Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 11 12 13 14 15 ... 22
Send Topic Print
Marriages to be annulled (Read 17927 times)
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 130884
Gender: male
Re: Marriages to be annulled
Reply #180 - Oct 14th, 2017 at 2:26pm
 

Stop wasting Goose's time, everyone.

He's getting upset.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Auggie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


The Bull Moose

Posts: 8571
Re: Marriages to be annulled
Reply #181 - Oct 14th, 2017 at 3:03pm
 
Grendel wrote on Oct 14th, 2017 at 1:50pm:
Auggie wrote on Oct 14th, 2017 at 9:40am:
Grendel wrote on Oct 14th, 2017 at 9:33am:
Well there you go TROLLS...  more stuff you can ignore as you continue on trashing topics... Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy


I simply disagree with those facts. I don’t believe that SSM devalues marriage. Marriage is personal and is no one’s busy but their own.

Second, I actually agree with you on one point: churches and/or religious institutions should not be forced to marry or recognise SSM. Also, I don’t agree with the leftist crusade on shutting down everyone who disagrees with ssm. I’m a libertarian, not a lefty, G.

I will never force a priest to marry a gay couple, nor would I force a baker to bake a cake for a gay wedding.

Marriage is defined as TWO consenting adults. Not children or animals; nor more than TWO. I think that’s pretty blatantly obvious.

LOL
You can disagree with those FACTS, but guess what Auggie... 
they still remain FACTS


Disagreeing with reality says something disturbing about you and people like you. Cheesy


What? The fact that there is a growing trend of dissolved marriages due to SSM? Get real? That’s a consequence of the modern world, G. Looks like you need a dose of reality.

Why not blame capitalism? Or pornography for he breakdown of marriage? Why not ban divorce to preserve the sanctity of marriage?

There are many cause as to why marriage has broken down and SSM certainly isn’t one of them.
Back to top
 

The Progressive President
 
IP Logged
 
Mattyfisk
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 91848
Gender: male
Re: Marriages to be annulled
Reply #182 - Oct 14th, 2017 at 4:04pm
 
Auggie wrote on Oct 14th, 2017 at 3:03pm:
Grendel wrote on Oct 14th, 2017 at 1:50pm:
Auggie wrote on Oct 14th, 2017 at 9:40am:
Grendel wrote on Oct 14th, 2017 at 9:33am:
Well there you go TROLLS...  more stuff you can ignore as you continue on trashing topics... Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy


I simply disagree with those facts. I don’t believe that SSM devalues marriage. Marriage is personal and is no one’s busy but their own.

Second, I actually agree with you on one point: churches and/or religious institutions should not be forced to marry or recognise SSM. Also, I don’t agree with the leftist crusade on shutting down everyone who disagrees with ssm. I’m a libertarian, not a lefty, G.

I will never force a priest to marry a gay couple, nor would I force a baker to bake a cake for a gay wedding.

Marriage is defined as TWO consenting adults. Not children or animals; nor more than TWO. I think that’s pretty blatantly obvious.

LOL
You can disagree with those FACTS, but guess what Auggie... 
they still remain FACTS


Disagreeing with reality says something disturbing about you and people like you. Cheesy


What? The fact that there is a growing trend of dissolved marriages due to SSM? Get real? That’s a consequence of the modern world, G. Looks like you need a dose of reality.

Why not blame capitalism? Or pornography for he breakdown of marriage? Why not ban divorce to preserve the sanctity of marriage?

There are many cause as to why marriage has broken down and SSM certainly isn’t one of them.


Grendel's article doesn't include any facts. It points to things like "increased risk" of civil damages for people refusing to rent venues out to gays, for example, or polygamists being "emboldened", or advocates "demanding" same sex marriages be treated the same in the classroom.

