Australian Politics Forum - aggressive left sacks those voting NO

President Elect, The Mechanic

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 17501
Gender: male

Re: aggressive left sacks those voting NO
Reply #45 - Sep 20^th, 2017 at 5:27am

parents have already lost their rights to their children education in regards to Social Engineering...

There is no opt-out for students who don’t want to participate.

Parents cannot sign a form that prevents their child from participating.

Parents can not sit-in on the training sessions.

http://concit.org/safe-schools-meet-the-new-parents-of-victoria/

just wait till SSM goes through... the lid will be open to the freaks to run riot...

Back to top

Q

The STORM has arrived
Every Dog Has Its Day...
Dark to Light.
Sheep no more.

IP Logged

philperth2010

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 19625
Perth
Gender: male

Re: aggressive left sacks those voting NO
Reply #46 - Sep 20^th, 2017 at 7:31am

matty wrote on Sep 19^th, 2017 at 10:55pm:

philperth2010 wrote on Sep 19^th, 2017 at 7:24pm:

Fuzzball wrote on Sep 19^th, 2017 at 7:16pm:

philperth2010 wrote on Sep 19^th, 2017 at 6:57pm:

So the right are worried about cake makers and religious institutions not being able to discriminate based on their beliefs and then they criticise someone who sacks someone based on their beliefs....Go figure....I thought this is what you wanted???

Roll Eyes

Now that really is a load of cr@p Phyllis....

If its ok for a baker to refuse to bake a cake for someone based on their beliefs why is it not ok to terminate a contract based on your beliefs....If a pastor can withdraw his services because he opposes the opinions of his client why cant a business sack someone who for the same thing???

Huh

Because you go to a baker and a priest to get food and get married, respectively. They are optional services. When you are an employee or contractor you have signed mutually agreed terms and conditions of employment, which are legal.

So it is ok for a shop owner to tell a customer they are not welcome in their shop because they are gay but it is not ok to end a contract with a contractor for what ever reason....The first instance would violate the discrimination act as it stands now and the second instance is a business decision that is legal....You have no idea do you???

Roll Eyes

Back to top

If knowledge can create problems, it is not through ignorance that we can solve them.
Isaac Asimov (1920 - 1992)

IP Logged

Bam

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 21905
Gender: male

Re: aggressive left sacks those voting NO
Reply #47 - Sep 20^th, 2017 at 1:58pm

President Elect, The Mechanic wrote on Sep 20^th, 2017 at 5:27am:

parents have already lost their rights to their children education in regards to Social Engineering...

There is no opt-out for students who don’t want to participate.

Parents cannot sign a form that prevents their child from participating.

Parents can not sit-in on the training sessions.

http://concit.org/safe-schools-meet-the-new-parents-of-victoria/

Sounds like neoliberalism.

Back to top

You are not entitled to your opinion. You are only entitled to hold opinions that you can defend through sound, reasoned argument.

IP Logged

BigOl64

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 14438
Townsville QLD
Gender: male

Re: aggressive left sacks those voting NO
Reply #48 - Sep 20^th, 2017 at 2:07pm

Looks like there may a lesson to learn for the nut bag hateful lefties; don't be a fkken b1tch and expect everyone to be fine with it.

THE businessowner of a children’s party business who sacked one of her workers for promoting the “no” vote has had a Facebook post deleted for apparently causing hate speech.
It comes as she cops a series of abusive messages and death threats herself.
The 18-year-old worker, who has been identified only by her first name Madeline, was let go as a contractor by the Canberra small business for posting a Facebook profile picture with a filter saying “It’s OK to vote no”.
Capital Kids Parties business owner Madlin Sims said she fired Madeline because “advertising your desire to vote no for SSM [same-sex marriage] is, in my eyes, hate speech”.
She says she has since been called a skank, wh**e, b**ch, putrid and a sl*t.

http://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/gay-marriage/no-voter-fires-back-after-getting-...

Back to top

IP Logged

Auggie

Gold Member

Offline

The Bull Moose

Posts: 8571

Re: aggressive left sacks those voting NO
Reply #49 - Sep 20^th, 2017 at 2:29pm

I have a think about this over the last couple of days, and I think that people should be able to express an opinion without having to worry about their livelihoods being destroyed.

