Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 30 31 32 33 34 
Send Topic Print
I Still Call Australia Hom .... ophobic (Read 28148 times)
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 131487
Gender: male
Re: I Still Call Australia Hom .... ophobic
Reply #465 - Aug 15th, 2017 at 7:47pm
 
Valkie wrote on Aug 15th, 2017 at 7:42pm:
Auggie wrote on Aug 15th, 2017 at 7:32pm:
Valkie wrote on Aug 15th, 2017 at 7:31pm:
You are saying that when they marry, they will not engage in thye disgusting practices that marks them as homosexuals in the first place....more on?

Or are you simply being obtuse and expecting people to believe that relationships based on LUST will no longer undertake and engage in the act?.....more on.

Come on now.
We both know what it is about poofs that makes them poofs.
We also know that if they marry, they will always be poofs, in act and name.

By trying to legitimize this abhorrent act of disgusting perversion by saying that they will not/ may not engage in this act is simply trying to make it sound less disgusting than it really is.


You know that St Paul and Jesus both viewed sex for pleasure as a sin and as an abhorrent act?

Have you ever had sex for pleasure, Valkie?


Regularly, I have no problem with sex between a man and a woman.



Okay, we're getting somewhere.

You have no problem with sex between a man and a woman.

That includes fellatio, cunnilingus, and anal sex.

So, what's the problem with those acts being performed with two people of the same sex?

Can't say?

Of course you can't, you ignorant hypocrite.


Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
mothra
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 34507
Gender: female
Re: I Still Call Australia Hom .... ophobic
Reply #466 - Aug 15th, 2017 at 7:51pm
 
Valkie wrote on Aug 15th, 2017 at 7:42pm:
Auggie wrote on Aug 15th, 2017 at 7:32pm:
Valkie wrote on Aug 15th, 2017 at 7:31pm:
You are saying that when they marry, they will not engage in thye disgusting practices that marks them as homosexuals in the first place....more on?

Or are you simply being obtuse and expecting people to believe that relationships based on LUST will no longer undertake and engage in the act?.....more on.

Come on now.
We both know what it is about poofs that makes them poofs.
We also know that if they marry, they will always be poofs, in act and name.

By trying to legitimize this abhorrent act of disgusting perversion by saying that they will not/ may not engage in this act is simply trying to make it sound less disgusting than it really is.


You know that St Paul and Jesus both viewed sex for pleasure as a sin and as an abhorrent act?

Have you ever had sex for pleasure, Valkie?


Regularly, I have no problem with sex between a man and a woman.

This is normal and healthy.

Not like the other type



Actually, i find the thought of you having sex utterly repulsive, Valkie.

Do i get a say?
Back to top
 

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.
 
IP Logged
 
Valkie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 16088
Central Coast
Gender: male
Re: I Still Call Australia Hom .... ophobic
Reply #467 - Aug 15th, 2017 at 7:53pm
 
Auggie wrote on Aug 15th, 2017 at 7:45pm:
Valkie wrote on Aug 15th, 2017 at 7:42pm:
Auggie wrote on Aug 15th, 2017 at 7:32pm:
Valkie wrote on Aug 15th, 2017 at 7:31pm:
You are saying that when they marry, they will not engage in thye disgusting practices that marks them as homosexuals in the first place....more on?

Or are you simply being obtuse and expecting people to believe that relationships based on LUST will no longer undertake and engage in the act?.....more on.

Come on now.
We both know what it is about poofs that makes them poofs.
We also know that if they marry, they will always be poofs, in act and name.

By trying to legitimize this abhorrent act of disgusting perversion by saying that they will not/ may not engage in this act is simply trying to make it sound less disgusting than it really is.


You know that St Paul and Jesus both viewed sex for pleasure as a sin and as an abhorrent act?

Have you ever had sex for pleasure, Valkie?


Regularly, I have no problem with sex between a man and a woman.

This is normal and healthy.

Not like the other type


Ah, dodging it.

So, you have had sex for pleasure...

What a dirty bastard you are, Valkie. What a disgusting and vile act on your behalf...