None of this actually means anything. It's the same argument applied to the gay marriage debate here. It shows that after legalising same sex marriage, nothing has actually changed in Canada at all.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Oct 14th, 2017 at 4:09pm by Mattyfisk »  
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 130884
Gender: male
Re: Marriages to be annulled
Reply #183 - Oct 14th, 2017 at 4:09pm
 
Mattyfisk wrote on Oct 14th, 2017 at 4:04pm:
Auggie wrote on Oct 14th, 2017 at 3:03pm:
Grendel wrote on Oct 14th, 2017 at 1:50pm:
Auggie wrote on Oct 14th, 2017 at 9:40am:
Grendel wrote on Oct 14th, 2017 at 9:33am:
Well there you go TROLLS...  more stuff you can ignore as you continue on trashing topics... Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy


I simply disagree with those facts. I don’t believe that SSM devalues marriage. Marriage is personal and is no one’s busy but their own.

Second, I actually agree with you on one point: churches and/or religious institutions should not be forced to marry or recognise SSM. Also, I don’t agree with the leftist crusade on shutting down everyone who disagrees with ssm. I’m a libertarian, not a lefty, G.

I will never force a priest to marry a gay couple, nor would I force a baker to bake a cake for a gay wedding.

Marriage is defined as TWO consenting adults. Not children or animals; nor more than TWO. I think that’s pretty blatantly obvious.

LOL
You can disagree with those FACTS, but guess what Auggie... 
they still remain FACTS


Disagreeing with reality says something disturbing about you and people like you. Cheesy


What? The fact that there is a growing trend of dissolved marriages due to SSM? Get real? That’s a consequence of the modern world, G. Looks like you need a dose of reality.

Why not blame capitalism? Or pornography for he breakdown of marriage? Why not ban divorce to preserve the sanctity of marriage?

There are many cause as to why marriage has broken down and SSM certainly isn’t one of them.


Grendel's article doesn't include any facts. 


Hmm, that's unlike Grendel.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Auggie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


The Bull Moose

Posts: 8571
Re: Marriages to be annulled
Reply #184 - Oct 14th, 2017 at 4:13pm
 
Mattyfisk wrote on Oct 14th, 2017 at 4:04pm:
Auggie wrote on Oct 14th, 2017 at 3:03pm:
Grendel wrote on Oct 14th, 2017 at 1:50pm:
Auggie wrote on Oct 14th, 2017 at 9:40am:
Grendel wrote on Oct 14th, 2017 at 9:33am:
Well there you go TROLLS...  more stuff you can ignore as you continue on trashing topics... Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy


I simply disagree with those facts. I don’t believe that SSM devalues marriage. Marriage is personal and is no one’s busy but their own.

Second, I actually agree with you on one point: churches and/or religious institutions should not be forced to marry or recognise SSM. Also, I don’t agree with the leftist crusade on shutting down everyone who disagrees with ssm. I’m a libertarian, not a lefty, G.

I will never force a priest to marry a gay couple, nor would I force a baker to bake a cake for a gay wedding.

Marriage is defined as TWO consenting adults. Not children or animals; nor more than TWO. I think that’s pretty blatantly obvious.

LOL
You can disagree with those FACTS, but guess what Auggie... 
they still remain FACTS


Disagreeing with reality says something disturbing about you and people like you. Cheesy


What? The fact that there is a growing trend of dissolved marriages due to SSM? Get real? That’s a consequence of the modern world, G. Looks like you need a dose of reality.

Why not blame capitalism? Or pornography for he breakdown of marriage? Why not ban divorce to preserve the sanctity of marriage?

There are many cause as to why marriage has broken down and SSM certainly isn’t one of them.


Grendel's article doesn't include any facts. It points to things like "increased risk" of civil damages for people refusing to rent venues out to gays, for example, or polygamists being "emboldened", or advocates "demanding" same sex marriages be treated the same in the classroom.

None of this actually means anything. It's the same argument applied to the gay marriage debate here. It shows that after legalising same sex marriage, nothing has actually changed in Canada at all.


