Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 4 ... 22
Send Topic Print
Marriages to be annulled (Read 17948 times)
Grendel
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 28080
Gender: male
Re: Marriages to be annulled
Reply #15 - Oct 4th, 2017 at 5:32pm
 
Auggie wrote on Oct 4th, 2017 at 12:55pm:
Grendel wrote on Oct 4th, 2017 at 12:10pm:
When you post lies about people and fail to withdraw or apologise, others know you are a disingenuous immature fool.


It is no lie that you wish to deny a minority of people the right to marriage. That makes you anti-freedom and against the principal of 'equality under the law'.

Oh and before I forget...  this lie about me denying a minority...  should we deny a majority for a minority?
I have always stated that they can have a union, call it civil call it gayrriage or whatever they like but for the thousands of years and billions of people that have gone before the right to the term marriage should remain for them.

But you know that is unacceptable to the gay and social activists they have bigger plans, societal change.

So if you cant tell the truth bugger off eh. Roll Eyes
Back to top
« Last Edit: Oct 4th, 2017 at 6:18pm by Grendel »  
 
IP Logged
 
President Elect, The Mechanic
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 17501
Gender: male
Re: Marriages to be annulled
Reply #16 - Oct 4th, 2017 at 6:13pm
 
Auggie wrote on Oct 3rd, 2017 at 9:38pm:
Based on my conversations with several members, I believe that they have breached the principals of traditional marriage, and therefore, because of that, their marriages should be annulled.

1) Grendel: he has admitted that he has had sex for pleasure. The traditional definition of marriage indicates that marriage is solely for the purpose of having children and procreation. Any act that does not result in this purpose is contrary to marriage, and is therefore not marriage.

Grendel, you should not be married. I declare your marriage to be annulled.

2) Valkie: he has admitted to having sexual intercourse with his wife solely for pleasure, which has not resulted in procreation. Therefore, this violates the sanctity of marriage. Therefore, legally Valkie's marriage should be annulled on this basis.

Any person who:

- has had sex for pleasure, either before or during their marriage;

- has divorced their wife/husband and has remarried;

- has been in relationship that has not produced children

has not/is not/ and has never been married.
----
Marriage is only valid when:

- you are married in a religious institution with the first person with whom you were engaged.
- you have only had sex with your wife/husband, which act has resulted in the birth of children.
- you have children.
- and you die still married to that person.

Any other marriage consumed under any other circumstances is not marriage and should not be legally recognized.

Q.E.D.

Sorry Grendel and Valkie. You should'nt be married.



is a blowjob in a Skyrail Rainforest Cablecar over Australia’s World Heritage listed Tropical Rainforest canopy and deep into the forest ok or am I going straight to hell??  Undecided

im not saying that I done that ... I'm just asking...  Undecided
Back to top
 

Q

The STORM has arrived
Every Dog Has Its Day...
Dark to Light.
Sheep no more.
 
IP Logged
 
Grendel
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 28080
Gender: male
Re: Marriages to be annulled
Reply #17 - Oct 4th, 2017 at 6:20pm
 
You don't have to say you've done anything mechanic...  he makes it up as he goes along.

Every day in every way he's sounding more and more like mothra.  That is a good reason to steer clear.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Gnads
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 27649
Gender: male
Re: Marriages to be annulled
Reply #18 - Oct 4th, 2017 at 6:28pm
 
Auggie wrote on Oct 4th, 2017 at 10:46am:
Grendel wrote on Oct 4th, 2017 at 7:40am:
Auggie wrote on Oct 3rd, 2017 at 9:38pm:
Based on my conversations with several members, I believe that they have breached the principals of traditional marriage, and therefore, because of that, their marriages should be annulled.

1) Grendel: he has admitted that he has had sex for pleasure. The traditional definition of marriage indicates that marriage is solely for the purpose of having children and procreation. Any act that does not result in this purpose is contrary to marriage, and is therefore not marriage.

Grendel, you should not be married. I declare your marriage to be annulled.