I oppose government censorship. Internal or social censorship is pretty much the same thing.

Therefore, I'm inclined to support unfair dismissal laws that make punish employers for firing employees who express an opinion. There must also be some caveats. For e.g.

- the employee/contractor must state that the opinion which she/he holds is not that of the business, and that she/he does not represent the business in her/his comments in any way.

- the employee/contractor must not use expletive language when making the opinion.

Thoughts?

Back to top

The Progressive President

IP Logged

Auggie

Gold Member

Offline

The Bull Moose

Posts: 8571

Re: aggressive left sacks those voting NO
Reply #50 - Sep 20^th, 2017 at 2:30pm

BigOl64 wrote on Sep 20^th, 2017 at 2:07pm:

Looks like there may a lesson to learn for the nut bag hateful lefties; don't be a fkken b1tch and expect everyone to be fine with it.

THE businessowner of a children’s party business who sacked one of her workers for promoting the “no” vote has had a Facebook post deleted for apparently causing hate speech.
It comes as she cops a series of abusive messages and death threats herself.
The 18-year-old worker, who has been identified only by her first name Madeline, was let go as a contractor by the Canberra small business for posting a Facebook profile picture with a filter saying “It’s OK to vote no”.
Capital Kids Parties business owner Madlin Sims said she fired Madeline because “advertising your desire to vote no for SSM [same-sex marriage] is, in my eyes, hate speech”.
She says she has since been called a skank, wh**e, b**ch, putrid and a sl*t.

http://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/gay-marriage/no-voter-fires-back-after-getting-...

Hate speech = free speech. There is no difference.

Back to top

The Progressive President

IP Logged

TheFunPolice

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 9009
waggawagga
Gender: male

Re: aggressive left sacks those voting NO
Reply #51 - Sep 20^th, 2017 at 3:36pm

Auggie wrote on Sep 19^th, 2017 at 10:10pm:

Grendel wrote on Sep 19^th, 2017 at 8:35pm:

YOU HAVE TO BE KIDDING.

UNFAIR DISMISSAL AND ALL SORTS OF LEGAL SHYTE NEEDS TO BE TOSSED AT THIS TWERP

This is the sort of demented mindset that No voters have to face. Roll Eyes

G, you would be well within your right to fire an employee if they insulted Jesus.

It goes both ways you know.

Are you serious?

Back to top

......Australia has an illegitimate Government!

IP Logged

TheFunPolice

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 9009
waggawagga
Gender: male

Re: aggressive left sacks those voting NO
Reply #52 - Sep 20^th, 2017 at 3:40pm

matty wrote on Sep 19^th, 2017 at 10:47pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 19^th, 2017 at 1:57pm:

BigOl64 wrote on Sep 19^th, 2017 at 1:55pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 19^th, 2017 at 1:53pm:

Again, the no campaign reaching for any issue other than the one we're actually voting on.

So?

If the left keep attacking people it won't change their mind it will merely harden their resolve.

It happens everyone some d1ckhead socialist wants to change something

Good luck with the yes campaign. Grin

Why arent these people just focusing on what the question is about?

The initial post had nothing to do with gay marriage and was about unfair dismissal. You made it about marriage so perhaps heed your own advice when talking about focusing on what the question is about.

Pastafarians need a slippery substance to digest their birdseed ... Reject the ragu and you reject the pastafarian Wink

Back to top

......Australia has an illegitimate Government!

IP Logged

BigOl64

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 14438
Townsville QLD
Gender: male

Re: aggressive left sacks those voting NO
Reply #53 - Sep 20^th, 2017 at 3:42pm

Auggie wrote on Sep 20^th, 2017 at 2:30pm:

BigOl64 wrote on Sep 20^th, 2017 at 2:07pm:

Looks like there may a lesson to learn for the nut bag hateful lefties; don't be a fkken b1tch and expect everyone to be fine with it.