Not only that they’re conflating same sex marriage with freedom of conscience or being deprived of their free speech rights. This vote has nothing to do with any of these.
Back to top
 

The Progressive President
 
IP Logged
 
Mattyfisk
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 91848
Gender: male
Re: Marriages to be annulled
Reply #185 - Oct 14th, 2017 at 4:18pm
 
Auggie wrote on Oct 14th, 2017 at 4:13pm:
Mattyfisk wrote on Oct 14th, 2017 at 4:04pm:
Auggie wrote on Oct 14th, 2017 at 3:03pm:
Grendel wrote on Oct 14th, 2017 at 1:50pm:
Auggie wrote on Oct 14th, 2017 at 9:40am:
Grendel wrote on Oct 14th, 2017 at 9:33am:
Well there you go TROLLS...  more stuff you can ignore as you continue on trashing topics... Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy


I simply disagree with those facts. I don’t believe that SSM devalues marriage. Marriage is personal and is no one’s busy but their own.

Second, I actually agree with you on one point: churches and/or religious institutions should not be forced to marry or recognise SSM. Also, I don’t agree with the leftist crusade on shutting down everyone who disagrees with ssm. I’m a libertarian, not a lefty, G.

I will never force a priest to marry a gay couple, nor would I force a baker to bake a cake for a gay wedding.

Marriage is defined as TWO consenting adults. Not children or animals; nor more than TWO. I think that’s pretty blatantly obvious.

LOL
You can disagree with those FACTS, but guess what Auggie... 
they still remain FACTS


Disagreeing with reality says something disturbing about you and people like you. Cheesy


What? The fact that there is a growing trend of dissolved marriages due to SSM? Get real? That’s a consequence of the modern world, G. Looks like you need a dose of reality.

Why not blame capitalism? Or pornography for he breakdown of marriage? Why not ban divorce to preserve the sanctity of marriage?

There are many cause as to why marriage has broken down and SSM certainly isn’t one of them.


Grendel's article doesn't include any facts. It points to things like "increased risk" of civil damages for people refusing to rent venues out to gays, for example, or polygamists being "emboldened", or advocates "demanding" same sex marriages be treated the same in the classroom.

None of this actually means anything. It's the same argument applied to the gay marriage debate here. It shows that after legalising same sex marriage, nothing has actually changed in Canada at all.


Not only that they’re conflating same sex marriage with freedom of conscience or being deprived of their free speech rights. This vote has nothing to do with any of these.


Of course. There's actually more of a risk of these happening in a society without gay marriage. Those "demanding" gay marriage are more likely to demand these things as a form of protest.

The article contains no incidents or court rulings on the examples it's describing. It's no more than a silly rant.

This doesn't waste Grendel's time. He's perfectly free to ignore all this.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Grendel
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 28080
Gender: male
Re: Marriages to be annulled
Reply #186 - Oct 14th, 2017 at 4:35pm
 
greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 14th, 2017 at 2:26pm:
Stop wasting Goose's time, everyone.

He's getting upset.


You don't upset me gweggy...  you have tickets on yourself.
YOU are just a FOOL. Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 130884
Gender: male
Re: Marriages to be annulled
Reply #187 - Oct 14th, 2017 at 4:36pm
 
Grendel wrote on Oct 14th, 2017 at 4:35pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 14th, 2017 at 2:26pm:
Stop wasting Goose's time, everyone.

He's getting upset.


You don't upset me gweggy... 


No, but the people wasting your time do.

Stop it, people!

