This is the Thread Old Drama Queen Herself Madam Cods is referring to:

Link.

Why bother with this Thread, cods?  You could have simply sent your PM.

Aussie wrote on Aug 12^th, 2017 at 6:47pm:


LOL! You idiot, I just had a quick squizz of the first page only of Relationships at the threads started by you. 

Bit of a drama queen yourself. 

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 12^th, 2017 at 6:57pm:



because we are trouble makers.... thats why?...

I was under the impression personal comments in sigs and even titles of threads were not acceptable..

It's pretty obvious from this very Thread why cods is unable to post in Feedback.

Quote:


Read that again cods.....and tell me how much sense it makes, how dishonest it is, and how stunningly stupid it is.

I can work out who the moderator of the Tavern is without any help at all..
.

after fd gave the order..

John Smith wrote on Aug 13^th, 2017 at 12:14am:



in your mind so that makes it alright...


as if.

cods wrote on Aug 12^th, 2017 at 6:40pm:


Neither can I.

Why not?

I've asked many times before, but nobody ever answers.

Why can't cods and I post in 'Feedback'?

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 12^th, 2017 at 6:57pm:


Good show Greg, make this about you.

edit: Perhaps contemplate on "Feedback is not about me" and work it out yourself.

If the tone of a forum becomes hostile or starts to move in the direction of personal attacks, the forum moderator usually has the discretion to lock the discussion to prevent heated, interchanges. He may also be able to hide discussions he deems unworthy of further discussion. Conversely, topics he feels deserve further examination can be posted indefinitely by the moderator even if they garner no comments.

Bobby. wrote on Aug 13^th, 2017 at 8:43am:



exactly   and it encourages ganging up....as set has mentioned   one usually expects better of those in charge...

some folks use their miniscule power as a weapon....

It is the responsibility of a moderator to maintain order during discussions and to see to it that all participants behave with courtesy. Forums involve the exchange of ideas whereby participants air their views and sometimes engage in debates about the identified topics. Therefore, there is a possibility of the discussion becoming unruly particularly where the forum topic is controversial. Moderators order the forum by keeping the discussion civil and constructive. They share the rules of the forum, which may prohibit abusive language, derogatory comments and such other offensive behavior.

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 12^th, 2017 at 6:57pm:


Good show Greg, make this about you.

Setanta wrote on Aug 13^th, 2017 at 4:47am:


Why can't cods and I post on 'Feedback'?

cods wrote on Aug 13^th, 2017 at 12:31am:


didn't you say in your very first comment that you can't comment in feedback?

cods wrote on Aug 13^th, 2017 at 12:31am:


didn't you say in your very first comment that you can't comment in feedback?

Aussie, did you ever think that maybe your skin is considerably thicker than Agnes's?

mothra wrote on Aug 13^th, 2017 at 3:16pm:


I learned when I was very young that it was not wise to pick a physical fight with elder brother.......for a number of reasons, the principle one of which was that he was better at it than I was.  It took a while before I got and accepted the message....but I did.

John Smith wrote on Aug 13^th, 2017 at 10:31am:


She didn't say she can't read it and complaints via PM are very common. I can see what you mean though.

Indeed. But i bet your brother was kind enough not to do you any lasting damage while he taught you that lesson?

Kept in mind that you were weaker than him when he doled out reprisal?

Quote:


I doubt he was even thinking about that when he dealt with a little schit trying to be a smart arse.

Quote:


No I was stronger.......so I thought....I learned otherwise quickly enough and before any permanent harm was done.

Oh...I reckon that has been achieved.   It is a simple lesson and very old one....don't poke a bear unless you can deal with the consequences.

Even normally very docile bears have a line in the sand.

I think you're halfway to what i'm trying to say, Aussie.

Let me just say i don't think "dumb" is the variable in need of consideration.

Aussie wrote on Aug 13^th, 2017 at 4:29pm:



Do you think that's going to happen, Aussie?

Do you think this way is working?

Setanta wrote on Aug 13^th, 2017 at 1:12pm:

she asked me to check feedback for any complaints from her .... how can she complain on feedback when she says she can't post?