You shouldn't be allowed to be married...


What do you mean dodging it, cant you read.

I said regularly, but for you, as you appear to be simple minded,
I engage in love making on a regular basis with my legally married wife because I love her and wish to give her pleasure as well as have pleasure for myself.

It is an act of love, not LUST as with poofs.

But you wouldnt understand that would you?
Back to top
 

I HAVE A DREAM
A WONDERFUL, PEACEFUL, BEAUTIFUL DREAM.
A DREAM OF A WORLD THAT HAS NEVER KNOWN ISLAM
A DREAM OF A WORLD FREE FROM THE HORRORS OF ISLAM.

SUCH A WONDERFUL DREAM
O HOW I WISH IT WERE TRU
 
IP Logged
 
Auggie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


The Bull Moose

Posts: 8571
Re: I Still Call Australia Hom .... ophobic
Reply #468 - Aug 16th, 2017 at 12:27pm
 
Valkie wrote on Aug 15th, 2017 at 7:53pm:
What do you mean dodging it, cant you read.

I said regularly, but for you, as you appear to be simple minded,
I engage in love making on a regular basis with my legally married wife because I love her and wish to give her pleasure as well as have pleasure for myself.

It is an act of love, not LUST as with poofs.

But you wouldnt understand that would you?


But, hold on? I thought that the purpose of marriage was only for having children? Therefore, any sexual act that is not specifically for the purposes of bearing children is a sin and therefore nullifies the marriage?

Back to top
 

The Progressive President
 
IP Logged
 
Dr Mengele
Senior Member
****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 364
The Fourth Reich
Gender: female
Re: I Still Call Australia Hom .... ophobic
Reply #469 - Aug 16th, 2017 at 12:53pm
 
Auggie wrote on Aug 15th, 2017 at 7:45pm:
Valkie wrote on Aug 15th, 2017 at 7:42pm:
Auggie wrote on Aug 15th, 2017 at 7:32pm:
Valkie wrote on Aug 15th, 2017 at 7:31pm:
You are saying that when they marry, they will not engage in thye disgusting practices that marks them as homosexuals in the first place....more on?

Or are you simply being obtuse and expecting people to believe that relationships based on LUST will no longer undertake and engage in the act?.....more on.

Come on now.
We both know what it is about poofs that makes them poofs.
We also know that if they marry, they will always be poofs, in act and name.

By trying to legitimize this abhorrent act of disgusting perversion by saying that they will not/ may not engage in this act is simply trying to make it sound less disgusting than it really is.


You know that St Paul and Jesus both viewed sex for pleasure as a sin and as an abhorrent act?

Have you ever had sex for pleasure, Valkie?


Regularly, I have no problem with sex between a man and a woman.

This is normal and healthy.

Not like the other type





You shouldn't be allowed to be married...


But he/she IS allowed to get married...unlike fags.  Grin
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Valkie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 16088
Central Coast
Gender: male
Re: I Still Call Australia Hom .... ophobic
Reply #470 - Aug 16th, 2017 at 5:40pm
 
Auggie wrote on Aug 15th, 2017 at 7:41pm:
Valkie wrote on Aug 15th, 2017 at 7:39pm:
John Smith wrote on Aug 15th, 2017 at 7:31pm:
Frank wrote on Aug 15th, 2017 at 7:30pm:
We are having this conversation because sexual deviants want to be seen as not sexual deviants but normal.


hang, they're part of the species right? Have you ever stopped to consider that perhaps the deviant is you?


Again, Normal is the majority.
95% of the population is NORMAL, that is heterosexual.
Does this not make them ABNORMAL?

You never answered the question posed earlier.
What about those who love animals?
Or those who love inanimate objects?
Or those who like pain or inflicting pain?
What about other strange perversions, do these all get stamped with the "Look at me Im normal too" stamp just because they scream loud enough?

First it will be gay marriage.
Then it will be inter-species marriage.
It goes on from there, once the door is opened it all spills out.

