Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 32 33 34 
Send Topic Print
I Still Call Australia Hom .... ophobic (Read 27727 times)
Johnnie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 12485
Gender: male
Re: I Still Call Australia Hom .... ophobic
Reply #495 - Aug 17th, 2017 at 10:08am
 
Jovial Monk wrote on Aug 17th, 2017 at 9:57am:
Johnnie wrote on Aug 17th, 2017 at 9:49am:
Their are a lot of people here who defend the poofs but their is no one willing to admit to being a poof, why is that,, are they shameful of their abnormality, because they are certainly not to shameful when they ride aboard a cock float with their bums hanging out, or simulating sodomy in front of families in the mardi gras.
Are they disgusted with being one of the toilet loitering set.
Do they feel guilt about being the main community to spread aids.
Are they embarrassed that they have to root other men's bums to gain sexual gratification.
They want to normalize themselves by way of ssm, gimme a break.

Greenswin said he is a homosexual (he now uses ______ as his nick.)

And gay people are “coming out” more and more and now can do so without the shame and embarrassment and hatred to them that used to happen earlier. Alan Turing without a doubt saved Britain in WWII, without his bombes the Uboats could have done much more damage, isolating Britain. What was his reward? Conviction as a homosexual, chemical castration and suicide.

Does anybody here REALLY want to go back to those days? If not, marriage equality is the next step. It will happen before 2020, that is certain.

Justifying an argument by finding an odd man out and presenting that as an argument is a non argument it is an irregularity.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Jovial Monk
Gold Member
*****
Online


Dogs not cats!

Posts: 43273
Gender: male
Re: I Still Call Australia Hom .... ophobic
Reply #496 - Aug 17th, 2017 at 10:36am
 
Nope, I am saying this is what happened in the bad old days even to someone who performed a great service to his country. Worse happened to others who were found or even just suspected as being homosexual.
Back to top
 

Get the vaxx! 💉💉

If you don’t like abortions ignore them like you do school shootings.
 
IP Logged
 
Jovial Monk
Gold Member
*****
Online


Dogs not cats!

Posts: 43273
Gender: male
Re: I Still Call Australia Hom .... ophobic
Reply #497 - Aug 17th, 2017 at 10:36am
 
.
Back to top
 

Get the vaxx! 💉💉

If you don’t like abortions ignore them like you do school shootings.
 
IP Logged
 
Jovial Monk
Gold Member
*****
Online


Dogs not cats!

Posts: 43273
Gender: male
Re: I Still Call Australia Hom .... ophobic
Reply #498 - Aug 17th, 2017 at 10:37am
 
.
Back to top
 

Get the vaxx! 💉💉

If you don’t like abortions ignore them like you do school shootings.
 
IP Logged
 
Jovial Monk
Gold Member
*****
Online


Dogs not cats!

Posts: 43273
Gender: male
Re: I Still Call Australia Hom .... ophobic
Reply #499 - Aug 17th, 2017 at 10:37am
 
.
Back to top
 

Get the vaxx! 💉💉

If you don’t like abortions ignore them like you do school shootings.
 
IP Logged
 
Jovial Monk
Gold Member
*****
Online


Dogs not cats!

Posts: 43273
Gender: male
Re: I Still Call Australia Hom .... ophobic
Reply #500 - Aug 17th, 2017 at 10:37am
 
.
Back to top
 

Get the vaxx! 💉💉

If you don’t like abortions ignore them like you do school shootings.
 
IP Logged
 
Auggie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


The Bull Moose

Posts: 8571
Re: I Still Call Australia Hom .... ophobic
Reply #501 - Aug 17th, 2017 at 1:09pm
 
Frank wrote on Aug 16th, 2017 at 9:48pm:
Auggie wrote on Aug 16th, 2017 at 8:13pm:
Valkie wrote on Aug 16th, 2017 at 5:44pm:
mothra wrote on Aug 15th, 2017 at 7:51pm:
Valkie wrote on Aug 15th, 2017 at 7:42pm:
Auggie wrote on Aug 15th, 2017 at 7:32pm:
Valkie wrote on Aug 15th, 2017 at 7:31pm:
You are saying that when they marry, they will not engage in thye disgusting practices that marks them as homosexuals in the first place....more on?

