If you have a Republic.
The slate gets wiped clean and 'everyone' is treated 'equally'.
Doesn't matter if you were here 'first' or just became a citizen last night.

Anyone who prefers to refer to themselves as 'British' Australian, 'Native' Australian or 'Asian' Australian will place themselves on the outer as a '2nd Choice' to those (of any race) that just call themselves as 'Australians'.

I was hoping this was another thread about cheese.

What was that latest treaty stuff with the coons this week end, I didn't know we were at war, I thought they had equal rights to everything except land rights, where they have more.

Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 6^th, 2017 at 6:50pm:
A snowflake tried to change the name of Coon Cheese actually-

wiki- The accuracy of the account of the origin of the brand name has been challenged by anti-racism campaigner Stephen Hagan. In spite of much contrary evidence, Hagan claims he has been unable to find evidence that Edward Coon was a famous cheese maker, contending that the name came instead from a black wraparound in which it was originally sold.[12] In 2008 he was reported to be "questioning the makers of Coon cheese about the origin of the brand name". Hagan claimed that Edward Coon was an obscure factory hand who was induced to subscribe his name to the patent for cheese manufacture, yet had no explanation for Edward Coon's ownership of many dairy factories

As for the current situation of 'special benefits'.

Well, the British 'bought' some of the Black Tribes to fight on their side, after they had 'bought' the Coloureds (non-white immigrants into South Africa).
The Boers had 'black tribes' ally with them and attack British forces. But the better funded British, who eventually brought in Australian and New Zealand troops as well. Managed to 'coerce' and buy most of the Black Tribes against the Boers.
Shame really, the Boers were the ones who were 'integrating' with the Xhosian Tribes, not the British - who were making the Xhosians dependent on Politics.

...so, there is that. They probably 'pay' the Aboriginals against 'whoever' may threaten the 'British' rule here in Australia.

But lets also consider that the Romans allowed the 'primative' Britons a period of 500 years before they actually considered it worth 'invading'. Mind you, it took hundreds of years before a Briton could actually 'evolve' to live inside a 'House'.

The Vikings also traded over Europe, into Asia and far across the Meditteranean into Middle-East for over 800 years before they actually 'invaded' and conquered.

So with some 'sympathy'. I have no 'anti' against Aboriginals getting 'support', be it financial or otherwise.
They have spent 50,000 years isolated and then suddenly the WHOLE WORLD suddenly spills into their country.
The 'culture shock' would be intense and sometimes brutal (though I don't think Aboriginals have ever suffered as much as other people's have at the hands of others through-out history).
I'm all for them getting 'support' to adjust, because adjust they must.

People wonder why a 'white' looking person, calling themselves 'Aboriginal' because they have a 5% bloodline connection, gets all the 'benefits' at the cost of a taxpayer.
Oh well, we all have 'choices' in life. Many 'non-white' people consider themselves 'Political' or 'British'.

But will those people still remain 'Aboriginal' when a Republic comes?
A Republic that will 'draw the line' "You are with us, or against us!?"

So there you have it.
It's the British that 'fund' the Aboriginals.
The very Aboriginals that cry 'Invasion' while holding out their hands for the money.

So when a Republic comes,
the British 'Criminal' and the Aboriginal 'goes'.
Back into the past where they prefer to stay in their bitterness.
While those of the Republic embrace the future, regardless of 'race'.

Its time wrote on Aug 6^th, 2017 at 6:57pm:

It wont be long, the Martyrs are having smoko.

Save yourself the bother as I do.  I don't read his/her/its stuff.

Is that because you have no idea on the rules and regulations of colonisations and what the World is trying to achieve, for better and worse?

it_is_the_light wrote on Aug 6^th, 2017 at 7:10pm:
When they go back to India.

Setanta wrote on Aug 6^th, 2017 at 7:17pm:

Ok JaSin, it looks like you lose.
Spin again.

Johnnie wrote on Aug 6^th, 2017 at 7:19pm:

For the most part JaSin is right but you wont be heard  in a forum as racist as this one-

Aussie wrote on Aug 6^th, 2017 at 7:53pm:


Paneer?

it_is_the_light wrote on Aug 6^th, 2017 at 7:10pm:


All those problems aborigines have today are largely self-inflicted. How long does it take a demographic to get their act together? Why is it that some aborigines can succeed whilst others can't?

Would any aborigine today swap all the benefits they have for a traditional aboriginal life, just to avoid having to deal with the problems of modern living? I think not.

UnSubRocky wrote on Aug 6^th, 2017 at 8:37pm:


Aboriginals have been doing the same thing for 60000 years.  It's going to take time

Come in spinner.

Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 6^th, 2017 at 6:50pm:





All it did was to enlighten several million Australians who previously hadn't known that 'Coon' is a derogatory term for a black fella.

Own goal, big time.

Instead of whinging they should have just smiled and said "CHEESE!"