Goose is busy.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Grendel
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 28080
Gender: male
Re: Marriages to be annulled
Reply #188 - Oct 14th, 2017 at 4:38pm
 
Mattyfisk wrote on Oct 14th, 2017 at 4:04pm:
Auggie wrote on Oct 14th, 2017 at 3:03pm:
Grendel wrote on Oct 14th, 2017 at 1:50pm:
Auggie wrote on Oct 14th, 2017 at 9:40am:
Grendel wrote on Oct 14th, 2017 at 9:33am:
Well there you go TROLLS...  more stuff you can ignore as you continue on trashing topics... Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy


I simply disagree with those facts. I don’t believe that SSM devalues marriage. Marriage is personal and is no one’s busy but their own.

Second, I actually agree with you on one point: churches and/or religious institutions should not be forced to marry or recognise SSM. Also, I don’t agree with the leftist crusade on shutting down everyone who disagrees with ssm. I’m a libertarian, not a lefty, G.

I will never force a priest to marry a gay couple, nor would I force a baker to bake a cake for a gay wedding.

Marriage is defined as TWO consenting adults. Not children or animals; nor more than TWO. I think that’s pretty blatantly obvious.

LOL
You can disagree with those FACTS, but guess what Auggie... 
they still remain FACTS


Disagreeing with reality says something disturbing about you and people like you. Cheesy


What? The fact that there is a growing trend of dissolved marriages due to SSM? Get real? That’s a consequence of the modern world, G. Looks like you need a dose of reality.

Why not blame capitalism? Or pornography for he breakdown of marriage? Why not ban divorce to preserve the sanctity of marriage?

There are many cause as to why marriage has broken down and SSM certainly isn’t one of them.


Grendel's article doesn't include any facts. It points to things like "increased risk" of civil damages for people refusing to rent venues out to gays, for example, or polygamists being "emboldened", or advocates "demanding" same sex marriages be treated the same in the classroom.

None of this actually means anything. It's the same argument applied to the gay marriage debate here. It shows that after legalising same sex marriage, nothing has actually changed in Canada at all.

Really karnal...  YOU do have problems with English don't you.
The Canadian professor who studied the changes also disagrees with you.
The fact you are still ignorant or dishonest about tthe facts says a lot about you.  Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Grendel
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 28080
Gender: male
Re: Marriages to be annulled
Reply #189 - Oct 14th, 2017 at 4:39pm
 
Keep trying to trash the place folks with your ridicule and lies...  no skin off my nose.
You just make fools of yourselves.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Mattyfisk
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 91848
Gender: male
Re: Marriages to be annulled
Reply #190 - Oct 14th, 2017 at 4:44pm
 
Grendel wrote on Oct 14th, 2017 at 4:38pm:
Mattyfisk wrote on Oct 14th, 2017 at 4:04pm:
Auggie wrote on Oct 14th, 2017 at 3:03pm:
Grendel wrote on Oct 14th, 2017 at 1:50pm:
Auggie wrote on Oct 14th, 2017 at 9:40am:
Grendel wrote on Oct 14th, 2017 at 9:33am:
Well there you go TROLLS...  more stuff you can ignore as you continue on trashing topics... Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy


I simply disagree with those facts. I don’t believe that SSM devalues marriage. Marriage is personal and is no one’s busy but their own.

Second, I actually agree with you on one point: churches and/or religious institutions should not be forced to marry or recognise SSM. Also, I don’t agree with the leftist crusade on shutting down everyone who disagrees with ssm. I’m a libertarian, not a lefty, G.

I will never force a priest to marry a gay couple, nor would I force a baker to bake a cake for a gay wedding.

Marriage is defined as TWO consenting adults. Not children or animals; nor more than TWO. I think that’s pretty blatantly obvious.

LOL
You can disagree with those FACTS, but guess what Auggie... 
they still remain FACTS


Disagreeing with reality says something disturbing about you and people like you. Cheesy


What? The fact that there is a growing trend of dissolved marriages due to SSM? Get real? That’s a consequence of the modern world, G. Looks like you need a dose of reality.

Why not blame capitalism? Or pornography for he breakdown of marriage? Why not ban divorce to preserve the sanctity of marriage?

