Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 21 22 23 24 25 ... 34
Send Topic Print
I Still Call Australia Hom .... ophobic (Read 27715 times)
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 94104
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: I Still Call Australia Hom .... ophobic
Reply #330 - Aug 13th, 2017 at 8:24pm
 

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 39921
Gender: male
Re: I Still Call Australia Hom .... ophobic
Reply #331 - Aug 13th, 2017 at 8:38pm
 
mothra wrote on Aug 13th, 2017 at 1:46pm:
Frank wrote on Aug 13th, 2017 at 12:37pm:
mothra wrote on Aug 12th, 2017 at 11:23pm:
What has acceptance to do with it Frank? Isn't this abut availability of information?

Have you been paying attention, Frank? I think not.

Once we sort out where you stand on that one, we can move on to what you need to accept or not.


There is all sorts of information available. Information does mean it's  true. Accepting information is treating it as true.
Do you accept every piece of information as true, uncritically? No.
That's  what acceptance has to do with it, uncritical non-thinker.



Then why your surprise that Greg had "information available"?



I am not surprised by anything you two say. You are as thick as mince and no surprise.

I would be surprised if you made a reasonable point. That's what would surprise me.  Gweggy is an AGW skeptic so I give him nods there. You? You couldn't make a reasoned or reasonable point to save the planet, let alone save yourself. You are sure to be wrong about everything. You are that kind of weather wane. You utter = you are wrong. Because you have no ability to reason, to critically evaluate, to weigh up. You are an Emotionally Correct non-thinker.
Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Grendel
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 28080
Gender: male
Re: I Still Call Australia Hom .... ophobic
Reply #332 - Aug 13th, 2017 at 8:48pm
 
greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 13th, 2017 at 7:49pm:
Valkie wrote on Aug 13th, 2017 at 7:30pm:
marriage is expected to bear children.


Incorrect.

How so Gweggy, interested on your take on it.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 94104
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: I Still Call Australia Hom .... ophobic
Reply #333 - Aug 13th, 2017 at 8:50pm
 
*
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 94104
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: I Still Call Australia Hom .... ophobic
Reply #334 - Aug 13th, 2017 at 8:50pm
 
*
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 94104
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: I Still Call Australia Hom .... ophobic
Reply #335 - Aug 13th, 2017 at 8:50pm
 
6 posts to flip the page
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Johnnie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 12485
Gender: male
Re: I Still Call Australia Hom .... ophobic
Reply #336 - Aug 13th, 2017 at 9:07pm
 
Bobby. wrote on Aug 13th, 2017 at 8:50pm:
6 posts to flip the page

Why flip pages?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Auggie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


The Bull Moose

Posts: 8571
Re: I Still Call Australia Hom .... ophobic
Reply #337 - Aug 13th, 2017 at 9:08pm
 
Johnnie wrote on Aug 13th, 2017 at 7:34pm:
Auggie wrote on Aug 13th, 2017 at 4:15pm:
Johnnie wrote on Aug 13th, 2017 at 12:57pm:
Bobby. wrote on Aug 13th, 2017 at 11:49am:
Ajax wrote on Aug 13th, 2017 at 11:35am:
Bobby the oligarchy fleeces us (you, me the country) to the tune of billions, $122 million is but a pebble in a lake.



No it's not - that money could be used to house homeless people -
to do something - anything -  worthwhile -

not just make printers rich.

The elitist politicians don't have the right to upturn the most important society institution we have, that is for society itself to decide, and hang the costs.
They will only spend the money on importing  terrorists anyway.


Shouldn't it be for individuals to decide?

We as a society decide on the way society is run, if we decide to rule out beastiality  then the individuals right to root animals is out the window.


There's nothing preventing a person now from having sexual relations with an animal.
Back to top
 

The Progressive President
 
IP Logged
 
Auggie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


The Bull Moose

Posts: 8571
Re: I Still Call Australia Hom .... ophobic
Reply #338 - Aug 13th, 2017 at 9:09pm
 
Quote:
Again, you misinterpret the facts, marriage is expected to bear children.
Truely gay couples cannot have children.


What if a heterosexual married couple doesn't have children, should that marriage be annulled? According to your logic, it should be.
Back to top
 

The Progressive President
 
IP Logged
 
Johnnie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 12485
Gender: male
Re: I Still Call Australia Hom .... ophobic
Reply #339 - Aug 13th, 2017 at 9:10pm
 
Auggie wrote on Aug 13th, 2017 at 9:08pm:
Johnnie wrote on Aug 13th, 2017 at 7:34pm:
Auggie wrote on Aug 13th, 2017 at 4:15pm:
Johnnie wrote on Aug 13th, 2017 at 12:57pm:
Bobby. wrote on Aug 13th, 2017 at 11:49am:
Ajax wrote on Aug 13th, 2017 at 11:35am:
Bobby the oligarchy fleeces us (you, me the country) to the tune of billions, $122 million is but a pebble in a lake.



No it's not - that money could be used to house homeless people -
to do something - anything -  worthwhile -

not just make printers rich.

The elitist politicians don't have the right to upturn the most important society institution we have, that is for society itself to decide, and hang the costs.
They will only spend the money on importing  terrorists anyway.


Shouldn't it be for individuals to decide?

We as a society decide on the way society is run, if we decide to rule out beastiality  then the individuals right to root animals is out the window.


There's nothing preventing a person now from having sexual relations with an animal.