Lets look at the latest Grooming practice of the PC gay group.
Safe schools?
It is nothing short of grooming children to accept perverted abnormal behavior which less that 10% of the population engage in.

Once there is legalized SSM, there will be a push to normalize it in schools and FORCE normal children to believe in this rubbish or be bullied into accepting it.

So the anti bullying bull shite scheme is actually legitimized bullying of normal children.

Sad isnt it.


You know Valkie that the White Man is no longer the 'normal' globally.

Therefore you are a not normal.


Ahh, but I'm not talking about skin colour or race.

We are discussing a perverted practice which is practiced by perverted ABNORMAL people who are mentally ill and need help to normalize themselves.

I could not care less what colour you are, or where you are from.

Its the activities, what you do that defines your sickness.

Poofs come in many coulours
Muzzos come in many colours.

Its not the colour or race its the sickness that affects their minds.
Back to top
 

I HAVE A DREAM
A WONDERFUL, PEACEFUL, BEAUTIFUL DREAM.
A DREAM OF A WORLD THAT HAS NEVER KNOWN ISLAM
A DREAM OF A WORLD FREE FROM THE HORRORS OF ISLAM.

SUCH A WONDERFUL DREAM
O HOW I WISH IT WERE TRU
 
IP Logged
 
Valkie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 16088
Central Coast
Gender: male
Re: I Still Call Australia Hom .... ophobic
Reply #471 - Aug 16th, 2017 at 5:44pm
 
mothra wrote on Aug 15th, 2017 at 7:51pm:
Valkie wrote on Aug 15th, 2017 at 7:42pm:
Auggie wrote on Aug 15th, 2017 at 7:32pm:
Valkie wrote on Aug 15th, 2017 at 7:31pm:
You are saying that when they marry, they will not engage in thye disgusting practices that marks them as homosexuals in the first place....more on?

Or are you simply being obtuse and expecting people to believe that relationships based on LUST will no longer undertake and engage in the act?.....more on.

Come on now.
We both know what it is about poofs that makes them poofs.
We also know that if they marry, they will always be poofs, in act and name.

By trying to legitimize this abhorrent act of disgusting perversion by saying that they will not/ may not engage in this act is simply trying to make it sound less disgusting than it really is.


You know that St Paul and Jesus both viewed sex for pleasure as a sin and as an abhorrent act?

Have you ever had sex for pleasure, Valkie?


Regularly, I have no problem with sex between a man and a woman.

This is normal and healthy.

Not like the other type



Actually, i find the thought of you having sex utterly repulsive, Valkie.

Do i get a say?


And that is your right.
I care naught about what you think of my love or lovemaking with my wife.
This is a private act and YOU have nothing to do with it simply because its NORMAL and LEGAL.

I could not care less what you think and I would not even think about you having sex.


Back to top
 

I HAVE A DREAM
A WONDERFUL, PEACEFUL, BEAUTIFUL DREAM.
A DREAM OF A WORLD THAT HAS NEVER KNOWN ISLAM
A DREAM OF A WORLD FREE FROM THE HORRORS OF ISLAM.

SUCH A WONDERFUL DREAM
O HOW I WISH IT WERE TRU
 
IP Logged
 
Valkie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 16088
Central Coast
Gender: male
Re: I Still Call Australia Hom .... ophobic
Reply #472 - Aug 16th, 2017 at 5:47pm
 
Auggie wrote on Aug 16th, 2017 at 12:27pm:
Valkie wrote on Aug 15th, 2017 at 7:53pm:
What do you mean dodging it, cant you read.

I said regularly, but for you, as you appear to be simple minded,
I engage in love making on a regular basis with my legally married wife because I love her and wish to give her pleasure as well as have pleasure for myself.

It is an act of love, not LUST as with poofs.

But you wouldnt understand that would you?


But, hold on? I thought that the purpose of marriage was only for having children? Therefore, any sexual act that is not specifically for the purposes of bearing children is a sin and therefore nullifies the marriage?



And had children I have, 3 beautiful, normal, healthy, successful and wonderful children.

