Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 7 8 9 10 11 ... 22
Send Topic Print
Marriages to be annulled (Read 17941 times)
Mattyfisk
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 91855
Gender: male
Re: Marriages to be annulled
Reply #120 - Oct 13th, 2017 at 2:28pm
 
Frank wrote on Oct 13th, 2017 at 2:25pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 13th, 2017 at 10:13am:
Frank wrote on Oct 13th, 2017 at 10:07am:
greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 13th, 2017 at 9:01am:
Frank wrote on Oct 13th, 2017 at 8:59am:
Auggie wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 11:31pm:
Quote:
'Procreation card's, Bwian?  Really? Like it's  a furphy that we ARE a species made up heterosexual men and women?

The socialization of boys and girls is a furphy? The social, cultural bridging of of generations is a furphy?

You can't  be so stupi d as to ignore all these things across the ages for the new slogan of love is love (How dam BANAL can you go?)


We have been and always will be a society of men and women; same-sex marriage doesn't and won't change this. Heterosexuals will continue to be the majority, and the human race will continue to procreate.

Allowing same-sex couples to marry no more affects the institution of marriage and society any more than capitalism affects society, or how pornography affects people.

You might wake in the morning on the day after the Parliament has passed the law, and feel that your marriage is no longer what it was.

And that would be your problem.... And no one else's.

Same-sex marriage doesn't affect you. As to how it affects society, everything affects society, so let's ban everything, institute a totalitarian state with Kim Jong-UN as the Dear Leader because he knows best - after all he discovered DNA, and can apparently walk on water??? Because we would all be so much better off if we just all shut-up and listened to you, Frank.




When two blokes marry, which one is the wife? If they adopt kids, who will be the mother?
What will the kids say to their friends?  'Bwian is me mum's?

It is a farcical notion. Its like slapstick, SSM.


Hard to believe that such ignorance still exists in this country, in 2017.




Oh? Have I missed the latest directive on the korrekt  nomenclature? https://uwm.edu/lgbtrc/support/gender-pronouns/


Judging by that post, I'd say you missed an education.

Sad.

Cheesy

A virtue-signalling, vain turd!


Now now, old boy, Greggery's a married man. You stop flattering him so.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Mattyfisk
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 91855
Gender: male
Re: Marriages to be annulled
Reply #121 - Oct 13th, 2017 at 2:30pm
 
Frank wrote on Oct 13th, 2017 at 2:23pm:
Auggie wrote on Oct 13th, 2017 at 1:27pm:
Frank wrote on Oct 13th, 2017 at 8:59am:
Auggie wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 11:31pm:
Quote:
'Procreation card's, Bwian?  Really? Like it's  a furphy that we ARE a species made up heterosexual men and women?

The socialization of boys and girls is a furphy? The social, cultural bridging of of generations is a furphy?

You can't  be so stupi d as to ignore all these things across the ages for the new slogan of love is love (How dam BANAL can you go?)


We have been and always will be a society of men and women; same-sex marriage doesn't and won't change this. Heterosexuals will continue to be the majority, and the human race will continue to procreate.

Allowing same-sex couples to marry no more affects the institution of marriage and society any more than capitalism affects society, or how pornography affects people.

You might wake in the morning on the day after the Parliament has passed the law, and feel that your marriage is no longer what it was.

And that would be your problem.... And no one else's.

Same-sex marriage doesn't affect you. As to how it affects society, everything affects society, so let's ban everything, institute a totalitarian state with Kim Jong-UN as the Dear Leader because he knows best - after all he discovered DNA, and can apparently walk on water??? Because we would all be so much better off if we just all shut-up and listened to you, Frank.




When two blokes marry, which one is the wife? If they adopt kids, who will be the mother?
What will the kids say to their friends?  'Bwian is me mum's?

It is a farcical notion. Its like slapstick, SSM.


Children will say that they have 2 dads, or 2 mums. What's the big deal?

Er... it's a fake, 2 dads. Where's mum? How did 2 dads  make the little guy?
What a terrible thing to put on a little person out of sheer vanity.


Where's your children's mother, dear boy?

I'm curious.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
mothra
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 34374
Gender: female
Re: Marriages to be annulled
Reply #122 - Oct 13th, 2017 at 2:39pm
 
greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 13th, 2017 at 9:01am:
Frank wrote on Oct 13th, 2017 at 8:59am:
Auggie wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 11:31pm:
Quote:
'Procreation card's, Bwian?  Really? Like it's  a furphy that we ARE a species made up heterosexual men and women?

The socialization of boys and girls is a furphy? The social, cultural bridging of of generations is a furphy?

You can't  be so stupi d as to ignore all these things across the ages for the new slogan of love is love (How dam BANAL can you go?)