Or are you simply being obtuse and expecting people to believe that relationships based on LUST will no longer undertake and engage in the act?.....more on.

Come on now.
We both know what it is about poofs that makes them poofs.
We also know that if they marry, they will always be poofs, in act and name.

By trying to legitimize this abhorrent act of disgusting perversion by saying that they will not/ may not engage in this act is simply trying to make it sound less disgusting than it really is.


You know that St Paul and Jesus both viewed sex for pleasure as a sin and as an abhorrent act?

Have you ever had sex for pleasure, Valkie?


Regularly, I have no problem with sex between a man and a woman.

This is normal and healthy.

Not like the other type



Actually, i find the thought of you having sex utterly repulsive, Valkie.

Do i get a say?


And that is your right.
I care naught about what you think of my love or lovemaking with my wife.
This is a private act and YOU have nothing to do with it simply because its NORMAL and LEGAL.

I could not care less what you think and I would not even think about you having sex.




But, this isn't about sex is it? It's about commitment and a legal contract between two persons isn't it?

You're the one who was talking about sex.



So two heterosexual friends could marry each other as happened in NZ. But the gays were outraged and felt mocked and 'hurt'.
http://www.smh.com.au/world/gay-groups-angered-as-heterosexual-men-marry-to-win-...
So it IS about normalising deviant sexual behaviour and making it socially and culturally interchangeable with real marriage and heterosexual relationship.


No different is one person marries another person for their money. That's what it means to live in a free society.
Back to top
 

The Progressive President
 
IP Logged
 
TheFunPolice
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 9009
waggawagga
Gender: male
Re: I Still Call Australia Hom .... ophobic
Reply #502 - Aug 17th, 2017 at 8:14pm
 
John Smith wrote on Aug 17th, 2017 at 7:56am:
Valkie wrote on Aug 17th, 2017 at 7:48am:
John Smith wrote on Aug 16th, 2017 at 9:28pm:
Frank wrote on Aug 16th, 2017 at 9:23pm:
That's  why societies devised marriage between the two sexes.



rubbish ... society devised marriage as a way to protect assets


So.....What you are saying is that.

Gay people want to get married, not for love, not for companionship, not for a better life.

But simply to protect their assets?

Now it all starts to make sense, its about the money, not the love/lust.

Thanks for clearing that up


I'm saying that marriage as we know it was originally devised so as to protect assets. Nothing to do with why gays want to marry now.

This is a deliberate skirting of the truth!
Back to top
 

......Australia has an illegitimate Government!
 
IP Logged
 
Valkie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 16088
Central Coast
Gender: male
Re: I Still Call Australia Hom .... ophobic
Reply #503 - Aug 18th, 2017 at 7:58am
 
Jasin wrote on Aug 17th, 2017 at 9:51am:
You are all Pro-Trump, Pro-Nazi, right wing extremists, White supremacists and Racist Haters.


Slightly off topic

Dont you think??????
Back to top
 

I HAVE A DREAM
A WONDERFUL, PEACEFUL, BEAUTIFUL DREAM.
A DREAM OF A WORLD THAT HAS NEVER KNOWN ISLAM
A DREAM OF A WORLD FREE FROM THE HORRORS OF ISLAM.

SUCH A WONDERFUL DREAM
O HOW I WISH IT WERE TRU
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 39921
Gender: male
Re: I Still Call Australia Hom .... ophobic
Reply #504 - Aug 19th, 2017 at 3:38pm
 
Jovial Monk wrote on Aug 17th, 2017 at 5:49am:
Frank wrote on Aug 16th, 2017 at 9:48pm:
Auggie wrote on Aug 16th, 2017 at 8:13pm:
Valkie wrote on Aug 16th, 2017 at 5:44pm:
mothra wrote on Aug 15th, 2017 at 7:51pm:
Valkie wrote on Aug 15th, 2017 at 7:42pm:
Auggie wrote on Aug 15th, 2017 at 7:32pm:
Valkie wrote on Aug 15th, 2017 at 7:31pm:
You are saying that when they marry, they will not engage in thye disgusting practices that marks them as homosexuals in the first place....more on?