THE businessowner of a children’s party business who sacked one of her workers for promoting the “no” vote has had a Facebook post deleted for apparently causing hate speech.
It comes as she cops a series of abusive messages and death threats herself.
The 18-year-old worker, who has been identified only by her first name Madeline, was let go as a contractor by the Canberra small business for posting a Facebook profile picture with a filter saying “It’s OK to vote no”.
Capital Kids Parties business owner Madlin Sims said she fired Madeline because “advertising your desire to vote no for SSM [same-sex marriage] is, in my eyes, hate speech”.
She says she has since been called a skank, wh**e, b**ch, putrid and a sl*t.

http://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/gay-marriage/no-voter-fires-back-after-getting-...

Hate speech = free speech. There is no difference.

It can be, but it doesn't have to be.

Back to top

IP Logged

Prime Minister for Canyons

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 26906
Canberra
Gender: male

Re: aggressive left sacks those voting NO
Reply #54 - Sep 20^th, 2017 at 3:48pm

TheFunPolice wrote on Sep 20^th, 2017 at 3:40pm:

matty wrote on Sep 19^th, 2017 at 10:47pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 19^th, 2017 at 1:57pm:

BigOl64 wrote on Sep 19^th, 2017 at 1:55pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 19^th, 2017 at 1:53pm:

Again, the no campaign reaching for any issue other than the one we're actually voting on.

So?

If the left keep attacking people it won't change their mind it will merely harden their resolve.

It happens everyone some d1ckhead socialist wants to change something

Good luck with the yes campaign. Grin

Why arent these people just focusing on what the question is about?

The initial post had nothing to do with gay marriage and was about unfair dismissal. You made it about marriage so perhaps heed your own advice when talking about focusing on what the question is about.

Pastafarians need a slippery substance to digest their birdseed ... Reject the ragu and you reject the pastafarian Wink

So why not put it about unfair dismissal and not aggressive left sacks those voting no. It may have meant to be about unfair dismissal but the topic title is a loaded one.

Back to top

In a time of universal deceit — telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

No evidence whatsoever it can be attributed to George Orwell or Eric Arthur Blair (in fact the same guy)

IP Logged

TheFunPolice

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 9009
waggawagga
Gender: male

Re: aggressive left sacks those voting NO
Reply #55 - Sep 20^th, 2017 at 3:51pm

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 20^th, 2017 at 3:48pm:

TheFunPolice wrote on Sep 20^th, 2017 at 3:40pm:

matty wrote on Sep 19^th, 2017 at 10:47pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 19^th, 2017 at 1:57pm:

BigOl64 wrote on Sep 19^th, 2017 at 1:55pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 19^th, 2017 at 1:53pm:

Again, the no campaign reaching for any issue other than the one we're actually voting on.

So?

If the left keep attacking people it won't change their mind it will merely harden their resolve.

It happens everyone some d1ckhead socialist wants to change something

Good luck with the yes campaign. Grin

Why arent these people just focusing on what the question is about?

The initial post had nothing to do with gay marriage and was about unfair dismissal. You made it about marriage so perhaps heed your own advice when talking about focusing on what the question is about.

Pastafarians need a slippery substance to digest their birdseed ... Reject the ragu and you reject the pastafarian Wink

So why not put it about unfair dismissal and not aggressive left sacks those voting no. It may have meant to be about unfair dismissal but the topic title is a loaded one.

So,Pastafarians refuse to read between the lines ay: that's called being a pedant bro!

Back to top

......Australia has an illegitimate Government!

IP Logged

Prime Minister for Canyons

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 26906
Canberra
Gender: male

Re: aggressive left sacks those voting NO
Reply #56 - Sep 20^th, 2017 at 3:52pm

TheFunPolice wrote on Sep 20^th, 2017 at 3:51pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 20^th, 2017 at 3:48pm:

TheFunPolice wrote on Sep 20^th, 2017 at 3:40pm:

matty wrote on Sep 19^th, 2017 at 10:47pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 19^th, 2017 at 1:57pm:

BigOl64 wrote on Sep 19^th, 2017 at 1:55pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 19^th, 2017 at 1:53pm:

Again, the no campaign reaching for any issue other than the one we're actually voting on.

