Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 
Send Topic Print
$12,600 fines for speaking about homos (Read 7972 times)
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 94157
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: $12,600 fines for speaking about homos
Reply #60 - Sep 13th, 2017 at 8:07pm
 
TheFunPolice wrote on Sep 13th, 2017 at 5:58pm:
____ wrote on Sep 13th, 2017 at 3:49pm:
Bobby. wrote on Sep 13th, 2017 at 3:41pm:
____ wrote on Sep 13th, 2017 at 2:59pm:
Bobby. wrote on Sep 13th, 2017 at 2:37pm:
cods wrote on Sep 13th, 2017 at 2:11pm:
____ wrote on Sep 13th, 2017 at 12:59pm:
Speaking about gay people is fine Bobby.

What the bigger issue is : 'religious views' will impede the islamophobes.



you will never stop that   look at Islam   it really hates us infidels............

btw greenie they aint too happy with gays either... so I have heard



There's nothing wrong with what Greens_Win does:





Educate you on your own biases.
Why is heterosexual anal sex not a sin?



Read your Bible -
the answers are in there.



Gay Jesus sodomised his male lover for a ride back ... and now it's a sin.

Does this mean the bible is a false idol and worshiping it, is a one way direct ticket to hell?


Are you just making this all up?
Roll Eyes




Greens_Win is making it up to offend people of religious views.

Where is the chapter and verse quote to support his false claims?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 94157
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: $12,600 fines for speaking about homos
Reply #61 - Sep 13th, 2017 at 8:10pm
 
TheFunPolice wrote on Sep 13th, 2017 at 5:51pm:
Bobby. wrote on Sep 13th, 2017 at 1:26pm:
Captain Caveman wrote on Sep 13th, 2017 at 12:49pm:
Good.
A friend of my wives is on the no campaign and has been harrased and threatened to the point where she is to scared to leave her house.
Seems to be a reoccurring thing with these extremists. Say no to them and look out.




I think it's more to protect people of same sex persuasion from
other people describing what they do.

We can't really talk about it.

So what can we talk about in this fake debate?




It's not clear but it seems we have all been gagged.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
____
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 33410
Australia
Gender: male
Re: $12,600 fines for speaking about homos
Reply #62 - Sep 13th, 2017 at 8:11pm
 
Bobby. wrote on Sep 13th, 2017 at 8:07pm:
TheFunPolice wrote on Sep 13th, 2017 at 5:58pm:
____ wrote on Sep 13th, 2017 at 3:49pm:
Bobby. wrote on Sep 13th, 2017 at 3:41pm:
____ wrote on Sep 13th, 2017 at 2:59pm:
Bobby. wrote on Sep 13th, 2017 at 2:37pm:
cods wrote on Sep 13th, 2017 at 2:11pm:
____ wrote on Sep 13th, 2017 at 12:59pm:
Speaking about gay people is fine Bobby.

What the bigger issue is : 'religious views' will impede the islamophobes.



you will never stop that   look at Islam   it really hates us infidels............

btw greenie they aint too happy with gays either... so I have heard



There's nothing wrong with what Greens_Win does:





Educate you on your own biases.
Why is heterosexual anal sex not a sin?



Read your Bible -
the answers are in there.



Gay Jesus sodomised his male lover for a ride back ... and now it's a sin.

Does this mean the bible is a false idol and worshiping it, is a one way direct ticket to hell?


Are you just making this all up?
Roll Eyes




Greens_Win is making it up to offend people of religious views.

Where is the chapter and verse quote to support his false claims?



I'm suppose to use a false idol to prove a basic fact. I prefer wikipedia thanks.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 94157
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: $12,600 fines for speaking about homos
Reply #63 - Sep 13th, 2017 at 8:17pm
 
____ wrote on Sep 13th, 2017 at 7:29pm:



Greens_Win - there is no chapter and verse to support your disgusting claims:

Quote:
Some scholars have additionally suggested a homoerotic interpretation of Christ's relationship with the Beloved Disciple, although such a scriptural reading is disputed by others.[13][14] Tilborg suggests that the portrait in the Gospel of John is "positively attuned to the development of possibly homosexual behaviour". However, he cautions that "in the code... such imaginary homosexual behaviour is not an expression of homosexuality." Meanwhile, Dunderberg has also explored the issue and argues that the absence of accepted Greek terms for "lover" and "beloved" discounts a purely erotic reading.[15]

