Australian Politics Forum - Marriage ~ A Sackable Offence.

John Smith Gold Member Online Australian Politics Posts: 72271 Gender:	Re: Marriage ~ A Sackable Offence. Reply #30 - Aug 20^th, 2017 at 11:00am Gordon wrote on Aug 20^th, 2017 at 10:59am: What % of Catholic priests are gay ? I'd go with about 50%? i suspect even higher than that
Back to top	Our esteemed leader: I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus. IP Logged

____

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 33410
Australia
Gender: male

Re: Marriage ~ A Sackable Offence.
Reply #31 - Aug 20^th, 2017 at 11:03am

Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 20^th, 2017 at 10:57am:

____ wrote on Aug 20^th, 2017 at 10:55am:

Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 20^th, 2017 at 10:50am:

____ wrote on Aug 20^th, 2017 at 10:47am:

Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 20^th, 2017 at 10:44am:

____ wrote on Aug 20^th, 2017 at 10:42am:

Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 20^th, 2017 at 10:34am:

How can somebody work for the church and be homosexual? It's against what they believe.

How can women work within a sexist church ... because change is best when it comes from within.

Same applies with homophobia.

Try getting a job in a Muslim school if you have a cross around you neck. That's how the world works. people pick employees who fit into a job.

Sexuality is a god given attribute. Religion is a belief learnt from other people.

Would you employ a white nationalist?

I would, if they were the best person for the job.

bs.

Gay porn fluffers don't usually talk much.
White nationalists sucking dick ...

Back to top

IP Logged

Mr Hammer

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 25212
Gender: male

Re: Marriage ~ A Sackable Offence.
Reply #32 - Aug 20^th, 2017 at 11:03am

John Smith wrote on Aug 20^th, 2017 at 11:00am:

Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 20^th, 2017 at 10:57am:

John Smith wrote on Aug 20^th, 2017 at 10:54am:

Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 20^th, 2017 at 10:47am:

John Smith wrote on Aug 20^th, 2017 at 10:44am:

Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 20^th, 2017 at 10:34am:

How can somebody work for the church and be homosexual? It's against what they believe.

it's not a question of whether they can be homosexual so you haven't even got that excuse. They already employ homosexuals. It's only if they marry their partners that it becomes a problem.
I think this is another case of the church trying to influence the vote on gay marriage.

If the person they already employ does his job properly, what has it to do with them if they marry their boyfriend?

Would you employ a white nationalist?

you're not listening. They already employ gays. They apparently don't have a problem with that.

As to your question, if you did your job properly and didn't preach your racism on the job, yes, I'd give you a job.

What about gay people preaching on the job in a churchy job?

DO YOU UNDERSTAND THAT THE CHURCH ALREADY EMPLOYS GAY PEOPLE? the debate is not about employing gay people you doofus.

You are making a uniform judgement of all churchy workplaces. Many churchy employers won't employ gay people.

Back to top

IP Logged

Mr Hammer

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 25212
Gender: male

Re: Marriage ~ A Sackable Offence.
Reply #33 - Aug 20^th, 2017 at 11:04am

____ wrote on Aug 20^th, 2017 at 11:03am:

Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 20^th, 2017 at 10:57am:

____ wrote on Aug 20^th, 2017 at 10:55am:

Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 20^th, 2017 at 10:50am:

____ wrote on Aug 20^th, 2017 at 10:47am:

Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 20^th, 2017 at 10:44am:

____ wrote on Aug 20^th, 2017 at 10:42am:

Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 20^th, 2017 at 10:34am:

How can somebody work for the church and be homosexual? It's against what they believe.

How can women work within a sexist church ... because change is best when it comes from within.

Same applies with homophobia.

Try getting a job in a Muslim school if you have a cross around you neck. That's how the world works. people pick employees who fit into a job.

Sexuality is a god given attribute. Religion is a belief learnt from other people.

Would you employ a white nationalist?

I would, if they were the best person for the job.

bs.

Gay porn fluffers don't usually talk much.
White nationalists sucking dick ...

Your ideal employee would have pink hair , hairy armpits and an abo flag wrapped around their head.

Back to top

IP Logged

____

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 33410
Australia
Gender: male

Re: Marriage ~ A Sackable Offence.
Reply #34 - Aug 20^th, 2017 at 11:05am

Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 20^th, 2017 at 11:03am:

John Smith wrote on Aug 20^th, 2017 at 11:00am:

Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 20^th, 2017 at 10:57am:

John Smith wrote on Aug 20^th, 2017 at 10:54am:

Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 20^th, 2017 at 10:47am:

John Smith wrote on Aug 20^th, 2017 at 10:44am:

Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 20^th, 2017 at 10:34am:

How can somebody work for the church and be homosexual? It's against what they believe.

it's not a question of whether they can be homosexual so you haven't even got that excuse. They already employ homosexuals. It's only if they marry their partners that it becomes a problem.
I think this is another case of the church trying to influence the vote on gay marriage.

