Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 4 
Send Topic Print
No, the internet is not stealing kids’ innocence (Read 1746 times)
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 131487
Gender: male
Re: No, the internet is not stealing kids’ innocence
Reply #45 - Jul 25th, 2017 at 10:16pm
 
Aussie wrote on Jul 25th, 2017 at 10:09pm:
Setanta, read:

Quote:
Re: No, the internet is not stealing kids’ innocence
Reply #5 - Today at 3:40pm Quote
Lack of education is one thing, conditioning masquerading as education is another.

http://www.teenvogue.com/story/anal-sex-what-you-need-to-know

Thoughts on targetting pre/teens with articles about anal?


Indeed.

Honky tells a lie, to push his twisted agenda.

I prove him wrong, and make him look unbelievably foolish.

Then, he calls me a paedophile.

I then get accused of calling him 'sick' (which never happened).

Jesus   Roll Eyes
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Setanta
Gold Member
*****
Offline


\/ Peace man!

Posts: 15914
Northern NSW
Gender: male
Re: No, the internet is not stealing kids’ innocence
Reply #46 - Jul 25th, 2017 at 10:19pm
 
greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 25th, 2017 at 10:16pm:
Aussie wrote on Jul 25th, 2017 at 10:09pm:
Setanta, read:

Quote:
Re: No, the internet is not stealing kids’ innocence
Reply #5 - Today at 3:40pm Quote
Lack of education is one thing, conditioning masquerading as education is another.

http://www.teenvogue.com/story/anal-sex-what-you-need-to-know

Thoughts on targetting pre/teens with articles about anal?


Indeed.

Honky tells a lie, to push his twisted agenda.

I prove him wrong, and make him look unbelievably foolish.

Then, he calls me a paedophile.

I then get accused of calling him 'sick' (which never happened).

Jesus   Roll Eyes


See Aussie's highlight Greg, it says pre/teens which means preteens and teens.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 131487
Gender: male
Re: No, the internet is not stealing kids’ innocence
Reply #47 - Jul 25th, 2017 at 10:21pm
 
Setanta wrote on Jul 25th, 2017 at 10:19pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 25th, 2017 at 10:16pm:
Aussie wrote on Jul 25th, 2017 at 10:09pm:
Setanta, read:

Quote:
Re: No, the internet is not stealing kids’ innocence
Reply #5 - Today at 3:40pm Quote
Lack of education is one thing, conditioning masquerading as education is another.

http://www.teenvogue.com/story/anal-sex-what-you-need-to-know

Thoughts on targetting pre/teens with articles about anal?


Indeed.

Honky tells a lie, to push his twisted agenda.

I prove him wrong, and make him look unbelievably foolish.

Then, he calls me a paedophile.

I then get accused of calling him 'sick' (which never happened).

Jesus   Roll Eyes


See Aussie's highlight Greg, it says pre/teens which means preteens and teens.


Exactly.

Teen Vogue doesn't target preteens - agreed?

Honky is a lying POS - agreed?

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Setanta
Gold Member
*****
Offline


\/ Peace man!

Posts: 15914
Northern NSW
Gender: male
Re: No, the internet is not stealing kids’ innocence
Reply #48 - Jul 25th, 2017 at 10:26pm
 
greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 25th, 2017 at 10:21pm:
Setanta wrote on Jul 25th, 2017 at 10:19pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 25th, 2017 at 10:16pm:
Aussie wrote on Jul 25th, 2017 at 10:09pm:
Setanta, read:

Quote:
Re: No, the internet is not stealing kids’ innocence
Reply #5 - Today at 3:40pm Quote
Lack of education is one thing, conditioning masquerading as education is another.

http://www.teenvogue.com/story/anal-sex-what-you-need-to-know

Thoughts on targetting pre/teens with articles about anal?


Indeed.

Honky tells a lie, to push his twisted agenda.

I prove him wrong, and make him look unbelievably foolish.

Then, he calls me a paedophile.

I then get accused of calling him 'sick' (which never happened).

Jesus   Roll Eyes


See Aussie's highlight Greg, it says pre/teens which means preteens and teens.