Setanta wrote on Aug 13^th, 2017 at 4:35pm:


No Setanta, you are wrong.  I have not posted relentless malicious lies, some of which were made with the specific intent of having Members suffer a ban.

Mothra....I dunno if anything is working.  Don't care much either.  I have extended her an opportunity, and it is hers for the taking.

Aussie wrote on Aug 13^th, 2017 at 4:29pm:




the Emperor has spoken..

do my bidding  and I will unban ye...

if ye disobey I will haunt you until you die...
be warned fair maiden for  I am the devil..


I made that up....but I feel like this is a time warp 

this guy is kidding ... right?

tell me hes kidding...

Who said what and when cods?

Link.

Thread started by Agnes....seems to be calling for a dismissal, yes, cods?

You are wasting your time cods, and your endeavours would be better spent addressing Agnes, not me.

this was probably after you claimed she almost killed a lady called annie....by the time you had finished with her thats how she felt..

setanta has tried to explain that to you...

I believe even mothra has had a try   but a complete waste of time as you point out.

two wrongs make a right as far as your spite goes..

I now wait for the screaming  banshee barrage  as you rage against cods..calling her all the names you can think of... Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

agnes needs to pull her head in I have told her a couple of times....and yes she does listen to me.. and  she doesnt deny anything!...

unlike yourself   who refuses to see anything he does as being wrong or provocative....

Pompous Pilate.. Angry

People have told fibs about me, "the right thing" to me is to not GaF, even though I may point them out, and let my wider interactions speak against them.

If you have something practical in mind, just spit it out.  What do you want.....Agnes unbanned from Relationships....what?

I have never used my buttons to penalise what has been said about me and consider myself fair game considering my position.

Edit: You know what I consider practical, you choose not to believe it is.

Edit2: Whoops, yes, that would be a start to manning up.

Quote:


No-one, not anywhere....no-one ever claimed Agnes  'almost killed a lady called annie.'  That is yet another malicious lie.


NO YOU CLAIMED SHE SAID SHE WOULD TELL THE FORUM ANNIE HAD DIED... I ASKED YOU AND MONK REPEATEDLY TO SHOW WHERE SHE DID THAT.. AND NO YOU DIDNT...ITS OVER NOW i DONT WANT IT DRAGGED OVER AGAIN.. I AM TELLING YOU HOW SHE FELT AFTER YOU AND MONK KEPT BLAMING HER...IT WENT ON FOR DAYS AND PAGES.....
its time you took account for what you say about other people ... you sure do bite when its against yourself... but dare agnes do the same... and you carry on worse...

Quote:



He can speak for himself, and he has not done what you say.


OH YES HE HAS...not just in this thread either.

Quote:


Mothra can also speak for herself.


SHE HAS and again you ignore..
Quote:


I have done no wrong.  I have addressed the relentless malicious lies posted by Agnes.....something you avoid even referring to.



says it all..

you do nothing wrong aussie...nothing at all..


Quote:


Sorry to disappoint.



Quote:


How could she deny......as I always have the evidence.

OH YES you do..   BUT ONLY ONE SIDE  AS PER USUAL...


Quote:


I defend myself cods, always will.  If people are stupid enough to attack, then they can hardly cry 'foul' when that is addressed.



AUSSIE AGNES DEFENDS HERSELF  AGAINST YOU AND MONK AND JS...when you find the need to get together...

HAS SHE BEEN HERE MAKING DEMANDS OF YOU FOR A COUPLE OF DAYS....UMMMMMM...?

  not that I have seen....she was  very low in spirit  the last I spoke to her  which was friday....have a go at me if you have the need to bring someone down....

but leave her alone  I think enough harm has been done just quietly...



Quote:


My my, cods...is that you calling me terrible names?

So.....let's have this proof, alternatively let's have your apology and resignation from The Tavern.

Ban stays until Agnes does the right thing.

Setanta wrote on Aug 13^th, 2017 at 6:58pm:



I thought it was pretty obvious I didnt know there were two of them

Cods, it seems you simply will not accept some things as factual, but I’ll try yet again:

Quote:


I made no such claim, and no-one did.  Fact is, Agnes did allude to the death of Annie, and I showed you the post many times.  Here it is yet again:



she took it that way....poo/...

stop goingon about what you intended  you always want to justify what you did...always..


