Prime Minister for Canyons
Gold Member
Offline
Australian Politics
Posts: 26906
Canberra
Gender:
|
mothra wrote on Sep 4 th, 2017 at 2:02pm: Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 4 th, 2017 at 2:01pm: mothra wrote on Sep 4 th, 2017 at 2:00pm: Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 4 th, 2017 at 1:57pm: mothra wrote on Sep 4 th, 2017 at 1:55pm: Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 4 th, 2017 at 1:53pm: mothra wrote on Sep 4 th, 2017 at 1:52pm: Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 4 th, 2017 at 1:49pm: mothra wrote on Sep 4 th, 2017 at 1:45pm: Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 4 th, 2017 at 1:43pm: I'm dead certain I'm not defending the practice. To me the argument is like mulesing. You always want better practice, but show me a better solution first. So, you accept unspeakable cruelty if it yields profit. So don't sign the petition. You've just committed a logical fallacy right there. I'm a realist, signing a petition like this is not going to stop people eating prawns, just as the awareness of mulesing doesnt stop people eating lamb or buying wool. On the other hand, whole hordes of people buying prawns from manufacturers who do not use ablation techniques will change the industry. Yes. That's what the petition is for. And what i'm doing here. Rasising awareness. Were i a prawn eater, upon learning this, i would seek to ethically source my prawns. That would be my primary reaction. Your primary reaction, on the other hand, was to justify it and refute that prawns would rather like eyes, if it's all the same to everyone. No my reaction would be the same as yours. To ethically source prawns, or do more research into how widepread this practice usually is, or if its a PETA style beat up. Yet, it wasn't, was it. You just talked about how it was financially nonviable not to and said that it didn't matter if prawns had their eyes sliced or burnt off. Get off your damn high horse and actually read I wrote again. I did. And my reflection of it is spot on. I said get off your high horse and then do it. In other words, stop being a emotional retard and try facts. Where have i not stated facts? It seems to me you just don't like the summary of your input thus far. I can understand why. Apart from the misinterpretation of i dont defend the practice, but .....
|