So?

If the left keep attacking people it won't change their mind it will merely harden their resolve.

It happens everyone some d1ckhead socialist wants to change something

Good luck with the yes campaign. Grin

Why arent these people just focusing on what the question is about?

The initial post had nothing to do with gay marriage and was about unfair dismissal. You made it about marriage so perhaps heed your own advice when talking about focusing on what the question is about.

Pastafarians need a slippery substance to digest their birdseed ... Reject the ragu and you reject the pastafarian Wink

So why not put it about unfair dismissal and not aggressive left sacks those voting no. It may have meant to be about unfair dismissal but the topic title is a loaded one.

So,Pastafarians refuse to read between the lines ay: that's called being a pedant bro!

BTW, speaking of mental illness.

Back to top

In a time of universal deceit — telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

No evidence whatsoever it can be attributed to George Orwell or Eric Arthur Blair (in fact the same guy)

IP Logged

TheFunPolice

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 9009
waggawagga
Gender: male

Re: aggressive left sacks those voting NO
Reply #57 - Sep 20^th, 2017 at 3:54pm

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 20^th, 2017 at 3:52pm:

TheFunPolice wrote on Sep 20^th, 2017 at 3:51pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 20^th, 2017 at 3:48pm:

TheFunPolice wrote on Sep 20^th, 2017 at 3:40pm:

matty wrote on Sep 19^th, 2017 at 10:47pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 19^th, 2017 at 1:57pm:

BigOl64 wrote on Sep 19^th, 2017 at 1:55pm:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 19^th, 2017 at 1:53pm:

Again, the no campaign reaching for any issue other than the one we're actually voting on.

So?

If the left keep attacking people it won't change their mind it will merely harden their resolve.

It happens everyone some d1ckhead socialist wants to change something

Good luck with the yes campaign. Grin

Why arent these people just focusing on what the question is about?

The initial post had nothing to do with gay marriage and was about unfair dismissal. You made it about marriage so perhaps heed your own advice when talking about focusing on what the question is about.

Pastafarians need a slippery substance to digest their birdseed ... Reject the ragu and you reject the pastafarian Wink

So why not put it about unfair dismissal and not aggressive left sacks those voting no. It may have meant to be about unfair dismissal but the topic title is a loaded one.

So,Pastafarians refuse to read between the lines ay: that's called being a pedant bro!

BTW, speaking of mental illness.

I'm not pro gay marriage: you are! Cheesy

Back to top

......Australia has an illegitimate Government!

IP Logged

Prime Minister for Canyons Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 26906 Canberra Gender:	Re: aggressive left sacks those voting NO Reply #58 - Sep 20^th, 2017 at 3:56pm But you are given to histrionics, exclamation marks and wild claims.
Back to top	In a time of universal deceit — telling the truth is a revolutionary act. No evidence whatsoever it can be attributed to George Orwell or Eric Arthur Blair (in fact the same guy) IP Logged

Auggie

Gold Member

Offline

The Bull Moose

Posts: 8571

Re: aggressive left sacks those voting NO
Reply #59 - Sep 20^th, 2017 at 3:56pm

TheFunPolice wrote on Sep 20^th, 2017 at 3:36pm:

Auggie wrote on Sep 19^th, 2017 at 10:10pm:

Grendel wrote on Sep 19^th, 2017 at 8:35pm:

YOU HAVE TO BE KIDDING.

UNFAIR DISMISSAL AND ALL SORTS OF LEGAL SHYTE NEEDS TO BE TOSSED AT THIS TWERP

This is the sort of demented mindset that No voters have to face. Roll Eyes

G, you would be well within your right to fire an employee if they insulted Jesus.

It goes both ways you know.

Are you serious?

So, you disagree that an employer does not have the right to fire an employee if they express an opinion against the mainstream? Many on here have said that 'those who are against SSM' will have to put up with this crap. But, the same could apply to any person who opposes a mainstream belief, right? What if you believe that Australia is racist country? Does an employer have the right to fire her/him for that reason?

Back to top

The Progressive President

IP Logged