Dear dickhead, you have no right to lie about me or my life on this site or any other.
You don't know me.
You don't know if I'm married, single, divorced. bi or even gay.
You don't know if I was married and am now not and never will be again.
You certainly know nothing of my sex life.
You are a total wanker and a fool. Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy


When you start resorting to ad hominem arguments, you know have lost the argument.


You lost the argument when you posted this thread.
Back to top
 

"When you are dead, you do not know you are dead. It's only painful and difficult for others. The same applies when you are stupid." ~ Ricky Gervais
 
IP Logged
 
Gnads
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 27649
Gender: male
Re: Marriages to be annulled
Reply #19 - Oct 4th, 2017 at 6:30pm
 
Auggie wrote on Oct 4th, 2017 at 12:55pm:
Grendel wrote on Oct 4th, 2017 at 12:10pm:
When you post lies about people and fail to withdraw or apologise, others know you are a disingenuous immature fool.


It is no lie that you wish to deny a minority of people the right to marriage. That makes you anti-freedom and against the principal of 'equality under the law'.


Therein lies the crux of the matter .....

another minority group wishing to impose their demands on the majority.

You are a complete waste of space with that response.
Back to top
 

"When you are dead, you do not know you are dead. It's only painful and difficult for others. The same applies when you are stupid." ~ Ricky Gervais
 
IP Logged
 
Gnads
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 27649
Gender: male
Re: Marriages to be annulled
Reply #20 - Oct 4th, 2017 at 6:34pm
 
President Elect, The Mechanic wrote on Oct 4th, 2017 at 6:13pm:
Auggie wrote on Oct 3rd, 2017 at 9:38pm:
Based on my conversations with several members, I believe that they have breached the principals of traditional marriage, and therefore, because of that, their marriages should be annulled.

1) Grendel: he has admitted that he has had sex for pleasure. The traditional definition of marriage indicates that marriage is solely for the purpose of having children and procreation. Any act that does not result in this purpose is contrary to marriage, and is therefore not marriage.

Grendel, you should not be married. I declare your marriage to be annulled.

2) Valkie: he has admitted to having sexual intercourse with his wife solely for pleasure, which has not resulted in procreation. Therefore, this violates the sanctity of marriage. Therefore, legally Valkie's marriage should be annulled on this basis.

Any person who:

- has had sex for pleasure, either before or during their marriage;

- has divorced their wife/husband and has remarried;

- has been in relationship that has not produced children

has not/is not/ and has never been married.
----
Marriage is only valid when:

- you are married in a religious institution with the first person with whom you were engaged.
- you have only had sex with your wife/husband, which act has resulted in the birth of children.
- you have children.
- and you die still married to that person.

Any other marriage consumed under any other circumstances is not marriage and should not be legally recognized.

Q.E.D.

Sorry Grendel and Valkie. You should'nt be married.



is a blowjob in a Skyrail Rainforest Cablecar over Australia’s World Heritage listed Tropical Rainforest canopy and deep into the forest ok or am I going straight to hell??  Undecided

im not saying that I done that ... I'm just asking...  Undecided



I'll be right behind you ... coz I want one of them .. there.  Grin Cheesy
Back to top
 

"When you are dead, you do not know you are dead. It's only painful and difficult for others. The same applies when you are stupid." ~ Ricky Gervais
 
IP Logged
 
Aussie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 37678
Gender: male
Re: Marriages to be annulled
Reply #21 - Oct 4th, 2017 at 6:38pm
 
Gnads wrote on Oct 4th, 2017 at 6:30pm:
Auggie wrote on Oct 4th, 2017 at 12:55pm:
Grendel wrote on Oct 4th, 2017 at 12:10pm:
When you post lies about people and fail to withdraw or apologise, others know you are a disingenuous immature fool.


It is no lie that you wish to deny a minority of people the right to marriage. That makes you anti-freedom and against the principal of 'equality under the law'.


Therein lies the crux of the matter .....

another minority group wishing to impose their demands on the majority.

You are a complete waste of space with that response.