Or are you simply being obtuse and expecting people to believe that relationships based on LUST will no longer undertake and engage in the act?.....more on.

Come on now.
We both know what it is about poofs that makes them poofs.
We also know that if they marry, they will always be poofs, in act and name.

By trying to legitimize this abhorrent act of disgusting perversion by saying that they will not/ may not engage in this act is simply trying to make it sound less disgusting than it really is.


You know that St Paul and Jesus both viewed sex for pleasure as a sin and as an abhorrent act?

Have you ever had sex for pleasure, Valkie?


Regularly, I have no problem with sex between a man and a woman.

This is normal and healthy.

Not like the other type



Actually, i find the thought of you having sex utterly repulsive, Valkie.

Do i get a say?


And that is your right.
I care naught about what you think of my love or lovemaking with my wife.
This is a private act and YOU have nothing to do with it simply because its NORMAL and LEGAL.

I could not care less what you think and I would not even think about you having sex.




But, this isn't about sex is it? It's about commitment and a legal contract between two persons isn't it?

You're the one who was talking about sex.



So two heterosexual friends could marry each other as happened in NZ. But the gays were outraged and felt mocked and 'hurt'.
http://www.smh.com.au/world/gay-groups-angered-as-heterosexual-men-marry-to-win-...
So it IS about normalising deviant sexual behaviour and making it socially and culturally interchangeable with real marriage and heterosexual relationship.


Wasn’t just gays who were outraged, were they?

Quote:
But the stunt has prompted a rare union between gay rights groups and social conservatives, who have both condemned the sham marriage - for very different reasons.

Alex Greenwich, independent MP for Sydney and former convener of Australian Marriage Equality, said "all sides" of the marriage equality debate would be understandably upset.

"It essentially makes a mockery of marriage. Marriage is a really important institution about love and commitment and it's sad to see that there are people who are making a joke out of that," he said.

"Gay and lesbian people are fighting for the right to marry in Australia and have been fighting for the right in New Zealand, and it's because they take marriage extremely seriously, and the commitments and responsibilities that come with that. Here are two straight guys making a joke of that, and that's deeply concerning."



These two blokes made a mockery of Gay Marriage because in NZ two men could marry. THAT is the joke and thy just made another riff on that ridiculous notion, SSM. They also showed that the argument about 'love' is BS. Friends also love each other but their 'marriage' is not real. But two blokes fking each other doesn't make for marriage either.
It's all a stupid joke and a sham.

Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 39921
Gender: male
Re: I Still Call Australia Hom .... ophobic
Reply #505 - Aug 19th, 2017 at 3:39pm
 
But marriage is an institution BECAUSE we are a heterosexual species, NOT merely because we  frig each other.
Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 39921
Gender: male
Re: I Still Call Australia Hom .... ophobic
Reply #506 - Aug 19th, 2017 at 10:21pm
 
,
Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 39921
Gender: male
Re: I Still Call Australia Hom .... ophobic
Reply #507 - Aug 19th, 2017 at 10:24pm
 
Auggie wrote on Aug 17th, 2017 at 1:09pm:
Frank wrote on Aug 16th, 2017 at 9:48pm:
Auggie wrote on Aug 16th, 2017 at 8:13pm:
Valkie wrote on Aug 16th, 2017 at 5:44pm:
mothra wrote on Aug 15th, 2017 at 7:51pm:
Valkie wrote on Aug 15th, 2017 at 7:42pm:
Auggie wrote on Aug 15th, 2017 at 7:32pm:
Valkie wrote on Aug 15th, 2017 at 7:31pm:
You are saying that when they marry, they will not engage in thye disgusting practices that marks them as homosexuals in the first place....more on?

Or are you simply being obtuse and expecting people to believe that relationships based on LUST will no longer undertake and engage in the act?.....more on.

Come on now.
We both know what it is about poofs that makes them poofs.
We also know that if they marry, they will always be poofs, in act and name.