There are many cause as to why marriage has broken down and SSM certainly isn’t one of them.


Grendel's article doesn't include any facts. It points to things like "increased risk" of civil damages for people refusing to rent venues out to gays, for example, or polygamists being "emboldened", or advocates "demanding" same sex marriages be treated the same in the classroom.

None of this actually means anything. It's the same argument applied to the gay marriage debate here. It shows that after legalising same sex marriage, nothing has actually changed in Canada at all.

Really karnal...  YOU do have problems with English don't you.
The Canadian professor who studied the changes also disagrees with you.
The fact you are still ignorant or dishonest about tthe facts says a lot about you.  Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy


Which facts, Grendel? Would you like to point one out?

Sorry if this wastes more of your time.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 39920
Gender: male
Re: Marriages to be annulled
Reply #191 - Oct 14th, 2017 at 5:34pm
 
Auggie wrote on Oct 14th, 2017 at 1:04pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 14th, 2017 at 12:59pm:
Frank wrote on Oct 14th, 2017 at 12:33pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 14th, 2017 at 9:48am:
In SSM there are two partners.

Two husbands, or two wives.

Try to keep up.


The Boys Scouts will accept girls now. And gay scout masters. And the Girls SCouts will no doubt accept boys and  lesbians.



This about SSM.

Not children, or scouts.

Try to remain focused.


Nor is it about gender.

The way frank talks about it, society will collapse. We’ll all turn into zombies.


It's such a 'white' obsession, SSM. The Asians, Africans, Arabs etc are not hot for it, it's the perpetually guilt-ridden, self-abnegating whites who are hot for SSM, multiculturalism, euthanasia, no kids, climate catastrophe mongering - all the social suicide stuff.

Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 130884
Gender: male
Re: Marriages to be annulled
Reply #192 - Oct 14th, 2017 at 5:36pm
 
Mattyfisk wrote on Oct 14th, 2017 at 4:44pm:
Grendel wrote on Oct 14th, 2017 at 4:38pm:
Mattyfisk wrote on Oct 14th, 2017 at 4:04pm:
Auggie wrote on Oct 14th, 2017 at 3:03pm:
Grendel wrote on Oct 14th, 2017 at 1:50pm:
Auggie wrote on Oct 14th, 2017 at 9:40am:
Grendel wrote on Oct 14th, 2017 at 9:33am:
Well there you go TROLLS...  more stuff you can ignore as you continue on trashing topics... Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy


I simply disagree with those facts. I don’t believe that SSM devalues marriage. Marriage is personal and is no one’s busy but their own.

Second, I actually agree with you on one point: churches and/or religious institutions should not be forced to marry or recognise SSM. Also, I don’t agree with the leftist crusade on shutting down everyone who disagrees with ssm. I’m a libertarian, not a lefty, G.

I will never force a priest to marry a gay couple, nor would I force a baker to bake a cake for a gay wedding.

Marriage is defined as TWO consenting adults. Not children or animals; nor more than TWO. I think that’s pretty blatantly obvious.

LOL
You can disagree with those FACTS, but guess what Auggie... 
they still remain FACTS


Disagreeing with reality says something disturbing about you and people like you. Cheesy


What? The fact that there is a growing trend of dissolved marriages due to SSM? Get real? That’s a consequence of the modern world, G. Looks like you need a dose of reality.

Why not blame capitalism? Or pornography for he breakdown of marriage? Why not ban divorce to preserve the sanctity of marriage?

There are many cause as to why marriage has broken down and SSM certainly isn’t one of them.


Grendel's article doesn't include any facts. It points to things like "increased risk" of civil damages for people refusing to rent venues out to gays, for example, or polygamists being "emboldened", or advocates "demanding" same sex marriages be treated the same in the classroom.

None of this actually means anything. It's the same argument applied to the gay marriage debate here. It shows that after legalising same sex marriage, nothing has actually changed in Canada at all.