Quote:


WHERE DOES IT SAY IN THAT QUOTE   I INTEND TO TELL THE FORUM THE TRUTH ABOUT ANNIE...


i too have asked you this before... this is agnes telling us her version of how annie saw YOU..






As I have asked you before to do…..note the .

As a consequence of what Agnes posted, (several times similar stuff) Monk felt he had no choice but to make public the fact that Annie had in truth died.  He did.  He was unhappy he felt forced to do that. 

That is the full extent of what happened, and LOOK at how you have blown those basic facts out!


NO AUSSIE NEITHER YOU NOR MONK PROVIDED THE LINK TO WHERE AGNES LED HIM TO MAKE THE DECISION HE HAD NO CHOICE BUT TO TELL EVERY ONE ANNIE HAD DIED...

she claims she made no such statement.. 

and that quote says not a thing about news on annie..





Quote:


No-one has been making demands of anyone for a couple of days, cods.  It was you who started this Thread.  The fall out is at your feet, no-one else’s.  I have no idea what you mean about ‘spoke to her.’  I have no idea about ‘harm’ either.  If you had not started this Thread, there would be no current discussion about Agnes.  You brought it up.  You need not have.  If you had an issue, all you had to do was send a PM…not also make some public drama.



OK SO WHY DID YOU START A DRAMA WITH THAT THREAD ABOUT THE TAVERN MOD...WHY DIDNT YOU JUST SEND A PM...

YOU DO SEE WHERE I HAVE EXPLAINED WHY THIS THREAD IS IN THE OPEN... DONT YOU?????...
Quote:


Not out of spite at all Cods.  Agnes made malicious false allegations, said she had proof….and I called for the proof (which she never produced as usual) or for her apology and resignation.  She offered neither.

SO LIKE I HAVE SAID A THOUSAND TIMES

TWO WRONGS MAKE A RIGHT IN YOUR WORLD..


nasty revenge its n othing else but payback...


quote] you always have an answer

she doesnt think she has done anything wrong or anything worse than what you have done...

will you apologise to her???>............well will you?.

produce what you have accused agnes of doing to monk...

door - he threatened to really cause bodily harm to AiA when he turned up at Annies door- not because he gave a single shiit about Annie but because he hated and still hates AiA that much- he offered to book flights and pay for a trip to America at a pre designated date and time- all with the assistance of Annie supplying him with Info to carry this out- now what would we call this everyone- what kind of obsessive and what kind of "man" goes to these lengths- you guessed it ! A  real life  st---er ! this makes him a danger to anyone on any forum he is on- Annie in the end became very wary of Aussie because she realised she dealing with a nutter and with drew from the conversation- Annie was a class act- but she was dealing with an nasty clown who knew no boundaries- as you can see he has admitted to it but has tried to white wash his own behaviour and even if you believe what he says- still who does that!! ?  But what he didnt say was what his real intentions/ motivations  were for going to America to "assist " this lady- because he sure made them as clear as day to all of us  that he was going there to assault AiA!

AiA was of no threat in the slightest to Annie- he was a friend of Annies in fact-

who here thinks that aussie and fungus should get married? Cods can be the matron of honour

just keep on lying for a few pages won't you- mothballs as usual so stupid she doesnt know which way is up and she talks about thing skinned but she will support you in your troll- nothing changes

John Smith wrote on Aug 13^th, 2017 at 10:35pm:


I'd say she is far more suited to you Mr Smith.  She has never appealed to me in any way.

John Smith wrote on Aug 13^th, 2017 at 10:35pm:


I'd say she is far more suited to you Mr Smith.  She has never appealed to me in any way.

John Smith wrote on Aug 13^th, 2017 at 10:39pm:

balls of steel even lol

John Smith wrote on Aug 13^th, 2017 at 10:40pm:


Nah....you respond to her rubbish posts far more often than I do, Mr Smith.

John Smith wrote on Aug 13^th, 2017 at 10:46pm:


No wonder you have over 57000 posts!!

What socks????