Exactly.

Teen Vogue doesn't target preteens - agreed?

Honky is a lying POS - agreed?



I would say it doesn't not target them either, but doesn't say so because of the ramifications. Like I said, what a difference a day makes, there's only a day between 12 and 13. Only a pedant would make the distinction.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 131487
Gender: male
Re: No, the internet is not stealing kids’ innocence
Reply #49 - Jul 25th, 2017 at 10:28pm
 
Setanta wrote on Jul 25th, 2017 at 10:26pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 25th, 2017 at 10:21pm:
Setanta wrote on Jul 25th, 2017 at 10:19pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 25th, 2017 at 10:16pm:
Aussie wrote on Jul 25th, 2017 at 10:09pm:
Setanta, read:

Quote:
Re: No, the internet is not stealing kids’ innocence
Reply #5 - Today at 3:40pm Quote
Lack of education is one thing, conditioning masquerading as education is another.

http://www.teenvogue.com/story/anal-sex-what-you-need-to-know

Thoughts on targetting pre/teens with articles about anal?


Indeed.

Honky tells a lie, to push his twisted agenda.

I prove him wrong, and make him look unbelievably foolish.

Then, he calls me a paedophile.

I then get accused of calling him 'sick' (which never happened).

Jesus   Roll Eyes


See Aussie's highlight Greg, it says pre/teens which means preteens and teens.


Exactly.

Teen Vogue doesn't target preteens - agreed?

Honky is a lying POS - agreed?



I would say it doesn't not target them either, but doesn't say so because of the ramifications. Like I said, what a difference a day makes, there's only a day between 12 and 13. Only a pedant would make the distinction.



Indeed.

And still, Teen Vogue doesn't target preteens.

If you believe otherwise, show us the proof.

I asked Honky to do the same, however, he chickened out like the coward he is.

Can you help him?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Setanta
Gold Member
*****
Offline


\/ Peace man!

Posts: 15914
Northern NSW
Gender: male
Re: No, the internet is not stealing kids’ innocence
Reply #50 - Jul 25th, 2017 at 10:33pm
 
greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 25th, 2017 at 10:28pm:
Setanta wrote on Jul 25th, 2017 at 10:26pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 25th, 2017 at 10:21pm:
Setanta wrote on Jul 25th, 2017 at 10:19pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 25th, 2017 at 10:16pm:
Aussie wrote on Jul 25th, 2017 at 10:09pm:
Setanta, read:

Quote:
Re: No, the internet is not stealing kids’ innocence
Reply #5 - Today at 3:40pm Quote
Lack of education is one thing, conditioning masquerading as education is another.

http://www.teenvogue.com/story/anal-sex-what-you-need-to-know

Thoughts on targetting pre/teens with articles about anal?


Indeed.

Honky tells a lie, to push his twisted agenda.

I prove him wrong, and make him look unbelievably foolish.

Then, he calls me a paedophile.

I then get accused of calling him 'sick' (which never happened).

Jesus   Roll Eyes


See Aussie's highlight Greg, it says pre/teens which means preteens and teens.


Exactly.

Teen Vogue doesn't target preteens - agreed?

Honky is a lying POS - agreed?



I would say it doesn't not target them either, but doesn't say so because of the ramifications. Like I said, what a difference a day makes, there's only a day between 12 and 13. Only a pedant would make the distinction.



Indeed.

And still, Teen Vogue doesn't target preteens.

If you believe otherwise, show us the proof.

I asked Honky to do the same, however, he chickened out like the coward he is.


Can you help him?


I don't even think I can help you Greg! Grin
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 131487
Gender: male
Re: No, the internet is not stealing kids’ innocence
Reply #51 - Jul 25th, 2017 at 10:42pm
 
Setanta wrote on Jul 25th, 2017 at 10:33pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 25th, 2017 at 10:28pm:
Setanta wrote on Jul 25th, 2017 at 10:26pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 25th, 2017 at 10:21pm:
Setanta wrote on Jul 25th, 2017 at 10:19pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 25th, 2017 at 10:16pm:
Aussie wrote on Jul 25th, 2017 at 10:09pm:
Setanta, read:

Quote:
Re: No, the internet is not stealing kids’ innocence
Reply #5 - Today at 3:40pm Quote
Lack of education is one thing, conditioning masquerading as education is another.

http://www.teenvogue.com/story/anal-sex-what-you-need-to-know

Thoughts on targetting pre/teens with articles about anal?