The relationship between Christ and John was certainly interpreted by some as being of a physical erotic nature as early as the 16th century (albeit in a "heretical" context) - documented, for example, in the trial for blasphemy of Christopher Marlowe, who was accused of claiming that "St. John the Evangelist was bedfellow to Christ and leaned always in his bosom, that he used him as the sinners of Sodoma".[16] In accusing Marlowe of the "sinful nature" of homosexual acts, James I of England inevitably invited comparisons to his own erotic relationship with the Duke of Buckingham which he also compared to that of the Beloved Disciple.[17] Finally, Calcagno, a monk of Venice[18] faced trial and was executed in 1550 for claiming that "St. John was Christ's catamite".[14]



I accuse you of blasphemy, heresy and witchcraft &
you can also pay your $12,600 fine to a charity of your choice.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
____
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 33410
Australia
Gender: male
Re: $12,600 fines for speaking about homos
Reply #64 - Sep 13th, 2017 at 8:20pm
 
Bobby. wrote on Sep 13th, 2017 at 8:17pm:
____ wrote on Sep 13th, 2017 at 7:29pm:



Greens_Win - there is no chapter and verse to support your disgusting claims:

Quote:
Some scholars have additionally suggested a homoerotic interpretation of Christ's relationship with the Beloved Disciple, although such a scriptural reading is disputed by others.[13][14] Tilborg suggests that the portrait in the Gospel of John is "positively attuned to the development of possibly homosexual behaviour". However, he cautions that "in the code... such imaginary homosexual behaviour is not an expression of homosexuality." Meanwhile, Dunderberg has also explored the issue and argues that the absence of accepted Greek terms for "lover" and "beloved" discounts a purely erotic reading.[15]

The relationship between Christ and John was certainly interpreted by some as being of a physical erotic nature as early as the 16th century (albeit in a "heretical" context) - documented, for example, in the trial for blasphemy of Christopher Marlowe, who was accused of claiming that "St. John the Evangelist was bedfellow to Christ and leaned always in his bosom, that he used him as the sinners of Sodoma".[16] In accusing Marlowe of the "sinful nature" of homosexual acts, James I of England inevitably invited comparisons to his own erotic relationship with the Duke of Buckingham which he also compared to that of the Beloved Disciple.[17] Finally, Calcagno, a monk of Venice[18] faced trial and was executed in 1550 for claiming that "St. John was Christ's catamite".[14]



I accuse you of blasphemy, heresy and witchcraft &
you can also pay your $12,600 fine to a charity of your choice.



None of that is covered.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
TheFunPolice
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 9009
waggawagga
Gender: male
Re: $12,600 fines for speaking about homos
Reply #65 - Sep 13th, 2017 at 8:28pm
 
HBobby. wrote on Sep 13th, 2017 at 8:07pm:
TheFunPolice wrote on Sep 13th, 2017 at 5:58pm:
____ wrote on Sep 13th, 2017 at 3:49pm:
Bobby. wrote on Sep 13th, 2017 at 3:41pm:
____ wrote on Sep 13th, 2017 at 2:59pm:
Bobby. wrote on Sep 13th, 2017 at 2:37pm:
cods wrote on Sep 13th, 2017 at 2:11pm:
____ wrote on Sep 13th, 2017 at 12:59pm:
Speaking about gay people is fine Bobby.

What the bigger issue is : 'religious views' will impede the islamophobes.



you will never stop that   look at Islam   it really hates us infidels............

btw greenie they aint too happy with gays either... so I have heard



There's nothing wrong with what Greens_Win does:





Educate you on your own biases.
Why is heterosexual anal sex not a sin?



Read your Bible -
the answers are in there.



Gay Jesus sodomised his male lover for a ride back ... and now it's a sin.

Does this mean the bible is a false idol and worshiping it, is a one way direct ticket to hell?


Are you just making this all up?
Roll Eyes




Greens_Win is making it up to offend people of religious views.

Where is the chapter and verse quote to support his false claims?