Which minority is seeking to impose...what, Gonads?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Gnads
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 27649
Gender: male
Re: Marriages to be annulled
Reply #22 - Oct 4th, 2017 at 6:39pm
 
Aussie wrote on Oct 4th, 2017 at 6:38pm:
Gnads wrote on Oct 4th, 2017 at 6:30pm:
Auggie wrote on Oct 4th, 2017 at 12:55pm:
Grendel wrote on Oct 4th, 2017 at 12:10pm:
When you post lies about people and fail to withdraw or apologise, others know you are a disingenuous immature fool.


It is no lie that you wish to deny a minority of people the right to marriage. That makes you anti-freedom and against the principal of 'equality under the law'.


Therein lies the crux of the matter .....

another minority group wishing to impose their demands on the majority.

You are a complete waste of space with that response.


Which minority is seeking to impose...what, Gonads?



Come on Aussie ... are you that thick or just fishing?
Back to top
 

"When you are dead, you do not know you are dead. It's only painful and difficult for others. The same applies when you are stupid." ~ Ricky Gervais
 
IP Logged
 
Aussie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 37678
Gender: male
Re: Marriages to be annulled
Reply #23 - Oct 4th, 2017 at 6:41pm
 
No....I want you to express an answer.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 39926
Gender: male
Re: Marriages to be annulled
Reply #24 - Oct 4th, 2017 at 6:47pm
 
Auggie wrote on Oct 4th, 2017 at 12:55pm:
Grendel wrote on Oct 4th, 2017 at 12:10pm:
When you post lies about people and fail to withdraw or apologise, others know you are a disingenuous immature fool.


It is no lie that you wish to deny a minority of people the right to marriage. That makes you anti-freedom and against the principal of 'equality under the law'.



Lots of other people are also denied the right to marry: siblings, parent/child, etc - should they all be allowed?
And if not? why not? What about one plus one - is that sacrosanct? Why not marry, say, 47 people of various permutations IF THEY ALL SAY THEY LOVE EACH OTHER?


If the single most obvious, fundamental aspect that makes marriage marriage - ie that it is between men and women - is removed, what aspect of marriage is beyond further change and adjustment?


This is why SSM marriage is not an extension but the destruction of marriage. Now if you and the gays want to destroy it, say so. But do not pretend that removing the obvious meaning of it will have no consequences





Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Gnads
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 27649
Gender: male
Re: Marriages to be annulled
Reply #25 - Oct 4th, 2017 at 6:51pm
 
So you need it tattooed on your forehead that a minority....

the LGBITQ/Alphabet community want to impose their demands on the majority of Australians by having legislation /the marriage act changed to (supposedly) give them equal rights to be married.

When that is far from the truth of the matter & there is a minority activist group that wish to impose their ideals across a whole lot of social issues on the majority of the population...

and to speak out against this agenda is going to be considered hate speech by the PC wankers in authority?

Does that make you feel better?  Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

"When you are dead, you do not know you are dead. It's only painful and difficult for others. The same applies when you are stupid." ~ Ricky Gervais
 
IP Logged
 
Gnads
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 27649
Gender: male
Re: Marriages to be annulled
Reply #26 - Oct 4th, 2017 at 6:53pm
 
Frank wrote on Oct 4th, 2017 at 6:47pm:
Auggie wrote on Oct 4th, 2017 at 12:55pm:
Grendel wrote on Oct 4th, 2017 at 12:10pm:
When you post lies about people and fail to withdraw or apologise, others know you are a disingenuous immature fool.


It is no lie that you wish to deny a minority of people the right to marriage. That makes you anti-freedom and against the principal of 'equality under the law'.



Lots of other people are also denied the right to marry: siblings, parent/child, etc - should they all be allowed?
And if not? why not? What about one plus one - is that sacrosanct? Why not marry, say, 47 people of various permutations IF THEY ALL SAY THEY LOVE EACH OTHER?


If the single most obvious, fundamental aspect that makes marriage marriage - ie that it is between men and women - is removed, what aspect of marriage is beyond further change and adjustment?


This is why SSM marriage is not an extension but the destruction of marriage. Now if you and the gays want to destroy it, say so. But do not pretend that removing the obvious meaning of it will have no consequences







Well said & there is no reasonable or logical counter to that.


