The first man in America to have slaves was a black man...

TheFunPolice wrote on Aug 18^th, 2017 at 7:43pm:


Yes...

The first man in America to have slaves was a black man...

Sprintcyclist wrote on Aug 18^th, 2017 at 8:03pm:

For your own safety!

TheFunPolice wrote on Aug 18^th, 2017 at 8:04pm:


but, i would own them.

Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 18^th, 2017 at 8:08pm:


?

Sprintcyclist wrote on Aug 18^th, 2017 at 8:25pm:

Unless your neighbours found out... 

Anthony Johnson (BC 1600 – 1670) was an Angolan who achieved freedom in the early 17th century Colony of Virginia.

Johnson was captured in his native Angola by an enemy tribe and sold to Arab (Muslim) slave traders.

He was eventually sold as an indentured servant to a merchant working for the Virginia Company.

Sometime after 1635, Antonio and Mary gained their freedom from indenture. Antonio changed his name to Anthony Johnson.

In 1651 Anthony Johnson owned 250 acres, and the services of four white and one black indentured servants.

The black indentured servant John Casor (Casar, Cazarao and Corsala) demanded that Johnson release him after his seven years of indenture.

In March of 1654, according to Delmarva Settlers, Anthony’s servant, a man named John Casar requested that Johnson release him from his indenture because it had long expired past the usual seven years.

Johnson replied that he knew of no indenture and that Casar was to be his servant for life.

Anthony Johnson’s neighbors, George and Robert Parker, stated that they knew of another indenture for the said Casar to a planter on the other side of the bay.

They continued to threaten Johnson with the loss of the servant’s cattle if he were to deny him his freedom.

Johnson, with the influence from his family, released the servant, and even went to see that John Casar received his freedom dues. Freedom dues are materials and supplies given to the freed person in order for them to start their new lives with the necessary materials.

In the case of John Casar, clothing and corn.[110] But after careful reflection, Johnson was certain that Casar was his servant for life; a slave.

Johnson then sued the Parker brothers for unlawfully taking his property from him, and since there were no other indentures for John Casar, he was returned to the Johnsons.

The courts ruled in favor of Anthony Johnson and declared John Casor his property in 1655. Casor became the first person of African descent in Britain’s Thirteen Colonies to be declared as a slave for life as the result of Johnson’s civil suit.

In the case of Johnson v. Parker, the court of Northampton County upheld Johnson’s right to hold Casor as a slave, saying in its ruling of 8 March 1655:

“This daye Anthony Johnson negro made his complaint to the court against mr. Robert Parker and declared that hee deteyneth his servant John Casor negro under the pretence that said negro was a free man.

The court seriously consideringe and maturely weighing the premisses, doe fynde that the saide Mr. Robert Parker most unjustly keepeth the said Negro from Anthony Johnson his master …

It is therefore the Judgement of the Court and ordered That the said John Casor Negro forthwith returne unto the service of the said master Anthony Johnson, And that Mr. Robert Parker make payment of all charges in the suit.”

In a 1916 article, John H. Russell wrote, “Indeed no earlier record, to our knowledge, has been found of judicial support given to slavery in Virginia except as a punishment for a crime.”

It’s not clear if Anthony Johnson also kept his white indentured servants as slaves.

And still get richer and richer and gain a bigger and bigger share of the national wealth.

Time to play another tune Swaggy.

how come you are not allowed to own black slaves anymore ?

TheFunPolice wrote on Aug 18^th, 2017 at 9:03pm:



yes, some blacks in africa stole other blacks and sold them.

TheFunPolice wrote on Aug 18^th, 2017 at 9:03pm:


Google.

And still get richer and richer and gain a bigger and bigger share of the national wealth.

Time to play another tune Swaggy.

300 years ago?  Who cares... we are all slaves in some way....

Sprintcyclist wrote on Aug 18^th, 2017 at 8:03pm:


Because of progressive developments in farming technology making black slaves obsolete.

Gordon wrote on Aug 18^th, 2017 at 8:59pm:
I picture him like that Gordy. Only with Pecca's hand up his bum operating his mouth.

Africans even keep other Africans as slaves even today.



Wiki-

Slavery in Africa
Slavery has existed in Africa for many centuries, and still continues in the current day in some countries.

Systems of servitude and slavery were common in parts of Africa, as they were in much of the ancient world. In most African societies where slavery was prevalent, the enslaved people were not treated as chattel slaves and were given certain rights in a system similar to indentured servitude elsewhere in the world. When the Arab slave trade and Atlantic slave trade began, many of the local slave systems began supplying captives for slave markets outside Africa.[1]

TheFunPolice wrote on Aug 19^th, 2017 at 3:14am:


You'll figure it out.