Indeed.

Honky tells a lie, to push his twisted agenda.

I prove him wrong, and make him look unbelievably foolish.

Then, he calls me a paedophile.

I then get accused of calling him 'sick' (which never happened).

Jesus   Roll Eyes


See Aussie's highlight Greg, it says pre/teens which means preteens and teens.


Exactly.

Teen Vogue doesn't target preteens - agreed?

Honky is a lying POS - agreed?



I would say it doesn't not target them either, but doesn't say so because of the ramifications. Like I said, what a difference a day makes, there's only a day between 12 and 13. Only a pedant would make the distinction.



Indeed.

And still, Teen Vogue doesn't target preteens.

If you believe otherwise, show us the proof.

I asked Honky to do the same, however, he chickened out like the coward he is.


Can you help him?


I don't even think I can help you Greg! Grin


Well, now we can all get some sleep.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Gordon
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 20226
Gordon
Gender: male
Re: No, the internet is not stealing kids’ innocence
Reply #52 - Jul 25th, 2017 at 10:47pm
 
Setanta wrote on Jul 25th, 2017 at 10:26pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 25th, 2017 at 10:21pm:
Setanta wrote on Jul 25th, 2017 at 10:19pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 25th, 2017 at 10:16pm:
Aussie wrote on Jul 25th, 2017 at 10:09pm:
Setanta, read:

Quote:
Re: No, the internet is not stealing kids’ innocence
Reply #5 - Today at 3:40pm Quote
Lack of education is one thing, conditioning masquerading as education is another.

http://www.teenvogue.com/story/anal-sex-what-you-need-to-know

Thoughts on targetting pre/teens with articles about anal?


Indeed.

Honky tells a lie, to push his twisted agenda.

I prove him wrong, and make him look unbelievably foolish.

Then, he calls me a paedophile.

I then get accused of calling him 'sick' (which never happened).

Jesus   Roll Eyes


See Aussie's highlight Greg, it says pre/teens which means preteens and teens.


Exactly.

Teen Vogue doesn't target preteens - agreed?

Honky is a lying POS - agreed?



I would say it doesn't not target them either, but doesn't say so because of the ramifications. Like I said, what a difference a day makes, there's only a day between 12 and 13. Only a pedant would make the distinction.



In a past life I could have got hold of the material the ad sales people use which shows audience reach and demographics. They know the age range of readers and they'd know inappropriately young readers would see that article but simply not care.

Back to top
 

IBI
 
IP Logged
 
Setanta
Gold Member
*****
Offline


\/ Peace man!

Posts: 15914
Northern NSW
Gender: male
Re: No, the internet is not stealing kids’ innocence
Reply #53 - Jul 25th, 2017 at 10:51pm
 
Gordon wrote on Jul 25th, 2017 at 10:47pm:
Setanta wrote on Jul 25th, 2017 at 10:26pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 25th, 2017 at 10:21pm:
Setanta wrote on Jul 25th, 2017 at 10:19pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 25th, 2017 at 10:16pm:
Aussie wrote on Jul 25th, 2017 at 10:09pm:
Setanta, read:

Quote:
Re: No, the internet is not stealing kids’ innocence
Reply #5 - Today at 3:40pm Quote
Lack of education is one thing, conditioning masquerading as education is another.

http://www.teenvogue.com/story/anal-sex-what-you-need-to-know

Thoughts on targetting pre/teens with articles about anal?


Indeed.

Honky tells a lie, to push his twisted agenda.

I prove him wrong, and make him look unbelievably foolish.

Then, he calls me a paedophile.

I then get accused of calling him 'sick' (which never happened).