We have been and always will be a society of men and women; same-sex marriage doesn't and won't change this. Heterosexuals will continue to be the majority, and the human race will continue to procreate.

Allowing same-sex couples to marry no more affects the institution of marriage and society any more than capitalism affects society, or how pornography affects people.

You might wake in the morning on the day after the Parliament has passed the law, and feel that your marriage is no longer what it was.

And that would be your problem.... And no one else's.

Same-sex marriage doesn't affect you. As to how it affects society, everything affects society, so let's ban everything, institute a totalitarian state with Kim Jong-UN as the Dear Leader because he knows best - after all he discovered DNA, and can apparently walk on water??? Because we would all be so much better off if we just all shut-up and listened to you, Frank.




When two blokes marry, which one is the wife? If they adopt kids, who will be the mother?
What will the kids say to their friends?  'Bwian is me mum's?

It is a farcical notion. Its like slapstick, SSM.


Hard to believe that such ignorance still exists in this country, in 2017.




Indeed. At least Frank is honest about his objections but yes indeed, that is the level of ignorance we're working with.
Back to top
 

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.
 
IP Logged
 
Mattyfisk
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 91855
Gender: male
Re: Marriages to be annulled
Reply #123 - Oct 13th, 2017 at 2:44pm
 
mothra wrote on Oct 13th, 2017 at 2:39pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 13th, 2017 at 9:01am:
Frank wrote on Oct 13th, 2017 at 8:59am:
Auggie wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 11:31pm:
Quote:
'Procreation card's, Bwian?  Really? Like it's  a furphy that we ARE a species made up heterosexual men and women?

The socialization of boys and girls is a furphy? The social, cultural bridging of of generations is a furphy?

You can't  be so stupi d as to ignore all these things across the ages for the new slogan of love is love (How dam BANAL can you go?)


We have been and always will be a society of men and women; same-sex marriage doesn't and won't change this. Heterosexuals will continue to be the majority, and the human race will continue to procreate.

Allowing same-sex couples to marry no more affects the institution of marriage and society any more than capitalism affects society, or how pornography affects people.

You might wake in the morning on the day after the Parliament has passed the law, and feel that your marriage is no longer what it was.

And that would be your problem.... And no one else's.

Same-sex marriage doesn't affect you. As to how it affects society, everything affects society, so let's ban everything, institute a totalitarian state with Kim Jong-UN as the Dear Leader because he knows best - after all he discovered DNA, and can apparently walk on water??? Because we would all be so much better off if we just all shut-up and listened to you, Frank.




When two blokes marry, which one is the wife? If they adopt kids, who will be the mother?
What will the kids say to their friends?  'Bwian is me mum's?

It is a farcical notion. Its like slapstick, SSM.


Hard to believe that such ignorance still exists in this country, in 2017.




Indeed. At least Frank is honest about his objections but yes indeed, that is the level of ignorance we're working with.


Well yes, Frank has always been partial to a bit of virtue-signalling stool, it's just a fact.

He misses his dear Mormor's cooking back in the old country. He still gets homesick, you know.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 39921
Gender: male
Re: Marriages to be annulled
Reply #124 - Oct 13th, 2017 at 2:53pm
 
mothra wrote on Oct 13th, 2017 at 2:39pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 13th, 2017 at 9:01am:
Frank wrote on Oct 13th, 2017 at 8:59am:
Auggie wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 11:31pm:
Quote:
'Procreation card's, Bwian?  Really? Like it's  a furphy that we ARE a species made up heterosexual men and women?

The socialization of boys and girls is a furphy? The social, cultural bridging of of generations is a furphy?

You can't  be so stupi d as to ignore all these things across the ages for the new slogan of love is love (How dam BANAL can you go?)


We have been and always will be a society of men and women; same-sex marriage doesn't and won't change this. Heterosexuals will continue to be the majority, and the human race will continue to procreate.

Allowing same-sex couples to marry no more affects the institution of marriage and society any more than capitalism affects society, or how pornography affects people.

You might wake in the morning on the day after the Parliament has passed the law, and feel that your marriage is no longer what it was.

And that would be your problem.... And no one else's.

Same-sex marriage doesn't affect you. As to how it affects society, everything affects society, so let's ban everything, institute a totalitarian state with Kim Jong-UN as the Dear Leader because he knows best - after all he discovered DNA, and can apparently walk on water??? Because we would all be so much better off if we just all shut-up and listened to you, Frank.




When two blokes marry, which one is the wife? If they adopt kids, who will be the mother?
What will the kids say to their friends?  'Bwian is me mum's?

It is a farcical notion. Its like slapstick, SSM.


Hard to believe that such ignorance still exists in this country, in 2017.




Indeed. At least Frank is honest about his objections but yes indeed, that is the level of ignorance we're working with.

