in Australia
Reply #203 - Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:59pm
 
mothra wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:58pm:
Mattyfisk wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:55pm:
mothra wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:53pm:
John Smith wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:52pm:
Neferti wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:47pm:
Anybody who has done their Family History will know that "marriage" dates back to the year dot ... or when people could write and fill in Church Registers.



actually, marriage existed long before it was hijacked by the church



And among very many people, all over the world.

Not always between a man and a woman.


Well yes, Mr Howard might have changed that, but it was supported by the leftards, you know.



It's probably all part of the Marxist plot. Division  of the people so as to ultimately blame on the bourgeoisie. With the help of the ABC and fake news.


"Progressives". Typical.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Neferti
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 7965
Canberra
Gender: female
Re: racial hatred in Australia
Reply #204 - Oct 12th, 2017 at 4:00pm
 
greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:48pm:
Neferti wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:47pm:
"Marriage" has never, ever been between anybody BUT a MAN and a WOMAN.



Incorrect.


OK, I shall give you that BUT it always WAS between a man and a woman UNTIL the Homosexuals and their tag team (you & Co) started carrying on about it.

I don't care. NOBODY cares. Don't you get it?

Now Britain is starting to worry about "property" and so forth with their new Marriage Law.  At least Australia did it first ... change the "spouse" laws to apply to ALL couples, married or otherwise.  Y.A.W.N.

I can't wait for the Fat Lady to Sing!
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Neferti
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 7965
Canberra
Gender: female
Re: racial hatred in Australia
Reply #205 - Oct 12th, 2017 at 4:01pm
 
John Smith wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:52pm:
Neferti wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:47pm:
Anybody who has done their Family History will know that "marriage" dates back to the year dot ... or when people could write and fill in Church Registers.



actually, marriage existed long before it was hijacked by the church



Where?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 130913
Gender: male
Re: racial hatred in Australia
Reply #206 - Oct 12th, 2017 at 4:02pm
 
Neferti wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 4:00pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:48pm:
Neferti wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:47pm:
"Marriage" has never, ever been between anybody BUT a MAN and a WOMAN.



Incorrect.


OK, I shall give you that BUT it always WAS between a man and a woman UNTIL the Homosexuals and their tag team (you & Co) started carrying on about it.

I don't care. NOBODY cares. Don't you get it?

Now Britain is starting to worry about "property" and so forth with their new Marriage Law.  At least Australia did it first ... change the "spouse" laws to apply to ALL couples, married or otherwise.  Y.A.W.N.

I can't wait for the Fat Lady to Sing!


Yes, it's only a recent thing   Grin

"Roman Emperor Nero was married to not one man, but two. His nuptials were recorded and discussed at the time between subjects - friendly and hostile. The detail is recorded in the 1999 book Roman Homosexuality (updated in 2012) by Craig Williams, a classics professor of Brooklyn College, New York. The book includes a chapter on marriage between men, practiced throughout the empire, all the way to the top."

http://www.abc.net.au/news/factcheck/2013-11-01/tony-abbott-incorrect-history-ma...
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Neferti
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 7965
Canberra
Gender: female
Re: racial hatred in Australia
Reply #207 - Oct 12th, 2017 at 4:03pm
 
mothra wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:53pm:
John Smith wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:52pm:
Neferti wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:47pm:
Anybody who has done their Family History will know that "marriage" dates back to the year dot ... or when people could write and fill in Church Registers.



actually, marriage existed long before it was hijacked by the church



And among very many people, all over the world.

Not always between a man and a woman.


Got a link to that comment?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 130913
Gender: male
Re: racial hatred in Australia
Reply #208 - Oct 12th, 2017 at 4:05pm
 
Neferti wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 4:03pm:
mothra wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:53pm:
John Smith wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:52pm:
Neferti wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:47pm:
Anybody who has done their Family History will know that "marriage" dates back to the year dot ... or when people could write and fill in Church Registers.



actually, marriage existed long before it was hijacked by the church



And among very many people, all over the world.

Not always between a man and a woman.


Got a link to that comment?


A significant body of academic work shows that marriage and "other solemnised relationships" have not always been between "a man and a woman".

A Link.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
mothra
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 34385
Gender: female
Re: racial hatred in Australia
Reply #209 - Oct 12th, 2017 at 4:06pm
 
Neferti wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 4:03pm:
mothra wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:53pm:
John Smith wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:52pm:
Neferti wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 3:47pm:
Anybody who has done their Family History will know that "marriage" dates back to the year dot ... or when people could write and fill in Church Registers.



actually, marriage existed long before it was hijacked by the church



And among very many people, all over the world.

Not always between a man and a woman.


Got a link to that comment?


How many times do you people need it typed out?

Seriously?
Back to top
 

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 12 13 14 15 16 ... 20
Send Topic Print