Jesus   Roll Eyes


See Aussie's highlight Greg, it says pre/teens which means preteens and teens.


Exactly.

Teen Vogue doesn't target preteens - agreed?

Honky is a lying POS - agreed?



I would say it doesn't not target them either, but doesn't say so because of the ramifications. Like I said, what a difference a day makes, there's only a day between 12 and 13. Only a pedant would make the distinction.



In a past life I could have got hold of the material the ad sales people use which shows audience reach and demographics. They know the age range of readers and they'd know inappropriately young readers would see that article but simply not care.



Shh... Wink
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
mothra
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 34507
Gender: female
Re: No, the internet is not stealing kids’ innocence
Reply #54 - Jul 26th, 2017 at 11:14am
 
Do you people honestly think 12 year olds are not talking about this stuff in the schoolyard?

And learning wrong?

My 11 year old son recently collapsed into paroxysms of giggles because the clock said 6.09. I asked him why ... he said "69, geddit?".

I asked him where he had heard that and if he knew what it meant, really. He told me his best friend told him ... and he did know.

I'm not in the least bit concerned about young kids reading about sex. We used to read the Dolly Doctor when we were young and fall about laughing reading it.

Let's call a spade a spade. This isn't about sex per se; it's about anal sex. Some of you just think it's icky.
Back to top
 

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 131487
Gender: male
Re: No, the internet is not stealing kids’ innocence
Reply #55 - Jul 26th, 2017 at 11:16am
 
Gordon wrote on Jul 25th, 2017 at 10:47pm:
Setanta wrote on Jul 25th, 2017 at 10:26pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 25th, 2017 at 10:21pm:
Setanta wrote on Jul 25th, 2017 at 10:19pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 25th, 2017 at 10:16pm:
Aussie wrote on Jul 25th, 2017 at 10:09pm:
Setanta, read:

Quote:
Re: No, the internet is not stealing kids’ innocence
Reply #5 - Today at 3:40pm Quote
Lack of education is one thing, conditioning masquerading as education is another.

http://www.teenvogue.com/story/anal-sex-what-you-need-to-know

Thoughts on targetting pre/teens with articles about anal?


Indeed.

Honky tells a lie, to push his twisted agenda.

I prove him wrong, and make him look unbelievably foolish.

Then, he calls me a paedophile.

I then get accused of calling him 'sick' (which never happened).

Jesus   Roll Eyes


See Aussie's highlight Greg, it says pre/teens which means preteens and teens.


Exactly.

Teen Vogue doesn't target preteens - agreed?

Honky is a lying POS - agreed?



I would say it doesn't not target them either, but doesn't say so because of the ramifications. Like I said, what a difference a day makes, there's only a day between 12 and 13. Only a pedant would make the distinction.



In a past life I could have got hold of the material the ad sales people use which shows audience reach and demographics. They know the age range of readers and they'd know inappropriately young readers would see that article but simply not care.



Not the same as targeting them.

Honky lied, in order to push his twisted agenda.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
UnSubRocky
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Legend

Posts: 21728
Rockhampton, Q
Gender: male
Re: No, the internet is not stealing kids’ innocence
Reply #56 - Jul 27th, 2017 at 2:53am
 
I remember at 18 years of age being completely mesmerised by the new experience of the internet. I think my personality changed considerably within 2 months. My first few months were of looking up anything and everything that could be considered rebellious or illegal. Pornography. White Nationalism. Black Nationalism. Violent images. I was amazed at how grim the world could be. It was both refreshing to see how uncensored things could be. Someone could anonymously post what they thought about someone or something, and their honesty could inflict nightmares.

Of course, over the years, I learned to deal with the content of the internet. And we had filters put in place to shield us from disturbing content. But it is concerning to think how this might affect our teens and pre-teens who are tech savvy about accessing the internet. Before 1997, I would have to say I must have forgotten how naive and innocent I would have been. Not knowing how corrupt and violent the world could be. The changes of psyche I had in adulthood. How would a child or teen be able to cope with the content on the internet today? How would their perspectives change?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 
Send Topic Print