By trying to legitimize this abhorrent act of disgusting perversion by saying that they will not/ may not engage in this act is simply trying to make it sound less disgusting than it really is.


You know that St Paul and Jesus both viewed sex for pleasure as a sin and as an abhorrent act?

Have you ever had sex for pleasure, Valkie?


Regularly, I have no problem with sex between a man and a woman.

This is normal and healthy.

Not like the other type



Actually, i find the thought of you having sex utterly repulsive, Valkie.

Do i get a say?


And that is your right.
I care naught about what you think of my love or lovemaking with my wife.
This is a private act and YOU have nothing to do with it simply because its NORMAL and LEGAL.

I could not care less what you think and I would not even think about you having sex.




But, this isn't about sex is it? It's about commitment and a legal contract between two persons isn't it?

You're the one who was talking about sex.



So two heterosexual friends could marry each other as happened in NZ. But the gays were outraged and felt mocked and 'hurt'.
http://www.smh.com.au/world/gay-groups-angered-as-heterosexual-men-marry-to-win-...
So it IS about normalising deviant sexual behaviour and making it socially and culturally interchangeable with real marriage and heterosexual relationship.


No different is one person marries another person for their money. That's what it means to live in a free society.

Gays didn't  get miffy about that sorta thing. Not equal marriage rights for others?
Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 39921
Gender: male
Re: I Still Call Australia Hom .... ophobic
Reply #508 - Aug 20th, 2017 at 7:34pm
 
Auggie wrote on Aug 17th, 2017 at 1:09pm:
Frank wrote on Aug 16th, 2017 at 9:48pm:
Auggie wrote on Aug 16th, 2017 at 8:13pm:
Valkie wrote on Aug 16th, 2017 at 5:44pm:
mothra wrote on Aug 15th, 2017 at 7:51pm:
Valkie wrote on Aug 15th, 2017 at 7:42pm:
Auggie wrote on Aug 15th, 2017 at 7:32pm:
Valkie wrote on Aug 15th, 2017 at 7:31pm:
You are saying that when they marry, they will not engage in thye disgusting practices that marks them as homosexuals in the first place....more on?

Or are you simply being obtuse and expecting people to believe that relationships based on LUST will no longer undertake and engage in the act?.....more on.

Come on now.
We both know what it is about poofs that makes them poofs.
We also know that if they marry, they will always be poofs, in act and name.

By trying to legitimize this abhorrent act of disgusting perversion by saying that they will not/ may not engage in this act is simply trying to make it sound less disgusting than it really is.


You know that St Paul and Jesus both viewed sex for pleasure as a sin and as an abhorrent act?

Have you ever had sex for pleasure, Valkie?


Regularly, I have no problem with sex between a man and a woman.

This is normal and healthy.

Not like the other type



Actually, i find the thought of you having sex utterly repulsive, Valkie.

Do i get a say?


And that is your right.
I care naught about what you think of my love or lovemaking with my wife.
This is a private act and YOU have nothing to do with it simply because its NORMAL and LEGAL.

I could not care less what you think and I would not even think about you having sex.




But, this isn't about sex is it? It's about commitment and a legal contract between two persons isn't it?

You're the one who was talking about sex.



So two heterosexual friends could marry each other as happened in NZ. But the gays were outraged and felt mocked and 'hurt'.
http://www.smh.com.au/world/gay-groups-angered-as-heterosexual-men-marry-to-win-...
So it IS about normalising deviant sexual behaviour and making it socially and culturally interchangeable with real marriage and heterosexual relationship.


No different is one person marries another person for their money. That's what it means to live in a free society.

Deception is not deviance.

Different wrongs.

Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
capitosinora
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 2170
USA Florida
Gender: male
Re: I Still Call Australia Hom .... ophobic
Reply #509 - Aug 20th, 2017 at 9:13pm
 
____ wrote on Aug 11th, 2017 at 12:11pm:
Yes. Thank you most of Australia for not being Hom .... ophobic.


What about bashing poofters.


Back to top
 

GOD BLESS AMERICA
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 32 33 34 
Send Topic Print