President Elect, The Mechanic wrote on Aug 18^th, 2017 at 6:49pm:





Slavery in Australia mainly occurred on sugar plantations in the northern areas of the country. Along with many Indigenous Australians, many people from the islands surrounding Australia were kidnapped and forced to work.
Indigenous Australians, Malaysians, Timorese and Micronesians were caught and sold as slave-labour for the pearling industry of north western Australia.
The generally coercive recruitment was similar to the press-gangs once employed by the Royal Navy in England. Some 55,000 to 62,500 South Sea Islanders were taken to Australia as slaves.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slavery_in_Australia

The point is that in a democracy the majority rules.  51% can vote to enslave the other 49%

capitosinora wrote on Aug 20^th, 2017 at 9:43am:
Australia had white slaves. No mention of that?

capitosinora wrote on Aug 20^th, 2017 at 12:02pm:


.....and progressive tax payers

Every White man should have his coffle of Kaffirs to carry his burdens....

Tax the rich to death!!  90% on all income over $250k.... get the nation back on track... let the fat cats pay their way.... time for some genuine tough decisions.....

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Aug 21^st, 2017 at 6:32am:


So you are one that believes slavery is acceptable as long as the majority is happy?

...mind you that seems to be the consensus of the Left

TheFunPolice wrote on Aug 21^st, 2017 at 1:56pm:



Ochlocracy - wikipedia

The basic issue of the Confederacy is the Rights of States v Federal Government, and the Right (or otherwise)_ of a Federal Government to refuse to permit a signatory State to withdraw from a Union... and conversely the Right or otherwise of a signatory State to withdraw from tht Union on a majority vote of its people...

This has extended and morphed into the current malaise of the West in its (oft-times) Federal Governments taking on more and more power unto themselves..... and since one man's meat is another man's poison... they gotta be taking power from someone... and in most cases it's the ordinary person.  Those who oppose the White Rights campaigners fail to see that they are shooting themselves in the foot by creating of them an enemy rather than an ally.

Buggar all to do with slavery... that is the facile image that the opponents of this apparent white 'supremacy' movement latch on to so as to discredit them and refuse to discuss their issues.

Remember The Free State of Jones ( a very bad movie) ---- "Every Man is someone else's Niggruh!" (unless he stands free)....

TheFunPolice wrote on Aug 21^st, 2017 at 1:56pm:



Ochlocracy - wikipedia

Swagman wrote on Aug 21^st, 2017 at 2:30pm:


Ochlocracy (Greek: ὀχλοκρατία, okhlokratía; Latin: ochlocratia) or mob rule is the rule of government by mob. (Wikipedia)

So Australia has double, liberal and labour, mob democracy.

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Aug 21^st, 2017 at 4:34pm:

You're saying the slavery issue is a strawman ?

At that level of society, they are all sucking wind, Bro... poverty is a separate issue from past slavery....

Saying a 'consensus of historians' are now saying it was about slavery pure and simple is disingenuous... and THAT is revisionism.  The North did not declare abolition of slavery until 1865...

The North did not declare abolition of slavery until 1865...

re these 'antifa' people suggesting that the White rights people are demanding a return of slavery.. or that they should just continue to bow and apologise for an institution dead for 150 years?

Where existeth this Slaverye in modern America? 

Auggie wrote on Aug 21^st, 2017 at 6:29pm:


Not discussing poverty in isolation and I have no view of Blacks, their fathers, and the out of wedlock rate - I'm setting the record right as regards the War of Secession.  There are many poor whites as well.... poverty crosses all boundaries.... so I return to my position that the 'antifa' or whatever would be better served in forming an alliance with disaffected Whites, rather than playing Confrontation.

Their interests are the same - more personal power and a greater share of the pie.

Ain't nobody gonna win that one... but a lot of people gonna die before they work that out.

Jasin wrote on Aug 21^st, 2017 at 3:47pm:


That's because there was a demand for slaves from both the Islamic world and the Western world. Local tribal leaders didn't care about other tribes (or maybe even their own).

Jasin wrote on Aug 21^st, 2017 at 3:47pm:


No, in fact, the whole country was to blame for slavery. It was incredibly short-sighed of the Founders to maintain the institution of slavery.

Aussie wrote on Aug 21^st, 2017 at 7:53pm:


So, you think having a legacy of slavery is better than NOT having one just because in the former  case we're a republic whereas in the latter we're a monarchy?

I didn't read beyond your obvious prejudice in favour of the UK.   

I want them gone from any formal Australian role.......at just about any price.

Auggie wrote on Aug 21^st, 2017 at 7:52pm:


This is merely a demonstration of the resilience of social institutions. If you wanted to make some other point, perhaps you should spell it out.

freediver wrote on Aug 21^st, 2017 at 8:39pm:


My point is that we are where we are because of our British heritage. Had we gone at it alone we would've been worst off considerably.

And you want to spit on that legacy with a banana republic.

Well done! Congratulations.

What Antifa and The White Guys share is