Really karnal...  YOU do have problems with English don't you.
The Canadian professor who studied the changes also disagrees with you.
The fact you are still ignorant or dishonest about tthe facts says a lot about you.  Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy


Which facts, Grendel? Would you like to point one out?

Sorry if this wastes more of your time.


He logged out 2 minutes after your post, Karnal.

I guess he's gone to look for the facts.

I'm sure he'll be back later, with a complete and accurate list of all the aforementioned facts.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 39920
Gender: male
Re: Marriages to be annulled
Reply #193 - Oct 14th, 2017 at 5:38pm
 
Auggie wrote on Oct 14th, 2017 at 12:36pm:
Frank wrote on Oct 14th, 2017 at 12:18pm:
Auggie wrote on Oct 14th, 2017 at 11:30am:
Grendel wrote on Oct 14th, 2017 at 11:05am:
Really...  not co-parents or simply parents or carers?

Why not Lover A and Lover B...  it's all about love right?
Oh wait that's not Equal is it.

How about Equals... 



Remember, G, two consenting adults, nothing more nothing less. Not children, not animals. Not more than 2.



Why is 'two consenting adults' unchallengeable when 'one man and one woman' is not?

What undeniable principle does the former have that the latter lacks?


Please explain.



Because marriage is a legal institution and allowing same sex couples to marry abides by the principle of ‘equality before the law’.

We wouldn’t accept separate but equal for race, but we accept it for marriage?


So how the bloody hell does that make two consenting adults completely rock solid and unchallengeable?

Why not 75 consenting adults?

What is 'adult'?  What is 'consent'?  Gays are constantly agitating for the lowering of the age of consent. Efniks with arranged marriages don't even bother with consent. 1 mand and 4 wives? Two families? Three? A woman and 6 husbands, for 2 hours? No questions asked marriage, no fault divorce -
like Shia prostitution.  Self-mnarriage - why does it have to be TWO people??? Any madness can claim 'equality before the law'.

Are you going to deny them, Bwian?  On what grounds?





Back to top
« Last Edit: Oct 14th, 2017 at 5:46pm by Frank »  

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Grendel
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 28080
Gender: male
Re: Marriages to be annulled
Reply #194 - Oct 14th, 2017 at 5:38pm
 
Auggie wrote on Oct 14th, 2017 at 3:03pm:
Grendel wrote on Oct 14th, 2017 at 1:50pm:
Auggie wrote on Oct 14th, 2017 at 9:40am:
Grendel wrote on Oct 14th, 2017 at 9:33am:
Well there you go TROLLS...  more stuff you can ignore as you continue on trashing topics... Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy


I simply disagree with those facts. I don’t believe that SSM devalues marriage. Marriage is personal and is no one’s busy but their own.

Second, I actually agree with you on one point: churches and/or religious institutions should not be forced to marry or recognise SSM. Also, I don’t agree with the leftist crusade on shutting down everyone who disagrees with ssm. I’m a libertarian, not a lefty, G.

I will never force a priest to marry a gay couple, nor would I force a baker to bake a cake for a gay wedding.

Marriage is defined as TWO consenting adults. Not children or animals; nor more than TWO. I think that’s pretty blatantly obvious.

LOL
You can disagree with those FACTS, but guess what Auggie... 
they still remain FACTS


Disagreeing with reality says something disturbing about you and people like you. Cheesy


What? The fact that there is a growing trend of dissolved marriages due to SSM? Get real? That’s a consequence of the modern world, G. Looks like you need a dose of reality.

Why not blame capitalism? Or pornography for he breakdown of marriage? Why not ban divorce to preserve the sanctity of marriage?

There are many cause as to why marriage has broken down and SSM certainly isn’t one of them.

LOL
You are so dishonest.
Why not address the FACTS I posted...  oh right you hate to admit you are wrong. Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 11 12 13 14 15 ... 22
Send Topic Print