Back to top
 

"When you are dead, you do not know you are dead. It's only painful and difficult for others. The same applies when you are stupid." ~ Ricky Gervais
 
IP Logged
 
Aussie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 37678
Gender: male
Re: Marriages to be annulled
Reply #27 - Oct 4th, 2017 at 7:26pm
 
Gnads wrote on Oct 4th, 2017 at 6:51pm:
So you need it tattooed on your forehead that a minority....

the LGBITQ/Alphabet community want to impose their demands on the majority of Australians by having legislation /the marriage act changed to (supposedly) give them equal rights to be married.

When that is far from the truth of the matter & there is a minority activist group that wish to impose their ideals across a whole lot of social issues on the majority of the population...

and to speak out against this agenda is going to be considered hate speech by the PC wankers in authority?

Does that make you feel better?  Roll Eyes


They do not want to IMPOSE anything on you me or anyone else.

They have lobbied for support, they have had Government respond, and Government has decided to conduct a Poll (dumb arse Poll.)

The Poofs do not have a gun to anyone's head.

They have no capacity to IMPOSE anything, just like Muslims or Calathumpians cannot IMPOSE anything.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Grendel
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 28080
Gender: male
Re: Marriages to be annulled
Reply #28 - Oct 4th, 2017 at 8:30pm
 
Gnads wrote on Oct 4th, 2017 at 6:39pm:
Aussie wrote on Oct 4th, 2017 at 6:38pm:
Gnads wrote on Oct 4th, 2017 at 6:30pm:
Auggie wrote on Oct 4th, 2017 at 12:55pm:
Grendel wrote on Oct 4th, 2017 at 12:10pm:
When you post lies about people and fail to withdraw or apologise, others know you are a disingenuous immature fool.


It is no lie that you wish to deny a minority of people the right to marriage. That makes you anti-freedom and against the principal of 'equality under the law'.


Therein lies the crux of the matter .....

another minority group wishing to impose their demands on the majority.

You are a complete waste of space with that response.


Which minority is seeking to impose...what, Gonads?



Come on Aussie ... are you that thick or just fishing?

He's just a lonely troll looking for attention apparently gnads.
How can anyone truly be that thick? Roll Eyes
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Gnads
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 27649
Gender: male
Re: Marriages to be annulled
Reply #29 - Oct 4th, 2017 at 8:31pm
 
Aussie wrote on Oct 4th, 2017 at 7:26pm:
Gnads wrote on Oct 4th, 2017 at 6:51pm:
So you need it tattooed on your forehead that a minority....

the LGBITQ/Alphabet community want to impose their demands on the majority of Australians by having legislation /the marriage act changed to (supposedly) give them equal rights to be married.

When that is far from the truth of the matter & there is a minority activist group that wish to impose their ideals across a whole lot of social issues on the majority of the population...

and to speak out against this agenda is going to be considered hate speech by the PC wankers in authority?

Does that make you feel better?  Roll Eyes


They do not want to [highlight]IMPOSE anything on you me or anyone else.
[/highlight]
They have lobbied for support, they have had Government respond, and Government has decided to conduct a Poll (dumb arse Poll.)

The Poofs do not have a gun to anyone's head.

They have no capacity to IMPOSE anything, just like Muslims or Calathumpians cannot IMPOSE anything.


You are so far wrong that it's unbelievable.

What has has happened in nearly every country that has legalised SSM goes far beyond the simplistic BS that is being put forth by the Yes camp ... is they simply want to get married.

It isn't about equality it's a social agenda which also includes the Safe Schools Program.

Which also is not merely about preventing bullying at school.

You are as deef to this as you are to the Muslim agenda ... of which the truth has manifested in other western countries.

Bit I suppose your faith that this is Australia & it won't or isn't happening here is you source of comfort.
Back to top
 

"When you are dead, you do not know you are dead. It's only painful and difficult for others. The same applies when you are stupid." ~ Ricky Gervais
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 ... 22
Send Topic Print