If the person they already employ does his job properly, what has it to do with them if they marry their boyfriend?

Would you employ a white nationalist?

you're not listening. They already employ gays. They apparently don't have a problem with that.

As to your question, if you did your job properly and didn't preach your racism on the job, yes, I'd give you a job.

What about gay people preaching on the job in a churchy job?

DO YOU UNDERSTAND THAT THE CHURCH ALREADY EMPLOYS GAY PEOPLE? the debate is not about employing gay people you doofus.

You are making a uniform judgement of all churchy workplaces. Many churchy employers won't employ gay people.

Many as in Sydney's St Vincent Hospital.
Yet I know they do.

Back to top

IP Logged

John Smith

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 72271
Gender: male

Re: Marriage ~ A Sackable Offence.
Reply #35 - Aug 20^th, 2017 at 11:05am

Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 20^th, 2017 at 11:03am:

John Smith wrote on Aug 20^th, 2017 at 11:00am:

Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 20^th, 2017 at 10:57am:

John Smith wrote on Aug 20^th, 2017 at 10:54am:

Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 20^th, 2017 at 10:47am:

John Smith wrote on Aug 20^th, 2017 at 10:44am:

Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 20^th, 2017 at 10:34am:

How can somebody work for the church and be homosexual? It's against what they believe.

it's not a question of whether they can be homosexual so you haven't even got that excuse. They already employ homosexuals. It's only if they marry their partners that it becomes a problem.
I think this is another case of the church trying to influence the vote on gay marriage.

If the person they already employ does his job properly, what has it to do with them if they marry their boyfriend?

Would you employ a white nationalist?

you're not listening. They already employ gays. They apparently don't have a problem with that.

As to your question, if you did your job properly and didn't preach your racism on the job, yes, I'd give you a job.

What about gay people preaching on the job in a churchy job?

DO YOU UNDERSTAND THAT THE CHURCH ALREADY EMPLOYS GAY PEOPLE? the debate is not about employing gay people you doofus.

You are making a uniform judgement of all churchy workplaces. Many churchy employers won't employ gay people.

ohh for buggers sake .... just how big a fool are you? Have you even read the OP?
the topic is about the church threatening to SACK staff that marry their gay partners. They can't SACK them if they aren't working there. Cheesy

Back to top

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.

IP Logged

Mr Hammer Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 25212 Gender:	Re: Marriage ~ A Sackable Offence. Reply #36 - Aug 20^th, 2017 at 11:05am John Smith wrote on Aug 20^th, 2017 at 11:00am: Gordon wrote on Aug 20^th, 2017 at 10:59am: What % of Catholic priests are gay ? I'd go with about 50%? i suspect even higher than that rubbish.
Back to top	IP Logged

Mr Hammer

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 25212
Gender: male

Re: Marriage ~ A Sackable Offence.
Reply #37 - Aug 20^th, 2017 at 11:06am

____ wrote on Aug 20^th, 2017 at 11:05am:

Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 20^th, 2017 at 11:03am:

John Smith wrote on Aug 20^th, 2017 at 11:00am:

Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 20^th, 2017 at 10:57am:

John Smith wrote on Aug 20^th, 2017 at 10:54am:

Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 20^th, 2017 at 10:47am:

John Smith wrote on Aug 20^th, 2017 at 10:44am:

Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 20^th, 2017 at 10:34am:

How can somebody work for the church and be homosexual? It's against what they believe.

it's not a question of whether they can be homosexual so you haven't even got that excuse. They already employ homosexuals. It's only if they marry their partners that it becomes a problem.
I think this is another case of the church trying to influence the vote on gay marriage.

If the person they already employ does his job properly, what has it to do with them if they marry their boyfriend?

Would you employ a white nationalist?

you're not listening. They already employ gays. They apparently don't have a problem with that.

As to your question, if you did your job properly and didn't preach your racism on the job, yes, I'd give you a job.

What about gay people preaching on the job in a churchy job?

DO YOU UNDERSTAND THAT THE CHURCH ALREADY EMPLOYS GAY PEOPLE? the debate is not about employing gay people you doofus.

You are making a uniform judgement of all churchy workplaces. Many churchy employers won't employ gay people.

Many as in Sydney's St Vincent Hospital.
Yet I know they do.

A major hospital is different to working for a church.

Back to top

IP Logged

Gordon

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 20231
Gordon
Gender: male

Re: Marriage ~ A Sackable Offence.
Reply #38 - Aug 20^th, 2017 at 11:06am

John Smith wrote on Aug 20^th, 2017 at 11:00am:

Gordon wrote on Aug 20^th, 2017 at 10:59am:

What % of Catholic priests are gay ? I'd go with about 50%?

i suspect even higher than that

I'm glad I've had next to nothing to do with Catholicism.

I don't understand why Islam is such a protected species while it's open season on Christian based religion.