Cool, one in all in!
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Auggie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


The Bull Moose

Posts: 8571
Re: I Still Call Australia Hom .... ophobic
Reply #340 - Aug 13th, 2017 at 9:13pm
 
Johnnie wrote on Aug 13th, 2017 at 9:10pm:
Auggie wrote on Aug 13th, 2017 at 9:08pm:
Johnnie wrote on Aug 13th, 2017 at 7:34pm:
Auggie wrote on Aug 13th, 2017 at 4:15pm:
Johnnie wrote on Aug 13th, 2017 at 12:57pm:
Bobby. wrote on Aug 13th, 2017 at 11:49am:
Ajax wrote on Aug 13th, 2017 at 11:35am:
Bobby the oligarchy fleeces us (you, me the country) to the tune of billions, $122 million is but a pebble in a lake.



No it's not - that money could be used to house homeless people -
to do something - anything -  worthwhile -

not just make printers rich.

The elitist politicians don't have the right to upturn the most important society institution we have, that is for society itself to decide, and hang the costs.
They will only spend the money on importing  terrorists anyway.


Shouldn't it be for individuals to decide?

We as a society decide on the way society is run, if we decide to rule out beastiality  then the individuals right to root animals is out the window.


There's nothing preventing a person now from having sexual relations with an animal.

Cool, one in all in!


Most people wouldn't have sex with an animal even if a gun were held to their head.
Back to top
 

The Progressive President
 
IP Logged
 
Auggie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


The Bull Moose

Posts: 8571
Re: I Still Call Australia Hom .... ophobic
Reply #341 - Aug 13th, 2017 at 9:13pm
 
Bobby. wrote on Aug 13th, 2017 at 8:50pm:
6 posts to flip the page


Have you changed your opinion on the vote?

If you believe in liberty then you should support it?

Back to top
 

The Progressive President
 
IP Logged
 
John Smith
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 71950
Gender: male
Re: I Still Call Australia Hom .... ophobic
Reply #342 - Aug 13th, 2017 at 9:14pm
 
Auggie wrote on Aug 13th, 2017 at 9:08pm:
There's nothing preventing a person now from having sexual relations with an animal.



are you sure?

found this one, not sure if it's oz wide or limited to Vicoria




The legislation on Bestiality

Section 59 of the Crimes Act 1958 is the relevant law for Bestiality and is as follows:

Bestiality

(1) A person must not commit an act of bestiality.

Penalty: Level 6 imprisonment (5 years maximum).

(2) An act of bestiality is any of the following-

   (a)  buggery committed by a man on an animal of either sex;

   (b)  buggery committed by an animal on a man or woman;

   (c)  penetration of the vagina of an animal by the penis of a man;

   (d)  penetration of the vagina of a woman by the penis of an animal.

(3) The law relating to buggery is as set out in this Act and no prosecution shall be instituted for an offence of buggery unless it is for an offence under this section.
Back to top
 

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.
 
IP Logged
 
Auggie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


The Bull Moose

Posts: 8571
Re: I Still Call Australia Hom .... ophobic
Reply #343 - Aug 13th, 2017 at 9:15pm
 
John Smith wrote on Aug 13th, 2017 at 9:14pm:
Auggie wrote on Aug 13th, 2017 at 9:08pm:
There's nothing preventing a person now from having sexual relations with an animal.



are you sure?

found this one, not sure if it's oz wide or limited to Vicoria




The legislation on Bestiality

Section 59 of the Crimes Act 1958 is the relevant law for Bestiality and is as follows:

Bestiality

(1) A person must not commit an act of bestiality.

Penalty: Level 6 imprisonment (5 years maximum).

(2) An act of bestiality is any of the following-

   (a)  buggery committed by a man on an animal of either sex;

   (b)  buggery committed by an animal on a man or woman;

   (c)  penetration of the vagina of an animal by the penis of a man;

   (d)  penetration of the vagina of a woman by the penis of an animal.

(3) The law relating to buggery is as set out in this Act and no prosecution shall be instituted for an offence of buggery unless it is for an offence under this section.


Wow! There's an actual law criminalizing this?

I can't see the logic in criminalizing bestiality. Can someone explain this to me?
Back to top
 

The Progressive President
 
IP Logged
 
John Smith
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 71950
Gender: male
Re: I Still Call Australia Hom .... ophobic
Reply #344 - Aug 13th, 2017 at 9:20pm
 
Auggie wrote on Aug 13th, 2017 at 9:15pm:
John Smith wrote on Aug 13th, 2017 at 9:14pm:
Auggie wrote on Aug 13th, 2017 at 9:08pm:
There's nothing preventing a person now from having sexual relations with an animal.



are you sure?

found this one, not sure if it's oz wide or limited to Vicoria




The legislation on Bestiality

Section 59 of the Crimes Act 1958 is the relevant law for Bestiality and is as follows:

Bestiality

(1) A person must not commit an act of bestiality.

Penalty: Level 6 imprisonment (5 years maximum).

(2) An act of bestiality is any of the following-

   (a)  buggery committed by a man on an animal of either sex;

   (b)  buggery committed by an animal on a man or woman;

   (c)  penetration of the vagina of an animal by the penis of a man;

   (d)  penetration of the vagina of a woman by the penis of an animal.

(3) The law relating to buggery is as set out in this Act and no prosecution shall be instituted for an offence of buggery unless it is for an offence under this section.


Wow! There's an actual law criminalizing this?

I can't see the logic in criminalizing bestiality. Can someone explain this to me?



animals can't consent.

when I was younger there were rumours of at least two guys that got drunk or high and tried to screw an animal ... one a chicken, the other about a year later with a goat
Back to top
 

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 21 22 23 24 25 ... 34
Send Topic Print