And my children have had, between them, 5 beautiful, healthy, normal grand children.

Now, should any of them decide to take the wrong path, I will not love them any less, but I will feel sad that they are mentally ill.
I will support them and help where I can, but I truly hope they all remain normal and healthy.
Back to top
 

I HAVE A DREAM
A WONDERFUL, PEACEFUL, BEAUTIFUL DREAM.
A DREAM OF A WORLD THAT HAS NEVER KNOWN ISLAM
A DREAM OF A WORLD FREE FROM THE HORRORS OF ISLAM.

SUCH A WONDERFUL DREAM
O HOW I WISH IT WERE TRU
 
IP Logged
 
TheFunPolice
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 9009
waggawagga
Gender: male
Re: I Still Call Australia Hom .... ophobic
Reply #473 - Aug 16th, 2017 at 5:49pm
 
Auggie wrote on Aug 16th, 2017 at 12:27pm:
Valkie wrote on Aug 15th, 2017 at 7:53pm:
What do you mean dodging it, cant you read.

I said regularly, but for you, as you appear to be simple minded,
I engage in love making on a regular basis with my legally married wife because I love her and wish to give her pleasure as well as have pleasure for myself.

It is an act of love, not LUST as with poofs.

But you wouldnt understand that would you?


But, hold on? I thought that the purpose of marriage was only for having children? Therefore, any sexual act that is not specifically for the purposes of bearing children is a sin and therefore nullifies the marriage?


Sin isn't the issue: the issue is that gay marriage was never an institution because there was never an intention to raise children!

You're all red herrings buddy  Cheesy

That's why the NO vote says the YES vote is an attack on western civilisation by flim flam men who pretend they believe in democracy but actually are simply fascistic nutjobs on a propaganda campaign to bring down the west!

In your case you admitted you don't believe in democracy in the very next sentence after you said you actually believed in democracy: in the very same post infact.

Are you gay or something?

Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked


Back to top
 

......Australia has an illegitimate Government!
 
IP Logged
 
TheFunPolice
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 9009
waggawagga
Gender: male
Re: I Still Call Australia Hom .... ophobic
Reply #474 - Aug 16th, 2017 at 5:51pm
 
greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 15th, 2017 at 7:47pm:
Valkie wrote on Aug 15th, 2017 at 7:42pm:
Auggie wrote on Aug 15th, 2017 at 7:32pm:
Valkie wrote on Aug 15th, 2017 at 7:31pm:
You are saying that when they marry, they will not engage in thye disgusting practices that marks them as homosexuals in the first place....more on?

Or are you simply being obtuse and expecting people to believe that relationships based on LUST will no longer undertake and engage in the act?.....more on.

Come on now.
We both know what it is about poofs that makes them poofs.
We also know that if they marry, they will always be poofs, in act and name.

By trying to legitimize this abhorrent act of disgusting perversion by saying that they will not/ may not engage in this act is simply trying to make it sound less disgusting than it really is.


You know that St Paul and Jesus both viewed sex for pleasure as a sin and as an abhorrent act?

Have you ever had sex for pleasure, Valkie?


Regularly, I have no problem with sex between a man and a woman.



Okay, we're getting somewhere.

You have no problem with sex between a man and a woman.

That includes fellatio, cunnilingus, and
anal sex
.

So, what's the problem with those acts being performed with two people of the same sex?

Can't say?

Of course you can't, you ignorant hypocrite.



For you maybe,... but you aint everyone!
Back to top
 

......Australia has an illegitimate Government!
 
IP Logged
 
TheFunPolice
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 9009
waggawagga
Gender: male
Re: I Still Call Australia Hom .... ophobic
Reply #475 - Aug 16th, 2017 at 5:54pm
 
Auggie wrote on Aug 15th, 2017 at 7:41pm:
Valkie wrote on Aug 15th, 2017 at 7:39pm:
John Smith wrote on Aug 15th, 2017 at 7:31pm:
Frank wrote on Aug 15th, 2017 at 7:30pm:
We are having this conversation because sexual deviants want to be seen as not sexual deviants but normal.


hang, they're part of the species right? Have you ever stopped to consider that perhaps the deviant is you?