Grin  Grin 'you are working with?' You, one of the most PC, group-think addled person for miles!


What is ignorant about pointing out that you need a man and a woman to make a baby, to socialise it properly into a heterosexual species and society and to nurture it and and bring it into adulthood and to be, in turn, the next bridge between you and future generations?

What is 'ignorant' about recognising the way of the world?

Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Auggie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


The Bull Moose

Posts: 8571
Re: Marriages to be annulled
Reply #125 - Oct 13th, 2017 at 2:53pm
 
Frank wrote on Oct 13th, 2017 at 2:23pm:
Er... it's a fake, 2 dads. Where's mum? How did 2 dads  make the little guy?
What a terrible thing to put on a little person out of sheer vanity.


What about single parent households? Other children may ask the same question? What about women who choose to raise children as single mothers, without a father?
Back to top
 

The Progressive President
 
IP Logged
 
Aussie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 37678
Gender: male
Re: Marriages to be annulled
Reply #126 - Oct 13th, 2017 at 2:54pm
 
Auggie wrote on Oct 13th, 2017 at 2:53pm:
Frank wrote on Oct 13th, 2017 at 2:23pm:
Er... it's a fake, 2 dads. Where's mum? How did 2 dads  make the little guy?
What a terrible thing to put on a little person out of sheer vanity.


What about single parent households? Other children may ask the same question? What about women who choose to raise children as single mothers, without a father?


Ban them!
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 130891
Gender: male
Re: Marriages to be annulled
Reply #127 - Oct 13th, 2017 at 2:55pm
 
Frank wrote on Oct 13th, 2017 at 2:53pm:
mothra wrote on Oct 13th, 2017 at 2:39pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 13th, 2017 at 9:01am:
Frank wrote on Oct 13th, 2017 at 8:59am:
Auggie wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 11:31pm:
Quote:
'Procreation card's, Bwian?  Really? Like it's  a furphy that we ARE a species made up heterosexual men and women?

The socialization of boys and girls is a furphy? The social, cultural bridging of of generations is a furphy?

You can't  be so stupi d as to ignore all these things across the ages for the new slogan of love is love (How dam BANAL can you go?)


We have been and always will be a society of men and women; same-sex marriage doesn't and won't change this. Heterosexuals will continue to be the majority, and the human race will continue to procreate.

Allowing same-sex couples to marry no more affects the institution of marriage and society any more than capitalism affects society, or how pornography affects people.

You might wake in the morning on the day after the Parliament has passed the law, and feel that your marriage is no longer what it was.

And that would be your problem.... And no one else's.

Same-sex marriage doesn't affect you. As to how it affects society, everything affects society, so let's ban everything, institute a totalitarian state with Kim Jong-UN as the Dear Leader because he knows best - after all he discovered DNA, and can apparently walk on water??? Because we would all be so much better off if we just all shut-up and listened to you, Frank.




When two blokes marry, which one is the wife? If they adopt kids, who will be the mother?
What will the kids say to their friends?  'Bwian is me mum's?

It is a farcical notion. Its like slapstick, SSM.


Hard to believe that such ignorance still exists in this country, in 2017.




Indeed. At least Frank is honest about his objections but yes indeed, that is the level of ignorance we're working with.

Grin  Grin 'you are working with?' You, one of the most PC, group-think addled person for miles!


What is ignorant about pointing out that you need a man and a woman to make a baby...


Off-topic.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 39921
Gender: male
Re: Marriages to be annulled
Reply #128 - Oct 13th, 2017 at 2:56pm
 
Auggie wrote on Oct 13th, 2017 at 2:53pm:
Frank wrote on Oct 13th, 2017 at 2:23pm:
Er... it's a fake, 2 dads. Where's mum? How did 2 dads  make the little guy?
What a terrible thing to put on a little person out of sheer vanity.


What about single parent households? Other children may ask the same question? What about women who choose to raise children as single mothers, without a father?

What about them? In what way do they pretend that they are as whole and natural as a complete family?
Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 130891
Gender: male
Re: Marriages to be annulled
Reply #129 - Oct 13th, 2017 at 2:58pm
 
Frank wrote on Oct 13th, 2017 at 2:53pm:
mothra wrote on Oct 13th, 2017 at 2:39pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 13th, 2017 at 9:01am:
Frank wrote on Oct 13th, 2017 at 8:59am:
Auggie wrote on Oct 12th, 2017 at 11:31pm:
Quote:
'Procreation card's, Bwian?  Really? Like it's  a furphy that we ARE a species made up heterosexual men and women?

The socialization of boys and girls is a furphy? The social, cultural bridging of of generations is a furphy?

You can't  be so stupi d as to ignore all these things across the ages for the new slogan of love is love (How dam BANAL can you go?)