Lord Herbert wrote on Aug 6^th, 2017 at 8:57pm:


It took me until I was 8 years old to figure out that saying "cheese" was for the purpose of getting those being photographed to look like they are smiling. Initially thought it was code for photographers to know when the photographed were ready.

Jasin, might I suggest as a starter...
Terry Jones, Barbarians.
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL-bCOZuC0H4XW7B9ZTD-JEEaAHxgoPIhN

Hmm, it seems the BBC has had them pulled from youtube.

Ok. I've read enough.
So it seems that the Britons were a fluctuating existence of occupations for hundreds of thousands of years between Ice Ages and Glacial folds. Nothing but stone tooled and semi Neanderthal interactions from the south (Yep - the Neanderthal were more 'Middle-Eastern' than European).
There is even a 11% genetic connection (Chedder Man) from 'outside' of Europe during this period.

Anyway, lets cut to the chase and just admit that the 'Primitive' Britons didn't really change much up until roughly 1000 years BC.
I'm pretty sure with other mainland European cultures well into the Bronze/Iron ages. That spillover trade eventually reached Briton and helped them 'get up to date' a bit before the Romans moved in with their 'holiday' homes.

Still, with just 1000 years - the Britons did have to change pretty quick. But not 'all' of Briton changed to the modern effect of that time. They were still, in essence, pretty 'primative' to the Romans and mainland European history.

So I rest my case.
Chances are that the Roman's at Bath really did have wandering Briton Forrest Dwellers roaming around. Sure they may have had the odd crude iron or bronze spear for hunting, occasionally the odd crude farm somewhere out in a glade.
But its obvious that the 'Roman' interaction in Briton was what really made some changes.
But hey, the Danes, the Germans and others made a lot of 'changes' to the Britons.

...even the Moslems had to lift Europe out of a very long Dark Age 

Ha! Give me a break. 500 years for the Britons to quickly 'scrub up' a bit before the visitors arrived and another 500 years after that to actually feel 'equal' enough.

I think I'm just as right as you Setanta 

Jasin wrote on Aug 6^th, 2017 at 9:17pm:


It's not about me being right Jasin. Building in stone in the neolithic, they were not the forest dwellers you imagine. You will believe what you like and as I said, I just do not know where to start with what you have in your head. It's your head though so as long as you are happy there...

Jasin wrote on Aug 6^th, 2017 at 9:32pm:


They built Stonehenge in 3000BC, Scara Brae and Knap of Howar as early as 3,700 BC.

Setanta wrote on Aug 6^th, 2017 at 9:34pm:


Wow! Another amazing piece of architecture. 
I'm sure It_is_the_Light could give you a lot of amazing facts about the importance of those ...stones.
The Egyptians at least put more of an effort into their 'stone' work, thousands of years before the 'primatives' in Briton.

Maybe the Romans should have given them some special benefits like the Aboriginals of today.
Free housing.
Free dental care.
Free everything, like the British took their lands for 'free'.

The 'popular' Giza Pyramids are 2500 BC old.
But 'pyramids' in general have been built since 6000BC+

Anyway - lets get back to the real subject.

Setanta wrote on Aug 6^th, 2017 at 10:13pm:


Adam was a Jew. The first of his kind placed in 'writing' for his immortality long after he died. Hence why all Jews considered themselves as the 'Chosen People', because they were immortalised in 'Writing' - whereas, other 'peoples' were not.
Before that, Writing (as invented by the Sumerians, who worshiped Sin, the Moon, upon the Temple of Ur in Persia ...hence 'Sin-Ur'  ) - was used solely for keeping records of harvests and other logistical needs.

40000 years and the best the boongs could come up with was a bent stick, then they got conquered by a pom in a dinghy.

Now they just collect welfare off the hard working white man, sniff 91 unleaded and get tanked on goon.

They're subhumans....end of.

I am comfortable with the way our indigenous people behave.

To survive in such a harsh place as in the hotter north, the best way to survive is to not over exert yourself.
So you sit down and do nothing as often as you can.
You scratch around dig up a few roots, light up the bush, collect the dead burnt animals and go back to doing nothing.

Its a brilliant tactic.

Plus learn how to not need much, sleep anywhere etc.

The problem we have is that sections of the white population want to turn cavemen into white men.

Its mainly the left of politics (for some perceived political advantage) or the sheltered urban leafy suburb dwelling Drongo.

The aboriginals would be better if we just left them alone, the ones that want to join mainstream will at their own pace.

It's a sad indictment on this forum that:

a: This thread exists

b: Not one person has spoken against it

c: That the only comments on it appear to ones in general agreement with the appalling OP.

Is dirty boongs better?   

mothra wrote on Aug 7^th, 2017 at 10:58am:
It's a reaction to the aboriginal industry continually ramming it's opinions up our clacker. I'll tell you one that pisses me off. Every large sporting match has an aboriginal leader with varying degrees of whiteness welcoming us to their land. That's  inflammatory.

There's nothing wrong in talking about Indigenous Black Fella Privilege (IBFP) in which they are given concessions no other ethnicity in this country is allowed to enjoy.