Again, Normal is the majority.
95% of the population is NORMAL, that is heterosexual.
Does this not make them ABNORMAL?

You never answered the question posed earlier.
What about those who love animals?
Or those who love inanimate objects?
Or those who like pain or inflicting pain?
What about other strange perversions, do these all get stamped with the "Look at me Im normal too" stamp just because they scream loud enough?

First it will be gay marriage.
Then it will be inter-species marriage.
It goes on from there, once the door is opened it all spills out.

Lets look at the latest Grooming practice of the PC gay group.
Safe schools?
It is nothing short of grooming children to accept perverted abnormal behavior which less that 10% of the population engage in.

Once there is legalized SSM, there will be a push to normalize it in schools and FORCE normal children to believe in this rubbish or be bullied into accepting it.

So the anti bullying bull shite scheme is actually legitimized bullying of normal children.

Sad isnt it.


You know Valkie that the White Man is no longer the 'normal' globally.

Therefore you are a not normal
.

Are you joining issues for some reason?

(Was white man ever the most represented on the planet?

You are a serious looper dood !) Cheesy
Back to top
 

......Australia has an illegitimate Government!
 
IP Logged
 
Auggie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


The Bull Moose

Posts: 8571
Re: I Still Call Australia Hom .... ophobic
Reply #476 - Aug 16th, 2017 at 8:11pm
 
TheFunPolice wrote on Aug 16th, 2017 at 5:49pm:
Sin isn't the issue: the issue is that gay marriage was never an institution because there was never an intention to raise children!


A marriage that doesn't produce children also isn't an institution, right? What if the couple has children and aren't married?

Second, marriage has two parts - the religious part, and the legal part.

If you deny the legal part to SS couples then you are discriminating under the law.

Hence why I have advocated for the legal abolition of marriage, and leave marriage to churches and religious institutions. Surely, this is a better outcome for religious people such as yourself? Wouldn't you want to be to determine who is married and who is not?

TheFunPolice wrote on Aug 16th, 2017 at 5:49pm:
That's why the NO vote says the YES vote is an attack on western civilisation by flim flam men who pretend they believe in democracy but actually are simply fascistic nutjobs on a propaganda campaign to bring down the west!


Western Civilization? You know the Ancient Greeks practised homosexuality quite frequently and they were never discriminated against. Were the Greeks NOT civilized?

TheFunPolice wrote on Aug 16th, 2017 at 5:49pm:
In your case you admitted you don't believe in democracy in the very next sentence after you said you actually believed in democracy: in the very same post infact.


It was a joke. That was blatantly obvious.

Just as I assume was your comment about Ben Shapiro being a Jew?

TheFunPolice wrote on Aug 16th, 2017 at 5:49pm:
Are you gay or something?


No, I'm celibate.
Back to top
 

The Progressive President
 
IP Logged
 
Auggie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


The Bull Moose

Posts: 8571
Re: I Still Call Australia Hom .... ophobic
Reply #477 - Aug 16th, 2017 at 8:12pm
 
Valkie wrote on Aug 16th, 2017 at 5:40pm:
Auggie wrote on Aug 15th, 2017 at 7:41pm:
Valkie wrote on Aug 15th, 2017 at 7:39pm:
John Smith wrote on Aug 15th, 2017 at 7:31pm:
Frank wrote on Aug 15th, 2017 at 7:30pm:
We are having this conversation because sexual deviants want to be seen as not sexual deviants but normal.


hang, they're part of the species right? Have you ever stopped to consider that perhaps the deviant is you?


Again, Normal is the majority.
95% of the population is NORMAL, that is heterosexual.
Does this not make them ABNORMAL?

You never answered the question posed earlier.
What about those who love animals?
Or those who love inanimate objects?
Or those who like pain or inflicting pain?
What about other strange perversions, do these all get stamped with the "Look at me Im normal too" stamp just because they scream loud enough?