I think I asked for which chapter and there was no answer!
Back to top
 

......Australia has an illegitimate Government!
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 94157
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: $12,600 fines for speaking about homos
Reply #66 - Sep 13th, 2017 at 8:34pm
 
Ozpolitic will have to suspend free speech for 6 weeks:

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
TheFunPolice
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 9009
waggawagga
Gender: male
Re: $12,600 fines for speaking about homos
Reply #67 - Sep 13th, 2017 at 8:41pm
 
Bobby. wrote on Sep 13th, 2017 at 8:34pm:
Ozpolitic will have to suspend free speech for 6 weeks:


The laws only applies to "news" I think!

Shocked

I dunno....  Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

......Australia has an illegitimate Government!
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 94157
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: $12,600 fines for speaking about homos
Reply #68 - Sep 13th, 2017 at 8:42pm
 
TheFunPolice wrote on Sep 13th, 2017 at 8:41pm:
Bobby. wrote on Sep 13th, 2017 at 8:34pm:
Ozpolitic will have to suspend free speech for 6 weeks:


The laws only applies to "news" I think!

Shocked

I dunno....  Roll Eyes



It applies to all of us.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 94157
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: $12,600 fines for speaking about homos
Reply #69 - Sep 13th, 2017 at 9:00pm
 
Bobby. wrote on Sep 13th, 2017 at 8:34pm:
Ozpolitic will have to suspend free speech for 6 weeks:



What will FD do?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 47066
At my desk.
Re: $12,600 fines for speaking about homos
Reply #70 - Sep 13th, 2017 at 9:12pm
 
This is rediculous. They are inventing a different set of rules for a short period, but the interpretation of the rules by the courts, if it is established at all, won't happen until well after that period ends.

If it is not covered by existing laws, we don't need it.

I'm not going to do anything.
Back to top
 

I identify as Mail because all I do is SendIT!
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Aussie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 37678
Gender: male
Re: $12,600 fines for speaking about homos
Reply #71 - Sep 13th, 2017 at 9:15pm
 
Quote:
They are inventing a different set of rules for a short period, but the interpretation of the rules by the courts, if it is established at all, won't happen until well after that period ends.


100% correct Effendi.  It is very bad Law.  But.....then again this whole process is so absurd that it ought be no surprise bad Law is created to deal with the farce that it is.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 94157
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: $12,600 fines for speaking about homos
Reply #72 - Sep 13th, 2017 at 9:15pm
 
freediver wrote on Sep 13th, 2017 at 9:12pm:
This is ridiculous. They are inventing a different set of rules for a short period, but the interpretation of the rules by the courts, if it is established at all, won't happen until well after that period ends.

If it is not covered by existing laws, we don't need it.

I'm not going to do anything.




But Greens_Win called Jesus gay -

he's offended all Christians.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
cods
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 88048
Re: $12,600 fines for speaking about homos
Reply #73 - Sep 13th, 2017 at 10:18pm
 
Bobby. wrote on Sep 13th, 2017 at 9:15pm:
freediver wrote on Sep 13th, 2017 at 9:12pm:
This is ridiculous. They are inventing a different set of rules for a short period, but the interpretation of the rules by the courts, if it is established at all, won't happen until well after that period ends.

If it is not covered by existing laws, we don't need it.

I'm not going to do anything.




But Greens_Win called Jesus gay -

he's offended all Christians.



thats ok bobby  Christians are not people  everyone knows that.. they deserve nothing    you had better get used to it.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Brian Ross
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Representative of me

Posts: 39384
Re: $12,600 fines for abuse
Reply #74 - Sep 13th, 2017 at 10:34pm
 
cods wrote on Sep 13th, 2017 at 2:11pm:
____ wrote on Sep 13th, 2017 at 12:59pm:
Speaking about gay people is fine Bobby.

What the bigger issue is : 'religious views' will impede the islamophobes.



you will never stop that   look at Islam   it really hates us infidels............


I wonder how many Muslims you actually know, Cods?  Have actually talked to, openly about their religion to?

I;d really be interested to hear an honest answer from you.   It might explain how ignorant you are and how non-accepting you are.

Most Muslims are perfectly happy with non-Muslims, Cods.   

Back to top
 

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour.  Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe?  Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 
Send Topic Print