We have been and always will be a society of men and women; same-sex marriage doesn't and won't change this. Heterosexuals will continue to be the majority, and the human race will continue to procreate.

Allowing same-sex couples to marry no more affects the institution of marriage and society any more than capitalism affects society, or how pornography affects people.

You might wake in the morning on the day after the Parliament has passed the law, and feel that your marriage is no longer what it was.

And that would be your problem.... And no one else's.

Same-sex marriage doesn't affect you. As to how it affects society, everything affects society, so let's ban everything, institute a totalitarian state with Kim Jong-UN as the Dear Leader because he knows best - after all he discovered DNA, and can apparently walk on water??? Because we would all be so much better off if we just all shut-up and listened to you, Frank.




When two blokes marry, which one is the wife? If they adopt kids, who will be the mother?
What will the kids say to their friends?  'Bwian is me mum's?

It is a farcical notion. Its like slapstick, SSM.


Hard to believe that such ignorance still exists in this country, in 2017.




Indeed. At least Frank is honest about his objections but yes indeed, that is the level of ignorance we're working with.

Grin  Grin 'you are working with?' You, one of the most PC, group-think addled person for miles!


What is ignorant about pointing out that you need a man and a woman to make a baby ...


Nobody is saying anything to the contrary.

Ignorance is saying something like "which one is the wife?".


Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Aussie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 37678
Gender: male
Re: Marriages to be annulled
Reply #130 - Oct 13th, 2017 at 2:59pm
 
Frank wrote on Oct 13th, 2017 at 2:56pm:
Auggie wrote on Oct 13th, 2017 at 2:53pm:
Frank wrote on Oct 13th, 2017 at 2:23pm:
Er... it's a fake, 2 dads. Where's mum? How did 2 dads  make the little guy?
What a terrible thing to put on a little person out of sheer vanity.


What about single parent households? Other children may ask the same question? What about women who choose to raise children as single mothers, without a father?

What about them? In what way do they pretend that they are as whole and natural as a complete family?


My turn
.....Off Topic!
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
mothra
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 34374
Gender: female
Re: Marriages to be annulled
Reply #131 - Oct 13th, 2017 at 2:59pm
 
Frank wrote on Oct 13th, 2017 at 2:53pm:
What is ignorant about pointing out that you need a man and a woman to make a baby, to socialise it properly into a heterosexual species and society and to nurture it and and bring it into adulthood and to be, in turn, the next bridge between you and future generations?

What is 'ignorant' about recognising the way of the world?




Why do you think that heterosexuality normality will decline if ssm is allowed?

Do you think it will encourage people to be gay or something?

And you do not need any gender parent at all .. you just need someone who loves you. The more, the merrier.
Back to top
 

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.
 
IP Logged
 
Auggie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


The Bull Moose

Posts: 8571
Re: Marriages to be annulled
Reply #132 - Oct 13th, 2017 at 3:02pm
 
Frank wrote on Oct 13th, 2017 at 2:56pm:
Auggie wrote on Oct 13th, 2017 at 2:53pm:
Frank wrote on Oct 13th, 2017 at 2:23pm:
Er... it's a fake, 2 dads. Where's mum? How did 2 dads  make the little guy?
What a terrible thing to put on a little person out of sheer vanity.


What about single parent households? Other children may ask the same question? What about women who choose to raise children as single mothers, without a father?

What about them? In what way do they pretend that they are as whole and natural as a complete family?


A single mother who voluntarily chooses to raise a child may believe that they are 'whole and natural as a complete family' as you state.

Frankly, if people are going to make judgements about other people based on whether or not they have two parents or not, then they're not worth salt.

Back to top
 

The Progressive President
 
IP Logged
 
Mattyfisk
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 91855
Gender: male
Re: Marriages to be annulled
Reply #133 - Oct 13th, 2017 at 3:12pm
 
Frank wrote on Oct 13th, 2017 at 2:53pm:
'you are working with?'


Well, it might be work, but Mother has much love too. She does her best, dear boy. These things take time.

Remember, every day, in every way, things keep getting better and better.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 130891
Gender: male
Re: Marriages to be annulled
Reply #134 - Oct 13th, 2017 at 3:13pm
 
mothra wrote on Oct 13th, 2017 at 2:59pm:
Frank wrote on Oct 13th, 2017 at 2:53pm:
What is ignorant about pointing out that you need a man and a woman to make a baby, to socialise it properly into a heterosexual species and society and to nurture it and and bring it into adulthood and to be, in turn, the next bridge between you and future generations?

What is 'ignorant' about recognising the way of the world?




Why do you think that heterosexuality normality will decline if ssm is allowed?

Do you think it will encourage people to be gay or something?



Once SSM is legalised, we're all gonna catch the gay.

Hilarious   Grin
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 7 8 9 10 11 ... 22
Send Topic Print