First it will be gay marriage.
Then it will be inter-species marriage.
It goes on from there, once the door is opened it all spills out.

Lets look at the latest Grooming practice of the PC gay group.
Safe schools?
It is nothing short of grooming children to accept perverted abnormal behavior which less that 10% of the population engage in.

Once there is legalized SSM, there will be a push to normalize it in schools and FORCE normal children to believe in this rubbish or be bullied into accepting it.

So the anti bullying bull shite scheme is actually legitimized bullying of normal children.

Sad isnt it.


You know Valkie that the White Man is no longer the 'normal' globally.

Therefore you are a not normal.


Ahh, but I'm not talking about skin colour or race.

We are discussing a perverted practice which is practiced by perverted ABNORMAL people who are mentally ill and need help to normalize themselves.

I could not care less what colour you are, or where you are from.

Its the activities, what you do that defines your sickness.

Poofs come in many coulours
Muzzos come in many colours.

Its not the colour or race its the sickness that affects their minds.


The medical community has said otherwise. It's been well-proven that it's not a mental illness.

You're more absurd that what I took you for.
Back to top
 

The Progressive President
 
IP Logged
 
Auggie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


The Bull Moose

Posts: 8571
Re: I Still Call Australia Hom .... ophobic
Reply #478 - Aug 16th, 2017 at 8:13pm
 
Valkie wrote on Aug 16th, 2017 at 5:44pm:
mothra wrote on Aug 15th, 2017 at 7:51pm:
Valkie wrote on Aug 15th, 2017 at 7:42pm:
Auggie wrote on Aug 15th, 2017 at 7:32pm:
Valkie wrote on Aug 15th, 2017 at 7:31pm:
You are saying that when they marry, they will not engage in thye disgusting practices that marks them as homosexuals in the first place....more on?

Or are you simply being obtuse and expecting people to believe that relationships based on LUST will no longer undertake and engage in the act?.....more on.

Come on now.
We both know what it is about poofs that makes them poofs.
We also know that if they marry, they will always be poofs, in act and name.

By trying to legitimize this abhorrent act of disgusting perversion by saying that they will not/ may not engage in this act is simply trying to make it sound less disgusting than it really is.


You know that St Paul and Jesus both viewed sex for pleasure as a sin and as an abhorrent act?

Have you ever had sex for pleasure, Valkie?


Regularly, I have no problem with sex between a man and a woman.

This is normal and healthy.

Not like the other type



Actually, i find the thought of you having sex utterly repulsive, Valkie.

Do i get a say?


And that is your right.
I care naught about what you think of my love or lovemaking with my wife.
This is a private act and YOU have nothing to do with it simply because its NORMAL and LEGAL.

I could not care less what you think and I would not even think about you having sex.




But, this isn't about sex is it? It's about commitment and a legal contract between two persons isn't it?

You're the one who was talking about sex.
Back to top
 

The Progressive President
 
IP Logged
 
Moriaty
Full Member
***
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 209
Gender: male
Re: I Still Call Australia Hom .... ophobic
Reply #479 - Aug 16th, 2017 at 8:34pm
 
Valkie wrote on Aug 16th, 2017 at 5:47pm:
And had children I have, 3 beautiful, normal, healthy, successful and wonderful children.

And my children have had, between them, 5 beautiful, healthy, normal grand children.



And no doubt they will love you, despite your mental illness, and support you as you try and develop from an emotionally retarded frog into a loving human being.

God bless the hearts of those who will support you, love you and care for you. Despite your massive flaws.

Rest assured that most, if not all, gods and goddesses will despise and hate you for your views. It will only be the devils and demons who will fill your heart with hate.

Your salvation is YOUR choice.

Choose love. Choose equality.

Deny the hate. Deny the lesser demons of your human heart and embrace the all-loving angels of our better natures.

I believe you can change. I believe you WILL change.
Back to top
 

Defend Free-speech. Say no to censorship on this forum! Defend the freedoms our soldiers fought for against the Fascist-racist forces of evil!
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 30 31 32 33 34 
Send Topic Print