Lord Herbert wrote on Oct 6
th, 2017 at 8:06am:
Mr Hammer wrote on Oct 6
th, 2017 at 5:52am:
A person's view on someone says a lot about themselves. I see Pecker as a shrivelled-up, hypocritical elitistist who provides little apart from trolling and expropriating over people's art work. Aside from thaf he is dishonest and dishonorable. Then again, that's propably just me.
My objection to Gregg is that he persistently invades threads that have a chance at some decent discussion, to deliberately and with delinquent aforethought - (just as so often is the case with Aussie, Karnal, and John Smith) - hijacks the conversation with trite one-liners which inevitably starts a long string of posts that add nothing to the topic but are purely in the nature of being
ad hominems in which the attention is now focussed upon himself.
It's trolling to a very destructive degree, to the point where the more sincere members here simply end up asking themselves why bother to spend the effort and the time to nut out decent posts.
I don't mind the occasional blitz by such as Gregg if it helps him to get his rocks off temporarily, but as I've said countless times, it's the
inevitability that he and Karnal
et al will soon arrive to deposit off-topic
ad hominem turds into the thread in response to well-considered contributions, all of it ending up in childish tit-for-tat somewhere aged 9 or 10.
It's why the owner of the last forum board I belonged to (Brad) permanently banned anyone he noticed who made it their habit to log in and ~ Quote
"Go shitting in all four corners of the board". They were very promptly winkled out, never to be heard from again.
No, Herbie, your objection is that people question your propaganda. You have a very clear purpose here. You want to promote fear of the tinted races, starting with the Muselman. Your aim is to reintroduce the White Australia Policy, in the fullness of time.
To do this, you post what we call porkie pies, or lies. Examples in the past week include an alleged Muslim crime gang (with no Muslims) and a Muslim demonstration in support of terrorism (it was a demonstration
against terrorism).
We could go on and on with examples of your lies - you are, after all, renowned for it. By thread vandals, you refer to those who question your lies. What you want - on a political
discussion board - is an unquestioning audience for your propaganda.
If you want this, I'd suggest a You Tube presentation a la Alex Jones of Infowars. This is a hoax/conspiracy show where Jones just makes stuff up. Yes, it's probably a bit more effort than throwing a few Pickering or UK Daily Mail links together and talking about the fullness of time, but it's the only way I can see where you can get the sort of blind obedience you want.
If you post propaganda on a discussion board it will get discussed - big mistake. Whether it's Greggery or JS or silly old Karnal, someone will always question your posts because they're simply not true. What you need is a more one-way medium for your porkies. Sure, they'll still be questioned in private, but this won't interrupt the sort of mass frenzied hysteria you're trying to invoke.
If what Karnal says is true. Then I never picked it up by Lord Herbert. Pretty sly of him then.
At least with Dr Mengele - he just lets you know where he stands straight and obvious.