Vic, as you know, you banned Monk.  Why and for how long.

And before you tell me to mind my own business......please read:

Quote:


I'd give you the link, but FD has corrupted it with his sneaky word filter.

You'll see that posted in the Sand Pit at his Forum.

I look forward to your response.

I often wonder how the current moderators got their positions of authority ..

but why would monk get banned  ?

he does'nt seem to be abusive ?

yet one may wonder , in love and light

namaste

▲

Who holds the record for most times banned? Monk would be in the top three ... at least.

What did Monk say?

Link?

Question out of left field:-

Is it possible that Jovial Monk's banning is one of the early signs of Climate Change?

cods wrote on Sep 3^rd, 2017 at 9:56am:


If Monk was banned for saying that, how the hell does BigHole get away with his posts?

Bobby. wrote on Sep 3^rd, 2017 at 10:07am:


yes

Lord Herbert wrote on Sep 3^rd, 2017 at 11:31am:


10/10

Aussie wrote on Sep 3^rd, 2017 at 11:37am:


Jovial has about 10 threads here all about Climate Change but under different titles.

Just for that I think he should be left to swing in the breeze a little longer as penance for being a panic-merchant.

cods wrote on Sep 3^rd, 2017 at 9:56am:



That's fine coming from the King of Village Idiots himself ...

Bobby. wrote on Sep 3^rd, 2017 at 1:04pm:



10/10

Oh...so....to whom were you referring?

AiA wrote on Sep 3^rd, 2017 at 1:40pm:



.....and who is that....or have you had a case of sudden ball loss?

Aussie wrote on Sep 3^rd, 2017 at 1:42pm:


not Greg. that is all you need to know. and don't put words into my mouth again.

7 pages?

More?

Aussie wrote on Sep 3^rd, 2017 at 1:50pm:


I learned a long time ago not to play your game Aussie. Go run your cunte mouth to someone else.

Aussie wrote on Sep 3^rd, 2017 at 1:50pm:

Bet you'd like a set if you found some.

Bobby. wrote on Sep 3^rd, 2017 at 10:07am:



bobby he gets riled up....some people have a knack of  being polite whilst being nasty at the same time/..

just read what you have said about monk..

not one nice word   all nasty...

but if you read it its sort of not abuse as in

..YOU ARE A VICIOUS VINDICTIVE HATEFUL PERSON >.. which is what I have had thrown at me....and yes mods have agreed with that description...

I for one am sick of the personalised abuse   it affects us all in a different way....monk hits back  so does agnes...and thats all people remember what they have said   not what made them say it..

and its wrong...tell the antagonists to PING OFF bobs.....tell them to stop poking the bear...

you yourself dont get along with monk  he doesnt get along with you avoid each other...don t read each others dribble...and you wont clash...

in the mean time monk is always very courteous to myself and will speak out as I find...

he involves him self in lots of topics  he doesnt just come on here to spit vile personal abuse on others...

like some do!..

he is no more disruptive than the next person...

theres an old saying bobby 

if you cant say something nice about someone dont say anything at all....

AiA wrote on Sep 3^rd, 2017 at 1:06pm:




good one   as the title will tell you monk is banned...

to slag off at someone who isnt here to defend themselves. is pretty sad....


its neither brave nor acceptable as far as I am concerned....

Not at all cods.  AiA has done exactly what Monk did.  If Monk gets a ban for it.....so ought AiA.

Vic will want to be consistent and not demonstrate any favouratism, I'm sure of that.

cods wrote on Sep 3^rd, 2017 at 5:13pm:

I could not be clearer.  I have reported AiA publicly in this Thread.

We are be drilling down to one of the things I reckon Vic needs to clarify and that is:

Vic, do you only act on obvious abuse if the 'victim' complains? 

Aussie wrote on Sep 3^rd, 2017 at 5:16pm:



No

How did all the Aussie AiA animosity begin?

I'm curious because I got blowback from it, when I first joined here Aussie was hostile to me as he thought I was an AiA sock.

Ya never know, if not for that Aussie and I may have been besties.

President Elect, The Mechanic wrote on Sep 3^rd, 2017 at 8:30pm:


More nonsense from the old pom.

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 3^rd, 2017 at 8:34pm:


I would highly suggest you don't adjust my posts...

or you'll be the next one taking a break from the forum..

you should know that better than anyone... seems you're a slow learner..

Aussie wrote on Sep 3^rd, 2017 at 4:36pm:


So laf. Anyone with any sense here learned long ago two things about you Aussie:  1) don't ever open PMs from you and 2) don't ever answer any of your questions. Why? Because they are traps and you will use the answers against that person. You always do.

I haven't "abused" anyone. You are taking what I wrote out of context and reframing it to get me banned - a game you have played for well more than a decade. In fact, another member, a certain female one, has learned how to play that same game from you. No worries, however. She'll get burned by you. The online women in your life always do.

Booby is pretty good with the ad homs himself, calls me “fool” and “bloody fool” all the damn time because I point out the lies Dubyne tells all the time in his lying videos.