Agreed, but Mothra prefers ignorance.

I was being partly flippant with my explanation of why Aboriginals behave the way they do, there is some truth in it tho.

And its definitely a problem the way white people try and change them.

Jesus, it just gets worse.

Jesus, it just gets worse.


Don't let the door smack you in the arse as you leave then

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Aug 7^th, 2017 at 11:58am:



Or challenged, even.

QandA is an Abo special tonight

http://www.abc.net.au/tv/qanda/

It's funny how nobody bats an eyelid at the terms bogan and redneck?

I was a bit outraged by the lack of a C instead of a c in the title.

This will be brought up at the Workers Collective meeting

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Aug 7^th, 2017 at 12:22pm:
Who describes themselves as bogans?? Another one is houso.

Gordon wrote on Aug 7^th, 2017 at 11:51am:



What I find most outrageous is that even now after all the lessons have been learnt, each new generation of Indigenous Australian is taught as kids that it's a betrayal to join the mainstream in the same way as over 150 immigrant nationalities have ~ with a dozen of them being coloured.

And so they rot in their urban ghettoes and become substance-addicted from sheer idleness out in the rural and Outback areas.

They are their own worst enemy for continuing with their passive-aggressive sulk, generation after generation.

"Passive-aggressive behavior is the indirect expression of hostility, such as through procrastination, controlling, stubbornness, sullen behavior, or deliberate or repeated failure to accomplish requested tasks for which one is (often explicitly) responsible.

For research purposes, the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) revision IV describes passive-aggressive personality disorder as a "pervasive pattern of negativistic attitudes and passive resistance to demands for adequate performance in social and occupational situations."

Passive-aggressive behaviour often utilises malicious compliance; that is, veiling one's intent to avoid doing something by performing the specific task in a manner that causes an unwanted result".

President Elect, The Mechanic wrote on Aug 7^th, 2017 at 1:12pm:


Nope. A bunch of sad, old under-educated, pig-ignorant anachronisms venting their racist spleens.

I'm honestly embarrassed for the lot of you.

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Aug 7^th, 2017 at 12:56pm:
Some abos do to .

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Aug 7^th, 2017 at 1:17pm:



They can't spell it.

Lord Herbert wrote on Aug 7^th, 2017 at 1:21pm:


So lets go even worse then.

Lord Herbert wrote on Aug 7^th, 2017 at 1:26pm:




Who cares, offense isn't what about what you think you mean, its about what the person on the receiving end feels.

I called them dirty boongs cos Karnal does and no one says boo.   

Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 7^th, 2017 at 2:08pm:




Probably, but apart from bogan to describe you, I dont use the others.

BigOl64 wrote on Aug 7^th, 2017 at 1:29pm:



True, we're essentially lazy arseholes.

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Aug 7^th, 2017 at 2:11pm:
So why are you getting insulted with the term abo seeing that you don't mind branding people with names?

Well Valkie.
Having a 'different' way of existence, doesn't make one superior or inferior.
Just because the Yellow people of Asia formed up the most established concept of the 'city' (hence 'Citi-Zen') and feel most secure in them.
While Brown people of the Middle-East formed the concept of 'Temples' as the prime achiever of these.
Because Black Africans preferred to remain as 'Farmers' and basically kept a 'Garden of Africa' sustained.
Because the Green South Americans formulated 'Military Warfare' into a ceremonial act of entertainment (and culling).
etc.
etc.

Everyone is different.
Hence why the hapless Colonialists who came to Australia couldn't believe that the entire landscape of Sydney was 'manicured' as a 'Park-land' to easily provide sustainable living.

Ever notice Yellow Asians find it hard to live outside a 'City'?

The Western Europeans focused their empowerment on Speech and with it came 'Politics'.

So to dispel Aboriginals or Koori or Coons as uncivilised, is unfair, considering many 'civilised' people couldn't survive 2 days in the wild.

Africans are creating a 'Tree Wall' north of West Africa to help stop the spread of the Sahara. With 80% of Australia deforested, I don't see us doing something so 'common sense'.

Each to their own.

As for 'sticks & stones'?
Well Coon is a justified word in the Aboriginal vocab.
Coonamble and other towns with 'Coon' in it.
Just like the countries of Niger and Nigeria were the basis of the world <N_.igg..er> (which is blotted from this Forum's vocab).
Just like Khaffers were from Khaffaria where 'Caffeine' was a popular export.
Then you have Nips from Nippon
and Aussie from Australia.
But how dare you call me the 'derogatory' Aussie. 

It's how you throw the word at the other person.
Any word can be an insult or a compliment.

I caught some Sky News thing today and saw REAL aboriginals having something to say.  Can't recall what it was about but .... they were REAL Aboriginals. Not the other type.

Neferti wrote on Aug 7^th, 2017 at 7:28pm:


the ones with Ginger Hair and pale white skin?

opps..

Andrew Bolt went to court for saying such things...