Back to top

IBI

IP Logged

Mr Hammer

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 25212
Gender: male

Re: Marriage ~ A Sackable Offence.
Reply #39 - Aug 20^th, 2017 at 11:07am

John Smith wrote on Aug 20^th, 2017 at 11:05am:

Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 20^th, 2017 at 11:03am:

John Smith wrote on Aug 20^th, 2017 at 11:00am:

Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 20^th, 2017 at 10:57am:

John Smith wrote on Aug 20^th, 2017 at 10:54am:

Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 20^th, 2017 at 10:47am:

John Smith wrote on Aug 20^th, 2017 at 10:44am:

Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 20^th, 2017 at 10:34am:

How can somebody work for the church and be homosexual? It's against what they believe.

it's not a question of whether they can be homosexual so you haven't even got that excuse. They already employ homosexuals. It's only if they marry their partners that it becomes a problem.
I think this is another case of the church trying to influence the vote on gay marriage.

If the person they already employ does his job properly, what has it to do with them if they marry their boyfriend?

Would you employ a white nationalist?

you're not listening. They already employ gays. They apparently don't have a problem with that.

As to your question, if you did your job properly and didn't preach your racism on the job, yes, I'd give you a job.

What about gay people preaching on the job in a churchy job?

DO YOU UNDERSTAND THAT THE CHURCH ALREADY EMPLOYS GAY PEOPLE? the debate is not about employing gay people you doofus.

You are making a uniform judgement of all churchy workplaces. Many churchy employers won't employ gay people.

ohh for buggers sake .... just how big a fool are you? Have you even read the OP?
the topic is about the church threatening to SACK staff that marry their gay partners. They can't SACK them if they aren't working there. Cheesy

Not all Christin workplaces employ gay people. It's just a fact muppet. Try joining a church group if you take it up the wizzbang.

Back to top

IP Logged

Gordon Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 20231 Gordon Gender:	Re: Marriage ~ A Sackable Offence. Reply #40 - Aug 20^th, 2017 at 11:08am Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 20^th, 2017 at 11:05am: John Smith wrote on Aug 20^th, 2017 at 11:00am: Gordon wrote on Aug 20^th, 2017 at 10:59am: What % of Catholic priests are gay ? I'd go with about 50%? i suspect even higher than that rubbish. I reckon 50% would be pretty close.
Back to top	IBI IP Logged

freediver

Gold Member

Offline

www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 47481
At my desk.

Re: Marriage ~ A Sackable Offence.
Reply #41 - Aug 20^th, 2017 at 11:08am

Gordon wrote on Aug 20^th, 2017 at 11:06am:

John Smith wrote on Aug 20^th, 2017 at 11:00am:

Gordon wrote on Aug 20^th, 2017 at 10:59am:

What % of Catholic priests are gay ? I'd go with about 50%?

i suspect even higher than that

I'm glad I've had next to nothing to do with Catholicism.

I don't understand why Islam is such a protected species while it's open season on Christian based religion.

Because many idiots reflexively equate minority status with victimhood. Muslims could be marching middle eastern Jews into gas chambers and they would still call us Nazis for criticising Islam in Australia.

Back to top

I identify as Mail because all I do is SendIT!

IP Logged

Mr Hammer

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 25212
Gender: male

Re: Marriage ~ A Sackable Offence.
Reply #42 - Aug 20^th, 2017 at 11:11am

Gordon wrote on Aug 20^th, 2017 at 11:06am:

John Smith wrote on Aug 20^th, 2017 at 11:00am:

Gordon wrote on Aug 20^th, 2017 at 10:59am:

What % of Catholic priests are gay ? I'd go with about 50%?

i suspect even higher than that

I'm glad I've had next to nothing to do with Catholicism.

I don't understand why Islam is such a protected species while it's open season on Christian based religion.

Because white people follow Christianity. The left won't challenge brown muslims.

Back to top

IP Logged

Mr Hammer

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 25212
Gender: male

Re: Marriage ~ A Sackable Offence.
Reply #43 - Aug 20^th, 2017 at 11:11am

Gordon wrote on Aug 20^th, 2017 at 11:08am:

Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 20^th, 2017 at 11:05am:

John Smith wrote on Aug 20^th, 2017 at 11:00am:

Gordon wrote on Aug 20^th, 2017 at 10:59am:

What % of Catholic priests are gay ? I'd go with about 50%?

i suspect even higher than that

rubbish.

I reckon 50% would be pretty close.

I doubt half of Catholic priests are practising gay men.

Back to top

IP Logged

John Smith Gold Member Online Australian Politics Posts: 72271 Gender:	Re: Marriage ~ A Sackable Offence. Reply #44 - Aug 20^th, 2017 at 11:12am Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 20^th, 2017 at 11:05am: John Smith wrote on Aug 20^th, 2017 at 11:00am: Gordon wrote on Aug 20^th, 2017 at 10:59am: What % of Catholic priests are gay ? I'd go with about 50%? i suspect even higher than that rubbish. I guess it depends on whether you classify pedo's as gays
Back to top	Our esteemed leader: I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus. IP Logged