Booby can’t refute my critiques, hence the ad homs in reply to my factual posts. The world is warming quite quickly, Booby thinks we are in an ice age. It gets as stupid as that. That is why I call him a gullible fool. Because that is what he is. Believes the lies, overlooks the cherry picking etc by Dubyne, will not consider facts produced that show Dubyne is lying.

Then there was the time Booby started trolling me and Mothra, just suddenly, out of the blue, no provocation. First there was something about a dress. Dunno what that was about but then the bastard hints at the three year long, booooring taunt about me rooting my live terrier and my dead chihuahua. Then Booby thinks he is a christian. Hah!

You are a nasty person, Booby, quite disgusting. Do much less forgiving and a LOT more apologising, scumbag!

Have a look here: http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-09-01/australia-winter-2017-was-hot-dry-and-a-re...

President Elect, The Mechanic wrote on Sep 3^rd, 2017 at 8:41pm:


Someone say something?

President Elect, The Mechanic wrote on Sep 3^rd, 2017 at 8:41pm:


More ad hominem.

Mods, take note.

Jovial Monk wrote on Sep 4^th, 2017 at 9:53am:



Jovial,
I knew nothing about you rooting your dog.
I'd never heard the story before YOU mentioned it.
I was actually trying to be nice to you.
You know that -
I told you that -
now you're being disingenuous by mentioning it again
& pretending not to know what I said.

When will you ever change?

That is your story now but I do NOT believe a word of it. It came directly after that crap about a dress and directly before you started trolling Mothra.

You, by all reports and not denied by you, were thick as thieves with the cretinous IQ. IQ would have told you about the bestiality taunt.

You need to stop forgiving and start apologising. You are no christian, that is for sure!

Neferti wrote on Sep 3^rd, 2017 at 10:37am:


I was right, Ozzie was wrong. 

Sad old man wrote- Quote:

ROTFLMOA the funniest thing is this fellow actually thinks his self exile will have some sort of effect and or that posters will give a flying ...., too funny. mind your  butt on the door as you leave sweety.

Aussie wrote on Sep 4^th, 2017 at 5:55pm:


And I do.

Bad moderating in this forum is slowly destroying it.

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 4^th, 2017 at 6:00pm:


10/10.....now.

Neferti wrote on Sep 4^th, 2017 at 6:16pm:



Go Neferti !!

Neferti wrote on Sep 4^th, 2017 at 6:16pm:


good on you Nef.

Rules are bad for a mod.
Guidelines are good.

then they can't complain, or I'ld ban them longer 

Aussie wrote on Sep 4^th, 2017 at 7:24pm:

Vic should tell you it's none of your business.

skippy. wrote on Sep 4^th, 2017 at 7:44pm:


or just ban him

Rudolf Wilhelm wrote on Sep 4^th, 2017 at 8:14pm:



you know the 80/20 rule of business ?

Aussie wrote on Sep 4^th, 2017 at 7:46pm:

Does he? Where did he say that? Or you're lying again?
He certainly doesn't need a pretend lawyer,like you, questioning him. Leave the g mods to do their jobs, if fd ever thought you were up to it he would have appointed you. Instead he sacked you both times you were in a similar position.

Aussie wrote on Sep 4^th, 2017 at 9:32pm:

Well you should give up before you make your eleventh breach then.

Rudolf Wilhelm wrote on Sep 4^th, 2017 at 8:24pm:


I am oldish too
The 80/20 law  is interesting and applies to many areas of life.

in a business world it says 80% of your problems come from 20% of your customers.
Also, 80% of your profit comes from 20% of your customers .

The resultant idea is, get rid of your problem 20% customers. Offload them onto your opponents  .

that leaves you with more resources available to give to your profitable 20% customers

skippy. wrote on Sep 4^th, 2017 at 9:59pm:

skippy. wrote on Sep 4^th, 2017 at 9:27pm:



I forgot aussie doesnt mind answering for others   especially when its me and mothra... and he loves dissecting and whingeing about every line I make.....

thats ok isnt it aus?????but only when you do it.

cods wrote on Sep 4^th, 2017 at 10:27pm:


And he also also been AGAIN banned by either Vic or FD....including IP banned.

It means he cannot even read the Forum....as a guest.  He cannot access the Forum at all.

Someone has been very punitive.

Aussie wrote on Sep 5^th, 2017 at 10:09am:


as a guest anyone could read the forum...

forums aint that high tech...

Aussie wrote on Sep 5^th, 2017 at 10:34am:


I call bullshit..

most IPs are roaming and could be changed by simply rebooting your router..

or..

go to a website where you can generate a new one if you have a static IP..

but this forum, I doubt, could stop anyone from looking based on an IP address..

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 5^th, 2017 at 10:50am:


Interesting.  Would there be a "pop up message" to state that your IP has been "banned" if you tried to just LOOK at a site?
IF so, what would that be?

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 5^th, 2017 at 5:47pm:


Simple.  I'll ask Monk what message he gets.  Hopefully, it will be copyable to here.