Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5
Send Topic Print
Rules for banning members (Read 5512 times)
mothra
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 34380
Gender: female
Re: Rules for banning members
Reply #15 - Sep 12th, 2017 at 3:53pm
 
Secret Wars wrote on Sep 12th, 2017 at 3:52pm:
mothra wrote on Sep 12th, 2017 at 3:51pm:
Secret Wars wrote on Sep 12th, 2017 at 3:47pm:
mothra wrote on Sep 12th, 2017 at 3:45pm:
Secret Wars wrote on Sep 12th, 2017 at 3:44pm:
mothra wrote on Sep 12th, 2017 at 3:36pm:
Secret Wars wrote on Sep 12th, 2017 at 3:32pm:
Aussie wrote on Sep 12th, 2017 at 3:23pm:
I hope something is done.  In anger, I've often thought of contacting the most prolific posters and suggesting there be a 'collective' boycott of OzPol in the case of seemingly unjust arbitrary banning.  I've never done that, but it (the power imbalance) really does annoy me.





Power imbalance?  As for most prolific posters to whom do you refer? I noted yesterday that yourself, Mothra, John and Gregg do nearly a hundred posts a day.  98 to be exact.  That's an average, so every day, between you, you clowns are doing 700 posts a week.

It's rare that John, and Gregg especially are not present. 

And you all act as front men, a unified tag team  defending and deflecting from each other, feeding lines to each other for a straight man routine. 




What a funny thing to not only calculate, but obsess over reporting. Like, again and again and again and stuff.

Takes all sorts, i suppose.

Secret has checked out all of our profiles and actually done the maths!

Astonishing.


Work of a minute Mothra, click on your names, easily available everywhere, you clowns infest the forum,  Wink read, calculate.

If I were you I would be embarrassed about the amount of time you spend here rather than trying to deride my very easy gathering of a number.
 


Yet you did, Secret. You took the time to do it. You thought about it, then you did it.

Kinda pathetic, don't you think?


Work of a minute Mothra.  How many many minutes you spend here every day?

Pathetic you say?   Grin Grin Grin



Pathetic? No. I'm here in down time while i'm at work. I'm rarely here in the evenings or on weekends.

You though, kinda stay all day, don't you? And night.



Grin Grin Grin Grin yeah, you got it all going on ain't ya?  Grin Grin Cheesy


Do you think about me often?
Back to top
 

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.
 
IP Logged
 
Aussie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 37678
Gender: male
Re: Rules for banning members
Reply #16 - Sep 12th, 2017 at 3:53pm
 
Move on from that point, Mr Wars.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Sprintcyclist
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 39432
Gender: male
Re: Rules for banning members
Reply #17 - Sep 12th, 2017 at 3:54pm
 

Don't have rules.
It gives trolls something to argue about.

Have very broad vague guidelines.


eg  .......  'If your posts are abusive, offtopic or do not contribute positively to a discussion they may be deleted.'

' ..... If we delete too many of your posts, we will suspend you for a while.'
Back to top
 

Modern Classic Right Wing
 
IP Logged
 
Secret Wars
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 3928
Gender: male
Re: Rules for banning members
Reply #18 - Sep 12th, 2017 at 3:55pm
 
Sprintcyclist wrote on Sep 12th, 2017 at 3:54pm:
Don't have rules.
It gives trolls something to argue about.

Have very broad vague guidelines.


eg  .......  'If your posts are abusive, offtopic or do not contribute positively to a discussion they may be deleted.'

' ..... If we delete too many of your posts, we will suspend you for a while.'


Yup, no correspondence entered into.

Much like the rules Aussie has bragged about at what he calls his sandpit. 



Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Aussie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 37678
Gender: male
Re: Rules for banning members
Reply #19 - Sep 12th, 2017 at 3:56pm
 
Sprintcyclist wrote on Sep 12th, 2017 at 3:54pm:
Don't have rules.
It gives trolls something to argue about.

Have very broad vague guidelines.


eg  .......  'If your posts are abusive, offtopic or do not contribute positively to a discussion they may be deleted.'

' ..... If we delete too many of your posts, we will suspend you for a while.'


Not a bad idea, Mr Cyclist.  Do you agree the way it is done now is just not working or in the interests of the Forum?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Secret Wars
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 3928
Gender: male
Re: Rules for banning members
Reply #20 - Sep 12th, 2017 at 3:56pm
 
Aussie wrote on Sep 12th, 2017 at 3:53pm:
Move on from that point, Mr Wars.


I am happy to respond to any questions Mothra has.

Your attempt at intervention has been noted, you are a good wingman. Cool
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
mothra
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 34380
Gender: female
Re: Rules for banning members
Reply #21 - Sep 12th, 2017 at 3:58pm
 
Secret Wars wrote on Sep 12th, 2017 at 3:56pm:
Aussie wrote on Sep 12th, 2017 at 3:53pm:
Move on from that point, Mr Wars.


I am happy to respond to any questions Mothra has.

Your attempt at intervention has been noted, you are a good wingman. Cool 



Why would i have any questions for you? I don't find you even remotely interesting.
Back to top
 

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.
 
