Frank
|
Jovial Monk wrote on Aug 17 th, 2017 at 5:49am: Frank wrote on Aug 16 th, 2017 at 9:48pm: Auggie wrote on Aug 16 th, 2017 at 8:13pm: Valkie wrote on Aug 16 th, 2017 at 5:44pm: mothra wrote on Aug 15 th, 2017 at 7:51pm: Valkie wrote on Aug 15 th, 2017 at 7:42pm: Auggie wrote on Aug 15 th, 2017 at 7:32pm: Valkie wrote on Aug 15 th, 2017 at 7:31pm: You are saying that when they marry, they will not engage in thye disgusting practices that marks them as homosexuals in the first place....more on?
Or are you simply being obtuse and expecting people to believe that relationships based on LUST will no longer undertake and engage in the act?.....more on.
Come on now. We both know what it is about poofs that makes them poofs. We also know that if they marry, they will always be poofs, in act and name.
By trying to legitimize this abhorrent act of disgusting perversion by saying that they will not/ may not engage in this act is simply trying to make it sound less disgusting than it really is. You know that St Paul and Jesus both viewed sex for pleasure as a sin and as an abhorrent act? Have you ever had sex for pleasure, Valkie? Regularly, I have no problem with sex between a man and a woman. This is normal and healthy. Not like the other type Actually, i find the thought of you having sex utterly repulsive, Valkie. Do i get a say? And that is your right. I care naught about what you think of my love or lovemaking with my wife. This is a private act and YOU have nothing to do with it simply because its NORMAL and LEGAL. I could not care less what you think and I would not even think about you having sex. But, this isn't about sex is it? It's about commitment and a legal contract between two persons isn't it? You're the one who was talking about sex. So two heterosexual friends could marry each other as happened in NZ. But the gays were outraged and felt mocked and 'hurt'. http://www.smh.com.au/world/gay-groups-angered-as-heterosexual-men-marry-to-win-... So it IS about normalising deviant sexual behaviour and making it socially and culturally interchangeable with real marriage and heterosexual relationship. Wasn’t just gays who were outraged, were they? Quote:But the stunt has prompted a rare union between gay rights groups and social conservatives, who have both condemned the sham marriage - for very different reasons.
Alex Greenwich, independent MP for Sydney and former convener of Australian Marriage Equality, said "all sides" of the marriage equality debate would be understandably upset.
"It essentially makes a mockery of marriage. Marriage is a really important institution about love and commitment and it's sad to see that there are people who are making a joke out of that," he said.
"Gay and lesbian people are fighting for the right to marry in Australia and have been fighting for the right in New Zealand, and it's because they take marriage extremely seriously, and the commitments and responsibilities that come with that. Here are two straight guys making a joke of that, and that's deeply concerning." These two blokes made a mockery of Gay Marriage because in NZ two men could marry. THAT is the joke and thy just made another riff on that ridiculous notion, SSM. They also showed that the argument about 'love' is BS. Friends also love each other but their 'marriage' is not real. But two blokes fking each other doesn't make for marriage either. It's all a stupid joke and a sham.
|