mothra wrote on Sep 1
st, 2017 at 12:59pm:
Racism is real, race is not: a philosopher’s perspective
I argue that there are no races, only racialised groups – groups that have been misunderstood as biological races.
The reader may object – “surely, I can see race with my bare eyes!” However, it is not race we see, but the superficial visible biological diversity within our species: variation in traits such as skin colour, hair form and eye shape. This variation is not enough to justify racial classification. Our biological diversity is too small, and too smoothly distributed across geographic space, for race to be real.
Well, how DO you categorise people who share those 'superficially visible' traits?
Should we say next, 'there are no blondes and brunettes, these are superficially visible traits'.
Or 'don's call me tall/short, that's only a superficially visible trait'.
Race IS about visible difference, pretty closely mapped onto culture, origin, background etc. Visible racial characteristics are inherited so it's no use/stupid saying they have nothing to do with biology.
It is entirely right to say that race is not everything. But to say that it's nothing is just stupid - and so it takes a young philosopher, eager to be noticed, to propose such stupidity.