IP Logged
 
cods
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 88048
Re: Rules for banning members
Reply #22 - Sep 12th, 2017 at 4:01pm
 
mothra wrote on Sep 12th, 2017 at 3:45pm:
Secret Wars wrote on Sep 12th, 2017 at 3:44pm:
mothra wrote on Sep 12th, 2017 at 3:36pm:
Secret Wars wrote on Sep 12th, 2017 at 3:32pm:
Aussie wrote on Sep 12th, 2017 at 3:23pm:
I hope something is done.  In anger, I've often thought of contacting the most prolific posters and suggesting there be a 'collective' boycott of OzPol in the case of seemingly unjust arbitrary banning.  I've never done that, but it (the power imbalance) really does annoy me.





Power imbalance?  As for most prolific posters to whom do you refer? I noted yesterday that yourself, Mothra, John and Gregg do nearly a hundred posts a day.  98 to be exact.  That's an average, so every day, between you, you clowns are doing 700 posts a week.

It's rare that John, and Gregg especially are not present. 

And you all act as front men, a unified tag team  defending and deflecting from each other, feeding lines to each other for a straight man routine. 




What a funny thing to not only calculate, but obsess over reporting. Like, again and again and again and stuff.

Takes all sorts, i suppose.

Secret has checked out all of our profiles and actually done the maths!

Astonishing.


Work of a minute Mothra, click on your names, easily available everywhere, you clowns infest the forum,  Wink read, calculate.

If I were you I would be embarrassed about the amount of time you spend here rather than trying to deride my very easy gathering of a number.
 


Yet you did, Secret. You took the time to do it. You thought about it, then you did it.

Kinda pathetic, don't you think?



mothra aussie is famous for checking where and when someone is logged on....remember fd has two forums..

its one of his main games...for goodness sakes to even mention SW  in the same breath  is hilarious...



aussie is the biggest sticky beak on the forum...

he even demanded agnes tell him why she was banned... Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes.. for all we know he ev en PMd the gmod to find out....btw aussie  I know  what happened.... Smiley.. and yes it was quite a big deal..
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
mothra
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 34380
Gender: female
Re: Rules for banning members
Reply #23 - Sep 12th, 2017 at 4:02pm
 
Cods, i go by how people treat me. You should know that by now.
Back to top
 

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.
 
IP Logged
 
Secret Wars
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 3928
Gender: male
Re: Rules for banning members
Reply #24 - Sep 12th, 2017 at 4:03pm
 
mothra wrote on Sep 12th, 2017 at 3:58pm:
Secret Wars wrote on Sep 12th, 2017 at 3:56pm:
Aussie wrote on Sep 12th, 2017 at 3:53pm:
Move on from that point, Mr Wars.


I am happy to respond to any questions Mothra has.

Your attempt at intervention has been noted, you are a good wingman. Cool 



Why would i have any questions for you? I don't find you even remotely interesting.


You invite a response dopey then you are very likely to get one. 

See, just like that one.  It ain't difficult to work out.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
mothra
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 34380
Gender: female
Re: Rules for banning members
Reply #25 - Sep 12th, 2017 at 4:05pm
 
Secret Wars wrote on Sep 12th, 2017 at 4:03pm:
mothra wrote on Sep 12th, 2017 at 3:58pm:
Secret Wars wrote on Sep 12th, 2017 at 3:56pm:
Aussie wrote on Sep 12th, 2017 at 3:53pm:
Move on from that point, Mr Wars.


I am happy to respond to any questions Mothra has.

Your attempt at intervention has been noted, you are a good wingman. Cool 



Why would i have any questions for you? I don't find you even remotely interesting.


You invite a response dopey then you are very likely to get one. 

See, just like that one.  It ain't difficult to work out.


What does your response have to do with whether or not i want to ask you any questions?

Think now.
Back to top
 

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.
 
IP Logged
 
Aussie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 37678
Gender: male
Re: Rules for banning members
Reply #26 - Sep 12th, 2017 at 4:07pm
 
I am asking both of you to let that matter drop so the Topic gets some chance to be discussed.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
TheFunPolice
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 9009
waggawagga
Gender: male
Re: Rules for banning members
Reply #27 - Sep 12th, 2017 at 4:10pm
 
I know: give us all a ban button.... yay!

Imagine that  Grin
Back to top
« Last Edit: Sep 12th, 2017 at 4:15pm by TheFunPolice »  

......Australia has an illegitimate Government!
 
IP Logged
 
TheFunPolice
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 9009
waggawagga
Gender: male
Re: Rules for banning members
Reply #28 - Sep 12th, 2017 at 4:11pm
 
mothra wrote on Sep 12th, 2017 at 4:02pm:
Cods, i go by how people treat me. You should know that by now.

Chat sites really aren't rocket science!

Back to top
 

......Australia has an illegitimate Government!
 
IP Logged
 
cods
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 88048
Re: Rules for banning members
Reply #29 - Sep 12th, 2017 at 4:13pm
 
mothra wrote on Sep 12th, 2017 at 4:02pm:
Cods, i go by how people treat me. You should know that by now.



well in  that case    let others decide if they have been abused....you often come in to protect greg or js   or at least side with them..when there is a distinct case against them Sad

now you have told us the only person that interests you is you....we do at least know where we stand 

when you claim no one stands up for you when the word rape comes up.... Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

I presume you will   accept their reason being!

[i]I go by how people  treat me...

not anyone else..[/i]


I think its called a level playing field...
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5
Send Topic Print